From that article, a Zimmer quote...
Teddy can and should be a top 15 QB from a production perspective. You see a different mindset with AP there this year. I want the Vikes coaches to take the training wheels off and make this Teddy's team. He's amazing in the 4th Q when he no longer fears consequences of failure because he needs to score.Sometimes hes cautious with the ball because he doesnt want to give the other team a chance. I think he sees us playing fairly good defense at times, but I do have belief, like when we get behind in games he doesnt play that way, he kind of lets it loose and just plays football. I want him to be more like that throughout the course of the ballgame. Theres times when he just needs to say, 'the heck with it, its my ball, lets go.'
No quarterback in the league is pressured on more of his dropbacks than Bridgewater (45.9 percent), and while much of that is Norv Turner’s scheme and his league-high average time-to-throw number (2.83 seconds), it is something likely to catch up with them. Bridgewater’s passer rating when kept clean this season is 103.8 and he is completing 74.7 percent of his passes on those plays. When pressured his rating tumbles to 55.0, while completing just 48.0 percent of those passes.
I was thinking about this when reading Cosell's recent back pedal on Teddy.
Translation: Although we had the greatest, freakiest sex we've had in a long time, we will be returning to missionary this weekend, and no talking please.
But scoring TDs is what wins games.. Giving ADP the rock 30 times has not and will not be good enough to beat the good teams.Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.
Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats
Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.
Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.
technically, what wins games is scoring more than your opponent. I have said repeatedly in this thread and others on this board that Teddy is a better quarterback when he does not have Peterson in the backfield. I'm encouraged by his efficiency and generally good decision-making. He still does not have that deep passing game and there's a chance that he may never be proficient at that part of quarterbacking. But I also think Teddy is underrated, especially among the fantasy football community, because they look at boxscores in production which are not necessarily good indicators of whether or not a quarterback is truly performing well.But scoring TDs is what wins games.. Giving ADP the rock 30 times has not and will not be good enough to beat the good teams.Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.
Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats
Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.
Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.
I agree that performing well is more important, but from a fantasy perspective, I still have questions about whether he will ever be better than a mid-range fantasy Qb. My gut tells me no Has there ever been a top 5 type fantasy QB who can't throw the deep ball?mr roboto said:technically, what wins games is scoring more than your opponent. I have said repeatedly in this thread and others on this board that Teddy is a better quarterback when he does not have Peterson in the backfield.I'm encouraged by his efficiency and generally good decision-making. He still does not have that deep passing game and there's a chance that he may never be proficient at that part of quarterbacking. But I also think Teddy is underrated, especially among the fantasy football community, because they look at boxscores in production which are not necessarily good indicators of whether or not a quarterback is truly performing well.tone1oc said:But scoring TDs is what wins games.. Giving ADP the rock 30 times has not and will not be good enough to beat the good teams.mr roboto said:Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.
Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats
Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.
Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.
I concur with this I think Teddy has top 12 QB upside eventually.His FF ceiling is probably 7-10 IMO.
well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....
Hmmmm
I dunno man. I haven't watched too much of teddy admittedly but the few games I have watched him in this year I came away thoroughly unimpressed.well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....
Hmmmm
You should watch a few more games. He is playing within the system the Vikings are running, and that means he isn't going to put up gaudy numbers. But if you look at what he does, his talent is pretty undeniable.I dunno man. I haven't watched too much of teddy admittedly but the few games I have watched him in this year I came away thoroughly unimpressed.well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....
Hmmmm
I will admit he's been pedestrian from a production standpoint. A lot of that is due to system, O-line weakness and relative lack of talent at WR. And they lean on AP a ton. He needs to get more confident at the downfield passing game.I dunno man. I haven't watched too much of teddy admittedly but the few games I have watched him in this year I came away thoroughly unimpressed.well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....
Hmmmm
Teddy Bridgewater. The Seattle game might have been the wake-up call that Bridgewater and his teammates needed. Since the embarrassing home loss to the Seahawks, here are Teddy's numbers:
57 for 81, 734 yards, 7 total TDs, 0 INT, 123.2 quarterback rating.
When Bridgewater said he wants to play like Brett Favre I immediately thought to myself nooooooooooo Teddy have you seen all the interceptions Favre has thrown?
Matt Vensel of the Star Tribune noted that when analytics site Pro Football Focus reviewed the film and ruled out drops, purposeful throwaways and passes batted down at the line of scrimmage, Bridgewater’s accuracy percentage was 79.3, ahead of Cousins, Russell Wilson, Sam Bradford and Tom Brady.
All made sense until they ruled out passes batted down. How are those not a consequence, at least in part, of QB inaccuracy?PFF: Most Accurate Quarterback? Teddy Bridgewater
Matt Vensel of the Star Tribune noted that when analytics site Pro Football Focus reviewed the film and ruled out drops, purposeful throwaways and passes batted down at the line of scrimmage, Bridgewater’s accuracy percentage was 79.3, ahead of Cousins, Russell Wilson, Sam Bradford and Tom Brady.
Someone sticks their arm in the path of the ball, it doesn't mean you were inaccurate.All made sense until they ruled out passes batted down. How are those not a consequence, at least in part, of QB inaccuracy?PFF: Most Accurate Quarterback? Teddy Bridgewater
Matt Vensel of the Star Tribune noted that when analytics site Pro Football Focus reviewed the film and ruled out drops, purposeful throwaways and passes batted down at the line of scrimmage, Bridgewater’s accuracy percentage was 79.3, ahead of Cousins, Russell Wilson, Sam Bradford and Tom Brady.
It's not accuracy, it's decision-making.Actually if he is getting the ball batted down because he isn't chosing the right passing lane (or the OL isn't opening good ones) that is an accuracy issue. A QBs trajectory or velocity can also make it easier or harder for linemen to get to the ball.
It isn't all on the QB but it isnt independent of the QB either. Accuracy plays a factor in minimizing batted passes.
It could be both. Plus mechanics.It's not accuracy, it's decision-making.Actually if he is getting the ball batted down because he isn't chosing the right passing lane (or the OL isn't opening good ones) that is an accuracy issue. A QBs trajectory or velocity can also make it easier or harder for linemen to get to the ball.
It isn't all on the QB but it isnt independent of the QB either. Accuracy plays a factor in minimizing batted passes.