What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

QB Teddy Bridgewater (2 Viewers)

From that article, a Zimmer quote...
Sometimes hes cautious with the ball because he doesnt want to give the other team a chance. I think he sees us playing fairly good defense at times, but I do have belief, like when we get behind in games he doesnt play that way, he kind of lets it loose and just plays football. I want him to be more like that throughout the course of the ballgame. Theres times when he just needs to say, 'the heck with it, its my ball, lets go.'
Teddy can and should be a top 15 QB from a production perspective. You see a different mindset with AP there this year. I want the Vikes coaches to take the training wheels off and make this Teddy's team. He's amazing in the 4th Q when he no longer fears consequences of failure because he needs to score.

 
I completely agree with what Zimmer is emphasizing about Teddy being too cautious early on in the game. I think what happens is he will have a pre snap read of the defense but he still does not always trust that he has correctly identified the coverage. I have seen him looking at his first read and the player will come open, yet Teddy still hesitates and that hesitation gives the defender an opportunity to recover. The window of the player being open is short and Teddy just needs to throw it and trust what he sees.

Another way the coaches have put this is that Teddy needs to start sooner and he needs to get the ball out quicker.

 
Is Minnesota a legit NFC contender?

No quarterback in the league is pressured on more of his dropbacks than Bridgewater (45.9 percent), and while much of that is Norv Turner’s scheme and his league-high average time-to-throw number (2.83 seconds), it is something likely to catch up with them. Bridgewater’s passer rating when kept clean this season is 103.8 and he is completing 74.7 percent of his passes on those plays. When pressured his rating tumbles to 55.0, while completing just 48.0 percent of those passes.
 
Teddy Bridgewater completes 85% of his 20 pass attempts for 231 passing yards 4 TD 0 Interceptions and a QB rating of 154.4 he also ran 4 times for 17 yards and a TD.

For the season Bridgewater has 403 passing attempts 267 completions 66.3 % 2964 passing yards 13 TD 8 INT

Per game stats 28.8 passing attempts 19 completions 211.7 passing yards .93 TD .57 INT

At this pace Teddy should finish with around 460 passing attempts 305 completions 15TD 9 INT

Last four games

28 passing attempts 20 completions 71% 174 yards 0 TD 1 INT

28 passing attempts 17 completions 61% 118 yards 0 TD 1 INT

36 passing attempts 25 completions 69% 335 yards 1 TD 0 INT

20 passing attempts 17 completions 85% 231 yards 4 TD 0 INT

112 passing attempts 79 completions 71.5% 858 yards 5 TD 2 INT

4 game average

28 passing attempts 19.75 completions 71.5% 214.5 yards 1.25 TD .5 INT

 
I liked this fact from yesterday's broadcast...

The last time a Vikings QB threw for four and ran for one was...their very first game as a franchise.

 
I was at the game - Teddy looked decisive yesterday. They also are game planning more short throws because the O line is awful.

The 4TDs are great because most of the year they settled for FGs in the RZ. Honestly, when AP is out Teddy plays so much better.

 
Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.

Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats

Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.

Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.

 
Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.

Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats

Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.

Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.
But scoring TDs is what wins games.. Giving ADP the rock 30 times has not and will not be good enough to beat the good teams.

 
Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.

Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats

Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.

Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.
But scoring TDs is what wins games.. Giving ADP the rock 30 times has not and will not be good enough to beat the good teams.
technically, what wins games is scoring more than your opponent. I have said repeatedly in this thread and others on this board that Teddy is a better quarterback when he does not have Peterson in the backfield. I'm encouraged by his efficiency and generally good decision-making. He still does not have that deep passing game and there's a chance that he may never be proficient at that part of quarterbacking. But I also think Teddy is underrated, especially among the fantasy football community, because they look at boxscores in production which are not necessarily good indicators of whether or not a quarterback is truly performing well.

 
mr roboto said:
tone1oc said:
mr roboto said:
Production isn't performance. His performance vs AZ was better than his production. His production against CHI eclipsed his performance.

Production = yds, TDs aka FF stats

Performance = comp%, DVOA, AYA, TD/INT ratio etc.

Teddy is bottom 1/3 in production. He's middle or top 1/3 in performance. For a 2nd year QB I'd rather have Teddy's year than Bortles. Compiling stats on volume isn't an indication of playing well.
But scoring TDs is what wins games.. Giving ADP the rock 30 times has not and will not be good enough to beat the good teams.
technically, what wins games is scoring more than your opponent. I have said repeatedly in this thread and others on this board that Teddy is a better quarterback when he does not have Peterson in the backfield.I'm encouraged by his efficiency and generally good decision-making. He still does not have that deep passing game and there's a chance that he may never be proficient at that part of quarterbacking. But I also think Teddy is underrated, especially among the fantasy football community, because they look at boxscores in production which are not necessarily good indicators of whether or not a quarterback is truly performing well.
I agree that performing well is more important, but from a fantasy perspective, I still have questions about whether he will ever be better than a mid-range fantasy Qb. My gut tells me no Has there ever been a top 5 type fantasy QB who can't throw the deep ball?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I agree.. I think with the right conditions he could put up a top 5 season or two, but for fantasy purposes he's going to be a fringe QB1 for most of his career. In real football, you can certainly win with him I think.

 
Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....

Hmmmm

 
Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....

Hmmmm
well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.
 
Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....

Hmmmm
well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.
I dunno man. I haven't watched too much of teddy admittedly but the few games I have watched him in this year I came away thoroughly unimpressed.

 
Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....

Hmmmm
well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.
I dunno man. I haven't watched too much of teddy admittedly but the few games I have watched him in this year I came away thoroughly unimpressed.
You should watch a few more games. He is playing within the system the Vikings are running, and that means he isn't going to put up gaudy numbers. But if you look at what he does, his talent is pretty undeniable.

 
Whether it's BC he sucks or his coaches hold him back, for fantasy he generally sucks. Now, because of his mini week 15 outburst and Brees' injury, I'm wondering who the better spot start is for week 16 bw teddy and Jameis Winston....

Hmmmm
well he actually, demonstrably doesn't suck. Outside of that we don't care.
I dunno man. I haven't watched too much of teddy admittedly but the few games I have watched him in this year I came away thoroughly unimpressed.
I will admit he's been pedestrian from a production standpoint. A lot of that is due to system, O-line weakness and relative lack of talent at WR. And they lean on AP a ton. He needs to get more confident at the downfield passing game.

Having said that he's already an above average starter in the NFL. That's not sucking.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
PFF: Most Accurate Quarterback? Teddy Bridgewater

Matt Vensel of the Star Tribune noted that when analytics site Pro Football Focus reviewed the film and ruled out drops, purposeful throwaways and passes batted down at the line of scrimmage, Bridgewater’s accuracy percentage was 79.3, ahead of Cousins, Russell Wilson, Sam Bradford and Tom Brady.
All made sense until they ruled out passes batted down. How are those not a consequence, at least in part, of QB inaccuracy?

I also seem to recall this being a much more common occurance for TB than it ought to have been.

 
PFF: Most Accurate Quarterback? Teddy Bridgewater

Matt Vensel of the Star Tribune noted that when analytics site Pro Football Focus reviewed the film and ruled out drops, purposeful throwaways and passes batted down at the line of scrimmage, Bridgewater’s accuracy percentage was 79.3, ahead of Cousins, Russell Wilson, Sam Bradford and Tom Brady.
All made sense until they ruled out passes batted down. How are those not a consequence, at least in part, of QB inaccuracy?
Someone sticks their arm in the path of the ball, it doesn't mean you were inaccurate.

Passes getting knocked down may be an issue for him, but it has nothing to do with accuracy.

 
Actually if he is getting the ball batted down because he isn't chosing the right passing lane (or the OL isn't opening good ones) that is an accuracy issue. A QBs trajectory or velocity can also make it easier or harder for linemen to get to the ball.

It isn't all on the QB but it isnt independent of the QB either. Accuracy plays a factor in minimizing batted passes.

 
Actually if he is getting the ball batted down because he isn't chosing the right passing lane (or the OL isn't opening good ones) that is an accuracy issue. A QBs trajectory or velocity can also make it easier or harder for linemen to get to the ball.

It isn't all on the QB but it isnt independent of the QB either. Accuracy plays a factor in minimizing batted passes.
It's not accuracy, it's decision-making.

 
Actually if he is getting the ball batted down because he isn't chosing the right passing lane (or the OL isn't opening good ones) that is an accuracy issue. A QBs trajectory or velocity can also make it easier or harder for linemen to get to the ball.

It isn't all on the QB but it isnt independent of the QB either. Accuracy plays a factor in minimizing batted passes.
It's not accuracy, it's decision-making.
It could be both. Plus mechanics.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top