What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rams at 49ers (1 Viewer)

This is injury is going to make the Niners fans appreciate Smith IMO. Assuming he's out for more than a couple of drives.

 
For those watching the game, how does Amendola look? He got a couple catches early but has been quiet since. Are they targeting him? Is he running normally?

 
'zftcg said:
For those watching the game, how does Amendola look? He got a couple catches early but has been quiet since. Are they targeting him? Is he running normally?
Click to expand...
They just reported that he is out for now - he had a good catch earlier - but these two are hitting hard and I think he got dinged
 
The entire design of the Rams offense is disgusting to watch.

Here is how every 3rd & long goes:

Bradford takes the snap... runs for his life... throws incomplete 6 yards downfield.

I know he doesn't exactly have Cris Carter and Randy Moss, but can they throw the ball more than 15 yards now and then?

 
I am not a fan of these posts - but as a V Davis owner - what the hell happened - perfect option for the backup QB and nothing.

 
What is up with review today - he looked out there and the Dez catch in the Cowboys/Eagles game didn't look right as well

 
I don't get it either. His foot touches out of bounds before the ball hits the pylon, but it's a touchdown? :lmao:

And then the Rams fumble the kickoff.

 
Jeez, what a travesty. The Rams get robbed of a punt return to the SF 1 that would have set them up the opportunity to go up 21-7, and then a TD is awarded when the guys is OOB leading to the Rams fumbling the kickoff and SF taking the lead. Ouch.

 
There perhaps wasn't enough evidence to overturn. It was hard to really see it clearly on the replay. But even if it was overturned, it would have been 2nd-and-goal at the 2 with the Niners having the best OL in the league and a beast at RB. Probably would have turned out the same.

 
CC in the booth just said the Rams don't want to score too fast :confused:

This is not the NO/ATL game where that could be a slight issue. The Rams will take every point they can whether it happens in 6 minutes or 30 seconds.

 
'Shrugs said:
There perhaps wasn't enough evidence to overturn. It was hard to really see it clearly on the replay. But even if it was overturned, it would have been 2nd-and-goal at the 2 with the Niners having the best OL in the league and a beast at RB. Probably would have turned out the same.
Click to expand...
You never know. This ain't the PAC-12. ;)
 
Fisher called timeout too soon. He could have run off 30 seconds before doing it. Now he's giving San Francisco some extra time to tie the game.

 
Why did Fisher take that timeout so quickly? Now, if you score on the next play, you just gave SF an extra 30-40 seconds to go for the tying FG.

 
are these coaches always idiot? why use TO there before letting clock run well under 1 minute?

1st and goal with two timeouts is more than enough time with 40 seconds or so

 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

Hot Sauce Guy
Konata Mumpfield, WR Rams
Replies
20
Views
603
nittanylion
N
Joe Bryant
WR Equanimeous St. Brown, SF
Replies
36
Views
655
JohnnyU
JohnnyU
JohnnyU
What are the worst RB landing spots for this draft?
Replies
34
Views
1K
Stoneworker
S

Users who are viewing this thread

Total: 1 (members: 0, guests: 1)
Back
Top