Door County has a Fall 50 (miler) ...paved roads, not trail. But it's a really nice event with a mix of ultras, pairs, and relay teams.Looks fun, though I'm thinking slightly more local than Michigan for my first ultra. Sorry, I probably shouldn't have posted "upper midwest," though my hope is that someone has run an ultra or two more local to the Twin Cities (MInnesota, Dakotas, Wisconsin). Good luck!You may want to look here: http://dwd.runningfitsites.com/hell-home Tri-Man and I have a team that will be back for our 4th 100K Relay and will most certainly be back in 2014 (and you may even have TM running the ultra; rumor has it). Poppa, who posted here about his ultra adventures from time to time referred to Hell (as I recall) as "the best trail ever".
That's kind of what I'm thinking. I was watching the video of the Superior Trail race and thinking "holy $%#@ that's some serious terrain," and I'm sure that's not even half as bad as some of the more revered ultras. Of the two 50K's that I linked, I think the Surph the Murph would appear to be the easier of the two. It's within the Twin Cities metro run on a 16.8mile loop, so there shouldn't be any extreme elevation changes. The Wild Duluth 50K would be much cooler IMO being on the Superior Trail, but probably quite a bit tougher. Leaning the tougher route with the Wild Duluth 50K, just to be somewhere somewhat scenic and more challenging.Well, that's good. I've ran one 50k trail race and that was no joke. I think it's wise to try a 50k before jumping up to a 50 miler but that's just me.Yes, one on my own back in 2003 (3:59) where my marathon training were my first ever runs beyond ~5-6 miles and one pacing my wife in her first ever last year (4:40).I forget. Have you ran a marathon yet?
If you're thinking next fall, do the Glacial Trail 50K/50M here in Wisconsin in October (link in my sig). I did the 50K last fall as my first ultra in the pouring rain. Great race. If you're thinking spring, I just completed my first-ever 50-miler at the Ice Age Trail 50K/50M this past May. Both are sponsored by the Badgerland Striders running group. Both are very affordable and very well organized, and the drive to either one should be less than 5 hours.Let me know if you have any questions. Happy to help!SayWhat? said:I figure an ultra in the Fall of 2014 will be my best bet as it will allow me to build a better base on the treadmill this winter and give me plenty of months to train on accesible trails during next spring/summer. Does anyone have any experience with any upper midwest ultra's?
Thanks gruecd. I had actually seen both of those while looking, with the Glacial Trail 50K being the more tempting of the two (in the fall, and 50K < 50 miles!). I'll definitely consider that one, though the eastern side of Wisconsin is pushing the boundaries of it being a "convenient" first ultra (in terms of having family come with). Definitely an intriguing option though. Now that you've run a few others, what did you like about it?If you're thinking next fall, do the Glacial Trail 50K/50M here in Wisconsin in October (link in my sig). I did the 50K last fall as my first ultra in the pouring rain. Great race. If you're thinking spring, I just completed my first-ever 50-miler at the Ice Age Trail 50K/50M this past May. Both are sponsored by the Badgerland Striders running group. Both are very affordable and very well organized, and the drive to either one should be less than 5 hours.Let me know if you have any questions. Happy to help!SayWhat? said:I figure an ultra in the Fall of 2014 will be my best bet as it will allow me to build a better base on the treadmill this winter and give me plenty of months to train on accesible trails during next spring/summer. Does anyone have any experience with any upper midwest ultra's?
Well, you will, when you run the September Naperville trail HM with Juxt and me. It's a crushed gravel trail ...not technical, hilly single-track. At some point, you might want to drive a bit to the Waterfall Glen trail that circles Argonne Labs (9.5 miles, which Juxt and I just ran). One decent hill and a few rollers. You can find parking lots just south of I-55 on Cass or Lemont Rds. If you want some true single track, there's a whole slew of trails in the Palos area just south of Archer Ave. If I can find the link to the map system for it, I'll let you know.Any Chicagoland folk ever run the Danada forest preserve area?
They are easier on the body because you are running slower often with walk breaks.Thanks gruecd. I had actually seen both of those while looking, with the Glacial Trail 50K being the more tempting of the two (in the fall, and 50K < 50 miles!). I'll definitely consider that one, though the eastern side of Wisconsin is pushing the boundaries of it being a "convenient" first ultra (in terms of having family come with). Definitely an intriguing option though. Now that you've run a few others, what did you like about it?If you're thinking next fall, do the Glacial Trail 50K/50M here in Wisconsin in October (link in my sig). I did the 50K last fall as my first ultra in the pouring rain. Great race. If you're thinking spring, I just completed my first-ever 50-miler at the Ice Age Trail 50K/50M this past May. Both are sponsored by the Badgerland Striders running group. Both are very affordable and very well organized, and the drive to either one should be less than 5 hours.Let me know if you have any questions. Happy to help!SayWhat? said:I figure an ultra in the Fall of 2014 will be my best bet as it will allow me to build a better base on the treadmill this winter and give me plenty of months to train on accesible trails during next spring/summer. Does anyone have any experience with any upper midwest ultra's?
My biggest issue is that I have no idea what to expect relative to road running distances. I've heard/read that long duration trail races are easier on the body, but more difficult due to the ascents/descents/terrain. How would you equate the first 26.2 miles of an ultra to a road marathon? Same? Marginally more difficult? Sigificantly more difficult?
Thanks, how long is the Danada trails? Does it loop back?Well, you will, when you run the September Naperville trail HM with Juxt and me. It's a crushed gravel trail ...not technical, hilly single-track. At some point, you might want to drive a bit to the Waterfall Glen trail that circles Argonne Labs (9.5 miles, which Juxt and I just ran). One decent hill and a few rollers. You can find parking lots just south of I-55 on Cass or Lemont Rds. If you want some true single track, there's a whole slew of trails in the Palos area just south of Archer Ave. If I can find the link to the map system for it, I'll let you know.Any Chicagoland folk ever run the Danada forest preserve area?
finally a chart i can understand!We've been discussing hydration lately and referenced the WS Hydration Chart a few times. Pretty easy to figure out if you're properly hydrated or not by color. For me, I drink between 96-120 oz of water a day not counting coffee, gatorade, etc. I typically run in a mid 140 suckex in the mornings and don't need to carry on anything under 10. If I run in the sun, pretty much anything over 4 requires hydration.
Course map. It does loop a bit and I think you'll run fast enough to pass some of the slower runners between miles 9 and 10, IIRC. The race is small enough that it's not really a big problem.Thanks, how long is the Danada trails? Does it loop back?Well, you will, when you run the September Naperville trail HM with Juxt and me. It's a crushed gravel trail ...not technical, hilly single-track. At some point, you might want to drive a bit to the Waterfall Glen trail that circles Argonne Labs (9.5 miles, which Juxt and I just ran). One decent hill and a few rollers. You can find parking lots just south of I-55 on Cass or Lemont Rds. If you want some true single track, there's a whole slew of trails in the Palos area just south of Archer Ave. If I can find the link to the map system for it, I'll let you know.Any Chicagoland folk ever run the Danada forest preserve area?
Agreed and agreed. Unless you are an elite you'll be doing a good amount of walking in an ultra, especially at 50M and above. That variation of muscle group usage from alternating between running and walking, climbing and descending, and if it's on trail doing it all on somewhat "softer" ground can make it easier on the body than hammering out a road marathon. That being said, after 6-7-8 hours the body will hurt!They are easier on the body because you are running slower often with walk breaks.Thanks gruecd. I had actually seen both of those while looking, with the Glacial Trail 50K being the more tempting of the two (in the fall, and 50K < 50 miles!). I'll definitely consider that one, though the eastern side of Wisconsin is pushing the boundaries of it being a "convenient" first ultra (in terms of having family come with). Definitely an intriguing option though. Now that you've run a few others, what did you like about it?If you're thinking next fall, do the Glacial Trail 50K/50M here in Wisconsin in October (link in my sig). I did the 50K last fall as my first ultra in the pouring rain. Great race. If you're thinking spring, I just completed my first-ever 50-miler at the Ice Age Trail 50K/50M this past May. Both are sponsored by the Badgerland Striders running group. Both are very affordable and very well organized, and the drive to either one should be less than 5 hours.Let me know if you have any questions. Happy to help!SayWhat? said:I figure an ultra in the Fall of 2014 will be my best bet as it will allow me to build a better base on the treadmill this winter and give me plenty of months to train on accesible trails during next spring/summer. Does anyone have any experience with any upper midwest ultra's?
My biggest issue is that I have no idea what to expect relative to road running distances. I've heard/read that long duration trail races are easier on the body, but more difficult due to the ascents/descents/terrain. How would you equate the first 26.2 miles of an ultra to a road marathon? Same? Marginally more difficult? Sigificantly more difficult?
Personally I'd step right into the 50 miler. By the time you do a 50k, you're more than 60% of the way there. A 50k is basically just a marathon with an extended cool down. Nothing wrong with that, but it's a different experience.
And probably me. ###.Well, you will, when you run the September Naperville trail HM with Juxt and me.

Thought about that after I posted, but the editing seems hit or miss now.And probably me. ###.Well, you will, when you run the September Naperville trail HM with Juxt and me.![]()
Just checking in. I don't have nearly as many posts since I swore off complaining about the heat. Good luck everyone.
Street shoes <> Trail shoes. They won't hold up so I'd recommend looking into trail specific shoes.Questions for the trail and/or ultra crowd, specific towards training/completing a 50K with progression to 50 miler:
- Shoes: I've been running in ASICS Nimbus for what's likely been a decade or more. Is transitioning into trail specific shoes a no brainer for training/racing? Recommendations? Or do I just need to get into a local running store and speak with them?
- Hydration: Hydration pack, handheld bottle(s), or both? Recommendations?
- Others: Specific shirts, socks, or other gear that you love or feel is essential?
I would guess there is still something going on there if you are waking up with issues. Try sleeping with it elevated for a night and see if it makes a difference?Quick question about my ankle. I posted a while back that I sprained my ankle while running last Thursday. The swelling is gone now and I'm getting around pretty well. The odd thing is that it feels almost completely fine in the afternoon after I've been moving around a bit, but then the next morning it's still very stiff and gimpy when I get out of bed. Is that normal for this sort of injury? I usually associate that kind of pattern with tendonitis or something like that.
Also, I'm thinking about testing this out on Friday with a couple of very easy miles on the track (smooth, flat surface). Reasonable?
It is normal for it to be stiff in the morning and then loosen up as you walk on it.Quick question about my ankle. I posted a while back that I sprained my ankle while running last Thursday. The swelling is gone now and I'm getting around pretty well. The odd thing is that it feels almost completely fine in the afternoon after I've been moving around a bit, but then the next morning it's still very stiff and gimpy when I get out of bed. Is that normal for this sort of injury? I usually associate that kind of pattern with tendonitis or something like that.
Also, I'm thinking about testing this out on Friday with a couple of very easy miles on the track (smooth, flat surface). Reasonable?
I would respectfully disagree and get out of the way as the running elite in the thread trample me to get to a keyboard.Certainly purposeful runs are good for avoiding injuries and slow and steady gains but if you want to get fast quick there is nothing like just going all out every time.
Shoes - Really depends on the type of trail. For groomed or gravel I stick with my running shoes. For big rocks and roots I go with trail shoes. The trail shoe will allow you to feel what's under you and hopefully give you enough time to do something before rolling an ankle. The problem with feeling things under your feet is that shaper rocks will hurt like heck. I did my 54 miler and 100 miler in heavier running shoes for comfort reasons. Most of my training is in trail shoes. I have 3 different types of trail shoes depending on the conditions.Questions for the trail and/or ultra crowd, specific towards training/completing a 50K with progression to 50 miler:
- Shoes: I've been running in ASICS Nimbus for what's likely been a decade or more. Is transitioning into trail specific shoes a no brainer for training/racing? Recommendations? Or do I just need to get into a local running store and speak with them?
- Hydration: Hydration pack, handheld bottle(s), or both? Recommendations?
- Others: Specific shirts, socks, or other gear that you love or feel is essential?
Very normal. I lived like that for quite a while during my soccer days.It is normal for it to be stiff in the morning and then loosen up as you walk on it.Quick question about my ankle. I posted a while back that I sprained my ankle while running last Thursday. The swelling is gone now and I'm getting around pretty well. The odd thing is that it feels almost completely fine in the afternoon after I've been moving around a bit, but then the next morning it's still very stiff and gimpy when I get out of bed. Is that normal for this sort of injury? I usually associate that kind of pattern with tendonitis or something like that.
Also, I'm thinking about testing this out on Friday with a couple of very easy miles on the track (smooth, flat surface). Reasonable?
I'm close enough to consider this.sho nuff said:As far as a race to do as a group sometime...
http://www.rockandroadmarathon.racesonline.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=site.display&page_id=5065
Have heard good things about this.
Gives the trail guys some things...the marathon guys who want a bit of a challenge...and those that want just a half or 1/4 of the marathon in the relay.
Was supposed to team up and run the relay with a friend last year...but we had some scheduling conflicts with our kids and never did it.I'm close enough to consider this.sho nuff said:As far as a race to do as a group sometime...
http://www.rockandroadmarathon.racesonline.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=site.display&page_id=5065
Have heard good things about this.
Gives the trail guys some things...the marathon guys who want a bit of a challenge...and those that want just a half or 1/4 of the marathon in the relay.
I'm not really, but still might if its an open weekend during cross country season. I'd love to do the 2-man relay with someone not looking for hardware. That looks like a fantastic event. Is there onsite camping?I'm close enough to consider this.sho nuff said:As far as a race to do as a group sometime...
http://www.rockandroadmarathon.racesonline.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=site.display&page_id=5065
Have heard good things about this.
Gives the trail guys some things...the marathon guys who want a bit of a challenge...and those that want just a half or 1/4 of the marathon in the relay.
Not that I know of.I'm not really, but still might if its an open weekend during cross country season. I'd love to do the 2-man relay with someone not looking for hardware. That looks like a fantastic event. Is there onsite camping?I'm close enough to consider this.sho nuff said:As far as a race to do as a group sometime...
http://www.rockandroadmarathon.racesonline.com/index.cfm?fuseaction=site.display&page_id=5065
Have heard good things about this.
Gives the trail guys some things...the marathon guys who want a bit of a challenge...and those that want just a half or 1/4 of the marathon in the relay.
How about 2 sleeveless shirts?6 wet disgusting miles today with only slight knee discomfort. Thigh is feeling much better so i didnt need to baby it, which i am sure helped the knee a ton. Also went much slower due to the 162 suckdix which had to help. Only wore one shirt too, big step for me. Dont know if I will continue that practice though.
BnB - in the picture, are they showing the front or back? Where does that hold thing rest - above the belt line, or do the bottles and pocket in between hang below the belt (which would seem to imply they're in the front)?I can't recommend this belt enough http://www.rei.com/product/846112/salomon-xt-twin-hydration-belt,-bright-red/iron/white?preferredSku=8461120002&cm_mmc=cse_froogle-_-pla-_-product-_-8461120002&mr:referralID=699c10c5-ef2f-11e2-9dea-001b2166becc
The triangular bottles don't wiggle and for longer runs I upside the bottles. The pouch in front holds food, gel, car key, and salt tabs. Extra food, butt wipes, jacket, gloves, hat will fit in back pouch. There's a bunge which will hold more clothing.
Well, I frequently train too stupidly to be considered "elite" but I'll throw my two cents in regardless.I would respectfully disagree and get out of the way as the running elite in the thread trample me to get to a keyboard.Certainly purposeful runs are good for avoiding injuries and slow and steady gains but if you want to get fast quick there is nothing like just going all out every time.
Have the same belt...loved it this past fall when my runs hit above 15 and the temps were up and I needed to carry enough water.I can't recommend this belt enough http://www.rei.com/product/846112/salomon-xt-twin-hydration-belt,-bright-red/iron/white?preferredSku=8461120002&cm_mmc=cse_froogle-_-pla-_-product-_-8461120002&mr:referralID=699c10c5-ef2f-11e2-9dea-001b2166becc
The triangular bottles don't wiggle and for longer runs I upside the bottles. The pouch in front holds food, gel, car key, and salt tabs. Extra food, butt wipes, jacket, gloves, hat will fit in back pouch. There's a bunge which will hold more clothing.
Shoes - unless you're running super technical mountain trails, don't go overboard on trail shoes - I remember buying some super built up, gore-tex shoes when I first started that turned out to be a total waste of money. That being said, finding a "hybrid" with a little extra tread on the bottom, maybe some extra in the midsole to protect from those sharp rocks, is not a bad idea. I love my Brooks Cascadias, great hybrid shoe that is comfortable on pavement (at least for the 1-2 miles I ever run on it on the way to/from the trailhead) but does fine on singletrack as well. But I also do my long stuff in Hokas, which are a whole different story all together.Shoes - Really depends on the type of trail. For groomed or gravel I stick with my running shoes. For big rocks and roots I go with trail shoes. The trail shoe will allow you to feel what's under you and hopefully give you enough time to do something before rolling an ankle. The problem with feeling things under your feet is that shaper rocks will hurt like heck. I did my 54 miler and 100 miler in heavier running shoes for comfort reasons. Most of my training is in trail shoes. I have 3 different types of trail shoes depending on the conditions.Questions for the trail and/or ultra crowd, specific towards training/completing a 50K with progression to 50 miler:
- Shoes: I've been running in ASICS Nimbus for what's likely been a decade or more. Is transitioning into trail specific shoes a no brainer for training/racing? Recommendations? Or do I just need to get into a local running store and speak with them?
- Hydration: Hydration pack, handheld bottle(s), or both? Recommendations?
- Others: Specific shirts, socks, or other gear that you love or feel is essential?
Hydration - Packs can cause issues with running form and chaffing. I like the belts because of the pockets for food. The elites use the handhelds. I need my hands to break falls.
Other - A gel flask is nice to have for long training runs.
I can't recommend this belt enough http://www.rei.com/product/846112/salomon-xt-twin-hydration-belt,-bright-red/iron/white?preferredSku=8461120002&cm_mmc=cse_froogle-_-pla-_-product-_-8461120002&mr:referralID=699c10c5-ef2f-11e2-9dea-001b2166becc
The triangular bottles don't wiggle and for longer runs I upside the bottles. The pouch in front holds food, gel, car key, and salt tabs. Extra food, butt wipes, jacket, gloves, hat will fit in back pouch. There's a bunge which will hold more clothing.
Awesome advice from everyone on this board, and particularly this thread. That's why I love this place.Shoes - unless you're running super technical mountain trails, don't go overboard on trail shoes - I remember buying some super built up, gore-tex shoes when I first started that turned out to be a total waste of money. That being said, finding a "hybrid" with a little extra tread on the bottom, maybe some extra in the midsole to protect from those sharp rocks, is not a bad idea. I love my Brooks Cascadias, great hybrid shoe that is comfortable on pavement (at least for the 1-2 miles I ever run on it on the way to/from the trailhead) but does fine on singletrack as well. But I also do my long stuff in Hokas, which are a whole different story all together.Shoes - Really depends on the type of trail. For groomed or gravel I stick with my running shoes. For big rocks and roots I go with trail shoes. The trail shoe will allow you to feel what's under you and hopefully give you enough time to do something before rolling an ankle. The problem with feeling things under your feet is that shaper rocks will hurt like heck. I did my 54 miler and 100 miler in heavier running shoes for comfort reasons. Most of my training is in trail shoes. I have 3 different types of trail shoes depending on the conditions.Questions for the trail and/or ultra crowd, specific towards training/completing a 50K with progression to 50 miler:
- Shoes: I've been running in ASICS Nimbus for what's likely been a decade or more. Is transitioning into trail specific shoes a no brainer for training/racing? Recommendations? Or do I just need to get into a local running store and speak with them?
- Hydration: Hydration pack, handheld bottle(s), or both? Recommendations?
- Others: Specific shirts, socks, or other gear that you love or feel is essential?
Hydration - Packs can cause issues with running form and chaffing. I like the belts because of the pockets for food. The elites use the handhelds. I need my hands to break falls.
Other - A gel flask is nice to have for long training runs.
I can't recommend this belt enough http://www.rei.com/product/846112/salomon-xt-twin-hydration-belt,-bright-red/iron/white?preferredSku=8461120002&cm_mmc=cse_froogle-_-pla-_-product-_-8461120002&mr:referralID=699c10c5-ef2f-11e2-9dea-001b2166becc
The triangular bottles don't wiggle and for longer runs I upside the bottles. The pouch in front holds food, gel, car key, and salt tabs. Extra food, butt wipes, jacket, gloves, hat will fit in back pouch. There's a bunge which will hold more clothing.
Hydration really depends on preference, but it's important to consider how often you will be able to refill. Handhelds work great for shorter runs or those where you can refill regularly, and I try and use those in races if the aid stations are close enough that I can get by. I'll go with a handheld and a single bottle waist pack if it's going to be 60-90+ minutes between refill opportunities. And if I don't know, or it's just going to be a long day, I have a Nathan 2L hydration pack. The packs with bottles on the front are gaining in popularity, and I may check those out - they're easier to fill than a bladder at an aid station, but still give you the ability to carry multiple bottles and fuel.
Otherwise I do wear calf compression sleeves for longer runs, with the added bonus here in Northern California of protection from poison oak. I bought a pair of gaiters to help keep trail junk out of my shoes, but haven't actually tried them yet - but will do so and plan to wear them for my 50M. And body glide is huge when you're out there for many hours, I carry it and re-apply on hot runs in particular.
Nutrition at longer distances is ever more important but can be tricky, but that's totally an experiment of one. Try different things and find what works for you. I try to train with minimal calories as much as possible to try and ramp up my fat-burning systems, and then rely on liquid calories supplemented with aid station food (mostly Coke and potatoes dipped in salt) during races.
Only other quirk I can think of is that I carry candied ginger - when my stomach goes sideways several hours into a run, I'll pop that in my cheek and it seems to help settle it down enough to enable me to keep taking on hydration/nutrition.
I think I commented on this before. Going hard or near all out and shorter distances almost every run will be more beneficial to racing in the short term vs running purposeful but not as beneficial in the long term as running more purposefully.Well, I frequently train too stupidly to be considered "elite" but I'll throw my two cents in regardless.I would respectfully disagree and get out of the way as the running elite in the thread trample me to get to a keyboard.Certainly purposeful runs are good for avoiding injuries and slow and steady gains but if you want to get fast quick there is nothing like just going all out every time.
I'm sure AF's training experiences are legit. However, from the little I know about 5K training I suspect he hasn't been doing the right combinations of "purposeful runs". The right combination of faster than 5K pace intervals, longer tempos and long slow stuff might have him be even faster than his earlier balls-to-the-wall training style.
Additionally, balls-to-the-wall is more effective the shorter the distance. You can do well in 5Ks that way but it can be a recipe for disaster when training for half marathons and longer races.
Agree with Arid. Ivan, you may want to consider running after you've had a long period of walking around or, if you run in the morning, using a hot whirlpool or heating pad to warm it up.It is normal for it to be stiff in the morning and then loosen up as you walk on it.Quick question about my ankle. I posted a while back that I sprained my ankle while running last Thursday. The swelling is gone now and I'm getting around pretty well. The odd thing is that it feels almost completely fine in the afternoon after I've been moving around a bit, but then the next morning it's still very stiff and gimpy when I get out of bed. Is that normal for this sort of injury? I usually associate that kind of pattern with tendonitis or something like that.
Also, I'm thinking about testing this out on Friday with a couple of very easy miles on the track (smooth, flat surface). Reasonable?
Here you go.tri-man 47 said:BnB - in the picture, are they showing the front or back? Where does that hold thing rest - above the belt line, or do the bottles and pocket in between hang below the belt (which would seem to imply they're in the front)?I can't recommend this belt enough http://www.rei.com/product/846112/salomon-xt-twin-hydration-belt,-bright-red/iron/white?preferredSku=8461120002&cm_mmc=cse_froogle-_-pla-_-product-_-8461120002&mr:referralID=699c10c5-ef2f-11e2-9dea-001b2166becc
The triangular bottles don't wiggle and for longer runs I upside the bottles. The pouch in front holds food, gel, car key, and salt tabs. Extra food, butt wipes, jacket, gloves, hat will fit in back pouch. There's a bunge which will hold more clothing.
I agree with everything Koby said. Well put. Let me add that different runners respond to different training based on their own individual physiology and current fitness. I just ran a four-miler in warm temperatures at a pace (7:17), which is faster than my 5k PR. I did it without having run anything faster than a 10:30 pace for the preceding six weeks. I was just base-building with high mileage slow runs and pulled a great race out of my keyster. The more I run and train, the more I realize that I can get by and probably I am better off just running a lot of slow miles and adding just a small bit of race-specific training before a race. I stay healthy that way and when I run some fast stuff on fatigued legs, I make substantial gains quickly. Not everybody will find this to work for them.koby925 said:I think I commented on this before. Going hard or near all out and shorter distances almost every run will be more beneficial to racing in the short term vs running purposeful but not as beneficial in the long term as running more purposefully.Well, I frequently train too stupidly to be considered "elite" but I'll throw my two cents in regardless.I would respectfully disagree and get out of the way as the running elite in the thread trample me to get to a keyboard.Certainly purposeful runs are good for avoiding injuries and slow and steady gains but if you want to get fast quick there is nothing like just going all out every time.
I'm sure AF's training experiences are legit. However, from the little I know about 5K training I suspect he hasn't been doing the right combinations of "purposeful runs". The right combination of faster than 5K pace intervals, longer tempos and long slow stuff might have him be even faster than his earlier balls-to-the-wall training style.
Additionally, balls-to-the-wall is more effective the shorter the distance. You can do well in 5Ks that way but it can be a recipe for disaster when training for half marathons and longer races.
Anecdotal eveidence - If I train that way (and I have), I will always be in the 18s, no more no less, for 5k, which is great. If I train more purposefully, my first races (like this year) may be 19:XX+ but it will eventually get me to the 17s - I think/ hope I am there now. To add to what Jux said, if I train hard all the time, I think my 10k would be around 39 flat and I'd run 1:26-1:28 for a Half. With more purposeful training, I ran 37:44 and 1:22:05. I personally need that big build up of base if I am going to run anything over 5k close to my best.
Your own personal goals and the time you have to dedicate will of course determine what you can do. If you don't have a ton of time but want to maintain being pretty competive (for yourself) consistently, I see no problem with the approach. But if you want to see what you can do long term, count me in the camp that strongly advocates purposeful training.
Most important aspect of training, bar none.I agree with everything Koby said. Well put. Let me add that different runners respond to different training based on their own individual physiology and current fitness. I just ran a four-miler in warm temperatures at a pace (7:17), which is faster than my 5k PR. I did it without having run anything faster than a 10:30 pace for the preceding six weeks. I was just base-building with high mileage slow runs and pulled a great race out of my keyster. The more I run and train, the more I realize that I can get by and probably I am better off just running a lot of slow miles and adding just a small bit of race-specific training before a race. I stay healthy that way and when I run some fast stuff on fatigued legs, I make substantial gains quickly. Not everybody will find this to work for them.