worrierking
Footballguy
Wow MAC, awesome.
30, been running since jr high but not seriously from 18-26. Never knew how to train before finding this thread last year. Still don't really know, but I am further along than when I found you guys.FUBAR said:Mac nice work.
How old are you and how long have you been running? Seems like you haven't approached your potential yet.
Temps for Minocqua starting to trend warmer. Now looking like morning temps in the mid- to upper 50s with highs in the mid 70s. A couple of days ago it was saying lower 50s with a high in the low 70s. Crap.
I've also heard it is very flat. And the swim is timed with the tide, so it should be fast, as well.So training on hills right now is just for GP and quasi-speed work.
Looking at the 2012 results, this looks like a fast course. Goals in order are 1. Finish 2. Sub 5:30, 3. Sub 5
Did we expect the weather to stay perfect for a Grue race?Temps for Minocqua starting to trend warmer. Now looking like morning temps in the mid- to upper 50s with highs in the mid 70s. A couple of days ago it was saying lower 50s with a high in the low 70s. Crap.![]()
"Perfect" is the key word. Temp swings 2 degrees and all of a sudden his backside starts to pucker up.Did we expect the weather to stay perfect for a Grue race?Temps for Minocqua starting to trend warmer. Now looking like morning temps in the mid- to upper 50s with highs in the mid 70s. A couple of days ago it was saying lower 50s with a high in the low 70s. Crap.![]()
After last year's over training I'm not going to do 30 THIS year, but if all goes well this fall I will re-evaluate and consider expanding my weekly miles to that point for 2014. I'm just thinking of expanding to 23-25 mile weeks this fall though. I do cross training twice/week and I think that has aided tremendously in my gains so far this season. Those workouts are two miles of hill sprints, push up's, lunges, walking calf extensions, hip swings, mountain climbers, and burpees. If I continue to do that twice/week, two 3-4 mile runs (one recovery, one harder), one (easy-moderate) 5-6 mile run, and one (easy to moderate) 7-8 mile run that's between 23 and 25. I think that's a reasonable plan for this fall. I'm extra wary because of what happened last year and where I am physically right now, so I don't want to push the miles too much and screw up fall again. Next year? If this fall goes well? Cross training will still be a part of the plan, but I can see increasing the # of miles on my run days to get me to 30/week.I don't even think Mac has to go nearly as far as some in here. Mac, I know adding more mileage for time constraints and injury concerns is tough, believe me. But if you bump your mileage to 30 or so a week, you will see great advances from 17-22 miles a week. You can get 30 with 5 days of running a week if one day is 7-8 miles and the rest are 5-6 with your mixture (that's obviously working) of tempo, intervals and regular runs. That one 7-8 miler a week would do wonders for maintaining stamina in 5ks.
After last year's over training I'm not going to do 30 THIS year, but if all goes well this fall I will re-evaluate and consider expanding my weekly miles to that point for 2014. I'm just thinking of expanding to 23-25 mile weeks this fall though. I do cross training twice/week and I think that has aided tremendously in my gains so far this season. Those workouts are two miles of hill sprints, push up's, lunges, walking calf extensions, hip swings, mountain climbers, and burpees. If I continue to do that twice/week, two 3-4 mile runs (one recovery, one harder), one (easy-moderate) 5-6 mile run, and one (easy to moderate) 7-8 mile run that's between 23 and 25. I think that's a reasonable plan for this fall. I'm extra wary because of what happened last year and where I am physically right now, so I don't want to push the miles too much and screw up fall again. Next year? If this fall goes well? Cross training will still be a part of the plan, but I can see increasing the # of miles on my run days to get me to 30/week.I don't even think Mac has to go nearly as far as some in here. Mac, I know adding more mileage for time constraints and injury concerns is tough, believe me. But if you bump your mileage to 30 or so a week, you will see great advances from 17-22 miles a week. You can get 30 with 5 days of running a week if one day is 7-8 miles and the rest are 5-6 with your mixture (that's obviously working) of tempo, intervals and regular runs. That one 7-8 miler a week would do wonders for maintaining stamina in 5ks.
I like the general approach also and I never did more than 35mpw in high school either.Very nice run Mac. For someone in your situation I actually like the low-mileage approach. (although going up to 25-35 like you said shouldn't be stretching it). My HS team never did more than 35 mpw and I've only run about 30-45s faster on 3-4 times the training load. (although other factors as weight/age/consistency are also at play)
Koby-I am going to "do as I say" and take my advice that I gave you last week. I have a case of dead legs as well after my highest mileage week in a few months. (31 miles last week), so instead of training one more week and then taking next week off for our drive/move down to the lower-48, I am just going to take this week very easy. (maybe just run once with some friends since I told them I would before we move) and then take next week off, and effectively having a 2 week break.
Note that I mentioned the trend warmer. Don't be an ###."Perfect" is the key word. Temp swings 2 degrees and all of a sudden his backside starts to pucker up.Did we expect the weather to stay perfect for a Grue race?Temps for Minocqua starting to trend warmer. Now looking like morning temps in the mid- to upper 50s with highs in the mid 70s. A couple of days ago it was saying lower 50s with a high in the low 70s. Crap.![]()
Sounds about right. i did cross fit and ran short for speed last year in Afghanistan, dropped a couple minutes off my 5k despite adding ten pounds.Hang 10 said:MAC_32 said:After last year's over training I'm not going to do 30 THIS year, but if all goes well this fall I will re-evaluate and consider expanding my weekly miles to that point for 2014. I'm just thinking of expanding to 23-25 mile weeks this fall though. I do cross training twice/week and I think that has aided tremendously in my gains so far this season. Those workouts are two miles of hill sprints, push up's, lunges, walking calf extensions, hip swings, mountain climbers, and burpees. If I continue to do that twice/week, two 3-4 mile runs (one recovery, one harder), one (easy-moderate) 5-6 mile run, and one (easy to moderate) 7-8 mile run that's between 23 and 25. I think that's a reasonable plan for this fall. I'm extra wary because of what happened last year and where I am physically right now, so I don't want to push the miles too much and screw up fall again. Next year? If this fall goes well? Cross training will still be a part of the plan, but I can see increasing the # of miles on my run days to get me to 30/week.koby925 said:I don't even think Mac has to go nearly as far as some in here. Mac, I know adding more mileage for time constraints and injury concerns is tough, believe me. But if you bump your mileage to 30 or so a week, you will see great advances from 17-22 miles a week. You can get 30 with 5 days of running a week if one day is 7-8 miles and the rest are 5-6 with your mixture (that's obviously working) of tempo, intervals and regular runs. That one 7-8 miler a week would do wonders for maintaining stamina in 5ks.![]()
That actually sounds real similar to my workout schedule this summer. About 20-25 miles of running and 4 days of WODs. Overall I'm in the best shape of my life.
Thanks. Its not for a while yet.Sand said:I've also heard it is very flat. And the swim is timed with the tide, so it should be fast, as well.So training on hills right now is just for GP and quasi-speed work.
Looking at the 2012 results, this looks like a fast course. Goals in order are 1. Finish 2. Sub 5:30, 3. Sub 5
Good luck on the sub-5. Gotta have a monster bike leg for that feat.
Or, to a degree, it's less about fast swimming as it is the ability to feel strong and in control coming out of the swim.Thanks. Its not for a while yet.Sand said:I've also heard it is very flat. And the swim is timed with the tide, so it should be fast, as well.So training on hills right now is just for GP and quasi-speed work.
Looking at the 2012 results, this looks like a fast course. Goals in order are 1. Finish 2. Sub 5:30, 3. Sub 5
Good luck on the sub-5. Gotta have a monster bike leg for that feat.
I need to get faster swimming.
Hasn't been much of a problem in past tri's, but i would like to drop a few minutes without exhausting too much energy.Or, to a degree, it's less about fast swimming as it is the ability to feel strong and in control coming out of the swim.Thanks. Its not for a while yet.I need to get faster swimming.Sand said:I've also heard it is very flat. And the swim is timed with the tide, so it should be fast, as well.So training on hills right now is just for GP and quasi-speed work.
Looking at the 2012 results, this looks like a fast course. Goals in order are 1. Finish 2. Sub 5:30, 3. Sub 5
Good luck on the sub-5. Gotta have a monster bike leg for that feat.
Don't really understand this, but "4 PRs" has to be good right?! Solid work man.Cracking ride tonight. For some reason the jets were turned on. Typical course - but the power was well up, hitting 243w average and 261w normalized for the good 40 minutes. Four PRs and a lot of almosts randomly in there - we were flying. Averaged 20+mph with 1700ft of climbing in there. That ain't too shabby.
And as usual I'll get some good sleep tonight!
PR = personal record. Those PRs were on roads that I've ridden 30-50 times, so pretty good stuff.Don't really understand this, but "4 PRs" has to be good right?! Solid work man.Cracking ride tonight. For some reason the jets were turned on. Typical course - but the power was well up, hitting 243w average and 261w normalized for the good 40 minutes. Four PRs and a lot of almosts randomly in there - we were flying. Averaged 20+mph with 1700ft of climbing in there. That ain't too shabby.
And as usual I'll get some good sleep tonight!
Sorry, I guess I needed my morning coffee!lol, I understand the PR part(just not the rest of the biking data, although I know 20+mph with those elevation change is more than solid)
Fixed.Sorry, I guess I needed my morninglol, I understand the PR part(just not the rest of the biking data, although I know 20+mph with those elevation change is more than solid)
coffee!HGH.
So explain (if possible to a newb) this watts thing. Since I've spent the last month on the stationary bike I've been keeping an eye on watts as opposed to RPM's or the other typical categories available since I see you guys talking about it here all the time.Cracking ride tonight. For some reason the jets were turned on. Typical course - but the power was well up, hitting 243w average and 261w normalized for the good 40 minutes. Four PRs and a lot of almosts randomly in there - we were flying. Averaged 20+mph with 1700ft of climbing in there. That ain't too shabby.
And as usual I'll get some good sleep tonight!
Power = force over time. So basically how much force you can sustain over a period of time. Outdoors cycling is so variable as to the speed to you attain - wind, drafting, equipment, etc. all obscure what you are really doing. Speed is relatively useless in self assessment. Power cuts through all that and gives you an idea of really how much effort you were putting out. This chart gives you an idea of what different classes of riders can put out.So explain (if possible to a newb) this watts thing. Since I've spent the last month on the stationary bike I've been keeping an eye on watts as opposed to RPM's or the other typical categories available since I see you guys talking about it here all the time.Cracking ride tonight. For some reason the jets were turned on. Typical course - but the power was well up, hitting 243w average and 261w normalized for the good 40 minutes. Four PRs and a lot of almosts randomly in there - we were flying. Averaged 20+mph with 1700ft of climbing in there. That ain't too shabby.
And as usual I'll get some good sleep tonight!
Watts is a measurement of power. On a bike you can't use speed (because it is impacted by wind, aerodynamics, drafting, and terrain/elevation) to measure the quality of your workout. 300 watts on a TT bike with a wind at my back on flat terrain might yield 26 mph. 300 watts on a 2% grade into the wind on a road bike would net closer to 18 mph.So explain (if possible to a newb) this watts thing. Since I've spent the last month on the stationary bike I've been keeping an eye on watts as opposed to RPM's or the other typical categories available since I see you guys talking about it here all the time.Cracking ride tonight. For some reason the jets were turned on. Typical course - but the power was well up, hitting 243w average and 261w normalized for the good 40 minutes. Four PRs and a lot of almosts randomly in there - we were flying. Averaged 20+mph with 1700ft of climbing in there. That ain't too shabby.
And as usual I'll get some good sleep tonight!
I'd begin icing that knee post workout every day, not just the days its sore. I've bought a couple of those freezeable pads on Amazon that you can wrap on with an ace bandage. When I am really sore, typically my right calf, I'll ice it for 20 to 30 minutes several times a day.Listening to my body, I feel fantastic. Short of that mild tenderness I don't FEEL like I'm pushing anything... but her concerns have me curious. What are you guys thoughts?![]()
Being new to running again...Id probably skip speedwork for this race.You guys rule... thanks so much for the guidance.
So, assuming that my training weeks are going to look like this going forward:
D1: Easy : this week was Run 5 / walk 3 / Run 5 / Walk 3 / Run 5
D2 : Increasing: this week was Run 8 / walk 5 / Run 8
D3 : Tough Day : this week is run 20
Would you say tempo runs should be day 2 then maybe work in some speed work on the middle section of day 1 (press my pace) and just take D3 at a "casual/conversational" pace?
Sorry...last question..just want to make sure I balance this out and do things correctly. Thanks!
And roger that on the icing of the knee. I've got ice packs. I'll start doing that after every run.![]()
Definitely don't worry about speed or tempo stuff until you can run continuously.You guys rule... thanks so much for the guidance.
So, assuming that my training weeks are going to look like this going forward:
D1: Easy : this week was Run 5 / walk 3 / Run 5 / Walk 3 / Run 5
D2 : Increasing: this week was Run 8 / walk 5 / Run 8
D3 : Tough Day : this week is run 20
Would you say tempo runs should be day 2 then maybe work in some speed work on the middle section of day 1 (press my pace) and just take D3 at a "casual/conversational" pace?
Sorry...last question..just want to make sure I balance this out and do things correctly. Thanks!
And roger that on the icing of the knee. I've got ice packs. I'll start doing that after every run.![]()
Fine by me.gruecd said:OK, so regarding Naperville....
Jux, Annyong, and tri-man - I haven't actually registered for the race yet, but I did book a hotel room this morning (Chicago Marriott Naperville, only $71 on Hotwire and just a couple of minutes away from the race). The GF will be coming with me. Does anyone have any suggestions regarding a restaurant for dinner on Saturday night? How about Lou Malnati's in downtown Naperville??
i don't notice a difference in performance, but I am much more miserable in the cooler more humid weather.So, when we talk about the suck index, we acknowledge that temperature is worse than dew point, right? Ran this afternoon with a 140 suck index (temp 72, dew point 68). That wasn't nearly as bad as running in, like, temp 80, dew point 60.
I agree with this. The biking, as noted, has built strong leg muscles. The challenge of newbie running is that the muscles and supporting VO2 system aren't developed enough. But you have a base, all be it from another discipline. When you get there, the long, slow runs build up the body's ability to fuel (deliver oxygen to) the muscles. For now, enjoy your running and do well on the 4 miler! One caution: Don't expect improvement over the final 7-10 days. That's a time to stay sharp and get some rest.MAC_32 said:If I remember right, couch to 5k only has you running 3 times per week. If that's the case I disagree about slowing down, as long as your knee issue doesn't continue/worsen. Your risk of over training is very small when you're not running back to back days. Once you finish the program, if you decide to try to continue to improve, you will need to vary up the workout speeds as the others have suggested, especially if you run more times/week. The idea of couch to 5k is to intro running - just go, don't think. It's designed so if done properly and with proper form you won't hurt yourself.
If you were new to exercise I'd be more cautious, but given your history I think you're fine and it makes perfect sense why you transitioned so quickly.
Rode in to work again this morning.
Is it just me or is it harder to go 20 in the morning and 30 in the evening, vs 50 at once?
Suck index of 155 doesn't help, but it's saddle soreness too.
I guess it's bad here... looks like we have a "suck index" of 165-170 here midday or so... 90s with dew points in the 70s. ugh. Looks like it will be 160 when I run tomorrow at 6pm. Wheee memphis.That is past my limit - I'll go to about 155, but find that above that I really suffer. As much as I hate the treadmill I will hit that up instead. In fact, I did that yesterday and squeezed in three miles. Today I got rained/lightninged out of a bike and swim, so I guess my taper has started. I'll be getting to the start line pretty darn fat and rested.Rode in to work again this morning.
Is it just me or is it harder to go 20 in the morning and 30 in the evening, vs 50 at once?
Suck index of 155 doesn't help, but it's saddle soreness too.I guess it's bad here... looks like we have a "suck index" of 165-170 here midday or so... 90s with dew points in the 70s. ugh. Looks like it will be 160 when I run tomorrow at 6pm. Wheee memphis.
Man, maintaining focus during recovery runs is harder than the last mile of an actual race.
c'mon man, it's not that bad. I used to hate them, but now they're one of my favorite runs after figuring it all out. Tri put it best after a recovery run recently... 'I feel like I'm blood doping'. :zen:Agree x1000. Forget speed or tempo runs all together until you've got a good endurance base. You're going to get the best bang for the buck while keeping the injury risk low by running everything at a conversational pace.Hang 10 said:Definitely don't worry about speed or tempo stuff until you can run continuously.You guys rule... thanks so much for the guidance.
So, assuming that my training weeks are going to look like this going forward:
D1: Easy : this week was Run 5 / walk 3 / Run 5 / Walk 3 / Run 5
D2 : Increasing: this week was Run 8 / walk 5 / Run 8
D3 : Tough Day : this week is run 20
Would you say tempo runs should be day 2 then maybe work in some speed work on the middle section of day 1 (press my pace) and just take D3 at a "casual/conversational" pace?
Sorry...last question..just want to make sure I balance this out and do things correctly. Thanks!
And roger that on the icing of the knee. I've got ice packs. I'll start doing that after every run.![]()