Here's one recent example where it worked out great. http://forums.footballguys.com/forum/index.php?showtopic=302486&view=findpost&p=14356195I've also read that a lot of ultra runners attack runs this way since you will hit rough patch at some point in time and will recover.'gruecd said:With all due respect, for anything longer than a 5K (or maybe a 10K), I think "banking time" is a horrible idea. I've never seen it work. I mean, if you go out at a pace faster than what you're capable of sustaining, you'll have to rachet back to a significantly slower pace in order to keep going. Better to back off a little bit from the start, IMHO.'tri-man 47 said:Interesting question. In effect: Should we SandTM the first half of the race/run? I suppose the logic is the same as Sanding the start - you're going to get tired, so you might as well bank some time while you're fresh. With higher temps, now, we know our bodies will start to overheat more quickly. So it's probably best to bank some time early on while the body temp is lower. As the body heats up and the HR rises accordingly, it will be too difficult to pick up speed late in the race.'BassNBrew said:With the hotter days on us should we be targeting and training for positive splits?
One could argue the flip side that you can't bank time by saying you can't bank or build a reserve of cooler temps and shade.
at wraith being hurt and still beating my ###I did 9 miles yesterday in 1:22:10, an average of 9:08. Not bad considering mile 1 was 10:14. Wasnt until mile 4 that I clocked a mile under 9. Averaged 156 for HR which is where I wanted to be



x or a big ol' crash and burn. Oh, well. Nothing ventured, nothing gained.
)
I'd be interested to hear about the experience - PM me, or share some comments here, if you would.