Right, I already qualified. I had always planned on Boston being a one time thing. I don't think I'll run it next year but, obviously, I have plenty of time to make a decision.I am fairly certain Juxt has a qualifying time from 2012 Chicago marathon as well. (just not sure if he's planning on doing this again next year)
Thanks...don't think Im going to be ready by January.Come on down to Jackson, I went ahead and signed up for the Blues Marathon yesterday and was lucky enough to get in on the "first 500 discount."I have no way of qualifying so will leave it at that.
I am, however, considering another full...and possibly the Country Music Full...even being a hillier course...but just because it is here...and I run with a group and it means a lot to me to run this one with them (helps also knowing the town, course, logistics, and knowing I will be staying overnight right near the start as the group I run with blocks rooms off).
This would give me basically a year to get back into gear after this surgery...use the fall for getting into training shape again after being out of running for almost 2 months now.
Then I know of a great half tune up a month and a half before the marathon.
The tough part of it all is we are still talking about getting our house ready to sell and possibly moving in the next year...and convincing my wife that I am not crazy by wanting to do this to myself again.
Its a good course...and a nice race.
I mentioned before I might have an in at this race. I have a full on the schedule for fall followed by an endurance race then nothing until a half/full in March and possibly this. Pretty sure that would be bad ###.I have no way of qualifying so will leave it at that.I am, however, considering another full...and possibly the Country Music Full...even being a hillier course...but just because it is here...and I run with a group and it means a lot to me to run this one with them (helps also knowing the town, course, logistics, and knowing I will be staying overnight right near the start as the group I run with blocks rooms off).This would give me basically a year to get back into gear after this surgery...use the fall for getting into training shape again after being out of running for almost 2 months now.Then I know of a great half tune up a month and a half before the marathon. The tough part of it all is we are still talking about getting our house ready to sell and possibly moving in the next year...and convincing my wife that I am not crazy by wanting to do this to myself again.
I ran the inaugural Minocqua race last year. I paced a friend who got her first-ever BQ there (so yes, it's certified). Contemplating that one myself.tri-man 47 said:I'm very curious about that too. The same day as your Fix Cities race in Appleton is a Fox Valley race west of Chicago. I fear that would be too late (I certainly could not wait until the October race in Grand Rapids). I see a 9/1 race up in Minocqua on a rails-to-trails path ...will consider that if I proceed with this and it's a BQ race.gruecd said:Anyone know when registration opens for 2014? Wondering if Fox Cities on 9/22 might be too late...
I never realized that. I had always assumed they measured from the middle and if you took the turns right you could cheat a little. My Garmin measured 26.47 for Boston. I assumed it was a problem with the Garmin but perhaps not.wilked said:Whoa, just read this
http://howtorunamarathon.net/Run_the_Tangents.html
Now I see why the GPS watch said 26.5...
Of course veering over for some Wellesley smooches probably didn't help either
Yeah I don't know much about it either. Is it something you can keep under control? Still run on? I'm guessing so since you ran a Marathon on it.That sucks Workhorse. I thought you only had a sore toe from running! I don't know that much about gout, but hopefully those diet changes keep it under control. Do you think there's a chance it's a misdiagnosis?
I believe my Boston length was 26.44. That alone can add an extra couple of minutes to the overall time! In my HM PR last fall, which was on a gravel path and not crowded, I aggressively ran tangents and ended up at 13.0. It has an effect ..good or bad.I never realized that. I had always assumed they measured from the middle and if you took the turns right you could cheat a little. My Garmin measured 26.47 for Boston. I assumed it was a problem with the Garmin but perhaps not.wilked said:Whoa, just read this
http://howtorunamarathon.net/Run_the_Tangents.html
Now I see why the GPS watch said 26.5...
Of course veering over for some Wellesley smooches probably didn't help either
The doctor doesn't seem to think that this will be a chronic condition and he even said that once the gout-specific anti-inflammatories kick in, I could be back running in a week or so.Yeah I don't know much about it either. Is it something you can keep under control? Still run on? I'm guessing so since you ran a Marathon on it.That sucks Workhorse. I thought you only had a sore toe from running! I don't know that much about gout, but hopefully those diet changes keep it under control. Do you think there's a chance it's a misdiagnosis?
Gave me chills.BC Students: "We decide when our Marathon ends"
A bunch of students were organizing a group on Friday to walk the last 5 miles of the course from BC to Boylston Street, as a tribute to those injured and a sign of not giving in to terror.
They've had to temporarily postpone it, though, at officials' request. Because they didn't think they could accommodate the 15,000 people that have signed up so far.
So f'ing badash
I was all excited to give an update on where I am on Monday...then realized it was Boston Marathon Day and decided the timing was bad...then decided to follow along like the rest of you and offer my congrats once all were done...then...that happened.
Runners are like family. One, big, giant dysfunctional and oddly wired family. I feel like someone attacked my family. Like most runners it fueled my fire and got me to do one of the best runs I've done in a long time yesterday. I am not in the condition to do anything long distance wise, but modified my interval run yesterday to a 2.62 mile one. 2 min 62 sec warm up, 2.62 miles on, 2 mins 62 sec rest, 2.62 miles on, 2 mins 62 second cool down. Anger is motivating and I ran angry yesterday. I'm sure I wasn't the only one.
Those would be good books for him to read to get a lot of general (and advanced) knowledge. He probably shouldn't do speedwork though until he's built his endurance base -- particularly since he's had a history of injuries.I use a mix of 3 books in my training as well as training/workouts I can dig up online on what elites do and modify them. I would recommend 2 of the 3 books for most marathoners.
Advanced Marathoning (by Pfitzginer / Douglas) is popular with this group. (http://www.amazon.com/Advanced-Marathoning-Edition-Peter-Pfitzinger/dp/0736074600/ref=sr_1_1?ie=UTF8&qid=1366214744&sr=8-1&keywords=advanced+marathoning)
Hansons Marathon Method (by Luke Humphrey) is good too. (http://www.amazon.com/Hansons-Marathon-Method-Renegade-Fastest/dp/1934030856/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1366214830&sr=1-1&keywords=hanson+marathon+method)
Perfect timing for a report. F the terrorist.I do most of my events on 3-4 hours of sleep, but I do try to focus on a banking sleep/rest in the lead up days. Regarding hr, it likely was stress/excitement.Juxtatarot, on 17 Apr 2013 - 12:10, said:
First off, if anyone thinks it is too soon after the bombings to do a race report, I apologize. I feel a bit odd writing this but I’m home and have the day off work, I am too sore to do anything active and it’s an ugly, rainy day. I have the time to get this all written out now.
I’ve been thinking about my race and trying to analyze exactly what went wrong for me. Instead of giving a real race report, I’d like to post my splits (time and heart rate) from Boston and from my PR in Chicago last fall to use as a comparison.
Chicago Boston
5K 22:15/? 21:20/164
10K 21:39/159 21:29/165
15K 21:38/158 21:16/166
20K 21:37/154 21:38/166
25K 21:39/157 22:08/167
30K 21:42/158 23:27/167
35K 21:53/162 25:14/165
40K 22:46/164 31:31/145
Finish 10:17/167 16:19/135
A few things jump out. First, and most obvious, is my earlier slowdown in Boston and then you the collapse. Second thing is my heart rate is much more elevated until my collapse.
Of course, these are two entirely different marathons. Boston has it’s famous hills while Chicago is famously flat. It was also about 10 degrees cooler for the Chicago race and Chicago wasn’t in the sun like most of the Boston race.
My first thought was that I was a victim of the hills. Later, then, I thought it was just a matter of hitting the “wall” too quickly and perhaps I wasn’t careful enough with proper carb loading. I also thought I might have been more dehydrated than I realized. Now, however, I think the culprit was my elevated heart rate from the beginning. I really have no idea why it was so high. I noticed this during the first half of the race, but I really felt fine and comfortable. In fact, I felt so good that I thought I was holding myself back -- I really wanted to go faster. It wasn’t until the second half that things started quickly changing.
For further reference, I did a 16 mile run with 12 marathon pace during training and my HR was in the 150s for the MP portion (where I think it should be). When I ran the 5K a month ago, my HR in miles 2 and 3 both averaged 168 -- only a little higher than this marathon!
I’m strangely at peace with this one. Usually when I don’t run as well as I’d like I beat myself up for days but this one I’m taking in stride. (And I felt that way immediately after finishing so it’s not a matter of the bombings putting things in perspective although they have certainly done that as well.) However, I’d really like to get a better idea of what happened. I’d like for this to be a learning experience for my fall marathon.
Here are my questions for the group:
Why would my heart rate be so much higher than I would have anticipated? I doubt it was the hills because they don’t play a big role at the beginning. Might sleep matter? I’ve rarely slept well the night before a big race and also I’m a light sleeper regardless. It was quite noisy at the hotel and outside. I probably got a total of about 4 hours of sleep over Saturday and Sunday nights and never a deep sleep. I didn’t feel “sleepy” tired during or before the race, though.
Does a higher heart rate cause you to “hit the wall” sooner? I’d think so but I couldn’t find a good answer when I googled this.
Any other thoughts about my race?
Well said...for all of them really.--
wilked: Kudos again on your excellent race in Boston. Steady running and a huge PR. I don't want your success to be totally overwhelmed by the terrible events of the day. You deserve some recognition for your achievement!
Awesome...BC Students: "We decide when our Marathon ends"
A bunch of students were organizing a group on Friday to walk the last 5 miles of the course from BC to Boylston Street, as a tribute to those injured and a sign of not giving in to terror.
They've had to temporarily postpone it, though, at officials' request. Because they didn't think they could accommodate the 15,000 people that have signed up so far.
So f'ing badash
I am feeling some reality set in from my initial idea also. I have done zero marathons and don't know if it's good to do 2 in 6-7 months. I'm wondering if I have the time to commit to short notice marathon training, we are moving in June into our new house...I'm trying to find qualifiers that would work, etc. Chicago or Hartford (wife's from there) seem to make more sense from a readiness, travel and course layout perspective but they are too late for 2014 BQ. 2015 may be more realistic? I still haven't given up on 2014, though. Need to figure it out soon.Without reading the past few pages, I'm sure I'm feeling what some other posters are feeling now: GD it, I'm running me a Boston Marathon because I'm not going to let anyone take that chance away from me or anyone else. But the reality sets in: I've only run one marathon (documented in this thread over 2 years ago) and that was pretty much a disaster with injuries and a 5+ hour time.
This.Perfect timing for a report. F the terrorist.I do most of my events on 3-4 hours of sleep, but I do try to focus on a banking sleep/rest in the lead up days. Regarding hr, it likely was stress/excitement.Juxtatarot, on 17 Apr 2013 - 12:10, said:
First off, if anyone thinks it is too soon after the bombings to do a race report, I apologize. I feel a bit odd writing this but I’m home and have the day off work, I am too sore to do anything active and it’s an ugly, rainy day. I have the time to get this all written out now.
I’ve been thinking about my race and trying to analyze exactly what went wrong for me. Instead of giving a real race report, I’d like to post my splits (time and heart rate) from Boston and from my PR in Chicago last fall to use as a comparison.
Chicago Boston
5K 22:15/? 21:20/164
10K 21:39/159 21:29/165
15K 21:38/158 21:16/166
20K 21:37/154 21:38/166
25K 21:39/157 22:08/167
30K 21:42/158 23:27/167
35K 21:53/162 25:14/165
40K 22:46/164 31:31/145
Finish 10:17/167 16:19/135
A few things jump out. First, and most obvious, is my earlier slowdown in Boston and then you the collapse. Second thing is my heart rate is much more elevated until my collapse.
Of course, these are two entirely different marathons. Boston has it’s famous hills while Chicago is famously flat. It was also about 10 degrees cooler for the Chicago race and Chicago wasn’t in the sun like most of the Boston race.
My first thought was that I was a victim of the hills. Later, then, I thought it was just a matter of hitting the “wall” too quickly and perhaps I wasn’t careful enough with proper carb loading. I also thought I might have been more dehydrated than I realized. Now, however, I think the culprit was my elevated heart rate from the beginning. I really have no idea why it was so high. I noticed this during the first half of the race, but I really felt fine and comfortable. In fact, I felt so good that I thought I was holding myself back -- I really wanted to go faster. It wasn’t until the second half that things started quickly changing.
For further reference, I did a 16 mile run with 12 marathon pace during training and my HR was in the 150s for the MP portion (where I think it should be). When I ran the 5K a month ago, my HR in miles 2 and 3 both averaged 168 -- only a little higher than this marathon!
I’m strangely at peace with this one. Usually when I don’t run as well as I’d like I beat myself up for days but this one I’m taking in stride. (And I felt that way immediately after finishing so it’s not a matter of the bombings putting things in perspective although they have certainly done that as well.) However, I’d really like to get a better idea of what happened. I’d like for this to be a learning experience for my fall marathon.
Here are my questions for the group:
Why would my heart rate be so much higher than I would have anticipated? I doubt it was the hills because they don’t play a big role at the beginning. Might sleep matter? I’ve rarely slept well the night before a big race and also I’m a light sleeper regardless. It was quite noisy at the hotel and outside. I probably got a total of about 4 hours of sleep over Saturday and Sunday nights and never a deep sleep. I didn’t feel “sleepy” tired during or before the race, though.
Does a higher heart rate cause you to “hit the wall” sooner? I’d think so but I couldn’t find a good answer when I googled this.
Any other thoughts about my race?
I'd be interested in your nutrition plan before commenting further. For long events it's optimum not to eat anything 3 hours beforehand.
Pretty much what Steve and Juxt said...and Im sure Ned will chime in about liking what he did with pFitz as well as others.Without reading the past few pages, I'm sure I'm feeling what some other posters are feeling now: GD it, I'm running me a Boston Marathon because I'm not going to let anyone take that chance away from me or anyone else.
But the reality sets in: I've only run one marathon (documented in this thread over 2 years ago) and that was pretty much a disaster with injuries and a 5+ hour time.
I've been training for a half next month - the Colfax Marathon in Denver. The training has been much easier, but now about 4 weeks out I'm starting to feel some pain / maladies come on that are similar to 2 years ago. I stretch. I've been doing strength training since January. Maybe I'm just not training right. I'm hoping to do it under two hours - a measly 9 min. pace. Never can really seem to improve on my pace, but then again, maybe I'm just not doing it right/hard enough.
My question is - what program/regimen would you guys recommend for me to do to get to a qualifying time of 3:15 (I'm 42)? Last time (and for this half) I just downloaded Higdon's training program and followed it. I'm thinking I need to get more involved / detailed with strength training, learning how to pace, how to do speed training, diet, etc. Any books, links, programs, etc. that would get me where I need to go?
I don't expect I'll get it done by 2014. But I'm feeling determined - if I have to wait until 2015 or 2016, fine. I'll do a long, gradual, buildup if I have to.
I agree with others. F holding back on the race report. I don't know enough about Marathon running or HR but the numbers from my novice perspective lead me to believe maybe it just wasn't your day. It happens all too often in this wonderful but cruel sport. Your HR indicates you were giving a great effort just to accomplish what you did.First off, if anyone thinks it is too soon after the bombings to do a race report, I apologize. I feel a bit odd writing this but I’m home and have the day off work, I am too sore to do anything active and it’s an ugly, rainy day. I have the time to get this all written out now.
I’ve been thinking about my race and trying to analyze exactly what went wrong for me. Instead of giving a real race report, I’d like to post my splits (time and heart rate) from Boston and from my PR in Chicago last fall to use as a comparison.
Chicago Boston
5K 22:15/? 21:20/164
10K 21:39/159 21:29/165
15K 21:38/158 21:16/166
20K 21:37/154 21:38/166
25K 21:39/157 22:08/167
30K 21:42/158 23:27/167
35K 21:53/162 25:14/165
40K 22:46/164 31:31/145
Finish 10:17/167 16:19/135
A few things jump out. First, and most obvious, is my earlier slowdown in Boston and then you the collapse. Second thing is my heart rate is much more elevated until my collapse.
Of course, these are two entirely different marathons. Boston has it’s famous hills while Chicago is famously flat. It was also about 10 degrees cooler for the Chicago race and Chicago wasn’t in the sun like most of the Boston race.
My first thought was that I was a victim of the hills. Later, then, I thought it was just a matter of hitting the “wall” too quickly and perhaps I wasn’t careful enough with proper carb loading. I also thought I might have been more dehydrated than I realized. Now, however, I think the culprit was my elevated heart rate from the beginning. I really have no idea why it was so high. I noticed this during the first half of the race, but I really felt fine and comfortable. In fact, I felt so good that I thought I was holding myself back -- I really wanted to go faster. It wasn’t until the second half that things started quickly changing.
For further reference, I did a 16 mile run with 12 marathon pace during training and my HR was in the 150s for the MP portion (where I think it should be). When I ran the 5K a month ago, my HR in miles 2 and 3 both averaged 168 -- only a little higher than this marathon!
I’m strangely at peace with this one. Usually when I don’t run as well as I’d like I beat myself up for days but this one I’m taking in stride. (And I felt that way immediately after finishing so it’s not a matter of the bombings putting things in perspective although they have certainly done that as well.) However, I’d really like to get a better idea of what happened. I’d like for this to be a learning experience for my fall marathon.
Here are my questions for the group:
Why would my heart rate be so much higher than I would have anticipated? I doubt it was the hills because they don’t play a big role at the beginning. Might sleep matter? I’ve rarely slept well the night before a big race and also I’m a light sleeper regardless. It was quite noisy at the hotel and outside. I probably got a total of about 4 hours of sleep over Saturday and Sunday nights and never a deep sleep. I didn’t feel “sleepy” tired during or before the race, though.
Does a higher heart rate cause you to “hit the wall” sooner? I’d think so but I couldn’t find a good answer when I googled this.
Any other thoughts about my race?
Not sure on the HR.BnB and Steve - Maybe it was nerves but I would have thought that would have settled as the race progressed. I don't remember HR being excessively high walking around in the start corral.
Steve - I really doubt the cold hurt me. If anything, I thought it was a little too warm! I've had plenty of practice running in the cold.
BnB- About nutrition, I focused on carb heavy foods for a few days before the race. I didn't snack as much as if I were home before a marathon, though. That might have hurt me some. Race morning I had a bagel about 3 hours before and a package of PowerBar gummy chews about 20 minutes before. During the race, gels during miles 5, 11 (forgot at 10) and 15. Switched between gatorade and water at stations about 50/50.
A few questions...Without reading the past few pages, I'm sure I'm feeling what some other posters are feeling now: GD it, I'm running me a Boston Marathon because I'm not going to let anyone take that chance away from me or anyone else.
But the reality sets in: I've only run one marathon (documented in this thread over 2 years ago) and that was pretty much a disaster with injuries and a 5+ hour time.
I've been training for a half next month - the Colfax Marathon in Denver. The training has been much easier, but now about 4 weeks out I'm starting to feel some pain / maladies come on that are similar to 2 years ago. I stretch. I've been doing strength training since January. Maybe I'm just not training right. I'm hoping to do it under two hours - a measly 9 min. pace. Never can really seem to improve on my pace, but then again, maybe I'm just not doing it right/hard enough.
My question is - what program/regimen would you guys recommend for me to do to get to a qualifying time of 3:15 (I'm 42)? Last time (and for this half) I just downloaded Higdon's training program and followed it. I'm thinking I need to get more involved / detailed with strength training, learning how to pace, how to do speed training, diet, etc. Any books, links, programs, etc. that would get me where I need to go?
I don't expect I'll get it done by 2014. But I'm feeling determined - if I have to wait until 2015 or 2016, fine. I'll do a long, gradual, buildup if I have to.
You're correct, history tells me mid 160s is way too high for MP. I usually do LT runs at that HR. It just felt so easy through the first several miles. And I felt like my HR shouldn't be that high so I ignored it. That was stupid, I know. Steve warned me last week about feeling deceptively fresh after a lay-off (I took the week off beforehand to rest my Achilles). Although I understood that in theory, I probably didn't put that advice in practice. The HR drop-off at the end is from slowing all the way down to some run and walk at the end. Muscles were so sore too. Maybe the low HR is evidence that I threw in the towel a little bit and I could have managed a few minutes better if I would have forced myself.Juxt - I believe the Boston experience in and of itself causes the HR to run a bit higher ...so many stimuli. I do think you went out just a little too fast, given the challenges of the rolling hills in Newton still to come. But what puzzles me is the HR dropoff over the final miles. My take on it is that your sustainable pace is high 150's, which leads to some creep into the low 160s as you tire near the end of a marathon (see: Chicago). Mid/high 160's is not the right HR pace for you in a marathon. Do you have any training data that refutes that, I wonder? As I see it, you were cruising a little bit above your speed limit, and, yeah, you wore out and bonked to some degree over the final miles.
Did you notice what it was while standing in the corral? I'm willing to bet you were pretty amped up at the start.Perfect timing for a report. F the terrorist.I do most of my events on 3-4 hours of sleep, but I do try to focus on a banking sleep/rest in the lead up days. Regarding hr, it likely was stress/excitement.Juxtatarot, on 17 Apr 2013 - 12:10, said:
First off, if anyone thinks it is too soon after the bombings to do a race report, I apologize. I feel a bit odd writing this but I’m home and have the day off work, I am too sore to do anything active and it’s an ugly, rainy day. I have the time to get this all written out now.
I’ve been thinking about my race and trying to analyze exactly what went wrong for me. Instead of giving a real race report, I’d like to post my splits (time and heart rate) from Boston and from my PR in Chicago last fall to use as a comparison.
Chicago Boston
5K 22:15/? 21:20/164
10K 21:39/159 21:29/165
15K 21:38/158 21:16/166
20K 21:37/154 21:38/166
25K 21:39/157 22:08/167
30K 21:42/158 23:27/167
35K 21:53/162 25:14/165
40K 22:46/164 31:31/145
Finish 10:17/167 16:19/135
A few things jump out. First, and most obvious, is my earlier slowdown in Boston and then you the collapse. Second thing is my heart rate is much more elevated until my collapse.
Of course, these are two entirely different marathons. Boston has it’s famous hills while Chicago is famously flat. It was also about 10 degrees cooler for the Chicago race and Chicago wasn’t in the sun like most of the Boston race.
My first thought was that I was a victim of the hills. Later, then, I thought it was just a matter of hitting the “wall” too quickly and perhaps I wasn’t careful enough with proper carb loading. I also thought I might have been more dehydrated than I realized. Now, however, I think the culprit was my elevated heart rate from the beginning. I really have no idea why it was so high. I noticed this during the first half of the race, but I really felt fine and comfortable. In fact, I felt so good that I thought I was holding myself back -- I really wanted to go faster. It wasn’t until the second half that things started quickly changing.
For further reference, I did a 16 mile run with 12 marathon pace during training and my HR was in the 150s for the MP portion (where I think it should be). When I ran the 5K a month ago, my HR in miles 2 and 3 both averaged 168 -- only a little higher than this marathon!
I’m strangely at peace with this one. Usually when I don’t run as well as I’d like I beat myself up for days but this one I’m taking in stride. (And I felt that way immediately after finishing so it’s not a matter of the bombings putting things in perspective although they have certainly done that as well.) However, I’d really like to get a better idea of what happened. I’d like for this to be a learning experience for my fall marathon.
Here are my questions for the group:
Why would my heart rate be so much higher than I would have anticipated? I doubt it was the hills because they don’t play a big role at the beginning. Might sleep matter? I’ve rarely slept well the night before a big race and also I’m a light sleeper regardless. It was quite noisy at the hotel and outside. I probably got a total of about 4 hours of sleep over Saturday and Sunday nights and never a deep sleep. I didn’t feel “sleepy” tired during or before the race, though.
Does a higher heart rate cause you to “hit the wall” sooner? I’d think so but I couldn’t find a good answer when I googled this.
Any other thoughts about my race?
I'd be interested in your nutrition plan before commenting further. For long events it's optimum not to eat anything 3 hours beforehand.
Nah, once you bonk you're done. That low HR at the end is just a law of averages since you did a walk/run. I wouldn't question if you threw in the towel or not.You're correct, history tells me mid 160s is way too high for MP. I usually do LT runs at that HR. It just felt so easy through the first several miles. And I felt like my HR shouldn't be that high so I ignored it. That was stupid, I know. Steve warned me last week about feeling deceptively fresh after a lay-off (I took the week off beforehand to rest my Achilles). Although I understood that in theory, I probably didn't put that advice in practice. The HR drop-off at the end is from slowing all the way down to some run and walk at the end. Muscles were so sore too. Maybe the low HR is evidence that I threw in the towel a little bit and I could have managed a few minutes better if I would have forced myself.Juxt - I believe the Boston experience in and of itself causes the HR to run a bit higher ...so many stimuli. I do think you went out just a little too fast, given the challenges of the rolling hills in Newton still to come. But what puzzles me is the HR dropoff over the final miles. My take on it is that your sustainable pace is high 150's, which leads to some creep into the low 160s as you tire near the end of a marathon (see: Chicago). Mid/high 160's is not the right HR pace for you in a marathon. Do you have any training data that refutes that, I wonder? As I see it, you were cruising a little bit above your speed limit, and, yeah, you wore out and bonked to some degree over the final miles.
THIS CHANGES EVERYTHING!!!Mile 11/12ish we hit the Wellesley Scream Tunnel. Wow, this was cool. College gals packed this mile, all looking for a kiss, lots with hilarious signs. I slowed down, taking my time choosing, laid 2 or 3 kisses on a couple lucky gals. At the end of the Scream Tunnel two gals were holding signs, buck naked, signs covering the interesting parts, and signs read "If you run faster we will drop the signs." I took it as a sign (no pun intended) and got back on my horse. Goal through this 5 mile stretch was 8:20, which felt like I was pushing myself for the first time. Headphones were off at this point and I felt like I was racing for the first time. I had some fans in this stretch but wasn't positive where they were, so kept slowing looking for them. Pace suffered slightly, but not too much. Finished mile 15 right on my goal for that stretch, 8:20.
Congrats on the PR! I get those crazy HR spikes in the beginning of most of my runs. It's bad data. Ignore it. I've read it's normally caused by the sensors being too dry and/or something to do with the fabric of tech shirts.For some reason my HR spiked up to 180 early in the race, thinking it had to be a false reading, certainly didn't feel that high, as well as I have never gotten the thing above 170 running as hard as I can.
I knew you were not going to be happy with your outcome. I was following you just hoping you would not pack it in at mile marker 26.Any other thoughts about my race?
I have some little hills by me (it's not as flat as downtown Chicago, for instance) but nothing as long and steep as those hills.I also wouldn't be so quick to say the hills didn't play a role. You typically run flat training and races, right?