There was multiple guys on bikes making sure the runners followed the course (at least that's what I thought they were forWait the guy leading the racers on course took you the wrong way @Hang 10?
thats a problem I've never had mid back pack.
This. Nice job today!There are some fast MFers in here. Congrats fellas!
Stop thinking so much. Just run at a pace that is comfortable for you right now.Alright, let's take a few steps back from these studs in here and take it to the beginner's circle. You guys are filthy, btw.
I just realized that I need to get off the treadmill and start running outside if I want to do this 5k in a couple months. I just tried a run outside (first time since the run in Alaska) and it's a completely different animal. I downloaded the Strava app, which looks awesome, and tried it out. Right next to me, there's a little circular street that is about 1/2 mile in length. The street goes downhill one way and back uphill the other. So this should be ideal for me to train on both for a limited distance that I can keep adding to by doing laps along with the bit of elevation to it (lol@elevation).
I've got the app open and I start at what feels like a pretty slow pace and when I get to the halfway point of the circle I'm running at like a 7:45 pace. What??!! Now granted, this first part is downhill, but this isn't good. As I start trying to go back uphill to finish, I'm really struggling. I get to the top and I'm still at an 8:10 pace for this first half mile. I go one more time around and then I was feeling a bit winded and decided to let it go for today (I haven't run in a week). I did the mile in 8:20 which really surprised me because I didn't feel that I was moving that fast. That said, I HAVE to start slower and that was definitely what I learned today. My pace felt completely different than it has on the treadmill.
Anyway, my ave step pace on the Strava app was 171 and that was at the 8:20 pace for one mile. Good idea to just keep doing this circle, slow it down, and run as much as I can now to start? Is that cadence ok? Also, should I take advantage of the downhill and let the stride length get a little longer while slowing down on the uphill? The first time around, I tried to keep the same speed and work harder going up and that was a mistake, I think, as that's when I really wore down.
Hate that I'm still stuck on these short distances but I'm going to start increasing it now that I've got the time to do so.
This. You gotta crawl before you can walk...or run. Don't worry about hills or specific pacing @gianmarco . You just want to run easy and more often. The more your run the more you'll find out your natural pace and cadence.Stop thinking so much. Just run at a pace that is comfortable for you right now.
Good advice from Chief and Hang. I'll weigh in on this piece. Typically this advice is for road runners transitioning to hilly trails, but it applies here - assuming your goal is an easy/aerobic run and not a specific workout, the key is to try and maintain the same effort level regardless of the grade. So going downhill you're naturally going to pick it up a bit, and going back up you're going to slow down. Don't worry about your pace, just focus on your breathing (conversational pace) and keep it there throughout. This applies to the local neighborhood loop or a four mile climb up to 7,000'.Also, should I take advantage of the downhill and let the stride length get a little longer while slowing down on the uphill?
Thanks. Seriously awesome runs by you two. I never intended to run hard, just wanted to poke the bears a bit and get you guys going.
You guys encouraged me to just go do it so I threw the shoes on and just went on another run. Started much slower and easier and things just naturally picked up. Felt SO much better.This. You gotta crawl before you can walk...or run. Don't worry about hills or specific pacing @gianmarco . You just want to run easy and more often. The more your run the more you'll find out your natural pace and cadence.
If you are a beginner, I wouldn't worry about it too much, but your cadence is pretty slow. As you imagine yourself running, think shorter quicker steps (not to run faster), but with a slow cadence, you are likely bouncing a lot. If you can get that cadence to 185 minimum but preferably low 190's, you'll find that you are almost "floating" and not bouncing nearly at the same level. This will make you a more efficient runner.Alright, let's take a few steps back from these studs in here and take it to the beginner's circle. You guys are filthy, btw.
I just realized that I need to get off the treadmill and start running outside if I want to do this 5k in a couple months. I just tried a run outside (first time since the run in Alaska) and it's a completely different animal. I downloaded the Strava app, which looks awesome, and tried it out. Right next to me, there's a little circular street that is about 1/2 mile in length. The street goes downhill one way and back uphill the other. So this should be ideal for me to train on both for a limited distance that I can keep adding to by doing laps along with the bit of elevation to it (lol@elevation).
I've got the app open and I start at what feels like a pretty slow pace and when I get to the halfway point of the circle I'm running at like a 7:45 pace. What??!! Now granted, this first part is downhill, but this isn't good. As I start trying to go back uphill to finish, I'm really struggling. I get to the top and I'm still at an 8:10 pace for this first half mile. I go one more time around and then I was feeling a bit winded and decided to let it go for today (I haven't run in a week). I did the mile in 8:20 which really surprised me because I didn't feel that I was moving that fast. That said, I HAVE to start slower and that was definitely what I learned today. My pace felt completely different than it has on the treadmill.
Anyway, my ave step pace on the Strava app was 171 and that was at the 8:20 pace for one mile. Good idea to just keep doing this circle, slow it down, and run as much as I can now to start? Is that cadence ok? Also, should I take advantage of the downhill and let the stride length get a little longer while slowing down on the uphill? The first time around, I tried to keep the same speed and work harder going up and that was a mistake, I think, as that's when I really wore down.
Hate that I'm still stuck on these short distances but I'm going to start increasing it now that I've got the time to do so.
I don't pay much attention to cadence but I'm curious where you've seen suggestions for numbers that high. From what I've read, I think he's fine. Stuff like this:If you are a beginner, I wouldn't worry about it too much, but your cadence is pretty slow. As you imagine yourself running, think shorter quicker steps (not to run faster), but with a slow cadence, you are likely bouncing a lot. If you can get that cadence to 185 minimum but preferably low 190's, you'll find that you are almost "floating" and not bouncing nearly at the same level. This will make you a more efficient runner.
If you are just starting out though, just work on getting some miles under your belt. Once you can run 4-5 miles, then you can start to focus on cadence.
Good luck!
http://running.competitor.com/2014/09/training/3-ways-to-increase-running-cadence-for-speed_112765Your height, weight, leg and stride length and running ability will determine your optimal cadence. Everyday runners generally fall between 160-170 steps per minute, while elite runners strike the ground around 180 steps per minute or higher—with some getting above 200 at their fastest speeds.
According to Garmin, my cadence for my 17-miler on Saturday was only 170.If you are a beginner, I wouldn't worry about it too much, but your cadence is pretty slow. As you imagine yourself running, think shorter quicker steps (not to run faster), but with a slow cadence, you are likely bouncing a lot. If you can get that cadence to 185 minimum but preferably low 190's, you'll find that you are almost "floating" and not bouncing nearly at the same level. This will make you a more efficient runner.
Yeah but you're a clydesdale.According to Garmin, my cadence for my 17-miler on Saturday was only 170.![]()
IDK big guys don't need to take as many steps?Relevance, your honor?
I don't know if taller runners necessarily have lower cadences, but I guess logically that makes sense.IDK big guys don't need to take as many steps?
I think the high cadence thing is just a point to stress efficiency to inexperienced runners that tend to overstride/heel strike. Not all the top guys are true to the 180 rule. If your stride is naturally long and efficient than you don't need to take as many steps...but obviously you need to the ability to turn up the volume at the end of a race if you're going to be competitive.I don't know if taller runners necessarily have lower cadences, but I guess logically that makes sense.
Never thought I'd see the day where you post a weekly update and each run has a HR avg in it.Pretty solid training week for me last week. Eight weeks to go.
M - 5 recovery 8:24/141
T - 8 treadmill at 7:14 avg with cruise intervals: 1.5 up, 2.5 at 6:44, 2-min jog, 2.5 at 6:40, 1.25 down
W - 11 MLR 8:19/148
T- Rest
F - 5 recovery 8:33/136
S - 17 LR 7:57/150
S - 4 recovery 8:31/131
50 miles total for the week. Slight step-back on tap for this week.
I did it for you.Never thought I'd see the day where you post a weekly update and each run has a HR avg in it.![]()
Those Fri/Sun recovery runs really stand out when comparing it to Monday.I did it for you.![]()
It was a lot cooler outside.Those Fri/Sun recovery runs really stand out when comparing it to Monday.![]()
I'm a few inches shorter than you and I am usually 166-168 unless I am racing. I really don't worry about it.According to Garmin, my cadence for my 17-miler on Saturday was only 170.![]()
I was thinking the same thing. 180 is that "ideal" number that came from studying elite marathoners, but most running coaches I've heard speak about the subject indicate that an individual's ideal cadence is just that - individual. I think if you're at 150-155, then it might be worth looking at. I know I work on it sometimes (usually during strides) as mine is often below 160 when I get into my "all day" plodding ultra pace, and being a bit quicker with my turnover than that at any pace would be beneficial. But for @gianmarco at 171 naturally I wouldn't think he'd need to worry about that at all.I don't pay much attention to cadence but I'm curious where you've seen suggestions for numbers that high. From what I've read, I think he's fine. Stuff like this:
http://running.competitor.com/2014/09/training/3-ways-to-increase-running-cadence-for-speed_112765
When you do it every day you don't really notice the difference! I do remember when I add an afternoon run I'd probably start about 20-30 seconds faster a mile. I imagine that's because I'm not running fasted and the blood is already flowing.I don't know how you guys run all the time in the morning. I'm busy tonight, and since it was nice and cool this morning with temps in the upper 50s, I decided to go into work a little late and do my run this morning instead of waiting until this afternoon when it's forecast to be in the upper 70s. I think it literally took me like 8 miles until my legs woke up.
Overall averaged 8:13 pace (and 137 bpm for you, Ned). Glad it's done.
For some of us 90 and sunny is a requirement. My training is for officiating college football. Most of my games are noon on Saturday in Sept. In NC the usual temperature 90+ and sunny. I need to be used to it.When you do it every day you don't really notice the difference! I do remember when I add an afternoon run I'd probably start about 20-30 seconds faster a mile. I imagine that's because I'm not running fasted and the blood is already flowing.
BUT I know you of all people can appreciate avoiding the heat. This ain't FLA but southeastern VA does get pretty nasty this time of year. I can't fathom running any later. When I drive by people running when it's 90 and sunny, I just shake my head...idiots.
I told you I have a garmin 225 for sale!My TomTom is officially dead. It works but I can't turn it off / stop the timer without plugging it in. (So today might show as a 10 hour run by the time I stop the clock)
I love the wrist hrm but would prefer a longer battery life. Usually not an issue but if I ever do an ultra or IM, or even century ride again, it would be great to get the whole event timed.
Any suggestions? Looking inexpensive, simple and a wrist hrm.
Looks nice but I'm not sure it's worth $300+.Contemplating the 235...
I was an idiot long before running in 90+ heat.Hang 10 said:BUT I know you of all people can appreciate avoiding the heat. This ain't FLA but southeastern VA does get pretty nasty this time of year. I can't fathom running any later. When I drive by people running when it's 90 and sunny, I just shake my head...idiots.
I'll be there for the end if any of you do it!Anyone want to do a 340 mile, 88 hour canoe/kayak race next year?
It started this morning, and this race has always intrigued me. Could be fun. And nutty. Who's in?![]()
And so we turn to racing:“The satisfaction of manifesting oneself concretely in the world through manual competence has been known to make a man quiet and easy,” writes Crawford, who in 2001 quit his job in academia to become a mechanic. “It seems to relieve him of the felt need to offer chattering interpretations of himself to vindicate his worth. He simply points: the building stands, the car now runs, the lights are on.”
"...endurance sports offer something that most modern-day knowledge economy jobs do not: the chance to pursue a clear and measurable goal with a direct line back to the work they have put in."