Those last miles of the bike race were crazy!Sand said:Suck index = 170 here right now. About the highest I've ever seen.
I'm watching the Olympics. Watching the cycling counts, right?
I'm in again for this year!FUBAR said:By the way, is anyone interested in the fantasy football league again this year?
So this went well, I'll write something up later.fatguyinalittlecoat said:Doing my first Olympic distance triathlon tomorrow. Looking forward to it.
So this went well, I'll write something up later.
Question for the knowledgeable - how much of a difference does a fancy bike make? My bike is 15 years old, not really in great condition, no clip-in pedals or drop-down handlebars. It's a road bike but not really a racing bike.
In a 26+ mile bike course, how much faster would I go with one of them fancy bikes that most people had? One minute faster? Ten minutes? More?
Just curious.
![]()
Others can probably answer the bike question better than me. I have a road bike, but it's not very expensive or fast. Clip-in pedals definitely are a big help ...you're working through the whole rotation. Depending on the bike, you could shave a few to several minutes depending on how fancy the bike is. But that's the beauty of a triathlon - it's you against yourself. Competitors have different gear (wetsuits; bikes) and vastly different training schedules, so it's hard to measure against others (and the staggered starts make the in-race comparisons very difficult).
At about mile 15 I drank some water, tried to put my water bottle back in the holder, missed and dropped it on the ground. Didn't want to stop to pick it up so it's gone forever and I didn't get to drink for the last 10+ miles. Oh well.
I'm guessing he ran the 5K course (for the sprint tri) instead of the 10K course.Probably 3mph or so, to make it simple. For you it would have made a 5 minute difference or so. Given your time likely not enough to make a huge amount of difference.Question for the knowledgeable - how much of a difference does a fancy bike make? My bike is 15 years old, not really in great condition, no clip-in pedals or drop-down handlebars. It's a road bike but not really a racing bike.
OK, so here's some highlights from my first Olympic distance triathlon:
Woke up at like 4 am and couldn't get back to sleep. Ate breakfast and fussed around until I left for the race at 5:30. Race started at 7:00.
I know I said it was a tiny race, but it turned out to be even tinier than I thought. There were only 25 people total doing the Olympic Distance race -- 17 men and 8 women. It was so small we didn't even have a staggered start -- all 25 just got in the water and started at the same time.
Swim went pretty smoothly. I had trouble, like, swimming in a straight line. Went off the ideal course right at the start. When I got back on track I tried to stay near some guy who seemed like he knew what he was doing, but he kicked me a few times so i figured I better give him a little space. Near the end I totally collided with some woman, we both popped our heads out of the water and said sorry. I was pretty disoriented about where I was in the pack -- I knew some folks were ahead of me and some behind me, but I really had no idea what place I was in after the swim. Looking at the race results now, it looks like I was in 7th overall after the swim.
First transition was OK. Drank some water, threw a shirt, socks, shoes and helmet on as quickly as I could and took off.
Bike felt OK to me. I passed one woman but got passed by like 4 guys. I really did feel like my bike put me at a big disadvantage, though. Just seemed like the people passing me weren't pedaling faster or harder than me, just had better bikes.At about mile 15 I drank some water, tried to put my water bottle back in the holder, missed and dropped it on the ground. Didn't want to stop to pick it up so it's gone forever and I didn't get to drink for the last 10+ miles. Oh well.
Second transition I was feeling a little weak. Drank some water and grabbed a banana and apple and started out of the transition area. Whoops, still have helmet on. Threw it back where my bike was and got moving.
Run did not feel good at all. Legs were cramping up for the first mile or two and I could feel myself moving really slowly. Apple and banana and water stations helped with some of the low energy and leg cramps but my stomach started feeling a little bloated. Whatever, I just kept running very slowly. Got passed by a 19-year-old girl, but actually passed some guy that was alternating walking and running. We were so spread out that I didn't see anyone in front or behind me for almost the entire run. Tried to pick up the pace a little near the end but wasn't exactly motoring. Still it felt good to cross the finish line at something resembling a running pace.
Coolest thing at the race was a mother who did the whole thing dragging her disabled kid behind her. Kid had a little boogie board for the swim and this three-wheeled bike contraption for the other legs of the race. Really impressive.
It was possible to check the times and standings in real time, so after I was done and I recovered a little I checked the info. Looked like I had finished in 9th place overall, 7th place among men, and 3rd place for my age group (40-49). Oh well, only the top two for each age group get medals so I missed out. Or did I? Somehow between the time that I checked my phone and when they announced winners, some guy that finished ahead of me got disqualified. Really curious what disqualified him, but anyway, I got a second place medal for my age group (out of 6 participants in my age group).
Here were my times:
Swim -- 00:25:24 (I'm pretty sure this was somewhat less than a full mile. It's faster than I swim in the pool and some other guy I talked to said that his time was significantly faster than he normally swims a mile)
T1 -- 00:01:23
Bike -- 01:29:18 (this was supposed to be 25 miles but it actually was 26.8 or something)
T2 -- 00:00:45
Run -- 00:59:32 (10k)
Elapsed -- 02:56:24
ETA: I just looked at the times again and it looks like the guy that beat me but got DQed was about a minute behind me after the bike but then did the run in 29 minutes.I'm guessing he ran the 5K course (for the sprint tri) instead of the 10K course.
Good stuff, but you're skipping over the pedals. Are you just assuming he'll get those or am I greatly overestimating their impact? (I don't think so, but you're more smarter on this)To add to my comments - read this. Biggest difference is the TT suit and position. Assuming you were in a tri-suit that takes care of that to a large extent. As far as buying speed the cheapest thing to buy is an aero helmet. The rest I wouldn't bother with. One thing not in there is good tires. If you're running Armadillos those are anchors. Next time you buy tires just buy some Continental 4000s and forget about it.
But, really, other than clip-on aerobars and maybe an aero helmet ( I bought mine cheap on ebay) I wouldn't sweat the rest of it.
Nice job!!! So if you were only drinking water - you could instead drink a sports drink, like Gatorade. Or my favorite for longer events is Accelerade.OK, so here's some highlights from my first Olympic distance triathlon:
First transition was OK. Drank some water
Bike felt OK to me. At about mile 15 I drank some water
Second transition I was feeling a little weak. Drank some water
Makes a big difference with hills, on flats not too much. If he does get them I'd recommend something inexpensive. I've been wearing the same Shimano tri shoes for at least 5 years now. Think I paid $100 for them.Good stuff, but you're skipping over the pedals. Are you just assuming he'll get those or am I greatly overestimating their impact? (I don't think so, but you're more smarter on this)
So, so common. Open water swimming is completely different than pool swimming. By which I mean it's about a zillion times more awesome.Swim went pretty smoothly. I had trouble, like, swimming in a straight line. Went off the ideal course right at the start. When I got back on track I tried to stay near some guy who seemed like he knew what he was doing, but he kicked me a few times so i figured I better give him a little space. Near the end I totally collided with some woman, we both popped our heads out of the water and said sorry. I was pretty disoriented about where I was in the pack -- I knew some folks were ahead of me and some behind me, but I really had no idea what place I was in after the swim. Looking at the race results now, it looks like I was in 7th overall after the swim.
Interesting, goes against what I think I've experienced and virtually everyone has them, but you seem to be right.Makes a big difference with hills, on flats not too much. If he does get them I'd recommend something inexpensive. I've been wearing the same Shimano tri shoes for at least 5 years now. Think I paid $100 for them.
The other thing to remember in flat races (which most tri courses are) - weight means nothing. Buy the cheapest pedals in a class (Look Keo should work well). All you get with expensive pedals is weight reduction - gains you nothing in tris.
The Pedaling Technique of Elite Endurance Cyclists: Changes With Increasing Workload at Constant Cadencewas published in the International Journal of Sport Biometrics 7:29-53, 1991. However, it seems to come to the conclusion that they don't really make any difference as far as pedaling efficiency goes.
"...while torque during the upstroke did reduce the total positive work required during the downstroke, it did not contribute significantly to the external work done because 98.6% and 96.3% of the total work done at the low and high workloads, respectively, was done during the downstroke."
This is echoed in Physiological and biochemical determinants of elite endurance cycling performance published in the Medicine and Science in Sports and Exercise 23:93-107, 1991. There are numerous graphs showing that pedal force is only exerted between the top and bottom of the downstroke, represented by a very sharp parabola spiking at 90 degrees from vertical.
That said, I think it's obvious to anyone who has ever done any particularly technical riding that with and without clipless pedals that clipless pedals significantly improve the handling of a bicycle. A fact which is probably more difficult to verify through scientific studies.
I agree with the handling comment. I also have found that clipless do help on steep hills (10%+) as you do pull up there rather than just push. Other than that it isn't that massive a thing. In a tri I've seen folks in short ones purposely use running shoes so they don't have to change a second time.Interesting, goes against what I think I've experienced and virtually everyone has them, but you seem to be right.
I can see doing it in a flat sprint. But dang, it's like you're telling me I'm adopted. My life is a lieI agree with the handling comment. I also have found that clipless do help on steep hills (10%+) as you do pull up there rather than just push. Other than that it isn't that massive a thing. In a tri I've seen folks in short ones purposely use running shoes so they don't have to change a second time.
Dude - you're ruining my hard earned reputation around here.See, this is what is so great about this thread. Reading Sand and Fubar going back and forth on biking and techniques and such, and there is rational discussion. No "I'm right and you are wrong" arguments.
Just true rational discussion that leads to learning something new. Refreshing.![]()
See, this is what is so great about this thread. Reading Sand and Fubar going back and forth on biking and techniques and such, and there is rational discussion. No "I'm right and you are wrong" arguments.
Just true rational discussion that leads to learning something new. Refreshing.![]()
I'm getting schooled here, but yes, the discussion is always great in this thread.Shut up, #######.See, this is what is so great about this thread. Reading Sand and Fubar going back and forth on biking and techniques and such, and there is rational discussion. No "I'm right and you are wrong" arguments.
Just true rational discussion that leads to learning something new. Refreshing.![]()

There were some complaints about the thin WW last year. Cap the # of teams at 12 this time?ff right now includes Fubar, Ned, pbm107, duck, juxt, Nigel
That's 6. Good start, I think 10-16 works.
Add steel, sand, tri = 9
Since it clearly did not impact Sunday's run I love what you did Friday.Ned said:T: 6 recovery @ 9:01/129
F: 10 GA @ 7:50/145. I rarely do this, but I felt good so I decided to just let the HR go, but not break 150. I was rollin'.
S: 6 recovery @ 8:58/133 - didn't feel good at all. Almost felt hung over, but I didn't drink.![]()
S: 17 LR @ 8:08/141. Damn I felt good. At mile 14 my HR was still below 140, so at 14.5 I started to open my stride up a bit. Which turned into a strong finish with the last 2 miles at 7:41/154 & 7:27/157.
For many years, I had stirrups. What was great with those, as Sand notes, was the ability to put on running shoes after the swim and avoid one of the shoe changes ...just bike in the running shoes (while still getting good pedal control via the stirrups). An added benefit was being able to bike around town or to work, which doesn't work with clips and the special shoes.Sand said:I agree with the handling comment. I also have found that clipless do help on steep hills (10%+) as you do pull up there rather than just push. Other than that it isn't that massive a thing. In a tri I've seen folks in short ones purposely use running shoes so they don't have to change a second time.
Still building back up with a 36 mile training week (and some strength work at night):
T: 8 miles w/ 10 x 800 @ 3:20-25
S: 6 miles w/ 12 x 400 @ :90
Yes, I have these and this is what I did on Saturday. One drawback though was that I was sweating a lot and probably didn't dry my feet off enough after swimming, so when I started my run my socks were all wet and squishy. Probably should have done it with no socks but maybe then my shoes would have been wet and squishy.For many years, I had stirrups. What was great with those, as Sand notes, was the ability to put on running shoes after the swim and avoid one of the shoe changes ...just bike in the running shoes (while still getting good pedal control via the stirrups). An added benefit was being able to bike around town or to work, which doesn't work with clips and the special shoes.
Well that's a different kind of question. When in 'normal' swim shape, my 100s (two laps) would be about 110 seconds and my 200s would be about 3:45 ...definitely faster run splits when comparing those two measures. <SNL> I'm not that ..strong.. a swimmer </SNL>just curious - how well do your 800s match your 200s swim? 400 vs. 100? I think mine are pretty close to equal, maybe a little fast running but within 5%
It depends to some degree on the socks and the shoes. My lightweight racing shoes (Asics DS Racer 10) are quite porous, so any water gets squished right back out.Yes, I have these and this is what I did on Saturday. One drawback though was that I was sweating a lot and probably didn't dry my feet off enough after swimming, so when I started my run my socks were all wet and squishy. Probably should have done it with no socks but maybe then my shoes would have been wet and squishy.
Yep - done that!Yes, I have these and this is what I did on Saturday. One drawback though was that I was sweating a lot and probably didn't dry my feet off enough after swimming, so when I started my run my socks were all wet and squishy. Probably should have done it with no socks but maybe then my shoes would have been wet and squishy.
If you're going to run without socks, make sure you get in a couple training runs beforehand without them. I know that for me personally, running without socks doesn't work, as I get pretty bad hotspots/blisters that even Body Glide won't solve.Yes, I have these and this is what I did on Saturday. One drawback though was that I was sweating a lot and probably didn't dry my feet off enough after swimming, so when I started my run my socks were all wet and squishy. Probably should have done it with no socks but maybe then my shoes would have been wet and squishy.
I personally don't think there is any bigger impact on bike times than clipless pedals, especially in a sprint. You definitely lose a couple seconds in transitions (each way) with the shoe change, but IMO it's a huge boon to your efficiency and cadence. Tack on that you can likely run off the bike better with less-tired legs, and I think they're the best $120ish ($80 for shoes, $40 for pedals) you'll spend in triathlon. At the very least they're up there with my $50, used wetsuit that I still use todayGood stuff, but you're skipping over the pedals. Are you just assuming he'll get those or am I greatly overestimating their impact? (I don't think so, but you're more smarter on this)
and run in the shoes you'll wear during the race! I have two pairs I can run in without issue, but I need socks if I'm going more than a sprint in most of my other pairs. Zoot shoes are great for tri, sockless and slip-on.If you're going to run without socks, make sure you get in a couple training runs beforehand without them. I know that for me personally, running without socks doesn't work, as I get pretty bad hotspots/blisters that even Body Glide won't solve.
Funny - I'd be exactly the opposite. No way I'd ever be able to do 400m repeats at 1:10-12. I'd be way (way) slower.Well that's a different kind of question. When in 'normal' swim shape, my 100s (two laps) would be about 110 seconds and my 200s would be about 3:45 ...definitely faster run splits when comparing those two measures. <SNL> I'm not that ..strong.. a swimmer </SNL>
Excellent, I read somewhere that each bpm = 3 sec/mile. I have found this to be fairly accurate for me. For example if my monthly running totals shows that I average 8 min/mile at a HR of 145 and my marathon pace HR is 165 I am fairly confident that I can run a marathon at 7 min/mile pace. This is all assuming that I am running the necessary mileage.Sooo....
I was looking back at old training logs to see what progress I've made compared to this time last year. Basically I'm about 6-7 bpm a minute better at the same speed as last year. Anyone have a clue what that should translate to when it comes to racing?
Interesting...Excellent, I read somewhere that each bpm = 3 sec/mile. I have found this to be fairly accurate for me. For example if my monthly running totals shows that I average 8 min/mile at a HR of 145 and my marathon pace HR is 165 I am fairly confident that I can run a marathon at 7 min/mile pace. This is all assuming that I am running the necessary mileage.
Nah, you just need to light a fire under your ### at mile 26.15 and squeeze out those extra 3 seconds.Interesting...
So if I averaged 7:10 a mile last year for my marathon and this year I'm 6 bpm a minute better, that should translate into around 18 seconds and 6:52 (3:00:02). I'm gonna need to get 1 more BPM better at least...![]()