Zasada
Footballguy
Good article, and funny to see my alma matter getting some coverage!
Personally, I just ignore the Strava/Garmin fitness and recovery stats.
Strava's fitness score is a great example: My Strava fitness was 54 for my first HM (1:47). 79 for my second HM (1:41). That seems to make sense. But for my third HM (1:32) my Strava fitness was 65.
And we've had plenty of discussion about Garmin VO2Max and estimated race times (total fantasy for me).
So I just subjectively gauge my needed recovery by pace/effort. This morning I went out and didn't have to work that hard to run my usual pace in the hot conditions. And my HR was surprisingly good (again, given the heat). So, that probably means I should squeeze a SOS run in tomorrow or Saturday.
What I would like to understand is how my HR zones change as I get more fit (I think this is part of the reason my Strava/Garmin scores are so wrong). It used to be that I would have to get to a HR of 170 to hit dry-heave territory. In STL, I hit that in the mid-150s. Now, a hard effort in cool temps drives a HR in the 140s. So Strava & Garmin think I'm not working all that hard, when in fact I'm going all-out. No idea what's happening there.
Last edited by a moderator:
emojis?