What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Rate the following NCAA QBs for the NFL Draft (1 Viewer)

I've seen several people touting Croyle and I have to ask, "WHY?" Yes, he was a highly touted recruit coming out of high school, but he's torn up not one but BOTH knees in his past, has a quirky delivery, and a frame that doesn't appear equipped to take a pounding. Scouts also say he's attrocious at throwing on the run, yet isn't mobile enough to avoid the rush.

I've not seen him play much, mostly highlights, so to those touting him as more than the mid round pick he's projected to be, what do you see that you like so much?
Throw in a Heisman and you have Jason White.
 
Brad Smith dropped last year because his idiot coach tried to make him more of a pocket passer.  He's back to his running ways this year, but Missouri isn't going to finish more than 7-4 so he won't get any pub.  Do you think Alex Smith would have been the number one overall pick had Utah not gone 11-0?

Smith suffered a concussion in last week's game.  I think he has the arm strength to be an NFL QB.
Actually, Brad had almost the same number of rushes that he had the year before, the common misconception is that they tried to make him a pocket passer. In reality, the defenses caught up to him and made him beat them with his arm. During his big 2003 year, he had two all-conference O-lineman and the schools all time leading rusher to help him out. Last year he had 3 new starters on the O-line and a junior with about 50 career carries with a bad attitude and a redshirt frosh in the backfield.Here are his career stats coming into the year.

SMITH CAREER PASSING STATISTICS

G-GS Co.-Att. Pct. Yds. TDs INTs Rating

2002 12-12 196-366 53.6% 2,333 15 6 117.34

2003 13-13 211-350 60.3% 1,977 11 7 114.11

2004 11-11 191-369 51.8% 2,185 17 11 110.74

Totals 36-36 598-1085 55.1% 6,495 43 24 114.05

SMITH CAREER RUSHING STATISTICS

Att. Yds. Avg. TD Long

2002 193 1,029 5.3 7 75

2003 212 1,406 6.6 18 64

2004 165 553 3.4 4 36

Totals 570 2,988 5.2 29 75

SMITH CAREER TOTAL OFFENSE STATISTICS

Plays Yds. Avg./G

2002 559 3,362 280.2

2003 562 3,383 260.2

2004 534 2,738 248.9

Totals 1,655 9,483 263.4

He averaged under 2 less carries than the year before, passed on average less than seven more times per game, had the ball in his hands in total plays about 3 times less and ended up with about 11 yards difference in total offense per game than the year before when he was a 2nd team All-American. Of course the year before they played 12 games and a bowl game, but the stats are averages and they played from behind more in 2004.

Where are all of the extra passes that he attempted as a pocket passer instead of running? There was no other threat on the team, so when they shut down the run, you have to pass. They shut down the run alot last year.

One other thing, he is averaging almost 34 passing attempts and 18 carries per game this season.

If you want to question the play calls, that's a different story...

B. Nugget
How many of those rushing attempts were sacks?
 
Having watched almost all of Vince Young's college games so far, I can finally say that I think he has real potential as a QB in the NFL. It took a while for me to come around, but I have.The assinine comments about his inaccuracy are just that, assinine. Vince's problems are not with any of his physical skills, they are with his ability to think. He is borderline ######ed. If Vince had the playbook that Major Applewhite had at Texas, he would be a god, but unfortunately, he isn't smart enough to understand it. I liken it to how Vick's "west coast" offense was trimmed down in order to allow him to learn the system. Sure, he's gotten a little better, but Vick's still a lunkhead when it comes to running that involved of an offense. Probably always will be.Now, having said all that, I think he will be fine and will learn things as he goes. He is a rote learner, the more he sees things, the better he is at picking the right answer. It will take no less than 4 years for him to be good, but he will survive on his ability to run and his competitveness will keep whoever drafts him in games. And no, I don't think he's as ######ed as Brooks. Brooks is probably the dumbest starting QB in the league.

 
Having watched almost all of Vince Young's college games so far, I can finally say that I think he has real potential as a QB in the NFL. It took a while for me to come around, but I have.

The assinine comments about his inaccuracy are just that, assinine.

Vince's problems are not with any of his physical skills, they are with his ability to think. He is borderline ######ed. If Vince had the playbook that Major Applewhite had at Texas, he would be a god, but unfortunately, he isn't smart enough to understand it. I liken it to how Vick's "west coast" offense was trimmed down in order to allow him to learn the system. Sure, he's gotten a little better, but Vick's still a lunkhead when it comes to running that involved of an offense. Probably always will be.

Now, having said all that, I think he will be fine and will learn things as he goes. He is a rote learner, the more he sees things, the better he is at picking the right answer. It will take no less than 4 years for him to be good, but he will survive on his ability to run and his competitveness will keep whoever drafts him in games. And no, I don't think he's as ######ed as Brooks. Brooks is probably the dumbest starting QB in the league.
Never new that R E T A R D would end up as # # # # # #.
 
Never new that R E T A R D would end up as # # # # # #.
Young has been on the UT Athletic Director's academic honor roll since 02. He's a bit of a goodie two shoes. Doesn't go out much, never misses class, turns in his homework on time, goes to church, voulnteers for community service. None of that equates to football smarts, but I like what I'm reading about his character.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm reading more on this topic looking ahead to another weekend. 

(2)Texas vs. (7)Texas Tech. 

Should be a good game to watch both QBs.  I quote the above, and bring this thread up again, because Cody Hodges (TT) isn't mentioned by anybody.  He's QBing an undefeated top 10 Div 1 school while leading the nation in passing yards, tds, completions and completing over 70% of his passes. 

Is he just a product of a system?  Something missing?  Anybody?  Are there any Red Raider fans out there?  With three consecutive Big 12 wins, surely somebody has watched him.

Also, if you're one of those that thinks Young is a future WR, try to find the time to watch this game.  He isn't.  And the opinion that he is is baseless, sorry.  It kind of hurts the rest of your opinions from a credibility standpoint, sorry again.  No NFL team insiders have mentioned it.  No scouting service has mentioned it (that I know of).  Young doesn't have WR potential even if a few talking heads have considered it.  He is a QB prospect, and nothing else.  That's what the scouts are saying.  Not me.  Sure a few college QBs are playing WR in the NFL, but that has nothing to do with Young's prospects.  The college QBs playing WR were never graded as high as Young.  He has moved into the #2 spot on most rankings, behind only Leinart.
Hey Captain,Cody Hodges is DEFINITELY a product of that system and NFL scouts aren't going to give him the benefit of the doubt considering the numbers put up by Kinsbury and Symons before him. Remember Timmy Chang is the all-time leader in passing yards, and the top 10 is by and large a laundry list of guys who had minimal impact on the NFL.

As to Vince Young. While I respect your divergent opinion, to say that scouts aren't looking at Vince Young as an NFL passer is simply untrue.

From Mel Kiper's NFL Chat today:

Stan (Phoenix): Hey, Mel. Someone said that Brady Quinn is a better pro prospect than Matt Leinart. How would you rate Leinart, Quinn, V. Young, and the other premier upper classmen qbs?

Mel Kiper: I think the senior of this group is Leinart, with Quinn and Young as juniors...Leinart will be the No.1 pick this year. I think Quinn and Young are vying for the top spot from the junior class and the 2007 draft.

rich: Mel, if you could rate Marcus Vick on your board now, where we he fall if he was in this years draft

Mel Kiper: I would just rate him with the juniors...

Vince Young, then Brady Quinn are 1 and 1a. Next would be Drew Stanton from Michigan St., then Marcus Vick would be 4th, followed by Omar Jacobs and Jordan Palmer. Those are the ratings among juniors.
If I'm reading this right, then we are in agreement again. I am saying Young is not a "WR" prospect. Others have commented that they think he may go the way of Matt Jones. I don't think it's even a remote possibility (and Young himself has said as much, fwiw). I love the guy as a future NFL QB. If asked to wager on who from the current crop of Juniors and Seniors has the best shot to make it big in the NFL, I would choose Young-- from what I have seen to date. I could certainly be wrong, and his NFL situation will have as much to do with it as anything, but he's such a natural in the pocket, and so composed under pressure. Combine that with his athleticism, surprising accuracy this year, and I see someone with great potential, growing by leaps and bounds-- fixing his flaws and displaying great upside.I'm usually a little bit of a contrarian when someone is overhyped (Leinart/Maroney), but mostly I am a doubter because the next level usually requires top shelf physical ability. I think Young has IT, whereas Leinart better really be Brady-like or he may not make it.

Young won't talk about staying in school or declaring for the draft. It depends on how this season shakes out. I think he'd be wise to keep improving in college for a year, but if he wins a national title, beats Leinart in a bowl game... well, NFL here comes the next McNabb for some rowdy group of fans to boo on draft day. :)
:thumbup: I didn't read your post right the first time, indeed we ARE in agreement re: Young. :yes:
 
Call me crazy if you want, but my biggest sleeper QB for next year is Darrell Hackney out of UAB. I'm a University of Memphis homer, and I have seen this kid beat us like 4 years in a row now. The guy has good size, great intangibles (heart, leadership, clutchness), solid running ability, and an absolute CANNON. The guy throws one of the tighter spirals I have seen at the collegiate level this year, and his accuracy is well above average.

Last year I heard him talked about more, but this year he seems to be off the radar. He will be a very nice late round project for somebody. I hope it is my Titans.

 
Croyle without any offensive line won this game for Bama. He's easily the best player in the SEC. He missed a couple of deep balls, but made the clutch pass with the game on the line. I really don't know if anyone else is as good.That's my world through crimson colored glasses. Roll Tide Roll.

 
I liken it to how Vick's "west coast" offense was trimmed down in order to allow him to learn the system. Sure, he's gotten a little better, but Vick's still a lunkhead when it comes to running that involved of an offense. Probably always will be.
That's untrue. The west coast offense was never trimmed down for Vick to learn it. No offensive system was ever trimmed down for Vick, the only thing ever trimmed down for Vick was the verbage used when Dan Reeves was coach (most complicated verbage). Instead of saying like 20 - 30 words for a play, it was cut down to half or so. The stuff about offense being trimmed down in order for him to learn the system you just made up.
 
my 2 favorites: Brady Quinn Drew Stanton i think these 2 will have very productive careers at the next level.

 
FWIW, I am now sold on Vince Young's future as a QB in the NFL. He's learning a lot over the last few games, is not only a playmaker but actually seems to understand how an offense operates, and the defensive schemes against him. I'm not ready to say he's the best QB in college right now, but IMO he's closer to Culpepper than to Matt Jones.

 
FWIW, I am now sold on Vince Young's future as a QB in the NFL. He's learning a lot over the last few games, is not only a playmaker but actually seems to understand how an offense operates, and the defensive schemes against him.

I'm not ready to say he's the best QB in college right now, but IMO he's closer to Culpepper than to Matt Jones.
:goodposting: I'm also starting to pay closer attention to Brady Quinn. Obviously his raw stats are impressive, but when you consider the respect Charlie Weis has in the NFL AND the fact that Quinn is putting up numbers running Weis' system, I think NFL GMs will be chomping at the bit to get this kid.

Regardless of what the rating services say currently, I now think barring injury Quinn figures into the top 15-20 picks at a minimum when he comes out.

 
Brad Smith is a really exciting player, but I haven't seen him play in two years.  It seems his stock has been declining... why?
Defenses scheme to stop his running and he isn't a good passer (he does have a strong arm, just not accurate) and his WRs are usually not able to bail him out if he doesn't put it right into their hands.B. Nugget
He is a complete zero at the NFL level. As a QB you have to be able to pass not run. Look at Vick. He can't even play 16 games without being in an infirmary.
 
Having watched almost all of Vince Young's college games so far, I can finally say that I think he has real potential as a QB in the NFL. It took a while for me to come around, but I have.

The assinine comments about his inaccuracy are just that, assinine.

Vince's problems are not with any of his physical skills, they are with his ability to think. He is borderline ######ed. If Vince had the playbook that Major Applewhite had at Texas, he would be a god, but unfortunately, he isn't smart enough to understand it. I liken it to how Vick's "west coast" offense was trimmed down in order to allow him to learn the system. Sure, he's gotten a little better, but Vick's still a lunkhead when it comes to running that involved of an offense. Probably always will be.

Now, having said all that, I think he will be fine and will learn things as he goes. He is a rote learner, the more he sees things, the better he is at picking the right answer. It will take no less than 4 years for him to be good, but he will survive on his ability to run and his competitveness will keep whoever drafts him in games. And no, I don't think he's as ######ed as Brooks. Brooks is probably the dumbest starting QB in the league.
Ralph Wiley would have a field day with this post.
 
FWIW, I am now sold on Vince Young's future as a QB in the NFL. He's learning a lot over the last few games, is not only a playmaker but actually seems to understand how an offense operates, and the defensive schemes against him.

I'm not ready to say he's the best QB in college right now, but IMO he's closer to Culpepper than to Matt Jones.
Don't forget about Jamarcus Russell from LSU in 2007. He's HUGE at 6'6" 252lbs. He also has an absolute cannon for an arm. He's got the strongest arm I've seen so far this year in the NCAA. He's also completing around 65 percent of his passes.
 
  I liken it to how Vick's "west coast" offense was trimmed down in order to allow him to learn the system.  Sure, he's gotten a little better, but Vick's still a lunkhead when it comes to running that involved of an offense.  Probably always will be.
That's untrue. The west coast offense was never trimmed down for Vick to learn it. No offensive system was ever trimmed down for Vick, the only thing ever trimmed down for Vick was the verbage used when Dan Reeves was coach (most complicated verbage). Instead of saying like 20 - 30 words for a play, it was cut down to half or so. The stuff about offense being trimmed down in order for him to learn the system you just made up.
At VA Tech, Vick had I think 12 plays. Beamer kicked him in the butt and said go win us football games. Vick didn't even bark out a snap count for like the first half of his freshman year. To say that no offense was ever trimmed down for Vick is just silly. He has gotten a lot better with the mental part of the game since his college days, however.
 
my 2 favorites:

Brady Quinn

Drew Stanton

i think these 2 will have very productive careers at the next level.
I'm with ya Hendo. I've seen enough of Leinert to know know he'll be OK in the pros, but I don't think he's got "it". Just a feeling I have about him.Quinn, Can't think of enough adjectives to describe how good I think this kid will be. Prototype comes to mind. He's a stud and will learn enough from Weiss to go in with the right mindset.

Stanton, he's gifted, but raw.

One other name I'll throw out there that I've not heard much about, but I've gotten to see him many, many times in his career is Brett Basenez (sp?). This guy will be a steal by some NFL team. He's got the tools, head, leadership qualities, and determination to win. As has been stated before, situation means a lot in the NFL but I think given the right one, this kid from Northwestern will make it.

 
Reggie McNeal (Texas A&M) has a legitimate shot at being a quality NFL QB. He has all the tools necessary to excel at the position, but needs some coaching to "tame" him a bit in the passing game.

Strengths:

- Amazing feet. Runs like Vince Young and Michael Vick in the open field. Very elusive.

- Arm strength. He can throw the ball a country mile and zip it into very tight spots.

Weaknesses:

- Pass accuracy. On short/medium passing routes, he will frequently throw high. I feel he needs to be settled a little more and this will go away. It's like he is too jazzed up about getting the ball there quickly.

- Mental fortitude. He seems to become frustrated easily and get down on himself. I think this can be handled with a little coaching and some success in adverse conditions.

That said, he plays behind a very sub-par offensive line at Texas A&M that doesn't afford him the time that other successful college QBs have had. He also looks to pass first unlike Mike Vick so that is a plus for any coach looking at his feet as an asset and not a possible liability.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
From a Pasquarelli Tip Sheet:"Brad Smith of Missouri and Texas State's Barrick Nealy will try to become the latest quarterbacks to convert to wide receiver at the professional level. "

 
It's funny how chic it is becoming to knock Leinart.
:yes: This is what I've been saying for some time azgroover...Leinart is in the unenviable position of "playing with a lead." When you're so clearly considered the top NFL draft prospect going into the next season, there's nowhere to go but down. I'm not saying Leinart won't be the top pick, but every scout, GM and player/personnel executive has been spending this season figuring out reasons why he SHOULDN'T be the top pick...and those are tough odds to overcome.

 
Reggie McNeal (Texas A&M) has a legitimate shot at being a quality NFL QB. He has all the tools necessary to excel at the position, but needs some coaching to "tame" him a bit in the passing game.

Strengths:

- Amazing feet. Runs like Vince Young and Michael Vick in the open field. Very elusive.

- Arm strength. He can throw the ball a country mile and zip it into very tight spots.

Weaknesses:

- Pass accuracy. On short/medium passing routes, he will frequently throw high. I feel he needs to be settled a little more and this will go away. It's like he is too jazzed up about getting the ball there quickly.

- Mental fortitude. He seems to become frustrated easily and get down on himself. I think this can be handled with a little coaching and some success in adverse conditions.

That said, he plays behind a very sub-par offensive line at Texas A&M that doesn't afford him the time that other successful college QBs have had. He also looks to pass first unlike Mike Vick so that is a plus for any coach looking at his feet as an asset and not a possible liability.
:thumbdown: Sorry Mr. Urinal, but I couldn't disagree more. I'm a season ticket holder to A&M games, and feel pretty confident in saying Reggie will never play a snap as a QB in the NFL. He is no where near intelligent enough to play at the next level. He shows signs of greatness because he's a phenomenal athlete, but he doesn't have the cognitive skills to read defenses at this level, let alone the NFL.

Reggie is barely completing 50% of his passes, and has a good receiving corps. He's done all of this against (at best) only a mediocre schedule. Texas flippin' State made him look bad! He consistently locks into one WR, misses wide open receivers by a long margin and has too happy of feet in the pocket. He has trouble reading the options in the option, let alone different coverages. If you want to know where Reggie is going to throw, just watch the strong side safety. More times than not Reggie will throw to that receiver. He's just not a bright kid, nor does he have the mental capacity to ever learn how to be. He has gotten worse with his decision-making as the year has progressed. As many problems as Ferguson had learning the playbook in Green Bay, Reggie will have more. And he will be learning the WR version of the playbook, not the QB version ;) .

My .02 (and semi-personal rant),

~Liquor

 
I'm a longtime 2%-er and I feel that Reggie's shortcomings the past 2 seasons are more a sign of a very weak offensive line and too many plays run out of shotgun.

I think you would see markedly better McNeal performances if he were playing behind the monsters at UTexas. I mean, look what UT does using Vince Young and it's very, very limited playbook. McNeal can do all that and more, I feel.

And I sympathize with you being a season ticket holder. I'm very glad I didn't bite the bullet this year and pay the extortionist "donation" fee just for the right to buy tickets. It's ridiculous when you realize our season tix cost more than UTexas, Penn State, Ohio State, and other perennially top-ranked programs.

I don't mind disagreeing on McNeal's abilities. I do think he needs the benefit of more coaching and better talent surrounding him, though, before I can make a final judgment on him as a QB.

:thumbdown:

Sorry Mr. Urinal, but I couldn't disagree more. I'm a season ticket holder to A&M games, and feel pretty confident in saying Reggie will never play a snap as a QB in the NFL. He is no where near intelligent enough to play at the next level. He shows signs of greatness because he's a phenomenal athlete, but he doesn't have the cognitive skills to read defenses at this level, let alone the NFL.

Reggie is barely completing 50% of his passes, and has a good receiving corps. He's done all of this against (at best) only a mediocre schedule. Texas flippin' State made him look bad! He consistently locks into one WR, misses wide open receivers by a long margin and has too happy of feet in the pocket. He has trouble reading the options in the option, let alone different coverages. If you want to know where Reggie is going to throw, just watch the strong side safety. More times than not Reggie will throw to that receiver. He's just not a bright kid, nor does he have the mental capacity to ever learn how to be. He has gotten worse with his decision-making as the year has progressed. As many problems as Ferguson had learning the playbook in Green Bay, Reggie will have more. And he will be learning the WR version of the playbook, not the QB version ;) .

My .02 (and semi-personal rant),

~Liquor
 
Brad Smith is a really exciting player, but I haven't seen him play in two years.  It seems his stock has been declining... why?
Defenses scheme to stop his running and he isn't a good passer (he does have a strong arm, just not accurate) and his WRs are usually not able to bail him out if he doesn't put it right into their hands.B. Nugget
He is a complete zero at the NFL level. As a QB you have to be able to pass not run. Look at Vick. He can't even play 16 games without being in an infirmary.
I'm not sure why you chose this post to take a shot at Brad Smith, I posted early in this thread that he would convert to WR and make a hell of a kick returner.FWIW, I think Reggie McNeal falls in the same category; strong arm, lacks accuracy, great open field runner.

B. Nugget

 
It's funny how chic it is becoming to knock Leinart.
IIRC, it also became chic to knock Peyton Manning and Carson Palmer.
Well I'm one who knocks Leinart "almost" as hard as any. If you think he's a guaranteed bust, well, I cannot go that far. If you see a real possibility of him busting, so do I. My guess is that he will never be a great QB, but he could land in a great situation. If he lands in a bad one, it will be ugly for him. It hasn't "become" chic for me to knock Leinart though. I have been saying the same things since his Sophomore year. And I never knocked either Manning or Palmer, but I did knock Leaf and Rivers. My very high opinion of Palmer was well-documented at another site when it was chic to knock him. But, I've abandoned that site for the more palatable discussion here.

Palmer was obviously very gifted physically. He is alot faster on his feet than he gets credit for. He has a big big arm. He is very strong physically. None of this can be said for Leinart. It's also notable that Chow preferred Cassell to Leinart, and many observers believed Booty outplayed both of them before Leinart was dubbed the heir to Palmer. Whoever emerged from that competition was destined to do what Leinart has done because of the surrounding talent, great coaching, etc. So Leinart is the golden boy, but I assure you all, this guy is no Carson Palmer, and much closer to Joey Harrington (in all aspects physical and mental). I'd much rather build a team around Kyle Orton or Aaron Rodgers. Leinart gets several years leeway from me... to prove me wrong... so we wait and see.

 
Jay Cutler(Vanderbilt) will be a guy who needs to develop a little more physically and watch for a year or two, but will be a starter at the NFL level.

Ive been immensely impressed watching him play this season.
Cutler absolutely carries an awful Vandy team.
 
It's funny how chic it is becoming to knock Leinart.
I think it's funny too. I mean not only does the guy put up huge numbers, he wins.
What's funny to me is that people say "he wins." He has dug his team into three very deep holes this season and his team has climbed out despite Leinart's shoddy play. Does Bush win? Does White win? How about Jarrett, does he win? I never hear anyone saying that-- but two wins are White, Bush and the 0line, another is Bush and Jarrett. I cannot credit Leinart with "winning" any games this season. He's surrounded by studs who have bailed him out... against ND, against ASU, and against Oregon. Put Kyle Orton at USC and you get bigger numbers and more impressive wins.

 
It's funny how chic it is becoming to knock Leinart.
I think it's funny too. I mean not only does the guy put up huge numbers, he wins.
What's funny to me is that people say "he wins." He has dug his team into three very deep holes this season and his team has climbed out despite Leinart's shoddy play. Does Bush win? Does White win? How about Jarrett, does he win? I never hear anyone saying that-- but two wins are White, Bush and the 0line, another is Bush and Jarrett. I cannot credit Leinart with "winning" any games this season. He's surrounded by studs who have bailed him out... against ND, against ASU, and against Oregon. Put Kyle Orton at USC and you get bigger numbers and more impressive wins.
Orton plays QB for the Bears. Why not put Favre or Manning on USC and see if he puts up bigger numbers and more impressive wins. Ifs, wouldas, couldas, are all neat and dandy, all I know is Leinart has won like every game he ever played usually by alot, sometimes had to rally his team. I'm not saying draft him #1, but alot of people are really looking for anything against him to knock him down and I find almost comical.P.S. I am an SEC alum and avid follower of SEC football.

 
It's funny how chic it is becoming to knock Leinart.
I think it's funny too. I mean not only does the guy put up huge numbers, he wins.
What's funny to me is that people say "he wins." He has dug his team into three very deep holes this season and his team has climbed out despite Leinart's shoddy play. Does Bush win? Does White win? How about Jarrett, does he win? I never hear anyone saying that-- but two wins are White, Bush and the 0line, another is Bush and Jarrett. I cannot credit Leinart with "winning" any games this season. He's surrounded by studs who have bailed him out... against ND, against ASU, and against Oregon. Put Kyle Orton at USC and you get bigger numbers and more impressive wins.
Orton plays QB for the Bears. Why not put Favre or Manning on USC and see if he puts up bigger numbers and more impressive wins. Ifs, wouldas, couldas, are all neat and dandy, all I know is Leinart has won like every game he ever played usually by alot, sometimes had to rally his team. I'm not saying draft him #1, but alot of people are really looking for anything against him to knock him down and I find almost comical.P.S. I am an SEC alum and avid follower of SEC football.
I used Orton as an example because he is a raw rookie who IS starting for the Bears, yet he came into the league with very little expectations. To use Favre or Manning would be stupid, and you putting Orton on a list with them is odd. Leinart is coming into the league with HUGE expectations, which I don't think is fair to him, btw. Orton at USC, LAST YEAR, would have bigger numbers and equal hype to Leinart. My point is I think Orton is a better pro prospect, and I thought so last year when he was at Purdue. He should have gone sooner than the 4th round, and Chicago made a nice pick there.

I'm not sure what your SEC association has to do with it, but I am an avid PAC 10 follower and alum. I have seen all but a couple Palmer and Leinart starts at SC. These two are night and day. If Leinart was being discussed as a 4th rounder, like Orton was, then I would have nothing to say about his grade. Grading him as a franchise QB is going to cost some team buying into the hype a ton of money for a product that is very easy to find cheaper... and better.

Again you mention Leinart winning every game he has ever played. Bush, White, the 0-line, Jarrett, have all bailed him out this season or there would be a loss or two on Leinart's head because the Trojans were trailing while relying on Matt who wasn't getting it done. I cannot think of a more talented WR duo in college than Smith and Jarrett, and while there's been some great college backfields, Bush and White are right there with most of them. Of course the QB is going to have huge numbers. Would Brodie Croyle be doing as well as Leinart if he was at SC? Sure, maybe better. He has a much much better arm, and arm strength has cost Leinart several TDs this year.

Did you see Orton's 40 yard zing to Muhammad this weekend? Leinart cannot throw that pass.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
SeniorsMatt Leinart - Will be a pretty good NFL QB but not a top starBrodie Croyle - Should hang around as a #2 and be servicable if needed to playKellen Clemens - Jay Cutler - I like him a lot.Bruce GradkowskiReggie McNeal - Work in progress like Seneca WallaceD.J. Shockley - See McNealBrad Smith - Not as a QB. Maybe at a different positionCharlie Whitehurst - Needs a coach and some patience. Has the toolsMarques Hagans - Another Antwan Randel-El; Great hands and playmakerJuniorsReggie Ball- I'm at GT fan and he has no shot at playing QB in the NFLOmar Jacobs - STAR!!!!!Chris Leak - Should be a pretty good QBTyler Palko - Similar to Croyle, IMOJordan Palmer - Troy Smith - JunkMarcus Vick - Good athlete. Better passer than Big Bro. Will end up in Jail.Jared Zabransky - JunkSam KellerVince Young- Will be goodTrent Edwards - JunkBrady Quinn - See Croyle and PalkoDrew Tate - Drew Stanton

 
I'm a little biased, but I really think Stanton has all the tools. He has cooled a little bit lately this year, but he most likely has a whole other year to keep improving. He is mobile, accurate, smart, tough, a leader. The only question I'm not sure of is arm strength, but from what I have seen this year he has plenty. I'd love to see Mooch get him in here to Detroit.

 
It's funny how chic it is becoming to knock Leinart.
I think it's funny too. I mean not only does the guy put up huge numbers, he wins.
What's funny to me is that people say "he wins." He has dug his team into three very deep holes this season and his team has climbed out despite Leinart's shoddy play. Does Bush win? Does White win? How about Jarrett, does he win? I never hear anyone saying that-- but two wins are White, Bush and the 0line, another is Bush and Jarrett. I cannot credit Leinart with "winning" any games this season. He's surrounded by studs who have bailed him out... against ND, against ASU, and against Oregon. Put Kyle Orton at USC and you get bigger numbers and more impressive wins.
Orton plays QB for the Bears. Why not put Favre or Manning on USC and see if he puts up bigger numbers and more impressive wins. Ifs, wouldas, couldas, are all neat and dandy, all I know is Leinart has won like every game he ever played usually by alot, sometimes had to rally his team. I'm not saying draft him #1, but alot of people are really looking for anything against him to knock him down and I find almost comical.P.S. I am an SEC alum and avid follower of SEC football.
I used Orton as an example because he is a raw rookie who IS starting for the Bears, yet he came into the league with very little expectations. To use Favre or Manning would be stupid, and you putting Orton on a list with them is odd. Leinart is coming into the league with HUGE expectations, which I don't think is fair to him, btw. Orton at USC, LAST YEAR, would have bigger numbers and equal hype to Leinart. My point is I think Orton is a better pro prospect, and I thought so last year when he was at Purdue. He should have gone sooner than the 4th round, and Chicago made a nice pick there.

I'm not sure what your SEC association has to do with it, but I am an avid PAC 10 follower and alum. I have seen all but a couple Palmer and Leinart starts at SC. These two are night and day. If Leinart was being discussed as a 4th rounder, like Orton was, then I would have nothing to say about his grade. Grading him as a franchise QB is going to cost some team buying into the hype a ton of money for a product that is very easy to find cheaper... and better.

Again you mention Leinart winning every game he has ever played. Bush, White, the 0-line, Jarrett, have all bailed him out this season or there would be a loss or two on Leinart's head because the Trojans were trailing while relying on Matt who wasn't getting it done. I cannot think of a more talented WR duo in college than Smith and Jarrett, and while there's been some great college backfields, Bush and White are right there with most of them. Of course the QB is going to have huge numbers. Would Brodie Croyle be doing as well as Leinart if he was at SC? Sure, maybe better. He has a much much better arm, and arm strength has cost Leinart several TDs this year.

Did you see Orton's 40 yard zing to Muhammad this weekend? Leinart cannot throw that pass.
Lucky for us we will be able to see for ourselves next fall.
 
Lucky for us we will be able to see for ourselves next fall.
:thumbup: In fairness to any young QB, Leinart has three years to prove me wrong. If he goes through something like Carr has in Houston, he can have a couple more years. His situation will be as important as what he brings to the table.

I'm not wishing for him to fail, just sharing my opinion. I'm old and being wrong doesn't bother me anymore. Go Matt!!

 
Trent Edwards - Junk
Have you actually watched him play? Stanford would probably be 0-7 without him.
GT would probably be 1-6 without Reggie Ball. He still ain't an NFL QB. Whats your point?
My point is that he's having a pretty strong year and I suspect that you probably haven't even seen him play this season. He's a good player and, unlike Ball, is more than just an athlete playing QB. He's a good passer who's done a fine job running his team's offense despite having a very suspect supporting cast. Edwards was a five star recruit out of high school and is really starting come into his own. I don't think he's a lock to succeed in the NFL, but I think anyone who's dismissing him as "junk" might want to take a closer look.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top