Where are Deuce McAllister, Ahman Green, and Freddy Taylor on your cheatsheet? Those guys are all going 2 or 3 rounds after Lewis, and before anybody notes the different circumstances dont forget that none of them have a guy who's rushed for 1500 yards and 15 tds backing them up. My point is Lewis is not being treated like similar guys in his position are, and i cant understand why. And those guys are playing now.I'm more than willing to take a gamble on an "injury prone" 27-year-old RB with a 2000 yard season to his credit.
Be careful what you wish for...I realize this is mostly coincidence, but I thought it was funny given your comment. This is what you get from 27 year old RBs with 2000 yard seasons under their belt. (and I think only T.Davis's 2000 sample could be categorized as "injury prone".) The best was OJ with 93 combined yards per game and a whopping 4 total TDs. The others were complete disasters.Yeah - I'd be extremely happy w/ J. Lewis as a RB #3. I'm more than willing to take a gamble on an "injury prone" 27-year-old RB with a 2000 yard season to his credit.
J. Lewis = value
Well, part of that is how you view Lewis' injury. I'm in the camp that the Ravens saw what they needed to see and are just resting him up for the regular season.I love Mike Anderson - I took him last year as my #2 RB and his 1000 yards and 13tds were very much appreciated. But @ 33 I don't see him as a threat to Lewis - he's insurance, nothing more.Where are Deuce McAllister, Ahman Green, and Freddy Taylor on your cheatsheet? Those guys are all going 2 or 3 rounds after Lewis, and before anybody notes the different circumstances dont forget that none of them have a guy who's rushed for 1500 yards and 15 tds backing them up. My point is Lewis is not being treated like similar guys in his position are, and i cant understand why. And those guys are playing now.I'm more than willing to take a gamble on an "injury prone" 27-year-old RB with a 2000 yard season to his credit.
No team can just run that much--get real. That's the formula for the Ravens success?? Easier said than done my man. Defenses will put 8 guys in the box and good luck to running against that.
You're right - none of them have the wonderous Mike Anderson, who in his illustrious multi-year career put up those numbers (and anywhere close to those numbers) once - in what most agree is the most RB friendly offense EVAH. McAllister has one of the most talented RBs to come out of college in recent histroy as his "backup" - Green is coming off a more serious injury and is splitting time with 2 other backs and Taylor is much older (and much more injury prone). The fact is, the reason Lewis isn't being treated like guys in similar circumstances, is the guys you cited AREN'T in similar circumstances. In all 3 of your cases, the back of the future is the "backup" - in Jamal's case, he IS the back of the forseeable future - it's Anderson who is in the twilight of his less-than-amazing career.mbuehner said:Where are Deuce McAllister, Ahman Green, and Freddy Taylor on your cheatsheet? Those guys are all going 2 or 3 rounds after Lewis, and before anybody notes the different circumstances dont forget that none of them have a guy who's rushed for 1500 yards and 15 tds backing them up. My point is Lewis is not being treated like similar guys in his position are, and i cant understand why. And those guys are playing now.I'm more than willing to take a gamble on an "injury prone" 27-year-old RB with a 2000 yard season to his credit.
No team can just run that much--get real. That's the formula for the Ravens success?? Easier said than done my man. Defenses will put 8 guys in the box and good luck to running against that.Uhhh...I think the Ravens have faced 8 man fronts since Jamal has been there. They've never had a qb that scared defenses and keep them honest. It's always been about Jamal. Now that McNair is there defenses will have to play honest...no more 8 man fronts or McNair will pick them apart with Heap and Mason. I think it is very possible for Baltimore to run 500 times. I suspect Jamal will have a nice year...not great, but respectable. I just hope he stays healthy.
Agreed. The goal of every team (except for Martz teams) is to run the ball and play good defense. If teams can run they will. Having teams respect the pass will only open up the run. It's what they've been trying to do for years in Balt with no success.No team can just run that much--get real. That's the formula for the Ravens success?? Easier said than done my man. Defenses will put 8 guys in the box and good luck to running against that.Uhhh...I think the Ravens have faced 8 man fronts since Jamal has been there. They've never had a qb that scared defenses and keep them honest. It's always been about Jamal. Now that McNair is there defenses will have to play honest...no more 8 man fronts or McNair will pick them apart with Heap and Mason. I think it is very possible for Baltimore to run 500 times. I suspect Jamal will have a nice year...not great, but respectable. I just hope he stays healthy.
Ironically, people are saying "They got McNair - they aint gonna run" The fact that they got McNair is exatly WHY they will be able to run. Teams can't just put 8+ in the box - they're going to have to respect the Raven's passing game (did I just say 'Raven's passing game'?) If Billick has run 450+ times with 8 in the box - how often will he run when teams start dropping safties and LBs into coverage?I'm not saying, I'm just saying.
The 1226 all purpose yards and 13 TDs he scored last year in 15 games wasnt close? You really want to talk about one year flukes in a Jamal Lewis thread? The guy who scored twice as many TDs in his big year than he ever did before or since?You throw out both their big years and they both come out 4.1 y/c lifetime.You're right - none of them have the wonderous Mike Anderson, who in his illustrious multi-year career put up those numbers (and anywhere close to those numbers) once - in what most agree is the most RB friendly offense EVAH.
Boy, where to start. First of all, i can hear the Musa Smith owners grousing about being left out of the conversation. Secondly, unless you think Sam Gado and Greg Jones have showcased something i dont think they have, Mike Anderson is a heck of a bigger threat. Check out their respective paychecks to see if their GMs agree. And whip on Anderson all you like, his statistics are nearly identical to Lewis's... except Anderson hasnt fallen off a full yard per carry the last 2 years running, and he isnt on the trainers table half the year.In all 3 of your cases, the back of the future is the "backup" - in Jamal's case, he IS the back of the forseeable future - it's Anderson who is in the twilight of his less-than-amazing career.
he's not in Denver either...The 1226 all purpose yards and 13 TDs he scored last year in 15 games wasnt close? You really want to talk about one year flukes in a Jamal Lewis thread? The guy who scored twice as many TDs in his big year than he ever did before or since?You throw out both their big years and they both come out 4.1 y/c lifetime.You're right - none of them have the wonderous Mike Anderson, who in his illustrious multi-year career put up those numbers (and anywhere close to those numbers) once - in what most agree is the most RB friendly offense EVAH.Boy, where to start. First of all, i can hear the Musa Smith owners grousing about being left out of the conversation. Secondly, unless you think Sam Gado and Greg Jones have showcased something i dont think they have, Mike Anderson is a heck of a bigger threat. Check out their respective paychecks to see if their GMs agree. And whip on Anderson all you like, his statistics are nearly identical to Lewis's... except Anderson hasnt fallen off a full yard per carry the last 2 years running, and he isnt on the trainers table half the year.In all 3 of your cases, the back of the future is the "backup" - in Jamal's case, he IS the back of the forseeable future - it's Anderson who is in the twilight of his less-than-amazing career.
For starters, Jamal hasn't had the benefit of playing in Denver his whole career (and Anderson no longer does either) I think Olandis Gary, Quentin Griffin, Tatum Bell, and Ron Dayne are pretty available in most drafts. Second, Jamal will be turning 27 - Anderson will be 33. Third, in Jamal's 7 year career, he has had 2 seasons when he DIDN'T have 1,000+ rushing yards, Anderson had only had 2 where he DID. I wouldn't exactly call Anderson the model of consistency. In terms of TDs - Lewis has had 6+ TD's 4 seasons, Anderson only two.The 1226 all purpose yards and 13 TDs he scored last year in 15 games wasnt close? You really want to talk about one year flukes in a Jamal Lewis thread? The guy who scored twice as many TDs in his big year than he ever did before or since?You throw out both their big years and they both come out 4.1 y/c lifetime.
You are correct on one point here - Anderson hasn't dropped off over 1 yard per carry in the past two years - he didn't even PLAY in 2004. Again - in Taylor's case, he's on the wrong side of 30 (he's already 33) and there are other backs in the backfield's of Jacksonville and Green Bay other than Jones and Gado. Is Anderson a capable backup? Certainly. Is he a threat to steal Lewis' starting job if Lewis is remotely close to healthy? No. Are the chances of Jamal being healthy by game 1 better than Taylor's or Green's? I think so.Boy, where to start. First of all, i can hear the Musa Smith owners grousing about being left out of the conversation. Secondly, unless you think Sam Gado and Greg Jones have showcased something i dont think they have, Mike Anderson is a heck of a bigger threat. Check out their respective paychecks to see if their GMs agree. And whip on Anderson all you like, his statistics are nearly identical to Lewis's... except Anderson hasnt fallen off a full yard per carry the last 2 years running, and he isnt on the trainers table half the year.
And I dont recall any of those guys approaching what Anderson did in 2000 or 2005. Now Reuban Droughns and Clinton Portis on the other hand seem to have done ok for themselves? So how much is the Denver scheme and how much is Denver grooming good backs?I think Olandis Gary, Quentin Griffin, Tatum Bell, and Ron Dayne are pretty available in most drafts.
Lewis has managed to compile some decent seasons. But he needs 300+ carries to do it. Which he cant do anymore, making the point moot.In terms of TDs - Lewis has had 6+ TD's 4 seasons, Anderson only two.
Again - in Taylor's case, he's on the wrong side of 30 (he's already 33) and there are other backs in the backfield's of Jacksonville...
# 28 Fred Taylor
Position: RB
Height: 6-1
Weight: 234
Born: 01/27/1976
My bad - good catch. I was arguing with someone else about Curtis Martin earlierAgain - in Taylor's case, he's on the wrong side of 30 (he's already 33) and there are other backs in the backfield's of Jacksonville...
# 28 Fred Taylor
Position: RB
Height: 6-1
Weight: 234
Born: 01/27/1976
Last yr was your first year watching football huh?Please Lord, don't make me have to watch Jamal shuffling his big slow butt to the line 500 times.How in the world that hump ran for 2 grand is beyond me. They should include the offensive line in that stat.
I like your points - I even like the way you back them up with stats, but as you can likely tell by my sig, you can pretty much make stats say what you want. First off, Lewis had 269 carries last year - coming off jail time and an ankle injury (which he tried to rehab while in prison). 3 of the last 4 seasons Lewis has played in 15+ games (in 2004, he was suspended for 4 games - hence not making the 15 game plateau). I'm not exactly sure where you get the assertion that Lewis is not capable of playing through injury.Taylor, on the other hand has reached 15+ GP exactly twice in his career. Green missed 11 games last year, as did McAllister. (Taylor missed 5 games last year). The point is simply that McAllister, Taylor and Green are still all recovering from major injuries (or in Taylor's case, just a lot of them). Lewis is already recovered, therefore, he is ahead of the other 3. Certainly I am not saying that all 4 don't stand an equal chance of getting hurt - I'm simply saying that as of right now, Lewis seems to be the healthiest of the 4.Lewis has managed to compile some decent seasons. But he needs 300+ carries to do it. Which he cant do anymore, making the point moot.
You'll note you are putting words in my mouth to begin with. My argument isnt that a healthy Anderson will overtake a healthy Lewis, because that isnt a viable scenario. Lewis will get banged up, and its at that point that Anderson will start eating carries. because thats what happens to Lewis. And same deal with the Green, McAllister, Taylor argument- its not an argument over who is good or better, its an argument of why those guys have the high likelihood of injury factored into their projections but Lewis doesnt seem to.
But the coach said so, so it must be true.bet ya $100 that they don't