Billy Bats
Footballguy
Well it's only fitting that Rhianna is singing the opening song for TNF. You can't make this #### up.
Horrible. :(I'm not sure the prosecutor isn't going to see such "calls".So why isn't NOW out there calling for the police chief and DA to resign?
Well...The companies really don't want to bail on the NFL - the advertising exposure that you get via the NFL is second to none. They may issue press releases saying they're "reevaluating their relationship with the NFL", but that'll just be saber rattling and I don't even think it'll come to that. A Goodell firing will be a nice clean bow to put on this that saves everyone's face and, more importantly, their lucrative economic relationships.I think that a company will bail first, which will lead to the real pressure on Goodell.Goodell will be gone long before that happens. There are phone calls going on right now about that I'm sure. Fire Goodell, promise reforms, and everyone saves face and continues doing business.Playbook says sponsors must start bailing.
To be fair to the prosecutor, Ray Rice is famousHorrible. :(I'm not sure the prosecutor isn't going to see such "calls".So why isn't NOW out there calling for the police chief and DA to resign?
Are you serious?Well it's only fitting that Rhianna is singing the opening song for TNF. You can't make this #### up.
Yup, throat clearing. I guess it's started then. They've got female customers/clients/business owners who they need to posture for too.Well...The companies really don't want to bail on the NFL - the advertising exposure that you get via the NFL is second to none. They may issue press releases saying they're "reevaluating their relationship with the NFL", but that'll just be saber rattling and I don't even think it'll come to that. A Goodell firing will be a nice clean bow to put on this that saves everyone's face and, more importantly, their lucrative economic relationships.I think that a company will bail first, which will lead to the real pressure on Goodell.Goodell will be gone long before that happens. There are phone calls going on right now about that I'm sure. Fire Goodell, promise reforms, and everyone saves face and continues doing business.Playbook says sponsors must start bailing.
@Marriott As a league partner, closely following situation. We trust NFL will address matter appropriately.
7:26pm - 10 Sep 14
Along those lines.Goodell will be gone long before that happens. There are phone calls going on right now about that I'm sure. Fire Goodell, promise reforms, and everyone saves face and continues doing business.Playbook says sponsors must start bailing.
League partner and hotel chain Marriott said it was "closely following the situation."
"We trust that the NFL will address the matter appropriately," a statement on Marriott's Twitter account said.
And you'd have a hard time calling him racist.To be fair to the prosecutor, Ray Rice is famousHorrible. :(I'm not sure the prosecutor isn't going to see such "calls".So why isn't NOW out there calling for the police chief and DA to resign?
correctedTo be fair to the prosecutor, Ray Rice is INfamousHorrible. :(I'm not sure the prosecutor isn't going to see such "calls".So why isn't NOW out there calling for the police chief and DA to resign?
who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
Are you serious?Well it's only fitting that Rhianna is singing the opening song for TNF. You can't make this #### up.![]()
They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
Marriott is also a very morally guided organization. Morman family (although they don't project their beliefs on employees, actually are quite liberal in that re: benies etc) that does try to do the "right thing" as I understand it.They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
Makes sense that their latest campaign is "Remove Roger Goodell." Started about an hour ago. Think it'll be catchy.They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
It only makes sense- why sleep on the couch when you can crash at Marriott?They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
"Our elevators have no railings."It only makes sense- why sleep on the couch when you can crash at Marriott?They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
More like "no beds at the shelter and we have some spare rooms? Let's call a domestic violence shelter and offer some women and their kids a place to stay while their insane husbands are getting out on bail."It only makes sense- why sleep on the couch when you can crash at Marriott?They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
Pretty awesome if that's what they do.More like "no beds at the shelter and we have some spare rooms? Let's call a domestic violence shelter and offer some women and their kids a place to stay while their insane husbands are getting out on bail."It only makes sense- why sleep on the couch when you can crash at Marriott?They spend a huge amount of money on domestic violence charities. I don't known for sure, but I suspect they donate more to domestic violence charities than any other non-charitable corporation in the country.who could forget their campaign, "Instead of hitting your wife, take a break... stay at a Marriott"Marriott puts a lot of money toward domestic violence. They will take a stand on this if it gets too crazy.
What that would represent, imo, is the beginning of a larger exodus. If a company were to do THAT, plenty of others would likely follow.Marriott is the official hotel chain of the NFL, right? What would happen if they withdrew from that contract and then cancelled all NFL team reservations, do you think?
Marriott, who has undoubtedly pre-paid for the privilege of calling themselves a "partner", would undboutedly seek some of their money back; meanwhile the NFL might pursue them for breach of contract to the extent future payments were obligated under the contract. There'd be some negotiating and likely a settlement.Marriott is the official hotel chain of the NFL, right? What would happen if they withdrew from that contract and then cancelled all NFL team reservations, do you think?
Goodell would be gone before it got to that.Marriott, who has undoubtedly pre-paid for the privilege of calling themselves a "partner", would undboutedly seek some of their money back; meanwhile the NFL might pursue them for breach of contract to the extent future payments were obligated under the contract. There'd be some negotiating and likely a settlement.Marriott is the official hotel chain of the NFL, right? What would happen if they withdrew from that contract and then cancelled all NFL team reservations, do you think?
Considering Senator Blumenthal lied about his own military service and then stuffed his presser with Legion guys that kept chanting "hooah!" on the dais while offering no apologies for lying, he really ought shut the #### up.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
You really think the NFL calculations would result in math that suggests they should battle for some millions now, at the potential expense of tens of, hundreds of, thousands of millions going forward from feeding into a perspective that the NFL cares more about its brand than about the welfare of beaten women (even if that's the case?)Marriott, who has undoubtedly pre-paid for the privilege of calling themselves a "partner", would undboutedly seek some of their money back; meanwhile the NFL might pursue them for breach of contract to the extent future payments were obligated under the contract. There'd be some negotiating and likely a settlement.Marriott is the official hotel chain of the NFL, right? What would happen if they withdrew from that contract and then cancelled all NFL team reservations, do you think?
This is not about Blumenthal.Considering Senator Blumenthal lied about his own military service and then stuffed his presser with Legion guys that kept chanting "hooah!" on the dais while offering no apologies for lying, he really ought shut the #### up.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
And I have no love for Goodell.
Last ditch attempt at saving Goodell's job. And at keeping a sponsor or sponsors from jumping ship. The NFL better hope no more leaks come out, and that's something they don't control. Right now the league has the public's attention, and not in the way the NFL wants.Former FBI Director Robert S. Mueller III will conduct an independent investigation into the NFL's pursuit and handling of evidence in the Ray Rice domestic violence incident, Commissioner Roger Goodell announced Wednesday night.Director Mueller's investigation will be overseen by NFL owners John Mara of the New York Giants and Art Rooney of the Pittsburgh Steelers, and the final report will be made public. Mara and Rooney are both attorneys.
I don't know the details, but IIRC the NFL has some minor anti-trust exemption something to do with broadcasting games.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
Wow. I don't think y'all are getting it here. This has far less to do with Congress' legitimacy interjecting in this manner (seriously, Congress is pathetic at this point, moreso than Goodell) and far more with public opinoin (ya know, ratings, sponsors and advertisers and the ultimate lifeline of any entertainment gig).I don't know the details, but IIRC the NFL has some minor anti-trust exemption something to do with broadcasting games.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
An individual Senator or Congressman, can comment all they want, I don't care, but Congress has no role in this.
"Ought" was kind of a key word in my post.This is not about Blumenthal.Considering Senator Blumenthal lied about his own military service and then stuffed his presser with Legion guys that kept chanting "hooah!" on the dais while offering no apologies for lying, he really ought shut the #### up.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
And I have no love for Goodell.
And his views are not his alone.
Oh, and he's still a ####### Senator while we are bantering on a message board.
This hurts. As of 4 hours ago, I didn't see any real way that Goodell would be at risk of actually losing his job.
As of right now? It's over.
Who has legitimate moral authority aside, Blumenthal hardly rises to the level of Marion Barry. Please."Ought" was kind of a key word in my post.This is not about Blumenthal.Considering Senator Blumenthal lied about his own military service and then stuffed his presser with Legion guys that kept chanting "hooah!" on the dais while offering no apologies for lying, he really ought shut the #### up.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
And I have no love for Goodell.
And his views are not his alone.
Oh, and he's still a ####### Senator while we are bantering on a message board.
This hurts. As of 4 hours ago, I didn't see any real way that Goodell would be at risk of actually losing his job.
As of right now? It's over.
Sure he has power. The fools in my state gave it to him. It's like Marion Barry smoking crack, saying "##### set me up!," and getting re-elected. Sure, there's power, but it has little to no moral authority. Just authority, plain and simple.
I understand, our only disagreement is with your comment that Congress is involved.Wow. I don't think y'all are getting it here. This has far less to do with Congress' legitimacy interjecting in this manner (seriously, Congress is pathetic at this point, moreso than Goodell) and far more with public opinoin (ya know, ratings, sponsors and advertisers and the ultimate lifeline of any entertainment gig).I don't know the details, but IIRC the NFL has some minor anti-trust exemption something to do with broadcasting games.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
An individual Senator or Congressman, can comment all they want, I don't care, but Congress has no role in this.
And public opinion is not going the right way. Senators commenting as to that fact is not going to help. And yes, it will make it worse.
In a southern drone... "heh... Well... heh, heh... thatall dee-pends on what the meanin' of "have" is. Heh heh.Or like Goodell saying the NFL didn't have the video.
I meant from the public dialogue perspective, not from any actual legislative issues nor Congressional actions.I understand, our only disagreement is with your comment that Congress is involved.Wow. I don't think y'all are getting it here. This has far less to do with Congress' legitimacy interjecting in this manner (seriously, Congress is pathetic at this point, moreso than Goodell) and far more with public opinoin (ya know, ratings, sponsors and advertisers and the ultimate lifeline of any entertainment gig).I don't know the details, but IIRC the NFL has some minor anti-trust exemption something to do with broadcasting games.Well, now Congress is involved.
Regardless of your views on that (although they do hold some legit place due to their antitrust law exceptions with are Congressional mandates), ####'s getting REAL.
Senator Blumenthal from CT just laid out Goodell.
“Recent reports that the NFL had the Ray Rice battering video point to Roger Goodell’s burgeoning, insurmountable credibility gap,” Blumenthal said in a statement issued through his office. “If these reports are true, Commissioner Goodell must go, for the good of the NFL and its fans. The current leadership of the NFL cannot be trusted to fairly, genuinely implement policies that address domestic violence. As Roger Goodell himself said several years ago when allegations arose that the New Orleans Saints offered bounties for injuring opponents, ‘ignorance is not an excuse.’
That last line is key. Going to be hard for Rog to wiggle out of this one. Ignorance, is not an excuse.
(Can't deny a bit of schaudenfraude here. When you are a greater than thou, judge, jury and executioner and then you become the plaintiff, it's going to be rough and deservedly so).
An individual Senator or Congressman, can comment all they want, I don't care, but Congress has no role in this.
And public opinion is not going the right way. Senators commenting as to that fact is not going to help. And yes, it will make it worse.
I agree with everything else you said.
I agree and said as much before; I was writing up more what would happen if Marriott wanted to follow through on the threat regardless.Goodell would be gone before it got to that.Marriott, who has undoubtedly pre-paid for the privilege of calling themselves a "partner", would undboutedly seek some of their money back; meanwhile the NFL might pursue them for breach of contract to the extent future payments were obligated under the contract. There'd be some negotiating and likely a settlement.Marriott is the official hotel chain of the NFL, right? What would happen if they withdrew from that contract and then cancelled all NFL team reservations, do you think?
http://7online.com/sports/roddy-white-say-we-messed-up/303661/"I fear the failure of the NFL to understand the scope and severity of this act of domestic violence has already led to significant damage for vulnerable members of society,'' Republican Sen. Dean Heller of Nevada said, adding that he was "highly disappointed'' that Goodell and the NFL did not take severe action against Rice until after the security video was made public.
"By waiting to act until it was made public you effectively condoned the action of the perpetrator himself,'' Heller wrote in his letter to Goodell. "I cannot and will not tolerate that position by anybody, let alone the National Football League.''
You mean as opposed to the circumspection they've displayed on this issue to date?You really think the NFL calculations would result in math that suggests they should battle for some millions now, at the potential expense of tens of, hundreds of, thousands of millions going forward from feeding into a perspective that the NFL cares more about its brand than about the welfare of beaten women (even if that's the case?)Marriott, who has undoubtedly pre-paid for the privilege of calling themselves a "partner", would undboutedly seek some of their money back; meanwhile the NFL might pursue them for breach of contract to the extent future payments were obligated under the contract. There'd be some negotiating and likely a settlement.Marriott is the official hotel chain of the NFL, right? What would happen if they withdrew from that contract and then cancelled all NFL team reservations, do you think?
probably should be a spin off thread.Who has legitimate moral authority aside, Blumenthal hardly rises to the level of Marion Barry. Please.
I would rather vote for an embarrassed crack smoker than a guy that calculatedly and deliberately lies about his military service for almost forty years and then doesn't apologize for it.
YMMV.
On May 17, 2010, prior to the Democratic convention, The New York Times published an article citing a speech delivered by Blumenthal in Norwalk, Connecticut in which he referred to having served "in Vietnam".[101] Beyond the 2006 Norwalk speech, there was evidence of a 2003 occasion when Blumenthal appeared to suggest he'd been amongst those returning from Vietnam.[102] The campaign of a prospective Blumenthal opponent, Republican Linda McMahon, briefly posted on its website that her campaign research team had found video footage of the speech and provided the story to The Times.[102][103] After the Times story was published, Rasmussen Reports indicated that Blumenthal's lead over McMahon had shrunk to three percentage points.[104]Politico covered criticism of the Times, including from the left, which noted that Blumenthal had accurately described his military service record at the outset of his Norwalk speech by saying he had "served in the military during the Vietnam era in the Marine Corps". Politico also quoted Times editor Bill Keller writing that Blumenthal's introductory statement "does not contradict his later statement that he served ‘in Vietnam’".[105] Connecticut's The Day newspaper, meanwhile, stated that its staff could find no articles in its archives with any suggestion by Blumenthal that he had served in Vietnam but also noted the 2003 and 2008 occasions. It quoted Blumenthal defending his representation of his military service: "On a few occasions, I have misspoken about my service and I regret that. I take full responsibility, but I will not allow anyone to take a few misplaced words and impugn my record of military service."[102] Blumenthal's commanding officer in 1974 and 1975, Larry Baldino of Woodbridge, CT, addressed the misspeaking in a letter to the editor to the New Haven Register. Baldino opined that the misleading statement was too 'petty' to be the basis for supporting or not supporting Blumenthal. Baldino further portrayed Blumenthal as 'good natured' and described him as 'one of the best Marines with whom I ever worked'.[106]
Yep.This is really insane.
It should be a spin-off, but the Wiki story was the left's story. It was perfectly replicated in a state that has no national Republican representatives at any federal level, and identifies as deep blue. And whose paper, as you can imagine, runs the same temp.probably should be a spin off thread.Who has legitimate moral authority aside, Blumenthal hardly rises to the level of Marion Barry. Please.
I would rather vote for an embarrassed crack smoker than a guy that calculatedly and deliberately lies about his military service for almost forty years and then doesn't apologize for it.
YMMV.
From wiki, what I think is a fair summary of the issue.
On May 17, 2010, prior to the Democratic convention, The New York Times published an article citing a speech delivered by Blumenthal in Norwalk, Connecticut in which he referred to having served "in Vietnam".[101] Beyond the 2006 Norwalk speech, there was evidence of a 2003 occasion when Blumenthal appeared to suggest he'd been amongst those returning from Vietnam.[102] The campaign of a prospective Blumenthal opponent, Republican Linda McMahon, briefly posted on its website that her campaign research team had found video footage of the speech and provided the story to The Times.[102][103] After the Times story was published, Rasmussen Reports indicated that Blumenthal's lead over McMahon had shrunk to three percentage points.[104]Politico covered criticism of the Times, including from the left, which noted that Blumenthal had accurately described his military service record at the outset of his Norwalk speech by saying he had "served in the military during the Vietnam era in the Marine Corps". Politico also quoted Times editor Bill Keller writing that Blumenthal's introductory statement "does not contradict his later statement that he served ‘in Vietnam’".[105] Connecticut's The Day newspaper, meanwhile, stated that its staff could find no articles in its archives with any suggestion by Blumenthal that he had served in Vietnam but also noted the 2003 and 2008 occasions. It quoted Blumenthal defending his representation of his military service: "On a few occasions, I have misspoken about my service and I regret that. I take full responsibility, but I will not allow anyone to take a few misplaced words and impugn my record of military service."[102] Blumenthal's commanding officer in 1974 and 1975, Larry Baldino of Woodbridge, CT, addressed the misspeaking in a letter to the editor to the New Haven Register. Baldino opined that the misleading statement was too 'petty' to be the basis for supporting or not supporting Blumenthal. Baldino further portrayed Blumenthal as 'good natured' and described him as 'one of the best Marines with whom I ever worked'.[106]
Unprecedented.Yep.This is really insane.