What is a good approximate value for Edmonds in a PPR dynasty league?
Responses are likely to be all over the map because he's still such an unknown quantity that almost any outcome for his career is plausible.
One big game doesn't conclusively prove anything about his future, so it's hard to assess whether he's a Chris Carson/Arian Foster/Willie Parker/Priest Holmes or just a Tre Mason/Spencer Ware/Branden Oliver/Quentin Griffin. Is he a guy who will endure over time or just a flash in the pan? There have been a lot of the latter and not many who have made the jump to reliable FF asset. My sincere take at the moment:
1. David Johnson is overrated. I'm sorry, but that's the sense I get from reading this thread. Too much weight is being given to things that happened years ago, and not enough emphasis is being placed on his recent form. He's looked mediocre all year and I think his superstar status is more fragile than name brand value alone would dictate. With that being the case, the immediate opportunity here may be better than we've initially believed.
2. Chase Edmonds is underrated. I was bullish on him as a draft prospect and I thought he looked decent last year, but this year he has seemingly taken a step forward and even before his breakout game there were signs that he was on the cusp. He's looked bigger and quicker than I would've expected, and some of his individual runs and plays have been very impressive. Given that he was a small school guy who had injury problems in his final college season, his late 4th round draft slot in 2018 can perhaps be explained beyond him just being mediocre. I think there's a chance that he will not only be solid, but exceptional. He reminds me a little bit of Tiki Barber, Priest Holmes, or Brian Westbrook in size, play style, and skill set.
So where's the reasonable middle ground when you're trying to assign a reasonable value? For me, he has already shown enough that I wouldn't take a 2nd round rookie pick. Those are good picks, but the hit rate is going to be around 35% long-term and I think he's probably more likely to provide value than a random 2nd rounder now that he has shown some big hints of competence. On the other hand, an early first seems like an overpay since there's still a considerable risk that he'll fade into JAG territory over time.
For me, that suggests that he's worth a late 1st right now. If he flops and he's an irrelevant backup in 12-15 months, you'll be annoyed that you didn't exit right now. On the other hand, if this is the next Priest Holmes or Arian Foster and you let him walk for a modest profit at the first sign of his value exploding, you will also be kicking yourself. Either outcome is possible, but I see enough special qualities that I wouldn't want to get rid of him lightly.
As I may have said before, the fact that few people were onto Edmonds until very recently and that most of his dynasty/redraft owners likely acquired him for a pittance is going to have them treating him like found money and being happy to turn a "profit" off any modest trade package they receive for him. I'd caution against that because, while the risk of long-term irrelevance is considerable, there's also a chance that you just lucked into a top 10-15 PPR back and if you're not getting offered something substantial then there may be a lot more upside in holding.