He's carried the ball 8 times for 13 yards...he's just a big back. Claiming his stakes to be the vulture if nothing else.I knew it! Stud!
Touches ended up being 13 for McCoy, 11 for Darrel W. Not sure of snap counts.Was in the whole last series and I believe most of the one before that. That’s a lot of trust by Reid
He’s trusted enough to be in that late is telling IMO. I didn’t watch the whole game but it seemed like he was on for a lot of the snaps as well.Cheap points but I needed them and will take them.
Does the 40 yds receiving count?He's carried the ball 8 times for 13 yards...he's just a big back. Claiming his stakes to be the vulture if nothing else.
It does, but one catch was for like 30 yards, right?Does the 40 yds receiving count?
Him being in on the final drives is pretty telling IMO.I don't know, however, if we cleared anything up about this backfield.
Sure, that he's trusted. Not sure I see that clearly translating into a role. (ETA and by role, I mean having a solid split with Shady going forward).Him being in on the final drives is pretty telling IMO.
It would have been cause for concern if he was benched after the fumble... the fact that his involvement went up AFTER the fumble says a lot.You gotta be happy but the fumble is cause for concern.
You gotta believe this kid is being groomed for more touches. Maybe the other Williams comes back but perhaps McCoy is iffy at that point...there is room for a solid RB2 on this roster that is a better option to gain yds and also is much younger than the other guy...this is best case scenario for owners minus the fumble.
He snagged a 30 yard laser from Mahomes over the middle of the field. He showed good hands on his college video.
This is a good question... would love to know the answer to that.Was McCoy injured at the end of the game?
Fair question. Seems Shady will be the between the 20s guy.Was McCoy injured at the end of the game?
I don't think so. I think Darrel was used as the passing down/two minute drill RB all game. McCoy is the pure runner?This is a good question... would love to know the answer to that.
Why more valuable?He's the passing game back on the best offense in the league.
Wow. Damien 2.0? More valuable than Damien was?
To be clear I'm asking rather than stating that - but I'd say because Damien is a 27 year old retread, and Darrel is a 24 year old with more perceived potential?Why more valuable?
If I remember correctly, he had 3 carries inside the 5, and there was one play around their own 30 that was blown up in the backfield, didn’t have a chance.Touches ended up being 13 for McCoy, 11 for Darrel W. Not sure of snap counts.
A little worried about Darrel's 8 carries for 13 yards. Did several short-yardage attempts skew his average, or was he getting stoned? Not that 8 carries is much of a sample size, but still.
Ok fair enough.To be clear I'm asking rather than stating that - but I'd say because Damien is a 27 year old retread, and Darrel is a 24 year old with more perceived potential?
Should be = Special teamer (if McCoy&Darrel Williams healthy)What happens when Damien williams is back?
Kinda my thoughts too. Who do you target thoughHe may never get 2 rushing TDs again. By my count, the KC RBs had 13 total rushing TDs last year (Hunt-7, William-4, Ware-2). I'd try to trade him this week.
The McCoy or Damien owner. Damien had an ADP of RB-15 during the preseason. McCoy was around 40. The Damien owner might give up more.Kinda my thoughts too. Who do you target though
Home versus Indy next week looks pretty juicy.He may never get 2 rushing TDs again. By my count, the KC RBs had 13 total rushing TDs last year (Hunt-7, William-4, Ware-2). I'd try to trade him this week.
Dude you should drop him and Carson and move on to the better options in your league.Sure, that he's trusted. Not sure I see that clearly translating into a role. (ETA and by role, I mean having a solid split with Shady going forward).
I'm excited as everyone about his points today. I don't see how this means anything about what it may mean for Darell going forward, do you?
There's a difference between him being trusted -- and I agree him getting the ball after he fumbled is a great sign -- and securing a dependable role.Dude you should drop him and Carson and move on to the better options in your league.
Seriously, yes. The guy fumbled, I was super worried. Posted on this thread in fact. They went back to him when the game is on the line. So... if you don't see how that bodes well not sure what to say. As was pointed by others: they trust him.
IIRC, Ivory was the money back in Buffalo. I think one of the Williams will be the GL/short yardage back when they want the option of powering it in.Jesus, this guy, for all the guys you call JAG, is the biggest jagbag of grab bags. I'm just gonna call this guy bag from now on.
8 for 13 to Shady's 11 for 56.
He did replace him late. If anyone can tell me what that means, I'll certainly listen.
Hoo baby, this is funny.
Yeah, Chris Ivory was a really good short yardage back and Shady's running style is conducive to losses on the goal line.IIRC, Ivory was the money back in Buffalo. I think one of the Williams will be the GL/short yardage back when they want the option of powering it in.
It is interesting how Darrel Williams put up roughly the same numbers as Todd Gurley today, yet the perception is so different: Darrel Williams is the toast of those who picked him up, and Todd Gurley is simply toast.Jesus, this guy, for all the guys you call JAG, is the biggest jagbag of grab bags. I'm just gonna call this guy bag from now on.
8 for 13 to Shady's 11 for 56.
He did replace him late. If anyone can tell me what that means, I'll certainly listen.
Hoo baby, this is funny.
Nicely worded. What was that old Mad TV dating show? Lowered Expectations?It is interesting how Darrel Williams put up roughly the same numbers as Todd Gurley today, yet the perception is so different: Darrel Williams is the toast of those who picked him up, and Todd Gurley is simply toast.
I think this is a pretty universal sentiment of people on the board. I wish it were not so, but holding a bench space seems imperative if you've got one of the three. DT not so much.The fact that we’ve seen numerous RBs be productive in this backfield over the past year + means you have to hold any piece of it and bide your time. Whether it’s Shady, DWill Squared or even Darwin, don’t cut one of these guys at any time unless they are IRed.
Sometimes you need to look at the cost of roster spots in finding a way through byes and the dynamism of which you speak. Holding three or four spots in shorter bench leagues for running backs can be really counterproductive. I usually roll with bare essentials -- like no backup QB, and even I can't afford the extra spots for all those guys. Eventually, you pick your elixir and go with what your eyes tell you about the talent and situation. Right now, IMHO, Shady looks like the best back by far there. I'm holding McCoy and Darrel Williams in my main league (some guy drafted Damien early second in that one...eesh.)Just the fact that these three should be universally rostered tells you that Darwin should also be rostered. Crazy #### can happen in an 8-10 week span in the NFL.
Well he’s also the passing down back so he should supplement with catching TDs too.SoBeDad said:He may never get 2 rushing TDs again. By my count, the KC RBs had 13 total rushing TDs last year (Hunt-7, William-4, Ware-2). I'd try to trade him this week.