unckeyherb
Footballguy
Dude is a beast. Need his production this year.
Is it known if we will have a definitive answer on this debacle today?The Elliot watch begins again. I'm guessing it will be another 5 pm eastern thing.
Nothing about this ever seems definitive but everything I have read says today is it for this season.Is it known if we will have a definitive answer on this debacle today?
She was the first that I saw to post the news last time.Amy Dash on CBS is a good follow, she also thinks he plays the season.
Yeah and one of the few to make a stance for awhile and stick by it. Answers everyone's questions. Hope she's right.She was the first that I saw to post the news last time.
Pete Brush was also quick and correct about everything.
Everything is trending to the judge delaying this. Of course that means she will uphold the suspension immediately because this has been the bizzaro world case.Yeah and one of the few to make a stance for awhile and stick by it. Answers everyone's questions. Hope she's right.
That is the NFL for sure.The General said:Everything is trending to the judge delaying this. Of course that means she will uphold the suspension immediately because this has been the bizzaro world case.
500 pm ET, that's a late hearing.ourmanflint said:
If you can't understand plain English, that's your problem. Please go Google "lack" and "cooperation" and see it if defines either word as ANYTHING, like you seem to think."Lack of cooperation" could mean ANYTHING. And where are the details about Zeke wiping his phone after the request? Where are the details about what he even did to get suspended in the first place?
Just stop.
I'm playing against the Zeke owner in Week 12...with a little luck, he'll be on suspension.The General said:The Daniel Wallach guy that people cite in here and Pete Brush on Twitter will have this covered today. I’m just here to help myself cope with losing my main cog of my fantasy team which is really what is most important here.
Wow. Find another place to trollIf you can't understand plain English, that's your problem. Please go Google "lack" and "cooperation" and see it if defines either word as ANYTHING, like you seem to think.
This isn't rocket science. The NFL said Zeke didn't cooperate and cited him wiping his phones. There's only 1 plain-English interpretation for what that means: the NFL requested his phones, Zeke wiped them, so they cited him for lack of cooperation with his phones.
Zactly! Would consider playing McFadden against him just for fun....I'm playing against the Zeke owner in Week 12...with a little luck, he'll be on suspension.
Not sure which is worse... espnespn the poster, or espn the network. Either way this is not being excellent.If you can't understand plain English, that's your problem. Please go Google "lack" and "cooperation" and see it if defines either word as ANYTHING, like you seem to think.
This isn't rocket science. The NFL said Zeke didn't cooperate and cited him wiping his phones. There's only 1 plain-English interpretation for what that means: the NFL requested his phones, Zeke wiped them, so they cited him for lack of cooperation with his phones.
From what I understand.. if he gets the injunction he WILL play until the trial which SHOULD be next year.is the general consensus that if the injuction is upheld today Zeke's good to go for the season? I'm wasting a 1/3 of my bench in two leagues waiting for this to resolve
Even though he wiped his phones, he did turn over all phone records in May 2017. That included all text messages, phone calls and even pictures sent from his phone(s). He complied completely, just not in a timely fashion. The idea that his wiping the phones hid information from them is not valid.If you can't understand plain English, that's your problem. Please go Google "lack" and "cooperation" and see it if defines either word as ANYTHING, like you seem to think.
This isn't rocket science. The NFL said Zeke didn't cooperate and cited him wiping his phones. There's only 1 plain-English interpretation for what that means: the NFL requested his phones, Zeke wiped them, so they cited him for lack of cooperation with his phones.
They are the same.If I'm understanding all this, Failla will be ruling on a preliminary injunction, not a TRO. And the standards for granting a PI are higher than those around a TRO.
So Failla ruling for the NFL wouldn't constitute reversing Crotty, just applying the higher burden of proof required for granting a PI. In fact ruling against the NFL would constitute reversing the Brady judges, who denied a PI request over the "fundamental fairness" issue. Presumably they're well respected also.
Correct. Until the appeal on the merits, which, as you said, would probably be in the off-season. The NFL probably won't seek an emergency stay because they would not get it.From what I understand.. if he gets the injunction he WILL play until the trial which SHOULD be next year.
Better hope your league mate is isn't in here.Might post some false info.....Have my finger on the 'Accept' button for a Zeke for Gordon deal. Trying to read tea leaves.
I wouldn't be shocked at anything....maybe zeke will pull his mask off and reveal that he IS Josh Gordon....still wouldn't be shockedCrotty set this up for zeke.
Will be shocked if this goes against them.
yesI believe he can still request another injunction from a different court, and/or or different grounds, if he loses today, right?
SELL SELL SELL..what, everybody is selling?, then BUY BUY BUYI am SO EXCITED that I might know what to do with McFadden & Morris before waivers run. This is like Christmas.