What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Ezekiel Elliott, LAC (9 Viewers)

Actually, it's an indictment of our legal system that it isn't like this for the average Joe. Any random guy off the street gets involved in a legal beef, it might be two years before the case goes to trial, another year for an appeal, six months for the decision of the appeal, two years for the appeal of the appeal, and so on. After it's all done, few can afford to seek 'justice' in the first place. It exists only as a luxury for the rich.
I'm not sure if the timelines you laid out are accurate to these types of cases but yeah generally it's much better to be rich.

 
Next week
I suppose you’re right, then; but I’m inclined to think if this judge thought missing this 1 game was enough irreparable harm to issue the administrative stay, it’s likely that 2 judges will decide that missing 6 games is irreparable harm that can be avoided by granting the permanent stay until the case has been resolved.

 
If I was a second year player and have already been caught beating up a chick, lifting a girl's shirt to expose her breasts to the public, and decked a DJ in a nightclub, I'd be tickled pink if I walked away from it a free man and only missed a few lousy football games. This kid is on the wrong path. Letting him get away with everything is just showing him that he has nothing to straighten out. The only 'irreparable damage' that could be done is giving him a free pass and making him think he's making good choices.
Dude, this guy....

its a shame you represent all the good Eagles fans. Facts mean nothing to you? Just that he's a Cowboy. Lol

Please provide proof of the beatings, or GTFO.

 
Dude, this guy....

its a shame you represent all the good Eagles fans. Facts mean nothing to you? Just that he's a Cowboy. Lol

Please provide proof of the beatings, or GTFO.
Holy ####.........are you for real?

this guy........provide evidence he didn't or GTFO.

 
OK, hold up...You guys want someone to prove a negative?

You want people to prove he didnt abuse someone when he wasnt charged with a crime and when the investigator in charge of investigating for the NFL said no suspension warranted, you still think we should prove the negative that he didnt?

Evidence says he didnt do anything criminal...the people who investigated from the law enforcement agencies and from the league office have way more info than you and they denied to charge and did not recommend suspensions...a clearly angry and ignorant commish who is now getting destroyed by his employers went against recommendations and did what he always does...puts his total control on everything.

To recap: People say Zeke is an abuser because the commish of a sports league says so while the cops and investigators and the prosecutors office says he isnt.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
For those comparing Zeke to the average guy, filing paper work in an appellate court for an emergency motion is pretty pricey when you include lawyers and the time they put into the filings. They also cost more because they are emergency and need to be heard fast. Clearly this is a high profile arbitration case with urgency behind it or some will be effected without action that cant be returned, irreparable harm...you know what, this has been explained and explained and explained. Clearly it doesnt matter.

The rules of life dont go out the window because this is about football. People with money have more advantages than those who dont, are we born yesterday or just ignoring real life facts? If you believe it to be right or wrong morally, it has nothing what so ever to do with if it is a reality...and it is. Rich people with deep pockets and connections have more advantages.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Holy ####.........are you for real?

this guy........provide evidence he didn't or GTFO.
Well the GTFO wasn't necessary. But he does have a point. I haven't seen any evidence of what he allegedly did. In past DV cases we at least had some details, but in this one all we got is "several acts of domestic violence during the week of July..." Kind of odd how there wasn't any specific details about the incident. I wish we knew exactly what it was that he allegedly did. 

 
Well the GTFO wasn't necessary. But he does have a point. I haven't seen any evidence of what he allegedly did. In past DV cases we at least had some details, but in this one all we got is "several acts of domestic violence during the week of July..." Kind of odd how there wasn't any specific details about the incident. I wish we knew exactly what it was that he allegedly did. 
I remember an article that provided a pretty in-depth account of what took place from the girlfriend's perspective.  Take that for what its worth, but there are things out there that told this story of what allegedly took place.

 
Well the GTFO wasn't necessary. But he does have a point. I haven't seen any evidence of what he allegedly did. In past DV cases we at least had some details, but in this one all we got is "several acts of domestic violence during the week of July..." Kind of odd how there wasn't any specific details about the incident. I wish we knew exactly what it was that he allegedly did. 
Tiffany Thompson did give a pretty detailed description of all/most of the alleged acts. You can read them here: A Comprehensive Timeline of the Ezekiel Elliot Case

 
I remember an article that provided a pretty in-depth account of what took place from the girlfriend's perspective.  Take that for what its worth, but there are things out there that told this story of what allegedly took place.
The girlfriend  was deemed to be lacking credibility is an issue for me. I did read something about her registering an email for her to sell the Zeke sex tape if he didn't pay her off before all this happened.

 
The girlfriend  was deemed to be lacking credibility is an issue for me. I did read something about her registering an email for her to sell the Zeke sex tape if he didn't pay her off before all this happened.
Correct and there was more that eroded her credibility. That was more than likely why the DA declined to prosecute. Zeke's lawyers would have probably destroyed her in court. Would it have been enough? The prosecutor seems to think so. 

 
The girlfriend  was deemed to be lacking credibility is an issue for me. I did read something about her registering an email for her to sell the Zeke sex tape if he didn't pay her off before all this happened.
Yeah, she did some sketchy things to say the least.  After reading that article and others it had me swayed that he is innocent only in the sense that criminally they didn't have enough to convict him.  But that is just my opinion.

 
Yeah, she did some sketchy things to say the least.  After reading that article and others it had me swayed that he is innocent only in the sense that criminally they didn't have enough to convict him.  But that is just my opinion.
I agree. I do have to admit though that her story of the abuse doesn't sound made up. If true, it paints an ugly picture of Zeke. But we will never know I guess. 

 
probably worst case scenario for Zeke drafters...with hearing Thursday and ruling after sunday means he could be suspended for all the fantasy play-offs. I was gambling on being able to withstand the 1st 6 weeks without him and still making the play-offs with Zeke.

 
I agree. I do have to admit though that her story of the abuse doesn't sound made up. If true, it paints an ugly picture of Zeke. But we will never know I guess. 
This was where I was at.  I thought there was too much there that it didn't sound made up.  I know she could have been very well deceiving, that is just where I fell after reading about it.

 
probably worst case scenario for Zeke drafters...with hearing Thursday and ruling after sunday means he could be suspended for all the fantasy play-offs. I was gambling on being able to withstand the 1st 6 weeks without him and still making the play-offs with Zeke.
At this point I'm resigned to it. He's currently the #3 player in my league so far this season (out of all RB/WR/TE), and I got him at a second round price. Paired with Bell, or whoever you took in the first round, I'd say you got a pretty good return on investment on a points per game basis even if he misses the next six weeks (including fantasy playoffs) and a pretty reasonable chance at having already locked down a playoff spot already.

Woulda been nice for him to have already served the suspension, but I can't complain much from a fantasy perspective.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Ask Brian Banks about how well stories can be made up by women to put men in trouble, and how those false stories can even hold up in court.

But about the hearing this Thursday, the 3 judges are all that matters. If you are a Elliott fan, you do not want Chin.

Edit, as I refreshed this just popped up.


Daniel Wallach‏ @WALLACHLEGAL 3m3 minutes ago
Judges assigned to the #Zeke panel are:

Jacobs
Livingston
Droney

Oral argument will take place at 2 pm Thursday.



Two were appointed by Bush, one by Obama and Livingston used to be affiliated and helped the NFL in the concussion lawsuit.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
At this point I'm resigned to it. He's currently the #3 player in my league so far this season (out of all RB/WR/TE), and I got him at a second round price. Paired with Bell, or whoever you took in the first round, I'd say you got a pretty good return on investment on a points per game basis even if he misses the next six weeks (including fantasy playoffs) and a pretty reasonable chance at having already locked down a playoff spot already.

Woulda been nice for him to have already served the suspension, but I can't complain much from a fantasy perspective.
I disagree..It's all about the play-offs.....my record up to now is meaningless. If I didn't think I could make the play-offs with Zeke missing the 1st 6 games, I wouldn't have drafted him. If I knew,he would miss the last 6 games, no way I would have drafted.

 
Ask Brian Banks about how well stories can be made up by women to put men in trouble, and how those false stories can even hold up in court.
I agree with this. I just think it's more often than not the story is not being told.  That is one reason I don't want to discredit her even though she seems pretty unreliable.  

About the judges you named and Elliott not wanting Chin.  Whats the feedback on these 3? Any takes/history?

 
refresh my memory, this 3 judge hearing is just to allow the stay? Then, if he gets the stay, another 3 judge panel to decide the case...and that could be appealed as well?

 
Seems the blow up on twitter is that Livingston worked with the NFL making a case for their concussion lawsuit.

so if he is willing to defend that, will he even have a chance to side with Zeke here? Also, it is clear why the NFL wants this in NY, they stacked the deck of the legal process with Failia and Livingston.

I see a lot of people saying the players wont allow them to give up something to take control from the commish, the NFLPA lawyers may not give them a choice and the union is in charge until the players dont want a union and that means D Smith makes the decisions regarding the contract. The lawyers will explain to them after this case sets precedent they the commish can ruin their lives, what responsible NFLPA rep will allow that, even if it only effects 6 people, its the precedent of allowing a commish to have total control.

 
Seems the blow up on twitter is that Livingston worked with the NFL making a case for their concussion lawsuit.

so if he is willing to defend that, will he even have a chance to side with Zeke here? Also, it is clear why the NFL wants this in NY, they stacked the deck of the legal process with Failia and Livingston.

I see a lot of people saying the players wont allow them to give up something to take control from the commish, the NFLPA lawyers may not give them a choice and the union is in charge until the players dont want a union and that means D Smith makes the decisions regarding the contract. The lawyers will explain to them after this case sets precedent they the commish can ruin their lives, what responsible NFLPA rep will allow that, even if it only effects 6 people, its the precedent of allowing a commish to have total control.
How do they pick the judges? It's like they "randomly draw out of a hat" which the NFL's hat is looking at the schedule and putting it on any docket they see fit Pro NFL.

 
They are random, so they say, but it is not...

FWIW...I fly planes in and out of NYC, I hear a lot of things one thing I heard this weekend from one of my "clients" is Jerry wanted Livingston personally to work on the concussion case. The reason he came up is because he was on the docket to hear motions Tuesday and it was discussed. Chin still gets contributions from the NFL for his political aspirations and hearing that is why it wasnt scheduled for today is because Chin in a way recused himself although not publicly. One thing we all have to understand is so much behind the scenes stuff happens in courts, we are not even remotely seeing it all. These judges have already been discussing this case with their friends and family this weekend.

Sad, but its how it works. I know how judges talk, as I said...I fly planes and I shouldnt hear most the things I hear, but I do.

 
how can a judge who "worked" with the NFL in any way be allowed to hear a case involving the NFL.  NFLPA should demand he recuse himself.

 
how can a judge who "worked" with the NFL in any way be allowed to hear a case involving the NFL.  NFLPA should demand he recuse himself.
Exactly, last case the one judge's husband worked for the firm who organized the CBA.  The NFLPA chose not to fight that and it worked out.

 
If the judges don't end up deciding until next week, after Zeke plays week 10, and he does end up suspended then he will miss ALL of the FF playoffs, weeks 11-16. He will be droppable unless your league plays Week 17 but most don't.

I'm sure he has helped a lot of teams, including mine, win so far, but the loss of him in the playoffs is huge.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
If the judges don't end up deciding until next week, after Zeke plays week 10, and he does end up suspended then he will miss ALL of the FF playoffs, weeks 11-16. He will be droppable unless your league plays Week 17 but most don't.

I'm sure he has helped a lot of teams, including mine, win so far, but the loss of him in the playoffs is huge.
it is, but I'd rather he play week 10 and miss 11-16 (so I can drop him) rather than be out 10-15.  If he's out 10-15, it is very unlikely I make it to 16.  If I drop him, and a strong team picks him up (who else would pick him up but a strong team) they almost guarantee a win in 16.  Of course I'd rather he not miss at all, but the most important thing for me is that he plays this week.

 
it is, but I'd rather he play week 10 and miss 11-16 (so I can drop him) rather than be out 10-15.  If he's out 10-15, it is very unlikely I make it to 16.  If I drop him, and a strong team picks him up (who else would pick him up but a strong team) they almost guarantee a win in 16.  Of course I'd rather he not miss at all, but the most important thing for me is that he plays this week.
That's my thinking at this point, aside from him somehow winning until the offseason.

 
it is, but I'd rather he play week 10 and miss 11-16 (so I can drop him) rather than be out 10-15.  If he's out 10-15, it is very unlikely I make it to 16.  If I drop him, and a strong team picks him up (who else would pick him up but a strong team) they almost guarantee a win in 16.  Of course I'd rather he not miss at all, but the most important thing for me is that he plays this week.
This. If he’s gonna miss the playoffs, i guess is rather him miss all of it, cut bait, and find a new less exciting toy.

If he looks like he’s coming back week 16, there’s no way i don’t hold him and that probably even more detrimental to many teams.

 
it is, but I'd rather he play week 10 and miss 11-16 (so I can drop him) rather than be out 10-15.  If he's out 10-15, it is very unlikely I make it to 16.  If I drop him, and a strong team picks him up (who else would pick him up but a strong team) they almost guarantee a win in 16.  Of course I'd rather he not miss at all, but the most important thing for me is that he plays this week.
I wouldn't object to this either. In my short bench league it would be very difficult to hang onto a guy for 6 weeks in hopes of making the championship again. The benefits of that short bench is the guy who grabbed Alfred Morris last week ended up cutting him Sunday morning. Now wouldn't be a bad time to ask about Morris as some may not believe Zeke will be suspended apparently.

 
Putting aside both the issues of guilt and innocence and fantasy football implications, it seems to me that there is a fundamental unfairness in beginning Elliot’s suspension prior to the completion of his appeal process. If he wins his appeal, yet he was already suspended, what has he won? He can never get the games back. That just seems wrong to me. The punishment shouldn’t begin until all legal remedies have been fully exhausted. 

 
Putting aside both the issues of guilt and innocence and fantasy football implications, it seems to me that there is a fundamental unfairness in beginning Elliot’s suspension prior to the completion of his appeal process. If he wins his appeal, yet he was already suspended, what has he won? He can never get the games back. That just seems wrong to me. The punishment shouldn’t begin until all legal remedies have been fully exhausted. 
Agreed. I believe this is the basis of his teams arguement of irreparable harm.   Who knows if the judges will buy it though.Who knows if the judges will buy it though.

 
Putting aside both the issues of guilt and innocence and fantasy football implications, it seems to me that there is a fundamental unfairness in beginning Elliot’s suspension prior to the completion of his appeal process. If he wins his appeal, yet he was already suspended, what has he won? He can never get the games back. That just seems wrong to me. The punishment shouldn’t begin until all legal remedies have been fully exhausted. 
But that’s not the way things work.  There are a lot things in the world that aren’t fair.  Zeke maybe losing 6 games that could contribute stats towards a HOF candidacy is hardly at the top of that list.

 
But that’s not the way things work.  There are a lot things in the world that aren’t fair.  Zeke maybe losing 6 games that could contribute stats towards a HOF candidacy is hardly at the top of that list.
I feel like the NFL is essentially crapping where it eats with these court battles. The 2 biggest fights were with Brady and Zeke, 2 of the biggest seat fillers and jersey sellers on the planet. I understand the concern with what both of these players were alleged to have done. But the NFL worked themselves to death in coming up with these decisions, and in Zekes case, after the justice system passed on prosecuting. While the NFL thinks they are saving face, they really might be doing themselves more harm than good. I know. Ticket sales and TV ratings are the bottom line and they may not be worried about the slight drop but this should be considered another straw on the camels back.

 
He did already have an appeal process: Arbitration. The NFLPA agreement with the NFL states that the commissioner sets penalties, and if they are appealed, they can go to arbitration. The decision of arbitration is final. That's it.

Zeke is saying this is unfair somehow. If so, then the NFLPA shouldn't have agreed to it in the first place, and he shouldn't play under that agreement.

But, really, if the commissioner's penalties can be delayed for months or years by putting every infraction in to the US court system, instead of the internal arbitration process, then what power does the commissioner have to suspend or penalize anyone?

A guy could get suspended and easily delay implementation for a long, long time by tying up the legal system. Appealing to different district courts. Re-appealing the appeal. Getting a stay of each judgement. It's not unusual for high-profile court cases to drag on for years. In an industry where the average career is three years, a guy could delay his penalty until he's ready to retire.

Anyway, We see this all the time in baseball. A player gets suspended for two or three games, but if, say, he's on the Yankees and they're playing the Red Sox tomorrow, he'll "appeal" and get a four day reprieve. Then once the series with the Red Sox is over, he'll drop the appeal and serve his suspension when they're playing meaningless games against the Diamondbacks instead. 

And we see it all the time when a player gets injured, his team is out of contention, or otherwise won't play in meaningful games. Appeals are dropped and the suspension is served at the player's leisure.  Players already manipulate the process. It's naive to think that they won't continue to do so. And taking it out of the realm of arbitration, which is the speedy process they've all already agreed to, is threatening to football as a whole. Because if one player can put himself above the agreement between the NFLPA and the NFL, Inc., then the agreement itself, and the power of the commissioner himself, is meaningless.
I don't think we should expect it to play out any other way. Too much money on the line. This isn't just any ole arbitration process. Its an arbitration process involving millionaires and billion dollar corporations managed by billionaires.

 
I feel like the NFL is essentially crapping where it eats with these court battles. The 2 biggest fights were with Brady and Zeke, 2 of the biggest seat fillers and jersey sellers on the planet. I understand the concern with what both of these players were alleged to have done. But the NFL worked themselves to death in coming up with these decisions, and in Zekes case, after the justice system passed on prosecuting. While the NFL thinks they are saving face, they really might be doing themselves more harm than good. I know. Ticket sales and TV ratings are the bottom line and they may not be worried about the slight drop but this should be considered another straw on the camels back.
Agreed, but once the NFL makes one of these decisions, they refuse to lose.  IMO, it’s less about Zeke, Brady, or even public perception.  They want to make sure that they powers they bargained for aren’t limited by the courts.  From a public perception standpoint, the NFL came off worse in the Brady debacle than Brady did & I’d be willing to bet the same will be true worth the Zeke situation (barring the release of a video like with Rice).  But protecting their contractually bargained power seems to be more important than anything else.

 
Zeke already had his appeal via arbitration per the CBA. This whole thing is a joke. Zeke's lawyers are essentially going to have to prove Goodell had it out for him. I find that laughable, regardless of what you or I think of Goodell.

I'm a Dallas fan & while many of my fellow fans (who I respect) are hoping Zeke wiggles out of this thing, we're just delaying the inevitable.

Get it done this season (as in now). We have a shot at the playoffs.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top