lets be honest....even if KC has one of the best offenses if the league...if you chose to start anyone not named Mahomes or Kelce....you are rolling the dice every week and really can't complain if you get a donut....
				
			
			
				Last edited: 
			
		
	
								
								
									
								
							
							lets be honest....even if KC has one of the best offenses if the league...if you chose to start anyone not named Mahomes or Kelce....you are rolling the dice every week and really can't complain if you get a donut....it's not that hard....
He hasn't looked stellar at RB, mainly with his vision and patience lacking. Others have already said it on the thread, but he has a vibe of "Christine Michaels - what could have been". He just gets the ball and runs. I don't see him set up blocks or wait.lets be honest....even if KC has one of the best offenses if the league...if you chose to start anyone not named Mahomes or Kelce....you are rolling the dice every week and really can't complain if you get a donut....it's not that hard....
That is because the team is full of very average players. They have two elite athletes in Pacheco and Toney that may or may not expand their roles as the season progresses. If they do, they will join the list of Mahomes and Kelce.
Yes, quite a few CEH truthers were suggesting he was breaking out as a RB1, many touted him as a sure thing RB2 at various points. And when he had his 19 carry game, some thought he was going to be a bellcow going forward. Not just here, but on the twitters & YouTubes.did anybody really think of any of them as any more than the bolded at any point this year.....I see a great big nope, not gonna do it. Not in any important league would I start any of these guys other than a what the heck flex for a BYE or injury.Chiefs' RBs Week 7 snap counts and routes run (per @PFF):
Jerick McKinnon 28 (16)
Isiah Pacheco 19 (7)
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 17 (7)
I see no reason every week wouldn't be some variation of the above. You might get a couple weeks when one guy has a tear, but you'll need to get lucky
Nope nope nope nope nope
Not a bad comp. Michael was a bit more determined of a runner, and IMO had more power. CEH tends to crumple on contact, but he's shown a bit more there this year than in years past. And to be fair, his vision seems to have improved over last year where he'd run into the backs of his OL.Others have already said it on the thread, but he has a vibe of "Christine Michaels - what could have been". He just gets the ball and runs. I don't see him set up blocks or wait.
hmmmmm....I kind of got the impression that what CHE showed last year left most questioning ...and thought this his 8th round or so ADP kind of confirmed that...but I guess there are more truthers out there than I knew of....surprised if after what we saw anybody thought he was a sure thing (RB2 or whatever)....but I guess thats what you get on twitter/you tube....McKinnon was the preferred choice to close out the season etc....Yes, quite a few CEH truthers were suggesting he was breaking out as a RB1, many touted him as a sure thing RB2 at various points. And when he had his 19 carry game, some thought he was going to be a bellcow going forward. Not just here, but on the twitters & YouTubes.did anybody really think of any of them as any more than the bolded at any point this year.....I see a great big nope, not gonna do it. Not in any important league would I start any of these guys other than a what the heck flex for a BYE or injury.Chiefs' RBs Week 7 snap counts and routes run (per @PFF):
Jerick McKinnon 28 (16)
Isiah Pacheco 19 (7)
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 17 (7)
I see no reason every week wouldn't be some variation of the above. You might get a couple weeks when one guy has a tear, but you'll need to get lucky
Nope nope nope nope nope
I was actually referring to Pacheco's game play at RB. Granted it's a limited sample size.Yes, quite a few CEH truthers were suggesting he was breaking out as a RB1, many touted him as a sure thing RB2 at various points. And when he had his 19 carry game, some thought he was going to be a bellcow going forward. Not just here, but on the twitters & YouTubes.did anybody really think of any of them as any more than the bolded at any point this year.....I see a great big nope, not gonna do it. Not in any important league would I start any of these guys other than a what the heck flex for a BYE or injury.Chiefs' RBs Week 7 snap counts and routes run (per @PFF):
Jerick McKinnon 28 (16)
Isiah Pacheco 19 (7)
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 17 (7)
I see no reason every week wouldn't be some variation of the above. You might get a couple weeks when one guy has a tear, but you'll need to get lucky
Nope nope nope nope nope
Hard to say what Pacheco is or isn’t with such limited number of snaps.I was actually referring to Pacheco's game play at RB. Granted it's a limited sample size.Yes, quite a few CEH truthers were suggesting he was breaking out as a RB1, many touted him as a sure thing RB2 at various points. And when he had his 19 carry game, some thought he was going to be a bellcow going forward. Not just here, but on the twitters & YouTubes.did anybody really think of any of them as any more than the bolded at any point this year.....I see a great big nope, not gonna do it. Not in any important league would I start any of these guys other than a what the heck flex for a BYE or injury.Chiefs' RBs Week 7 snap counts and routes run (per @PFF):
Jerick McKinnon 28 (16)
Isiah Pacheco 19 (7)
Clyde Edwards-Helaire 17 (7)
I see no reason every week wouldn't be some variation of the above. You might get a couple weeks when one guy has a tear, but you'll need to get lucky
Nope nope nope nope nope
Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
Start Gibson. Robinson has a sore knee and KC is a RBBC nightmare.Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
I really don't know to be honest. When Pacheco was named starter for KC I jumped. Not sure what we're gonna get out of the bye. Regardless, Pacheco sits. I never owned or targeted CEH myself. I like how Pacheco shoots out with power moving forward.Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
So it's all a ploy to motivate Clyde?
My reference was how most thought Robinson would overtake Gibson, and then low and behold it's Gibson. I snagged him for free thinking what's not to like here.Start Gibson. Robinson has a sore knee and KC is a RBBC nightmare.Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
I gotta believe Clyde feels the demotion.Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
So it's all a ploy to motivate Clyde?
My reference was how most thought Robinson would overtake Gibson, and then low and behold it's Gibson. I snagged him for free thinking what's not to like here.Start Gibson. Robinson has a sore knee and KC is a RBBC nightmare.Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
As for KC it's CEH, then Pacheco named starter, and then wondering moving forward who has the most value between those two.
Chubb (bye), Pierce, Swift, and Gibson - gotta start 2 and Pierce already in the books with 13.9.
Tatum Bell has entered the chat.Ever consider Pacheco got the starter role in their last game to perhaps light a fire under CEH's be hind? Or is Pacheco really the #1 guy going forward?
Gibson, Robinson, Gibson...
CEH, Pacheco, hmmmmm...
So it's all a ploy to motivate Clyde?
I'm with you. I know that we should practice patience (especially in dynasty formats), but it's getting harder to see a RB1 outcome for him. 7th round draft capital, low volume in an ugly RBBC. Feels like the Chiefs have to be addressing RB this coming offseason which will be loaded with rookie and free agent options that would all upgrade over their current group.I've been holding this guy from the start of the year in hopes he'd become the starter somehow. Well, that happened and now I'm not too hopeful that he can be someone that can be relied on. You need to be able to pick up those short yardage carries and I know the Titans are a tough defense but if you want to take over a backfield you need to show you're a difference maker and I don't see it happening. Am I wrong?
usually when players can make the leap they need to grab the job by making difference making plays. I just don't see that from him or even that they will ever give a RB enough touches to make them viable. It was worth the gamble to park him on my bench but I suspect that experiment may come to an end if a new shiny object pops up...I'm with you. I know that we should practice patience (especially in dynasty formats), but it's getting harder to see a RB1 outcome for him. 7th round draft capital, low volume in an ugly RBBC. Feels like the Chiefs have to be addressing RB this coming offseason which will be loaded with rookie and free agent options that would all upgrade over their current group.I've been holding this guy from the start of the year in hopes he'd become the starter somehow. Well, that happened and now I'm not too hopeful that he can be someone that can be relied on. You need to be able to pick up those short yardage carries and I know the Titans are a tough defense but if you want to take over a backfield you need to show you're a difference maker and I don't see it happening. Am I wrong?
It's such a small sample size, and one really can't expect much from any back who only averages about 5 to 6 touches a game.usually when players can make the leap they need to grab the job by making difference making plays. I just don't see that from him or even that they will ever give a RB enough touches to make them viable. It was worth the gamble to park him on my bench but I suspect that experiment may come to an end if a new shiny object pops up...I'm with you. I know that we should practice patience (especially in dynasty formats), but it's getting harder to see a RB1 outcome for him. 7th round draft capital, low volume in an ugly RBBC. Feels like the Chiefs have to be addressing RB this coming offseason which will be loaded with rookie and free agent options that would all upgrade over their current group.I've been holding this guy from the start of the year in hopes he'd become the starter somehow. Well, that happened and now I'm not too hopeful that he can be someone that can be relied on. You need to be able to pick up those short yardage carries and I know the Titans are a tough defense but if you want to take over a backfield you need to show you're a difference maker and I don't see it happening. Am I wrong?
Isiah Pacheco rushed 16 times for 82 yards in the Chiefs' Week 10 win over the Jaguars.
Pacheco got the nod over Clyde Edwards-Helaire again this week. Pacheco still left the field on passing downs, mostly in favor of Jerick McKinnon, but he saw 16 of the Chiefs' 17 running back carries. Edwards-Helaire did not see a carry. Pacheco gave up a fumble in the red zone early in the game but recovered nicely, breaking off a handful of long runs throughout the remainder of the game. Outside of the lone mistake, he looked like the best runner on the team. He will be a touchdown-dependant RB3 in Week 11 against the Chargers.
Nov 13, 2022, 4:39 PM ET
Chiefs special teams coach Dave Toub said the team would "start looking at other guys in the kick return game" to replace Isiah Pacheco.
It is perhaps a sign that the Chiefs believe he is more important to the offense now. Pacheco saw 16 of the Chiefs 17 running back carries. It's likely that a platoon at the position will keep Pacheco in the RB3/FLEX range, but if he were to continue seeing usage like he saw against Jacksonville, he'd probably be in the RB2 conversation.
SOURCE: P.J. Green on Twitter
Nov 17, 2022, 1:33 PM ET
Chiefs special teams coach Dave Toub said the team would "start looking at other guys in the kick return game" to replace Isiah Pacheco.
It is perhaps a sign that the Chiefs believe he is more important to the offense now. Pacheco saw 16 of the Chiefs 17 running back carries. It's likely that a platoon at the position will keep Pacheco in the RB3/FLEX range, but if he were to continue seeing usage like he saw against Jacksonville, he'd probably be in the RB2 conversation.
SOURCE: P.J. Green on Twitter
Nov 17, 2022, 1:33 PM ET

Clyde Edward Helaire please report to the special teams room....Chiefs special teams coach Dave Toub said the team would "start looking at other guys in the kick return game" to replace Isiah Pacheco.
It is perhaps a sign that the Chiefs believe he is more important to the offense now. Pacheco saw 16 of the Chiefs 17 running back carries. It's likely that a platoon at the position will keep Pacheco in the RB3/FLEX range, but if he were to continue seeing usage like he saw against Jacksonville, he'd probably be in the RB2 conversation.
SOURCE: P.J. Green on Twitter
Nov 17, 2022, 1:33 PM ET
Yes! This has always been an indicator for me that the team now values the player more as a true RB they don't want to risk getting injured on ST. Good sign for sure IMOChiefs special teams coach Dave Toub said the team would "start looking at other guys in the kick return game" to replace Isiah Pacheco.
It is perhaps a sign that the Chiefs believe he is more important to the offense now. Pacheco saw 16 of the Chiefs 17 running back carries. It's likely that a platoon at the position will keep Pacheco in the RB3/FLEX range, but if he were to continue seeing usage like he saw against Jacksonville, he'd probably be in the RB2 conversation.
SOURCE: P.J. Green on Twitter
Nov 17, 2022, 1:33 PM ET![]()
Partly why I dropped Patterson for him.Yes! This has always been an indicator for me that the team now values the player more as a true RB they don't want to risk getting injured on ST. Good sign for sure IMOChiefs special teams coach Dave Toub said the team would "start looking at other guys in the kick return game" to replace Isiah Pacheco.
It is perhaps a sign that the Chiefs believe he is more important to the offense now. Pacheco saw 16 of the Chiefs 17 running back carries. It's likely that a platoon at the position will keep Pacheco in the RB3/FLEX range, but if he were to continue seeing usage like he saw against Jacksonville, he'd probably be in the RB2 conversation.
SOURCE: P.J. Green on Twitter
Nov 17, 2022, 1:33 PM ET![]()
Maybe but a lot of people think Toney's role is growing and he's the new punt returner.Yes! This has always been an indicator for me that the team now values the player more as a true RB they don't want to risk getting injured on ST. Good sign for sure IMO
It's not the punt return I look for. There are plenty of cases where the star RB/WR is still in as the punt returner (AB, Lamb etc). But Pacheco was on coverage team. That is what I mean. Pacheco was never the return man if I recall correctly.Maybe but a lot of people think Toney's role is growing and he's the new punt returner.Yes! This has always been an indicator for me that the team now values the player more as a true RB they don't want to risk getting injured on ST. Good sign for sure IMO
Pachecho actually leads the league in the number of kickoff returns.It's not the punt return I look for. There are plenty of cases where the star RB/WR is still in as the punt returner (AB, Lamb etc). But Pacheco was on coverage team. That is what I mean. Pacheco was never the return man if I recall correctly.Maybe but a lot of people think Toney's role is growing and he's the new punt returner.Yes! This has always been an indicator for me that the team now values the player more as a true RB they don't want to risk getting injured on ST. Good sign for sure IMO
OK. Regardless, I still was more interested in them moving him off coverage teamPachecho actually leads the league in the number of kickoff returns.It's not the punt return I look for. There are plenty of cases where the star RB/WR is still in as the punt returner (AB, Lamb etc). But Pacheco was on coverage team. That is what I mean. Pacheco was never the return man if I recall correctly.Maybe but a lot of people think Toney's role is growing and he's the new punt returner.Yes! This has always been an indicator for me that the team now values the player more as a true RB they don't want to risk getting injured on ST. Good sign for sure IMO
As a Pacheco owner this still seems like a dangerous game to play. But don't take my word for it since I sat Watson last night for the same fears.
Something tells me Clyde can't grasp all the complex stuff Mahomes was talking about.
Something tells me Clyde can't grasp all the complex stuff Mahomes was talking about.
I picked up Pacheco for the third time on waivers this week and he sits in the Flex spot at the moment. Would really love to hit with him this week.Pacheco is the perfect flex play this week. The chargers didn't even have any defensive tackles to finish the game last week. They are broken down on defense and are awful against the run. If there was ever a coming out party week for Pacheco it is this week. Flex play with a floor of 7-9 points, and upside to get 1-2 rushing TDs, and maybe break a long one.