What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Jahmyr Gibbs, DET (2 Viewers)

Nice matchups coming up Weeks 10-15

FF PA
GOPPto RBFantasySnapsRushingReceivingTargetsRoutes RunRZ RushesRZ TargetsRush Distance
RankPPROFFATTYDSTDRECYDSTDTARYPTRts% TgtYds/RRIN20IN10IN5IN20IN10IN5AVG20+40+
1.@KC25th8.0197420218029.0922.2%2.001100006.000
2.SEA17th12.6317170739094.32142.9%1.860000002.400
3.ATL31st9.2381780012021.01711.8%0.124310004.710
4.@GB6th9.1288400411052.21435.7%0.791001005.000
5.CAR2nd-DNP
6.@TB26th-DNP
7.@bal18th27.662116819580105.84522.2%1.291101106.210
8.LV4th29.956261521537057.42817.9%1.323100005.820
9.BYEtotals96.4234763992281650335.813424.6%1.2310612105.2540
10.@LAC10th
11.CHI7th
12.GB6th
13.@NO29th
14.@CHI7th
15.DEN1st
16.@MIN28th
17.@DAL24th

Weeks 16 & 17 on the road, not so much
I think its very possible Minnesota is a very good matchup by then, I think they could fall victim to time of possession deficits due to QB play.
 
Jr flipped him for Devante Adams this week
I wish I were as confident and good at trades like he is
Why would someone trade Gibbs for Adams? Yikes. Adams has been trending down for weeks and the QB situation sucks. Gibbs has been trending up and starting to get comfortable in the NFL.

Rookies take some time people. Why is everyone so impatient? Kids these days....
He foresaw although was not that much of a stretch to see
 
I've made a lot of strong offers for Gibbs (or for the #2 pick, pre-dynasty-draft). Obviously, what I'm willing to offer now is significantly lower than in was pre-dynasty-draft.

I asked him what an acceptable trade would look like.

He said: Gibbs, his 2024 first and second (likely quite early, good shot at top 3, but he's in a very weak division so he could certainly make the playoffs), for Garrett Wilson, Quentin Johnston, Kendre Miller, Tyjae Spears, and Roschon Johnson. I considered that was decidedly too steep. But I did completely understand that opinion, as I would not want to give up Gibbs; I didn't think the offer was crazy. But he went to great lengths to convince me it was a reasonable degree of overpay. I thought it was a bit more than reasonable. Curious what others might think. (Our league is a bit crazy for RB's, which somewhat makes sense because 2-3 out of 6 offensive starters are RB's.)

Also I wasn't necessarily looking for picks, though I am always happy to stock up. But I just used high picks on those 4 2023 rookies he wanted. Doesn't seem like progress to trade them in for fewer picks.
Not trying to make this the "eighsse's personal trade advice thread" but I'm really considering accepting this at this point. I hate losing Wilson but I may be able to flip picks. Should I jump off the plane with my shiny new Gibbs brand parachute or let Captain Wilson bring this thing down safely? This is a big one ... 12-team dynasty PPR, 1/2/2/0/1, yardage bonus yada yada ....

ETA: Have Hurts, Bijan, Etienne, Swift, AJ Brown, Lamb, Dotson, Godwin
My previous comments were meant from a perspective where my team is strong which is where I want to be.

Based on what you say you have your team looks strong. Very strong in fact and I don't see how those depth RB are actually helping you right now. You have better options.

In your position the way to make your team better is by adding stars and Gibbs certainly looks to be that. He is a RB who may be better than some of your already strong group and can start for you now. That's what you want.

Wilson is a nice player but does not have a good QB. I don't see moving him as a huge loss to your lineup that has other quality WR besides him.

I don't know how deep your league rosters are but freeing up 4 spots allows you to pick up free agent prospects which is basically what those depth RB are to you right now anyways. Your not starting them.

You can always use the picks to buy other players to improve your team if you don't want to use them on rookies next season.

This is exactly how you grind value and keep your team perpetually in a strong position by making deals like what has been offered you.

Not sure what you are hemming and hawing about.
I hope it doesn't sound like I'm arguing or trying to convince you of anything. It's truth I'm after, not proliferating my own opinion. But 8 years from now, do you think anyone who's had Garrett Wilson the whole time even thinks about "the Zach Wilson era"? I feel like that will look like a blip on his career. But I do feel I could flip picks for a good receiver ... I just don't like dismissing a young elite(?) WR due to his current QB.
No your point is valid and Wilson looks like a young star WR who is producing despite the lack of good QB play.

In a vacuum I do value the WR a bit more than RB because of the longevity of the position by comparison and how you have more time for situation to improve.

You want the core of your team to be WRs more than RB for the long term health and strength of your team.

That said RBs need to be replaced more often than WR do.

In a macro view of roster management in dynasty you try to keep the strength of your WR core as strong as possible and the RBs are the last piece of the roster to address once that has been established.

I can see why your trade partner wants to do the deal too, as this improves that team's WR core and adds depth with quality RB prospects that are young and could pan out. If their roster is weaker in terms of competing right now this is what you do. Improve the depth of your assets since a player like Gibbs is the last piece of that puzzle.

I disagree with them offering you their draft picks in this situation but that's their decision. It seems like a move playing for next season more than this one and from that point of view Gibbs maybe Hurts them by helping them win more games.

Anyhow I think the deal is fair, I just prefer the Gibbs side of it for a team that's contending and that's where I always want my team to be.
Well I can stop thinking about it now. Pulled the trigger 🔫🔫
 
It's almost Tuesday and my week 9 is already done - what's the latest on Monty and the division of work now?

Rib injuries can be quite painful and linger. I've had 2 bad ones (hard elbow playing basketball) and 2 weeks was not even close to enough time.
 
It's almost Tuesday and my week 9 is already done - what's the latest on Monty and the division of work now?

Rib injuries can be quite painful and linger. I've had 2 bad ones (hard elbow playing basketball) and 2 weeks was not even close to enough time.
Campbell said Montgomery is looking good for this week
 
It's almost Tuesday and my week 9 is already done - what's the latest on Monty and the division of work now?

Rib injuries can be quite painful and linger. I've had 2 bad ones (hard elbow playing basketball) and 2 weeks was not even close to enough time.

Campbell quoted as saying "it's looking good" for Monty to return.

Doubt he hands him 30+ carries THIS time after returning now from his SECOND injury.

I own both. May start both.
 
Lions HC Dan Campbell said Jahmyr Gibbs will “get his fair share” of touches even with David Montgomery expected to return.

We’ll have to see how things actually shake out once both backs are on the field together, but in the three games Gibbs and Montgomery played together, Montgomery handled 66.3 percent of the team’s rush attempts and played on 64.3 percent of the snaps. The playing time swung heavily in Montgomery’s favor early on, but as Campbell acknowledged on Monday, Gibbs “has gotten better every week.” Fantasy managers rostering Gibbs would love to see a more balanced approached between the two backs after the rookie totaled 315 yards from scrimmage and two touchdowns with Montgomery sidelined, averaging an impressive 6.2 yards per touch over that span. Until we see how the team distributes touches, Gibbs is best trusted as a high-upside RB3 who is capable of breaking out at any moment.
 
High upside RB3?

Like a Jaylen Warren?

I own both. You think I should be weighing which one to start in the Flex?

On the season, Gibbs is RB11. Warren is RB36. Full PPR PPG

Looking at the Consistency Calculator, neither has had a week worse than RB4.
  • Elite games (>25.05) Gibbs 2, Warren 0
  • RB1 (14.83 - 25.04) Gibbs 2, Warren 0
  • RB2 (12.49 - 14.82) Gibbs 3, Warren 2
  • RB3 (9.41 - 12.48) Gibbs 3, Warren 5
  • RB4 (6.79 - 9.40) Gibbs 6, Warren 8
By Week:
  1. Monty 13.4 Gibbs 8.0, Warren 6.8
  2. Monty 12. 4 Gibbs 12.6 Warren 12.6
  3. Gibbs 9.2 Warren 8.2
  4. Monty 34.1 Gibbs 9.1 Warren 11.5
  5. Monty 20.9 Gibbs dnp Warren 10.9
  6. Monty 4.3 Gibbs dnp Warren bye
  7. Gibbs 27.6 Warren 10.1
  8. Gibbs 29.9 Warren 7.8
  9. Gibbs bye Warren 14.3
Here in Week 10, do you think with Montgomery back Gibbs will revert back to being an RB4/4 with RB2 upside? Do you think we will see his production will regress to what it was 6 weeks ago? Do you think the twice-injured-this-season veteran will be the clear #1 with the bulk of the touches and all the GL work? Any upside for the rookie?
I don't think Gibbs is an RB3. That's what RW called him. I also don't think you can include games without Monty in your comparison. I also own both. Gibbs is the better start IMO. The reason he's a better start than Warren is due to the offense each plays in.
 
Appears healthy. Has looked great two straight games. At Chargers. Yes please
LAC run D is much improved, but hopefully he's leveraged in the passing game.

In my ESPN league where I own both Monty and Gibbs, projections:

* Gibbs: 13.3 points
* Monty: 13.9 points
 
High upside RB3?

Like a Jaylen Warren?

I own both. You think I should be weighing which one to start in the Flex?

On the season, Gibbs is RB11. Warren is RB36. Full PPR PPG

Looking at the Consistency Calculator, neither has had a week worse than RB4.
  • Elite games (>25.05) Gibbs 2, Warren 0
  • RB1 (14.83 - 25.04) Gibbs 2, Warren 0
  • RB2 (12.49 - 14.82) Gibbs 3, Warren 2
  • RB3 (9.41 - 12.48) Gibbs 3, Warren 5
  • RB4 (6.79 - 9.40) Gibbs 6, Warren 8
By Week:
  1. Monty 13.4 Gibbs 8.0, Warren 6.8
  2. Monty 12. 4 Gibbs 12.6 Warren 12.6
  3. Gibbs 9.2 Warren 8.2
  4. Monty 34.1 Gibbs 9.1 Warren 11.5
  5. Monty 20.9 Gibbs dnp Warren 10.9
  6. Monty 4.3 Gibbs dnp Warren bye
  7. Gibbs 27.6 Warren 10.1
  8. Gibbs 29.9 Warren 7.8
  9. Gibbs bye Warren 14.3
Here in Week 10, do you think with Montgomery back Gibbs will revert back to being an RB4/4 with RB2 upside? Do you think we will see his production will regress to what it was 6 weeks ago? Do you think the twice-injured-this-season veteran will be the clear #1 with the bulk of the touches and all the GL work? Any upside for the rookie?
I don't think Gibbs is an RB3. That's what RW called him. I also don't think you can include games without Monty in your comparison. I also own both. Gibbs is the better start IMO. The reason he's a better start than Warren is due to the offense each plays in.
PPR I am liking the Gibbster the rest of the season, barring injury of course. Still think Monty will get goal line carries though.
 
Yep. I will say Gibbs is that RB that doesn't need the 25 carries to get fantasy numbers. The modern smaller, faster rbs just get bigger chunks. I'd imagine as soon as this week Monty will get more touches. That's okay. Hopefully Gibbs gets 15 touches a game. I own zero shares of either. All my opinion. I reserve the right to change that opinion based on my mood.
 
Hard to imagine that we won't see at least a 50/50 split going forward. Everyone saw the same thing last Monday night.

Maybe game script will still shake things up as the games unfold... Lions up big, clock kill favors Monty... playing from behind we'll see more Gibbs.
 
Hard to imagine that we won't see at least a 50/50 split going forward. Everyone saw the same thing last Monday night.

Maybe game script will still shake things up as the games unfold... Lions up big, clock kill favors Monty... playing from behind we'll see more Gibbs.
Pretty much how I see it going as well.

They want to keep both RB fresh for the post season as much as they can.

Now that Montgomery is back I wonder if MOP still thinks Gibbs fades into the background as he said would happen a few time awhile back, or if he is listening to MOP Jr about this now. =P
 
Hard to imagine that we won't see at least a 50/50 split going forward. Everyone saw the same thing last Monday night.

Maybe game script will still shake things up as the games unfold... Lions up big, clock kill favors Monty... playing from behind we'll see more Gibbs.
Pretty much how I see it going as well.

They want to keep both RB fresh for the post season as much as they can.

Now that Montgomery is back I wonder if MOP still thinks Gibbs fades into the background as he said would happen a few time awhile back, or if he is listening to MOP Jr about this now. =P

I haven't seen anything to indicate that Monty is 100% and playing this week either. He could be eased back in (or limited snaps) if still dealing with soreness.
 
My personal opinion having watched every offensive snap of the Lions this year. Gibbs is the better player, but Monty is more trusted in crucial situations. I think Monty should handle most short yardage and blocking situations, but Gibbs should get most of the receptions, and honestly could have more overall touches.

I think this is going to be a 50-50 backfield, with some hot hand playing in, with GL and 3rd down having their respective consistency for roles.

I think there is plenty of meat on the bone for both to be top-15 RBs. This is a team that can run on anyone, plays good defense (Ravens game notwithstanding) and really only throws to 2 guys. I think this a team that could truly be a 50-50 run/pass team. A little like Zeke/Pollard last season, with Amon-Ra taking the Lamb role, and LaPorta being a better Schultz.
 
My personal opinion having watched every offensive snap of the Lions this year. Gibbs is the better player, but Monty is more trusted in crucial situations. I think Monty should handle most short yardage and blocking situations, but Gibbs should get most of the receptions, and honestly could have more overall touches.

I think this is going to be a 50-50 backfield, with some hot hand playing in, with GL and 3rd down having their respective consistency for roles.

I think there is plenty of meat on the bone for both to be top-15 RBs. This is a team that can run on anyone, plays good defense (Ravens game notwithstanding) and really only throws to 2 guys. I think this a team that could truly be a 50-50 run/pass team. A little like Zeke/Pollard last season, with Amon-Ra taking the Lamb role, and LaPorta being a better Schultz.
Agreed. Good post. I'll add without really knowing the guy, it feels Monty kinda defines what Campbell wants to do on offense. Plenty for both though. I think the fact that both have already missed time, having them healthy come playoffs is a big factor in weekly usage. Imo
 
My personal opinion having watched every offensive snap of the Lions this year. Gibbs is the better player, but Monty is more trusted in crucial situations. I think Monty should handle most short yardage and blocking situations, but Gibbs should get most of the receptions, and honestly could have more overall touches.

I think this is going to be a 50-50 backfield, with some hot hand playing in, with GL and 3rd down having their respective consistency for roles.

I think there is plenty of meat on the bone for both to be top-15 RBs. This is a team that can run on anyone, plays good defense (Ravens game notwithstanding) and really only throws to 2 guys. I think this a team that could truly be a 50-50 run/pass team. A little like Zeke/Pollard last season, with Amon-Ra taking the Lamb role, and LaPorta being a better Schultz.

This seems to be the size of it to me. RB wise it could end up being like Ingram and Kamara where both on most weeks were worthwhile starters on a fantasy team. I could see …

Monty 15 odd carries and 2-3 receptions

Early downs/Goal line work/ pass D/salting clock away

Gibbs 10-12 carries and 4-5 receptions

Standard carries sprinkled in/work between the 10-20 yard line where he’s more of a danger to house it/hurry up offence playing from behind etc

If the line is at all fit they can both eat against anybody. If it gets majorly dinged up again then maybe not so much against good run Ds
 
In PPR, if you had to start 1 this week would go Gibbs or Monty?
I'd go Gibbs.

LAC run D looks pretty stout lately. Don't see Monty ripping off a lot of runs. Could fall into the endzone though.

Think Gibbs does a lot of damage through the air where LAC stink.
 
In PPR, if you had to start 1 this week would go Gibbs or Monty?
I'd go Gibbs.

LAC run D looks pretty stout lately. Don't see Monty ripping off a lot of runs. Could fall into the endzone though.

Think Gibbs does a lot of damage through the air where LAC stink.
Makes sense. Plus hot hand and not injured.
I have the same problem to figure out and I think I might go Gibbs over Monty until I see Monty is back at 100% then that’ll make the decision even harder
 
My gut tells me the share moving forward should be around 50/50. However, Monty will get gl Carries and gibbs more routes. This is going to be game plan dependent moving forward, I assume. The oline is good enough that they won’t necessarily need a pass blocking option in the backfield. That said if there running the clock Monty is going to get more touches. If it’s close, a shootout or they’re down gibbs will get more. My moneys on the lions leading this one most the way. We’ll see what Herbert ekeler and Allen cans do to this defense. -rolls dice
 
I cross posted this in the Montgomery thread:

Dan Campbell was on talk radio this morning and when asked about injured players, namely Montgomery, he said he looked good yesterday but wants to see how he feels today and tomorrow.
 
David Montgomery and 2 offensive line starters on track to return for Lions

Dan Campbell said Montgomery was getting treatment on Wednesday, and that the running back hadn’t suffered any setbacks. The Lions head coach sounded optimistic about his progress, saying the next two days are crucial.

“Yeah, I mean, I think certainly we know what David can do,” Campbell said, “but we know that Gibbs has gotten better every week, so we’re going to ask those guys to do things they do well and that helps our offense move the football.

So, I don’t think necessarily sitting here talking to you right now, that I see Gibbs getting 65 plays. I don’t see that, but he’s going to get his fair share. We know what he can be and he’s growing. I think it’ll be a little bit by committee and make sure we get those guys touches. Gibbs will get his touches.”
 
How is this thread responding? Monty’s back, probably gonna bench Gibbs
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that. As a matter of fact some are starting Gibbs OVER Monty. I saw one person saying they're starting Bijan over him which is perfectly reasonable. Stop making **** up.
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
I agree Robinson will likely have a good game soon.

What are the details that make Robinson so much better than Gibbs on paper?
 
I'm rolling with him in my flex. Gibbs has shown enough to roll the dice on the split and I think the upside is still upsiding
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
I agree Robinson will likely have a good game soon.

What are the details that make Robinson so much better than Gibbs on paper?

Most people thought Bijan was a pretty generational talent coming out of the draft...gibbs not so much

I'll be the first to admit that it happens a 100x over that a guy like bijan does nothing and is out of the league in 4 years so he might suck. But the feed him game has to be coming - but I'm only giving it one more shot
 
I'm rolling with him in my flex. Gibbs has shown enough to roll the dice on the split and I think the upside is still upsiding
What do we make of the data when Monty starts and Gibbs is the CoP RB?
Do we disregard what we saw earlier in the season?
Does the last 1.5 games of unfiltered Gibbs tip the scales towards the Rookie?
Is it fair to say no one really knows and we are all just doing hot takes and hopeful projections based on which RB we are invested in?
I have them both in different redrafts and I'm not really sure where I have Gibbs this week.
I feel more confident wheeling out Monty, I see something like 15-18 carries, 80 yds and maybe 1-2 scores
Not sure what to make of Gibbs
 
I'm rolling with him in my flex. Gibbs has shown enough to roll the dice on the split and I think the upside is still upsiding
What do we make of the data when Monty starts and Gibbs is the CoP RB?
Do we disregard what we saw earlier in the season?
Does the last 1.5 games of unfiltered Gibbs tip the scales towards the Rookie?
Is it fair to say no one really knows and we are all just doing hot takes and hopeful projections based on which RB we are invested in?
I have them both in different redrafts and I'm not really sure where I have Gibbs this week.
I feel more confident wheeling out Monty, I see something like 15-18 carries, 80 yds and maybe 1-2 scores
Not sure what to make of Gibbs
Own both in one league and starting both of them.

General consensus seems to be it will be somewhere in the middle between early in the year when Monty dominated vs. last couple games when Gibbs had all the touches.

I forget what game it was early in the year when Monty had 30+ carries and was wearing down the D in the second half and got all the touches. What I could see taking place (or what I'd do as a coach) is, after pounding Monty, giving Gibbs his chances to rip off chunk yards if not take one to the house.

There's a new dimension now available to this offense that could make DET very, very difficult to contain. I'd think they understand that.

Have a feeling Monty is more consistent and has a higher floor, while Gibbs is the guy you may want if you need a 30+ point ceiling out of your flex spot when projected to lose to your opponent big.
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
People who continue to ride Bijan blindly going forward baffle me. Nothing about his situation, opportunity or historical production this year suggests he is anything but a boom/bust flex play, and that will remain true while A. Smith is still the coach.
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
People who continue to ride Bijan blindly going forward baffle me. Nothing about his situation, opportunity or historical production this year suggests he is anything but a boom/bust flex play, and that will remain true while A. Smith is still the coach.
I know this isn't the Bijan thread, but real quick, his opportunities by week have been: 16, 24, 16, 19, 16, 21, 1, 16, 15.

Had Bijan continued his catch % and yd/rec from weeks 1-6, these last 2 games he would have had ~9 additional ppr points. Which would be pretty significant. Now, why he has done so poorly in the receiving game lately, is another question. But I know he's going to be catching more than 22% for more then 4 yd/rec.
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
I agree Robinson will likely have a good game soon.

What are the details that make Robinson so much better than Gibbs on paper?

Most people thought Bijan was a pretty generational talent coming out of the draft...gibbs not so much

I'll be the first to admit that it happens a 100x over that a guy like bijan does nothing and is out of the league in 4 years so he might suck. But the feed him game has to be coming - but I'm only giving it one more shot
Well I wasn't listening to anyone talk about these players leading up to the draft or much after the draft either, so I can't speak on that.

What I can say for sure is there is a lot of hype. Months of nothing much else to talk about during that time and it really gets out of hand. Be careful about taking any of that very seriously.

Looking at some basic stuff though like college production it makes sense. Robinson did very well in his college career performance wise and much better as a runner than Gibbs. Gibbs was more productive than Robinson as a receiver though by a pretty large margin.

Combine data both has good metrics. Gibbs was faster but both are fast. Robinson weighed more.

Robinson was drafted 8th and Gibbs 12th. In my eyes that's pretty close and draft capital is perhaps the most important thing to consider, as teams evaluate all these other things and then some when making these decisions.

As far as generational talent I don't know. The high draft pick used on Robinson suggests that, but if you look at Lance Zierliens grades he compares Robinson to Josh Jacobs. He doesn't grade Robinson as an instant pro bowl talent. His grade on Sanquon Barkley was that and a higher grade by a lot over Robinson.

Robinson has been more productive than Gibbs as well so far this season even though people are unhappy with how much opportunity Robinson has had.
 
What are you even talking about. Read the last two pages and didn't see a single person say that.

Oh

I'm going to roll with Bijan over him for one more week.

Enjoy your day sunshine

Please don't drag me into your arguments

I didn't say anything about Gibbs performance i just said i believe (and continue to believe) that Bijan is in for a huge game one of these weeks. He's a much greater talent on paper than gibbs
I agree Robinson will likely have a good game soon.

What are the details that make Robinson so much better than Gibbs on paper?

Most people thought Bijan was a pretty generational talent coming out of the draft...gibbs not so much

I'll be the first to admit that it happens a 100x over that a guy like bijan does nothing and is out of the league in 4 years so he might suck. But the feed him game has to be coming - but I'm only giving it one more shot
Well I wasn't listening to anyone talk about these players leading up to the draft or much after the draft either, so I can't speak on that.

What I can say for sure is there is a lot of hype. Months of nothing much else to talk about during that time and it really gets out of hand. Be careful about taking any of that very seriously.

Looking at some basic stuff though like college production it makes sense. Robinson did very well in his college career performance wise and much better as a runner than Gibbs. Gibbs was more productive than Robinson as a receiver though by a pretty large margin.

Combine data both has good metrics. Gibbs was faster but both are fast. Robinson weighed more.

Robinson was drafted 8th and Gibbs 12th. In my eyes that's pretty close and draft capital is perhaps the most important thing to consider, as teams evaluate all these other things and then some when making these decisions.

As far as generational talent I don't know. The high draft pick used on Robinson suggests that, but if you look at Lance Zierliens grades he compares Robinson to Josh Jacobs. He doesn't grade Robinson as an instant pro bowl talent. His grade on Sanquon Barkley was that and a higher grade by a lot over Robinson.

Robinson has been more productive than Gibbs as well so far this season even though people are unhappy with how much opportunity Robinson has had.

Of course it's all hype all the time. Trent Richardson on line 1 for example.

You hit the NFL and you just never know

Stuff I read, the general consensus was, Bijan could have even gone 1st he was that talented and Gibbs was taken early by the lions. Like i said who knows....100% of these prognosticators are wrong 90% of the time
 
For the second time, sorry for making this the Bijan thread. But just a cool glass of refreshing reality to anyone thinking Bijan is a bust or even just not going to live up to his generational hype. Not considering the "headache game", Bijan's minimum snap % in his 8 career games is greater than Derrick Henry's maximum snap % in his first 30 games. Now imagine if they had anyone other than Arthur Smith as coach.

Back to your regularly scheduled Gibbs.
 
For the second time, sorry for making this the Bijan thread. But just a cool glass of refreshing reality to anyone thinking Bijan is a bust or even just not going to live up to his generational hype. Not considering the "headache game", Bijan's minimum snap % in his 8 career games is greater than Derrick Henry's maximum snap % in his first 30 games. Now imagine if they had anyone other than Arthur Smith as coach.

Back to your regularly scheduled Gibbs.

The weird thing is that Arthur Smith was the Titans OC when Henry had 1700+ yards and 18 TDs in 2019 and when Henry had 2100 total yards and 17 TDs in 2020.
 
For the second time, sorry for making this the Bijan thread. But just a cool glass of refreshing reality to anyone thinking Bijan is a bust or even just not going to live up to his generational hype. Not considering the "headache game", Bijan's minimum snap % in his 8 career games is greater than Derrick Henry's maximum snap % in his first 30 games. Now imagine if they had anyone other than Arthur Smith as coach.

Back to your regularly scheduled Gibbs.

The weird thing is that Arthur Smith was the Titans OC when Henry had 1700+ yards and 18 TDs in 2019 and when Henry had 2100 total yards and 17 TDs in 2020.
That's a very interesting point!
 
For the second time, sorry for making this the Bijan thread. But just a cool glass of refreshing reality to anyone thinking Bijan is a bust or even just not going to live up to his generational hype. Not considering the "headache game", Bijan's minimum snap % in his 8 career games is greater than Derrick Henry's maximum snap % in his first 30 games. Now imagine if they had anyone other than Arthur Smith as coach.

Back to your regularly scheduled Gibbs.

The weird thing is that Arthur Smith was the Titans OC when Henry had 1700+ yards and 18 TDs in 2019 and when Henry had 2100 total yards and 17 TDs in 2020.
Perhaps that was more of a HC/GM directive than something Smith wanted?
 
For the second time, sorry for making this the Bijan thread. But just a cool glass of refreshing reality to anyone thinking Bijan is a bust or even just not going to live up to his generational hype. Not considering the "headache game", Bijan's minimum snap % in his 8 career games is greater than Derrick Henry's maximum snap % in his first 30 games. Now imagine if they had anyone other than Arthur Smith as coach.

Back to your regularly scheduled Gibbs.
I wouldn't call Tyler Allgier a comparable talent to Demarco Murray though
 
I'm rolling with him in my flex. Gibbs has shown enough to roll the dice on the split and I think the upside is still upsiding
What do we make of the data when Monty starts and Gibbs is the CoP RB?
Do we disregard what we saw earlier in the season?
Does the last 1.5 games of unfiltered Gibbs tip the scales towards the Rookie?
Is it fair to say no one really knows and we are all just doing hot takes and hopeful projections based on which RB we are invested in?
I have them both in different redrafts and I'm not really sure where I have Gibbs this week.
I feel more confident wheeling out Monty, I see something like 15-18 carries, 80 yds and maybe 1-2 scores
Not sure what to make of Gibbs
I absolutely think we disregard what we saw earlier in the season as he's more proven now.

I still think it's a gamble at this point, but I'm comfortable flexing him over my other options. Next week I think we'll have a much better idea what to expect moving forward
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top