I've made a lot of strong offers for Gibbs (or for the #2 pick, pre-dynasty-draft). Obviously, what I'm willing to offer now is significantly lower than in was pre-dynasty-draft.
I asked him what an acceptable trade would look like.
He said: Gibbs, his 2024 first and second (likely quite early, good shot at top 3, but he's in a very weak division so he could certainly make the playoffs), for Garrett Wilson, Quentin Johnston, Kendre Miller, Tyjae Spears, and Roschon Johnson. I considered that was decidedly too steep. But I did completely understand that opinion, as I would not want to give up Gibbs; I didn't think the offer was crazy. But he went to great lengths to convince me it was a reasonable degree of overpay. I thought it was a bit more than reasonable. Curious what others might think. (Our league is a bit crazy for RB's, which somewhat makes sense because 2-3 out of 6 offensive starters are RB's.)
Also I wasn't necessarily looking for picks, though I am always happy to stock up. But I just used high picks on those 4 2023 rookies he wanted. Doesn't seem like progress to trade them in for fewer picks.
		
		
	 
Not trying to make this the "eighsse's personal trade advice thread" but I'm really considering accepting this at this point. I hate losing Wilson but I may be able to flip picks. Should I jump off the plane with my shiny new Gibbs brand parachute or let Captain Wilson bring this thing down safely? This is a big one ... 12-team dynasty PPR, 1/2/2/0/1, yardage bonus yada yada ....
ETA: Have Hurts, Bijan, Etienne, Swift, AJ Brown, Lamb, Dotson, Godwin
		
 
		
	 
My previous comments were meant from a perspective where my team is strong which is where I want to be.
Based on what you say you have your team looks strong. Very strong in fact and I don't see how those depth RB are actually helping you right now. You have better options.
In your position the way to make your team better is by adding stars and Gibbs certainly looks to be that. He is a RB who may be better than some of your already strong group and can start for you now. That's what you want.
Wilson is a nice player but does not have a good QB. I don't see moving him as a huge loss to your lineup that has other quality WR besides him.
I don't know how deep your league rosters are but freeing up 4 spots allows you to pick up free agent prospects which is basically what those depth RB are to you right now anyways. Your not starting them.
You can always use the picks to buy other players to improve your team if you don't want to use them on rookies next season.
This is exactly how you grind value and keep your team perpetually in a strong position by making deals like what has been offered you.
Not sure what you are hemming and hawing about.
		
 
		
	 
I hope it doesn't sound like I'm arguing or trying to convince you of anything. It's truth I'm after, not proliferating my own opinion. But 8 years from now, do you think anyone who's had Garrett Wilson the whole time even thinks about "the Zach Wilson era"? I feel like that will look like a blip on his career. But I do feel I could flip picks for a good receiver ... I just don't like dismissing a young elite(?) WR due to his current QB.
		
 
		
	 
No your point is valid and Wilson looks like a young star WR who is producing despite the lack of good QB play.
In a vacuum I do value the WR a bit more than RB because of the longevity of the position by comparison and how you have more time for situation to improve.
You want the core of your team to be WRs more than RB for the long term health and strength of your team.
That said RBs need to be replaced more often than WR do.
In a macro view of roster management in dynasty you try to keep the strength of your WR core as strong as possible and the RBs are the last piece of the roster to address once that has been established.
I can see why your trade partner wants to do the deal too, as this improves that team's WR core and adds depth with quality RB prospects that are young and could pan out. If their roster is weaker in terms of competing right now this is what you do. Improve the depth of your assets since a player like Gibbs is the last piece of that puzzle.
I disagree with them offering you their draft picks in this situation but that's their decision. It seems like a move playing for next season more than this one and from that point of view Gibbs maybe Hurts them by helping them win more games.
Anyhow I think the deal is fair, I just prefer the Gibbs side of it for a team that's contending and that's where I always want my team to be.