JohnnyU
Footballguy
Reports are that he has two. Seriously though, everything I read seems to point to a nothing burger.Dang, still no update on that ankle?
Reports are that he has two. Seriously though, everything I read seems to point to a nothing burger.Dang, still no update on that ankle?
Just realizing AZ plays on Monday. We wont hear anything until tmrw (which is really Wed for them).Reports are that he has two. Seriously though, everything I read seems to point to a nothing burger.Dang, still no update on that ankle?
Agreed... I think Demercado would be a problem for anyone thinking that Benson would simply slide in to Conner's workload.Just realizing AZ plays on Monday. We wont hear anything until tmrw (which is really Wed for them).Reports are that he has two. Seriously though, everything I read seems to point to a nothing burger.Dang, still no update on that ankle?
Obviously problematic if you don't own Benson. And even if you do, I'm not optimistic he carries a significant load vs...what's his name the receiving back.
Hoping I can skip this whole situation and go with T. Tracy.
Which has me question, why bother holding Benson at all. All reports indicate his tape is somewhat horrid.Hi I'm .
Agreed... I think Demercado would be a problem for anyone thinking that Benson would simply slide in to Conner's workload.Just realizing AZ plays on Monday. We wont hear anything until tmrw (which is really Wed for them).Reports are that he has two. Seriously though, everything I read seems to point to a nothing burger.Dang, still no update on that ankle?
Obviously problematic if you don't own Benson. And even if you do, I'm not optimistic he carries a significant load vs...what's his name the receiving back.
Hoping I can skip this whole situation and go with T. Tracy.
Which has me question, why bother holding Benson at all. All reports indicate his tape is somewhat horrid.
I think the official injury report comes out at 4 pm todayI don't think I saw Conner on the injury report. I could be blind though.
Yup - domo arigato, Emari Demarcado, for being a good corporate soldier, but it's Benson's job to win/lose.Which has me question, why bother holding Benson at all. All reports indicate his tape is somewhat horrid.
I don't think Demercado (who I hold in dynasty) is taking over for Conner in the event of injury. I think it'll be Benson. I'm fairly certain they're grooming him for that role. Emari runs the two-minute drill, but I'm not sure what you can draw from that. Just my opinion, so everybody's mileage may vary on that one.
That's the final injury report but I believe the one's they put out earlier in the week are considered official and Conner has not been listed on it all week.I think the official injury report comes out at 4 pm todayI don't think I saw Conner on the injury report. I could be blind though.
Any insight into why Benson wasn't practicing yesterday? Don't want to waste picking him up if he's injured or other.That's the final injury report but I believe the one's they put out earlier in the week are considered official and Conner has not been listed on it all week.I think the official injury report comes out at 4 pm todayI don't think I saw Conner on the injury report. I could be blind though.
I thought I saw somewhere that Benson was sick.... Yes Playerline app cited Bo Brack of GoPHNX.com, whatever that isAny insight into why Benson wasn't practicing yesterday? Don't want to waste picking him up if he's injured or other.That's the final injury report but I believe the one's they put out earlier in the week are considered official and Conner has not been listed on it all week.I think the official injury report comes out at 4 pm todayI don't think I saw Conner on the injury report. I could be blind though.
He’s not on any report so far this week.I don't think I saw Conner on the injury report. I could be blind though.
Murray put them in a hole last week. The whole offense looked terrible. MHJ concussed, down big early - that’s a perfect time to rest your 29 y/o RB.I guess there is no reason to worry that he won’t play on Monday but I still find last week’s game odd. The game script when they are behind has sometimes reduced his work but I don’t think it’s ever taken him out completely. Maybe it was a combination of the game script and being cautious.
Gannon remarked that Conner was doing fine on Monday and his snap count was lower due to game script and not an injury.
well, has anyone been watching Benson? there are a couple things in a rookie RB that I like to check out before betting on them.Do Conner owners feel compelled to own Benson?
It seems like even if Conner were to go down, Benson would share the load with Demarcado. Add to this, the overall ineffectiveness of the offense WITH Conner and I'm somewhat loathe to hold Benson.
I have an opportunity before kickoff to grab either the LAC D (vs NO...minus Carr, Shaheed, maybe Olave) or the BALT D (@CLE...with who knows at QB).
Thoughts?
1) No ideawell, has anyone been watching Benson? there are a couple things in a rookie RB that I like to check out before betting on them.Do Conner owners feel compelled to own Benson?
It seems like even if Conner were to go down, Benson would share the load with Demarcado. Add to this, the overall ineffectiveness of the offense WITH Conner and I'm somewhat loathe to hold Benson.
I have an opportunity before kickoff to grab either the LAC D (vs NO...minus Carr, Shaheed, maybe Olave) or the BALT D (@CLE...with who knows at QB).
Thoughts?
1) does he pick up blocks/blitz when he needs to?
Team spent an awful lot of money on a contract for Kyler Murray. I dont think they wanna get their franchise QB killed. so if hes not pulling his weight that way, he may sit a while even if Conner goes down.
2) How is the team likely to use him? does he catch passes? or is he just a pure running RB? Conner has historically been able to catch around 30 balls a year. not top end but not terrible. but enough to be relevant as a mid range to high end RB2. if his skillset compares how is he better and how is he deficient?
3) competition is likely Demarcodo. how does he compare?
because he was recently drafted I know the tendency is to play him but sometimes if the other backup has skills that he lacks its not a sure thing that he slides into that starting spot when Conner is gone.
This is sort of what I've seen as well. but some backs tend to play better when they get a full workload and can get in a rhythm. Not sure if hes one of those. Either way I ilked his college scouting report. mostly I'm concerned about his blocking. (and whether he fumbles. I dont typically draft fumblers) but I was thinking this turns into a time share if Conner goes down.1) No ideawell, has anyone been watching Benson? there are a couple things in a rookie RB that I like to check out before betting on them.Do Conner owners feel compelled to own Benson?
It seems like even if Conner were to go down, Benson would share the load with Demarcado. Add to this, the overall ineffectiveness of the offense WITH Conner and I'm somewhat loathe to hold Benson.
I have an opportunity before kickoff to grab either the LAC D (vs NO...minus Carr, Shaheed, maybe Olave) or the BALT D (@CLE...with who knows at QB).
Thoughts?
1) does he pick up blocks/blitz when he needs to?
Team spent an awful lot of money on a contract for Kyler Murray. I dont think they wanna get their franchise QB killed. so if hes not pulling his weight that way, he may sit a while even if Conner goes down.
2) How is the team likely to use him? does he catch passes? or is he just a pure running RB? Conner has historically been able to catch around 30 balls a year. not top end but not terrible. but enough to be relevant as a mid range to high end RB2. if his skillset compares how is he better and how is he deficient?
3) competition is likely Demarcodo. how does he compare?
because he was recently drafted I know the tendency is to play him but sometimes if the other backup has skills that he lacks its not a sure thing that he slides into that starting spot when Conner is gone.
2) Based on limited usage, Benson has been the first two down back and Demarcado has been the receiving back. I believe Demarcado also is the 2 minute back.
3) See above
In general, I feel like Benson has been...ok. Can't say that he's flashed that extra something special that has you say, "Conner goes down, I'm getting his full production."
Jacob Gibbs
This is one of the most absurd stats I've seen in awhile.
Top-three in missed tackles forced, per @FantasyPtsData:
54 - James Conner
31 - Kenneth Walker
31 - Bijan Robinson
Kyle Yates
NEWS
: Arizona Cardinals RB James Conner was LIMITED in practice on Wednesday with a finger injury.
Highly unlikely to be an injury that would sideline him for Week 10, but still worth monitoring as we move forward...
Around the NFL
Cardinals RB James Conner (finger) limited in Thursday's practice
nfl.com/news/nfl-news-…
He wasWIsh this guy was still a Steeler. Good for him.
The AZ offense runs thru Conner.Happy for him the player. Has made around 21 million in salary so this is big money. His last big payday. For the Cardinals, seems kinda odd to hand out this much money to 29 year old rb when they just used a 3rd round pick on his replacement. Maybe he isn't what they thought?
He wasWIsh this guy was still a Steeler. Good for him.
Not to open old wounds, but I always thought it was really dumb that the Steelers let Conner walk, then spent a 1st rounder on a RB, when it was obvious OL was the big issue with the running game. Its interesting looking back that they could have kept Connor (objectively a better RB than Najee) and either traded up a couple spots for Christian Darrisaw, or taken Landon Dickerson, and had a way better running game than what they've had since.WIsh this guy was still a Steeler. Good for him.
Poor try at humor by me, meaning they should have kept him. Not trying to be obtuse, sorry.He wasWIsh this guy was still a Steeler. Good for him.
Ummm....yeah. Hence the "still." Reading comprehension down, or just willfully obtuse?
Actually, I'm good either way. Have a blessed day.
No and ThanksARI RB situation seems muddled for the rest of the season.
Michael Carter ? DeeJay Dallas ?
Is it confirmed Conner is out??No and ThanksARI RB situation seems muddled for the rest of the season.
Michael Carter ? DeeJay Dallas ?
Sux he’s out for championship week
Everything I’ve read has been negative towards him being ready to go by Saturday.Is it confirmed Conner is out??No and ThanksARI RB situation seems muddled for the rest of the season.
Michael Carter ? DeeJay Dallas ?
Sux he’s out for championship week
This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
Can you honestly trust either? I'm in the same position, have both, and may pivot to Mooney at my flex this week. Cant afford a zero and Penix showed some connection with him last week.This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
With AZ out of it and Conner under a new contract, I have to believe if he is active he will be good to go with a normal workload. I also have both RB's, if word is Conner is GTG I think I will start him.Can you honestly trust either? I'm in the same position, have both, and may pivot to Mooney at my flex this week. Cant afford a zero and Penix showed some connection with him last week.This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
Sure. Fair point. If I'm Arizona--Benson showed me enough already. No reason to let him go out and get hit either.Can you honestly trust either? I'm in the same position, have both, and may pivot to Mooney at my flex this week. Cant afford a zero and Penix showed some connection with him last week.This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
I'd look at it the opposite.With AZ out of it and Conner under a new contract, I have to believe if he is active he will be good to go with a normal workload. I also have both RB's, if word is Conner is GTG I think I will start him.Can you honestly trust either? I'm in the same position, have both, and may pivot to Mooney at my flex this week. Cant afford a zero and Penix showed some connection with him last week.This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
My main point is "if he is active". Your points are valid and they may very well bench him because of these reasons but I would think he will only be active if they feel he good to go without fear of doing any further damage.I'd look at it the opposite.With AZ out of it and Conner under a new contract, I have to believe if he is active he will be good to go with a normal workload. I also have both RB's, if word is Conner is GTG I think I will start him.Can you honestly trust either? I'm in the same position, have both, and may pivot to Mooney at my flex this week. Cant afford a zero and Penix showed some connection with him last week.This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
They're out of contention. No reason to rush a career injury-prone guy back and risk re-injury that could possibly linger into next season.
You just re-signed him. They'll want the most bang for their buck starting next season.
They also have a rookie RB with fairly high draft capital invested in that I'm sure they'd love to get an extended look at at the end of a lost season.
Bolded is a very good point.My main point is "if he is active". Your points are valid and they may very well bench him because of these reasons but I would think he will only be active if they feel he good to go without fear of doing any further damage.I'd look at it the opposite.With AZ out of it and Conner under a new contract, I have to believe if he is active he will be good to go with a normal workload. I also have both RB's, if word is Conner is GTG I think I will start him.Can you honestly trust either? I'm in the same position, have both, and may pivot to Mooney at my flex this week. Cant afford a zero and Penix showed some connection with him last week.This is my problem. I have him and Benson. I believe I’d rather Benson start if he’s healthy and Conner be inactiveCan you trust him even if he's active?
They're out of contention. No reason to rush a career injury-prone guy back and risk re-injury that could possibly linger into next season.
You just re-signed him. They'll want the most bang for their buck starting next season.
They also have a rookie RB with fairly high draft capital invested in that I'm sure they'd love to get an extended look at at the end of a lost season.
My only trepidation is Conner really wants to play in every game for the 1st time in his career but could he only get limited amount of plays to accomplish this??