What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Jonathan Taylor, IND (4 Viewers)

Not greed, just common sense. If he wants a large contract, now's the time. If he plays out the year, he gets franchised next year and makes what, $10 million? So, after 5 years in the league, he'll have received less than $18M, and at age 27, he's not likely to get a massive contract, because the NFL doesn't pay RBs, especially 27 year old RBs, big contracts. If he plays and blows out an achilles, he doesn't even get that much.

Cole Kmet just signed a contract with $32 million guaranteed, but yeah, "greed on JT's part" is the problem here, not Irsay or the other NFL owners.
To be fair, pretty much everyone thought the Kmet deal was dumb. Its tough to use the example of, "this one crappy team did this, so why not you too?"
 
Not greed, just common sense. If he wants a large contract, now's the time. If he plays out the year, he gets franchised next year and makes what, $10 million? So, after 5 years in the league, he'll have received less than $18M, and at age 27, he's not likely to get a massive contract, because the NFL doesn't pay RBs, especially 27 year old RBs, big contracts. If he plays and blows out an achilles, he doesn't even get that much.

Cole Kmet just signed a contract with $32 million guaranteed, but yeah, "greed on JT's part" is the problem here, not Irsay or the other NFL owners.
RB has almost become a plug and play and you can find a quality player in the 3rd-4th round every year. Will they be as talented as JT? Most likely not, but is the drop off worth the alternative of tying up a massive contract on the RB? That's something only a GM can truly answer. I understand the GM view on this tbh.

From JT's standpoint, he needs to understand the market he is in. Saquan and Josh Jacobs do. As a RB, there is a lot of publicity, I'd think they should start really focusing in on endorsements. Also, if he gets tagged in B2B seasons, he'll earn roughly 22-24mm over those 2 seasons. If he performs as he expects, then he can sign another 3-30 or so at 28. IDK, $50-$60mm over 5 years (before even factoring in endorsements) isn't exactly a raw deal.

It's just position specific and it is what it is for a RB. I really don't fault either side here. He wants more money, Indy wants to be at market value for the position.
Agreed. Many want to blame the "greedy owners", but it doesn't make any sense- they aren't pocketing this money, it's just going to other players who play other positions. There's no difference to an owner if they pay Cole Kmet $32 million guaranteed and JT $15 mil or Cole Kmet $15 mil and JT $32 mil.
 
Last edited:
Not greed, just common sense. If he wants a large contract, now's the time. If he plays out the year, he gets franchised next year and makes what, $10 million? So, after 5 years in the league, he'll have received less than $18M, and at age 27, he's not likely to get a massive contract, because the NFL doesn't pay RBs, especially 27 year old RBs, big contracts. If he plays and blows out an achilles, he doesn't even get that much.

Cole Kmet just signed a contract with $32 million guaranteed, but yeah, "greed on JT's part" is the problem here, not Irsay or the other NFL owners.
It’s what the players union negotiated for their players.
 
Why? His ankle is fine and has been. This is part of his "rehab" routine he's been mandated by the Colts to to do every day. He apparently comes in early, gets his rehab done and otherwise has as limited involvement with the team as he possibly can.

The Colts did not put out that video and I'm pretty sure had zero to do with the "news" last week he'd be able to pass his physical in 4 weeks. This is all Taylor trying to let other teams know his ankle is fine while simultaneously forcing the Colts to put him on PUP because he says his ankle did not feel well.

He has to stop playing the ankle is hurt card and get off PUP by week 6. I'd sure not bet against something else will come up later but that's the expiration date on that play and he's trying to get messaging out to teams he's good to go.

I keep saying and I'll say it again, and I want people to know I was busy buying Taylor at the dip so I want this to work out. But what I keep hammering is this only is going to work out for those of us invested in Taylor if he gets traded or something is done with his contract. This is just not going to work out in Indy this year on that contract.
 
Why? His ankle is fine and has been. This is part of his "rehab" routine he's been mandated by the Colts to to do every day. He apparently comes in early, gets his rehab done and otherwise has as limited involvement with the team as he possibly can.

The Colts did not put out that video and I'm pretty sure had zero to do with the "news" last week he'd be able to pass his physical in 4 weeks. This is all Taylor trying to let other teams know his ankle is fine while simultaneously forcing the Colts to put him on PUP because he says his ankle did not feel well.

He has to stop playing the ankle is hurt card and get off PUP by week 6. I'd sure not bet against something else will come up later but that's the expiration date on that play and he's trying to get messaging out to teams he's good to go.

I keep saying and I'll say it again, and I want people to know I was busy buying Taylor at the dip so I want this to work out. But what I keep hammering is this only is going to work out for those of us invested in Taylor if he gets traded or something is done with his contract. This is just not going to work out in Indy this year on that contract.
Although I basically agree with everything your stating I will say many an athlete has returned to the same team after drama like this. To say it just simply won't work seems harsh. Let's say it has a 2% chance of working.
 
Why? His ankle is fine and has been. This is part of his "rehab" routine he's been mandated by the Colts to to do every day. He apparently comes in early, gets his rehab done and otherwise has as limited involvement with the team as he possibly can.

The Colts did not put out that video and I'm pretty sure had zero to do with the "news" last week he'd be able to pass his physical in 4 weeks. This is all Taylor trying to let other teams know his ankle is fine while simultaneously forcing the Colts to put him on PUP because he says his ankle did not feel well.

He has to stop playing the ankle is hurt card and get off PUP by week 6. I'd sure not bet against something else will come up later but that's the expiration date on that play and he's trying to get messaging out to teams he's good to go.

I keep saying and I'll say it again, and I want people to know I was busy buying Taylor at the dip so I want this to work out. But what I keep hammering is this only is going to work out for those of us invested in Taylor if he gets traded or something is done with his contract. This is just not going to work out in Indy this year on that contract.
nah, mate. He's gonna be a colt week 5.
 
Why? His ankle is fine and has been. This is part of his "rehab" routine he's been mandated by the Colts to to do every day. He apparently comes in early, gets his rehab done and otherwise has as limited involvement with the team as he possibly can.

The Colts did not put out that video and I'm pretty sure had zero to do with the "news" last week he'd be able to pass his physical in 4 weeks. This is all Taylor trying to let other teams know his ankle is fine while simultaneously forcing the Colts to put him on PUP because he says his ankle did not feel well.

He has to stop playing the ankle is hurt card and get off PUP by week 6. I'd sure not bet against something else will come up later but that's the expiration date on that play and he's trying to get messaging out to teams he's good to go.

I keep saying and I'll say it again, and I want people to know I was busy buying Taylor at the dip so I want this to work out. But what I keep hammering is this only is going to work out for those of us invested in Taylor if he gets traded or something is done with his contract. This is just not going to work out in Indy this year on that contract.
nah, mate. He's gonna be a colt week 5.
Sure but I just said he wants out, which everyone knows. I did not say anywhere a trade was imminent. I'm just saying his ankle's been fine and his time is about up on using that excuse and if a trade or something with is contract to appease him does not eventually go down things won't end well for fantasy purposes. Might pop off some good games before the deadline, even I'd bet on that, it's what happens if he's still on the roster after the trade deadline when I fully expect things go south in a hurry.
 
Why? His ankle is fine and has been. This is part of his "rehab" routine he's been mandated by the Colts to to do every day. He apparently comes in early, gets his rehab done and otherwise has as limited involvement with the team as he possibly can.

The Colts did not put out that video and I'm pretty sure had zero to do with the "news" last week he'd be able to pass his physical in 4 weeks. This is all Taylor trying to let other teams know his ankle is fine while simultaneously forcing the Colts to put him on PUP because he says his ankle did not feel well.

He has to stop playing the ankle is hurt card and get off PUP by week 6. I'd sure not bet against something else will come up later but that's the expiration date on that play and he's trying to get messaging out to teams he's good to go.

I keep saying and I'll say it again, and I want people to know I was busy buying Taylor at the dip so I want this to work out. But what I keep hammering is this only is going to work out for those of us invested in Taylor if he gets traded or something is done with his contract. This is just not going to work out in Indy this year on that contract.
Although I basically agree with everything your stating I will say many an athlete has returned to the same team after drama like this. To say it just simply won't work seems harsh. Let's say it has a 2% chance of working.
Seems optimistic
 
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
 
There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.
No sir, those things are very much guaranteed to happen.

ETA-I should clarify the coming off IR part is guaranteed to happen. What happens when he's forced to come off PUP/IR to accrue a season and he's still a Colt should be highly interesting and I'm on record as saying it won't go well. Especially if he's on the team past the trade deadline.
 
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
As someone who has Ekeler, Taylor, Kupp, and Watson in 1 league. Herbert wouldn't even be close for me.
 
Not greed, just common sense. If he wants a large contract, now's the time. If he plays out the year, he gets franchised next year and makes what, $10 million? So, after 5 years in the league, he'll have received less than $18M, and at age 27, he's not likely to get a massive contract, because the NFL doesn't pay RBs, especially 27 year old RBs, big contracts. If he plays and blows out an achilles, he doesn't even get that much.

Cole Kmet just signed a contract with $32 million guaranteed, but yeah, "greed on JT's part" is the problem here, not Irsay or the other NFL owners.
RB has almost become a plug and play and you can find a quality player in the 3rd-4th round every year. Will they be as talented as JT? Most likely not, but is the drop off worth the alternative of tying up a massive contract on the RB? That's something only a GM can truly answer. I understand the GM view on this tbh.

From JT's standpoint, he needs to understand the market he is in. Saquan and Josh Jacobs do. As a RB, there is a lot of publicity, I'd think they should start really focusing in on endorsements. Also, if he gets tagged in B2B seasons, he'll earn roughly 22-24mm over those 2 seasons. If he performs as he expects, then he can sign another 3-30 or so at 28. IDK, $50-$60mm over 5 years (before even factoring in endorsements) isn't exactly a raw deal.

It's just position specific and it is what it is for a RB. I really don't fault either side here. He wants more money, Indy wants to be at market value for the position.
Agreed. Many want to blame the "greedy owners", but it doesn't make any sense- they aren't pocketing this money, it's just going to other players who play other positions. There's no difference to an owner if they pay Cole Kmet $32 million guaranteed and JT $15 mil or Cole Kmet $15 mil and JT $32 mil.
It's exactly this. Look around the room and blame your friends kinda situation. Additionally, it's a position that doesn't take much synergy. QB and WR are connected but RB is pretty straight forward. See hole. Hit hole. Granted, some are better at it than others but there are as many good mid-round RBs as 1st/2nd round RBs in the NFL.
 
Not greed, just common sense. If he wants a large contract, now's the time. If he plays out the year, he gets franchised next year and makes what, $10 million? So, after 5 years in the league, he'll have received less than $18M, and at age 27, he's not likely to get a massive contract, because the NFL doesn't pay RBs, especially 27 year old RBs, big contracts. If he plays and blows out an achilles, he doesn't even get that much.

Cole Kmet just signed a contract with $32 million guaranteed, but yeah, "greed on JT's part" is the problem here, not Irsay or the other NFL owners.
RB has almost become a plug and play and you can find a quality player in the 3rd-4th round every year. Will they be as talented as JT? Most likely not, but is the drop off worth the alternative of tying up a massive contract on the RB? That's something only a GM can truly answer. I understand the GM view on this tbh.

From JT's standpoint, he needs to understand the market he is in. Saquan and Josh Jacobs do. As a RB, there is a lot of publicity, I'd think they should start really focusing in on endorsements. Also, if he gets tagged in B2B seasons, he'll earn roughly 22-24mm over those 2 seasons. If he performs as he expects, then he can sign another 3-30 or so at 28. IDK, $50-$60mm over 5 years (before even factoring in endorsements) isn't exactly a raw deal.

It's just position specific and it is what it is for a RB. I really don't fault either side here. He wants more money, Indy wants to be at market value for the position.
Agreed. Many want to blame the "greedy owners", but it doesn't make any sense- they aren't pocketing this money, it's just going to other players who play other positions. There's no difference to an owner if they pay Cole Kmet $32 million guaranteed and JT $15 mil or Cole Kmet $15 mil and JT $32 mil.
It's exactly this. Look around the room and blame your friends kinda situation. Additionally, it's a position that doesn't take much synergy. QB and WR are connected but RB is pretty straight forward. See hole. Hit hole. Granted, some are better at it than others but there are as many good mid-round RBs as 1st/2nd round RBs in the NFL.
And so many injuries. I understand that makes them want to get their money even sooner, but it also makes owners/GMs less willing to dish it out. I don't know if there's a way to bridge the divide.
 
So now Baltimore and Cleveland are down their starting RBs. Except Baltimore has been down Dobbins for like 4 years now and they just always roll with Gus/Justice. *If* anyone out there is serious about wanting to move for Taylor, this may drive the price a little (or move the clock up which has the same effect). Two AFC North competitors compounds that.

But it really does seem more and more like JT has been feigning this thing and it might not matter if that is true or not, because perception is reality. Which is why it's possible nobody makes a move because a player that feigns doesn't get paid. And nobody is going to meet Indy's price.

And I swear to God that when he comes off IR if he doesn't get traded, I'm not sure they decide to ever put him on the active roster. I'm definitely with @menobrown and have been all along that the only way he becomes FF relevant is if he is traded. And I'm not feeling great about the odds.

What it takes is someone to say JT can help us win. That isn't going to be Baltimore but mmmmmmaybe Cleveland. No idea their draft capital or salary cap flexibility etc. But the perception that he quit on his team, feigning injury, etc., is not good for him on any level.
 
At the end of the day, JT wants a new contract and I don't see any team, in today's RB climate, making that happen before he plays some games for that new team.

He is in a precarious spot because why trade away a 2nd or 3rd round pick to the Colts and get sacked with that contract, when he's clearly going to walk after this year. Irsay and the FO of the Colts seem like fools for not accepting some sort of trade, because he's going to leave for nothing.

Based on everything we have seen and some of the RB play this year... there is a need for JT but I can't see doing anything more than a 3rd round pick (which still seems high).
 
Jerome Ford looks fantastic. Just plug and play. He can come out and play good this year and take back to back tags. TBH, that’s prob his best financial bet. He takes the tag next year, even if he gets hurt, he could still get $4-$5mm the following year. A floor of $14-$15mm over 2 isn’t the end of the world, imo.
 
At the end of the day, JT wants a new contract and I don't see any team, in today's RB climate, making that happen before he plays some games for that new team.

He is in a precarious spot because why trade away a 2nd or 3rd round pick to the Colts and get sacked with that contract, when he's clearly going to walk after this year. Irsay and the FO of the Colts seem like fools for not accepting some sort of trade, because he's going to leave for nothing.

Based on everything we have seen and some of the RB play this year... there is a need for JT but I can't see doing anything more than a 3rd round pick (which still seems high).
Reportedly both Green Bay and Miami were ready to give him a new contract with significant money
 
I thought the last two days with Hunt signing and Akers getting basiclally put on glorified waivers and picked up was a good assist for Taylor's chances of getting traded. Of course those RB's are not on his level but it's still good to see two possibly viable RB replacements for needy teams removed from the market.

As a sign of the current landscape of available RB's when the Ravens had to bring in RB's for a tryout this week with Hill's injury they brought in James Robinson, Ronald Jones and Drake who they signed and will likely make active this week. If at one point it looked like there was a decent RB available on every corner it's now a ghost town.

My point being injuries will continue to mount across the league and the events of this week just enhanced the odds of a team suffering an injury to a RB making a move for someone like Taylor. I don't think the contract stuff will need to be worked out at this point either. I think Taylor will play for anyone else. The acquiring team just has to be comfortable with fact they might have to part with a 2 and change type of deal for a one year rental with decent odds of getting back a 2025 third round comp pick.
 
Does anyone know if JT attended the game last week? Or even what he’s doing on a day to day basis? Is he training with the team or by himself?
No he did not attend the game and Stiechen say he does not want to answer if he's going to Baltimore this week(spoiler alert, he's not) or for that matter answer any specific question on Taylor going forward.

I thought the last two days with Hunt signing and Akers getting basiclally put on glorified waivers and picked up was a good assist for Taylor's chances of getting traded. Of course those RB's are not on his level but it's still good to see two possibly viable RB replacements for needy teams removed from the market.

As a sign of the current landscape of available RB's when the Ravens had to bring in RB's for a tryout this week with Hill's injury they brought in James Robinson, Ronald Jones and Drake who they signed and will likely make active this week. If at one point it looked like there was a decent RB available on every corner it's now a ghost town.

My point being injuries will continue to mount across the league and the events of this week just enhanced the odds of a team suffering an injury to a RB making a move for someone like Taylor. I don't think the contract stuff will need to be worked out at this point either. I think Taylor will play for anyone else. The acquiring team just has to be comfortable with fact they might have to part with a 2 and change type of deal for a one year rental with decent odds of getting back a 2025 third round comp pick.

Thanks for these comments. Good perspective.

I hope there is more clarity in the next few weeks.
 
I thought the last two days with Hunt signing and Akers getting basiclally put on glorified waivers and picked up was a good assist for Taylor's chances of getting traded. Of course those RB's are not on his level but it's still good to see two possibly viable RB replacements for needy teams removed from the market.

As a sign of the current landscape of available RB's when the Ravens had to bring in RB's for a tryout this week with Hill's injury they brought in James Robinson, Ronald Jones and Drake who they signed and will likely make active this week. If at one point it looked like there was a decent RB available on every corner it's now a ghost town.

My point being injuries will continue to mount across the league and the events of this week just enhanced the odds of a team suffering an injury to a RB making a move for someone like Taylor. I don't think the contract stuff will need to be worked out at this point either. I think Taylor will play for anyone else. The acquiring team just has to be comfortable with fact they might have to part with a 2 and change type of deal for a one year rental with decent odds of getting back a 2025 third round comp pick.
I think these are very different markets. Anyone who is looking to plug a hole with a guy like Hunt, James Robinson, etc. isn't really in the JT market, and I don't see anyone being willing to part with a 2nd round pick and change for a 3/4 yr. rental (if he would even be willing to play under his current deal, still a complete unknown).

Put it this way, I don't think anyone is going to shift their focus to JT just because the break glass in case of emergency RBs are all gone (not that they are, still have a couple out there). I think he's in a different category, and that category still has a very limited market.
 
I thought the last two days with Hunt signing and Akers getting basiclally put on glorified waivers and picked up was a good assist for Taylor's chances of getting traded. Of course those RB's are not on his level but it's still good to see two possibly viable RB replacements for needy teams removed from the market.

As a sign of the current landscape of available RB's when the Ravens had to bring in RB's for a tryout this week with Hill's injury they brought in James Robinson, Ronald Jones and Drake who they signed and will likely make active this week. If at one point it looked like there was a decent RB available on every corner it's now a ghost town.

My point being injuries will continue to mount across the league and the events of this week just enhanced the odds of a team suffering an injury to a RB making a move for someone like Taylor. I don't think the contract stuff will need to be worked out at this point either. I think Taylor will play for anyone else. The acquiring team just has to be comfortable with fact they might have to part with a 2 and change type of deal for a one year rental with decent odds of getting back a 2025 third round comp pick.
I think these are very different markets. Anyone who is looking to plug a hole with a guy like Hunt, James Robinson, etc. isn't really in the JT market, and I don't see anyone being willing to part with a 2nd round pick and change for a 3/4 yr. rental (if he would even be willing to play under his current deal, still a complete unknown).

Put it this way, I don't think anyone is going to shift their focus to JT just because the break glass in case of emergency RBs are all gone (not that they are, still have a couple out there). I think he's in a different category, and that category still has a very limited market.

In going with your argument, which team situations do you think might be in the market for JTaylor?
 
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
As someone who has Ekeler, Taylor, Kupp, and Watson in 1 league. Herbert wouldn't even be close for me.
Yeah Herbert isnt likely the best rb in chicago.
 
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
I made an offer for JT. Thinking he could use "a RB Now" vs RB in 2024 theory ....

I proposed Kyren Williams /Zach Evans LAR RB + Terry McLaurin plus a mid-2024 2nd

He countered with Kyren Williams, Kendre Miller NOS RB, McLaurin and 2 x 2024 2nds ....
So, the idea that Chic RB Herbert gets it done is not realistic, in my league anyway.

I have not seen any JT trades to know what it takes... but I think that was too rich in his counter. Still pending but not likely accepting.
 
I thought the last two days with Hunt signing and Akers getting basiclally put on glorified waivers and picked up was a good assist for Taylor's chances of getting traded. Of course those RB's are not on his level but it's still good to see two possibly viable RB replacements for needy teams removed from the market.

As a sign of the current landscape of available RB's when the Ravens had to bring in RB's for a tryout this week with Hill's injury they brought in James Robinson, Ronald Jones and Drake who they signed and will likely make active this week. If at one point it looked like there was a decent RB available on every corner it's now a ghost town.

My point being injuries will continue to mount across the league and the events of this week just enhanced the odds of a team suffering an injury to a RB making a move for someone like Taylor. I don't think the contract stuff will need to be worked out at this point either. I think Taylor will play for anyone else. The acquiring team just has to be comfortable with fact they might have to part with a 2 and change type of deal for a one year rental with decent odds of getting back a 2025 third round comp pick.
I think these are very different markets. Anyone who is looking to plug a hole with a guy like Hunt, James Robinson, etc. isn't really in the JT market, and I don't see anyone being willing to part with a 2nd round pick and change for a 3/4 yr. rental (if he would even be willing to play under his current deal, still a complete unknown).

Put it this way, I don't think anyone is going to shift their focus to JT just because the break glass in case of emergency RBs are all gone (not that they are, still have a couple out there). I think he's in a different category, and that category still has a very limited market.
I got nothing to reply or add to this because I feel like every single issue and concern you are arguing against I already acknowledged in my initial post. This is called just not agreeing.
 
I thought the last two days with Hunt signing and Akers getting basiclally put on glorified waivers and picked up was a good assist for Taylor's chances of getting traded. Of course those RB's are not on his level but it's still good to see two possibly viable RB replacements for needy teams removed from the market.

As a sign of the current landscape of available RB's when the Ravens had to bring in RB's for a tryout this week with Hill's injury they brought in James Robinson, Ronald Jones and Drake who they signed and will likely make active this week. If at one point it looked like there was a decent RB available on every corner it's now a ghost town.

My point being injuries will continue to mount across the league and the events of this week just enhanced the odds of a team suffering an injury to a RB making a move for someone like Taylor. I don't think the contract stuff will need to be worked out at this point either. I think Taylor will play for anyone else. The acquiring team just has to be comfortable with fact they might have to part with a 2 and change type of deal for a one year rental with decent odds of getting back a 2025 third round comp pick.
I think these are very different markets. Anyone who is looking to plug a hole with a guy like Hunt, James Robinson, etc. isn't really in the JT market, and I don't see anyone being willing to part with a 2nd round pick and change for a 3/4 yr. rental (if he would even be willing to play under his current deal, still a complete unknown).

Put it this way, I don't think anyone is going to shift their focus to JT just because the break glass in case of emergency RBs are all gone (not that they are, still have a couple out there). I think he's in a different category, and that category still has a very limited market.
Yeah, I don't think any of this impacts the JT scenario...

The fact remains, he still costs a 2nd round pick + a large contract if you want him long-term. Maybe teams feel confident they can draft a high calibur RB with a 2nd round pick (which is probably accurate). The Colts get a 3rd round compensatory pick if he stays... I'm not sure how he gets moved. The only situation that would make any sense is star gets injured, team has zero depth behind star, they trade for JT because the star RB has a cheap or expiring contract and they have flexibility to deal with long-term JT contract talks.
 
KC makes sense for a longer term deal. Kelce will be 35 next October.
ESPN wrote a piece today behind their paywall (which I just cancelled when I canceled Disney and forgot that was part of the package so could not read it) about possible trades for Taylor and I think they listed KC, Steelers and Dolphins and made up some fake "make sense" to them trades. I think, can't read it to be sure. I don't know, nothing would surprise me especially as injuries continue to occur.

I'm just going to say I do think he will be traded to someone. This has nothing to do with his talent when I say that I think the Colts will view it as addition by subtraction. New coach, trying to build something, and off to a really promising start IMO, and I think ultimately getting back some comp and removing a malcontent who clearly does not want to be there will be the path that the Colts will want to take. Stiechen already sounds tired of this stuff.
 
I don't see the Dolphins putting out the asking price for JT especially if they're getting it done with Mostert and company. Yes Mostert will get hurt eventually but it just shows the system can accommodate a mid level back. Achane could thrive for way cheaper.
 
In going with your argument, which team situations do you think might be in the market for JTaylor?
I feel like this entire situation has been kept close to the vest so it's really hard to say without knowing what each party is looking for. IF JT is looking for a market-setting deal, AND IF Indy is holding out for a ~1st, there's essentially zero chance a deal gets done IMO. Even if only 1 of those is true it seems very unlikely a deal gets done. But again, we really have no idea. Earlier in this saga someone said that this wasn't about the Colts, it was purely money, and I wasn't so sure. Obviously money is a big factor, but I thought maybe things had soured enough where JT would be willing to take a lesser deal just to get out of there. But again, who really knows?

There's also a difference between who I think should be in the market and who I think might be in the market. I think teams like KC, Philly, Baltimore, Miami, and Minnesota should be in the market, pending asking price- basically teams with post season aspirations without great RBs. Some of those I wouldn't expect it though because it just isn't their MO, and really the only teams who reportedly were moderately interested were Miami and GB. Doesn't seem like they got anywhere close to a deal though, so someone's going to have to lose the game of chicken. Cleveland makes a lot of sense to me post Chubb, but they just signed Hunt, are a bit light on draft capital, and have cap issues beyond this year. Other teams could become interested if they experience an injury.

So, long winded way of saying we really have no idea, but it didn't appear that any teams were really "in" the initial market for him. Maybe (hopefully) that market has come down some now and something can get done.
I got nothing to reply or add to this because I feel like every single issue and concern you are arguing against I already acknowledged in my initial post. This is called just not agreeing.
Cool. We agree that we disagree.
Yeah, I don't think any of this impacts the JT scenario...

The fact remains, he still costs a 2nd round pick + a large contract if you want him long-term. Maybe teams feel confident they can draft a high calibur RB with a 2nd round pick (which is probably accurate). The Colts get a 3rd round compensatory pick if he stays... I'm not sure how he gets moved. The only situation that would make any sense is star gets injured, team has zero depth behind star, they trade for JT because the star RB has a cheap or expiring contract and they have flexibility to deal with long-term JT contract talks.
IMO it's the combination- the RB market is deflated, so while I think some teams would be interested in either giving up decent draft capital or a decent (but not outrageous) contract, I can't see any team doing both, and the initial lack of interest seems to back that up. We just don't know how much either side is willing to stick to their guns, but if both are, it's going to suck lol.

Yeah, an injury could definitely open things up, but I agree that it's going to have to be a specific set of circumstances like you mentioned. Cleveland seems to be a good fit- Chubb's injury is obviously devastating and he has no guaranteed money left. Still haven't seen details of Hunt's contract but guessing it wouldn't be prohibitive if they wanted to pursue it. No 1st rounder but do have a 2nd and 3rd, and they've obviously been willing to deal picks in the past.

But without at least one party lowering their demands quite a bit, it's hard to be optimistic that he's going to be traded.
 
Last edited:
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
I made an offer for JT. Thinking he could use "a RB Now" vs RB in 2024 theory ....

I proposed Kyren Williams /Zach Evans LAR RB + Terry McLaurin plus a mid-2024 2nd

He countered with Kyren Williams, Kendre Miller NOS RB, McLaurin and 2 x 2024 2nds ....
So, the idea that Chic RB Herbert gets it done is not realistic, in my league anyway.

I have not seen any JT trades to know what it takes... but I think that was too rich in his counter. Still pending but not likely accepting.
I think your offer was more than generous for a rb that may or may not play this year. The counter was rediculous. I would recounter with far less than you offered the first time.
 
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
I made an offer for JT. Thinking he could use "a RB Now" vs RB in 2024 theory ....

I proposed Kyren Williams /Zach Evans LAR RB + Terry McLaurin plus a mid-2024 2nd

He countered with Kyren Williams, Kendre Miller NOS RB, McLaurin and 2 x 2024 2nds ....
So, the idea that Chic RB Herbert gets it done is not realistic, in my league anyway.

I have not seen any JT trades to know what it takes... but I think that was too rich in his counter. Still pending but not likely accepting.
I think your offer was more than generous for a rb that may or may not play this year. The counter was . I would recounter with far less than you offered the first time.
I would not have made that initial offer. Taylor has too many issues for me.
 
KC makes sense for a longer term deal. Kelce will be 35 next October.
ESPN wrote a piece today behind their paywall (which I just cancelled when I canceled Disney and forgot that was part of the package so could not read it) about possible trades for Taylor and I think they listed KC, Steelers and Dolphins and made up some fake "make sense" to them trades. I think, can't read it to be sure. I don't know, nothing would surprise me especially as injuries continue to occur.

I'm just going to say I do think he will be traded to someone. This has nothing to do with his talent when I say that I think the Colts will view it as addition by subtraction. New coach, trying to build something, and off to a really promising start IMO, and I think ultimately getting back some comp and removing a malcontent who clearly does not want to be there will be the path that the Colts will want to take. Stiechen already sounds tired of this stuff.
archive.md lets you read any article behind a paywall for free.
 
I sent out offers this week, but it seems everyone still values him like it's 2021 for some reason. Even if / when he's healthy, there's the added risk with his attitude and he may not help teams much this year. I was probably done a favor with the rejections and I made some solid offers.
 
Tempted to try and trade for JT.

Taylor owner is soon to be 0-2 and owns C. Kupp, A. Jones, S. Barkley, C. Watson. Decimated. Could be out of he doesn't get warm bodies in the lineup.

What would be Taylor's worth at this point?

There's no guarantee he comes off IR and there's no guarantee he even plays again this year.

As the owner of Z. Moss, I wouldn't mind buying low here. Wonder if a K. Herbert would do it.
I made an offer for JT. Thinking he could use "a RB Now" vs RB in 2024 theory ....

I proposed Kyren Williams /Zach Evans LAR RB + Terry McLaurin plus a mid-2024 2nd

He countered with Kyren Williams, Kendre Miller NOS RB, McLaurin and 2 x 2024 2nds ....
So, the idea that Chic RB Herbert gets it done is not realistic, in my league anyway.

I have not seen any JT trades to know what it takes... but I think that was too rich in his counter. Still pending but not likely accepting.
I think your offer was more than generous for a rb that may or may not play this year. The counter was . I would recounter with far less than you offered the first time.
I would not have made that initial offer. Taylor has too many issues for me.
I understand the concerns, but I was targeting 2024 to be a Title Competitive team. I project 2023 to be a "maybe make playoffs if things fall right"... not a Title worthy roster.
I felt JT in 2024 would have all these issues resolved and be able to regain his production (either elsewhere or whatever).
But yes, he does have serious baggage today. I hope he has lighter travel plans in the future ... my effort to "buy low" was rebuked.
 
I sent out offers this week, but it seems everyone still values him like it's 2021 for some reason. Even if / when he's healthy, there's the added risk with his attitude and he may not help teams much this year. I was probably done a favor with the rejections and I made some solid offers.
I own him in my one league. Zero percent change I move him. None of us know how this plays out. If he comes back week 5 and looks healthy his value massively increases. To move him now for Pacheco and a pick before that bump in value is silly.
 
I sent out offers this week, but it seems everyone still values him like it's 2021 for some reason. Even if / when he's healthy, there's the added risk with his attitude and he may not help teams much this year. I was probably done a favor with the rejections and I made some solid offers.
I own him in my one league. Zero percent change I move him. None of us know how this plays out. If he comes back week 5 and looks healthy his value massively increases. To move him now for Pacheco and a pick before that bump in value is silly.
Yea he is definitely an enigma at this point. But if he pans out as your RB 3 on your roster he immediately has league winning upside.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top