What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

RB Leonard Fournette, FA (2 Viewers)

ivory should be the play, yeldon had 1 big run, I understand they all count, but you can't count on the 1 big run every week.

 
I hear you, I wish they were  playing Indy again so I could play them both...
Cinci has been 21st against the run over the last 4 weeks (according to the ESPN fantasy show I have going in the background).

They prefer Ivory fwiw

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Cinci has been 21st against the run over the last 4 weeks (according to the ESPN fantasy show I have going in the background).

They prefer Ivory...
Well then it's yeldon for sure...who did barry prefer. My tiebreaker is always to go against him...can't lose

 
Bloom is ranking Yeldon ahead of Ivory.

There were quotes coming from the Jags after their last game as well talking up Yeldon. Apparently, he just looked better all around. I picked up Yeldon and am plugging him in over D. Booker. So, can't lose either way, right?

 
Bloom is ranking Yeldon ahead of Ivory.

There were quotes coming from the Jags after their last game as well talking up Yeldon. Apparently, he just looked better all around. I picked up Yeldon and am plugging him in over D. Booker. So, can't lose either way, right?
Hmmm, indeed.  

I'm playing one of them over riddick (bye week issue) ..might just play them both and bench D. Parker from my flex spot??

 
Bloom is ranking Yeldon ahead of Ivory.

There were quotes coming from the Jags after their last game as well talking up Yeldon. Apparently, he just looked better all around. I picked up Yeldon and am plugging him in over D. Booker. So, can't lose either way, right?
I think Ivory and yeldon are good plays.  But if what you say is true ,why is ivory getting the start?

 
Hmmm, indeed.  

I'm playing one of them over riddick (bye week issue) ..might just play them both and bench D. Parker from my flex spot??
That's a tough call. I think if I had D Parker, I'd be playing him. Especially with Cutler back.

 
This makes much more sense

@AlfieBCC: Per @JayGlazer Fournette missed a photo, missed a workout and missed treatment.

 
Marrone likes his veterans.  Ivory getting start means nothing. Aside from he'll be in for first play.
It's Yeldon's third season and he's been with the Jags a year more than Ivory, despite Ivory's longer career.

I think we see both RBs in hopes a "hot hand" develops.  Ivory more in short yardage, Yeldon on passing downs.

 
This makes much more sense

@AlfieBCC: Per @JayGlazer Fournette missed a photo, missed a workout and missed treatment.
I'd read was at LSU game last night and was at game with Hill who suddenly got an out of nowhere injury and is out.

Also that tweet you quoted from Glazer left out end, he added something like there is more.

 
Any recent thoughts on this guy?  Prognostications?
He was rusty after 3 weeks off, and their O-line played terribly. And the coordinator doesn't do much to disguise the run. Then, when they were behind, they pulled him off the field, because of course, why wouldn't you pull your best offensive weapon off the field?

Mainly play calling and stacked boxes held him back. The run D in Cleveland is pretty good, so he might have another rough week but they should be up so he should get a lot of carries. Could end up being 20 carries for 50 yards and 2 TDs (or 0 TDs and you're not happy).

 
What are thoughts on him missing practice due to his ankle - the same ankle that cause him to miss tow weeks ago and possible play poorly last week?

 
Hes prolly gonna be a little gimpy on that ankle for the rest of the season. Wouldn't be surprised if he has surgery over the offseason to tighten it up

 
Leonard Fournette (ankle) is questionable for Week 11 against the Browns.

Fournette's ankle reportedly "still isn't right," and there's word the Jaguars think they can beat Cleveland without him on Sunday. That's getting a little full of themselves considering it's on the road, in the cold, and this is the Jaguars we're talking about. But either way, Fournette is shaping up as a game-time call Sunday. The good news is this one kicks off early at 1 PM ET.

Rotoworld

 
This is starting to sound like his ankle is way worse than they are letting on to.. He missed a week, then was "benched" for some BS missing a meeting or pictures or birthday cake reason.

Maybe a set back...does not look good

I'm thinking he's closer to done for the season than 100%

 
Last edited by a moderator:
This is starting to sound like his ankle is way worse than they are letting on to.. He missed a week, then was "benched" for some BS missing a meeting or pictures or birthday cake reason.

Maybe a set back...does not look good

I'm thinking he's closer to done for the season than 100%
:sleep:

 
I watched the game last week and was waiting for that obvious play in which he re-injured the ankle. My guess is it happened late in the 4th as Yeldon/Ivory mixed in during a crucial late series that you would have expected Fournette to be in.

To be honest, he at least looked better than Gordon. I could tell Gordon was injured but Fournette not so much. 

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top