GROOT
Footballguy
yeah why would he give his all so the Steelers could win the Superbowl?True but then gotta think he would sit out the playoffs. Once he gets his 6, no reason to believe he won't revert back to his plan to save himself for 2019.
yeah why would he give his all so the Steelers could win the Superbowl?True but then gotta think he would sit out the playoffs. Once he gets his 6, no reason to believe he won't revert back to his plan to save himself for 2019.
Because HE would win the Super Bowl?yeah why would he give his all so the Steelers could win the Superbowl?
So he would go all out at risk of injury to win the superbowl to make the Steelers a gazillion dollars? at risk to his future?Because HE would win the Super Bowl?
The Steelers offered Bell $15MM to play this season. It was Bell's choice to jet-ski in Miami instead.Remember, we have certified eye test talent evaluators here telling us Bell is better. Those opinions are more meaningful than the DC of Pittsburgh's #1 rival.
OWINGS MILLS, Md. -- Baltimore Ravens defensive coordinator Wink Martindale isn't breathing a sigh of relief from the fact that Pro Bowl running back Le'Veon Bell has yet to report to the Pittsburgh Steelers.
"There are a lot of stats [since 2015] that the Steelers are actually better without him," Martindale said Thursday. "That might be why he's riding a jet-ski down in Miami right now."
Remember, we have had over 50 media members whose job it is to evaluate NFL players tell us TWICE that Bell is one of the top RBs in the NFL. Their opinions are more important than a DC who wouldn’t want to give his opponents bulletin board material.tjnc09 said:Remember, we have certified eye test talent evaluators here telling us Bell is better. Those opinions are more meaningful than the DC of Pittsburgh's #1 rival.
OWINGS MILLS, Md. -- Baltimore Ravens defensive coordinator Wink Martindale isn't breathing a sigh of relief from the fact that Pro Bowl running back Le'Veon Bell has yet to report to the Pittsburgh Steelers.
"There are a lot of stats [since 2015] that the Steelers are actually better without him," Martindale said Thursday. "That might be why he's riding a jet-ski down in Miami right now."
True, but at least now we know you care.still scanning for the BIG RED TYPE that says Bell has reported but it looks like we just have 10 more pages of the same back and forth.![]()
I own him in 1 dynasty league, so I definitely care.True, but at least now we know you care.
The main update is that he didn't report before the trade deadline. And if you own him in fantasy, that was a HUGE deal. If he got traded you had a possible stud on your roster for the playoff run.I own him in 1 dynasty league, so I definitely care.
But breaking down, and re-breaking down, and re-re-re-breaking down the legal terms of franchise tagging and what his motivations may or may not be....well, not for me.
I just hope one of these posts is Breaking News that he has finally reported to the team.
I like this for 2 reasons:The main update is that he didn't report before the trade deadline. And if you own him in fantasy, that was a HUGE deal. If he got traded you had a possible stud on your roster for the playoff run.
As of now there's little chance that happens and he's totally screwed your fantasy season because: (1) He never reports, or (2) When he does report the Steelers do everything they can to limit his involvement with the team, including using the two-game exemption on him. The Steelers have moved on.
Remember, we have had over 50 media members whose job it is to evaluate NFL players tell us TWICE that Bell is one of the top RBs in the NFL. Their opinions are more important than a DC who wouldn’t want to give his opponents bulletin board material.
There are two stats since Bells rookie year thay tell us he’s a top RB: Two-time 1st team All-Pro.
you seriously said media members I get the logic, but ultimately I think you're gonna be disappointed in the end. Yea i'm biased, but CLE isn't going to fold. Williams has his issues let's just say, but he is a motivator of men. That's proven. Where this team & O goes with Freddie calling plays remains to be seen. I'm actually optimistic it will get better b/c EVERYONE in CLE (coaches et al) is playing for their next deal, wherever that may be. At least now the staff has their "roles". Williams D, Freddie O. No more internal BS like playing Gordon when he was allegedly benched.I almost hate to jump in here with, you know, an actual fantasy question, but hey.
Anyone have any thoughts on his redraft value at this point? Just gave Chubb for Bell (plus Fitzmagic, basically a throw-in) in a 2-QB full-PPR 10-teamer. Not sure I'd do this deal in a vacuum*, but Chubb's my RB5 and as a 6-2 Conner owner, the safety of (in theory) having the PIT backfield locked up for the stretch run is more appealing than the chance of Chubb hitting his ceiling in that offense.
* - FP consensus has them back-to-back at RB32/33 ROS. That seems pretty low on Chubb to me.
I was offered Bell for Chubb in redraft about two weeks ago and passed. But I’m in a different situation at 4-4 (3-4 at the time) I just can’t give up any weeks at this point. In your situation it makes much more sense.I almost hate to jump in here with, you know, an actual fantasy question, but hey.
Anyone have any thoughts on his redraft value at this point? Just gave Chubb for Bell (plus Fitzmagic, basically a throw-in) in a 2-QB full-PPR 10-teamer. Not sure I'd do this deal in a vacuum*, but Chubb's my RB5 and as a 6-2 Conner owner, the safety of (in theory) having the PIT backfield locked up for the stretch run is more appealing than the chance of Chubb hitting his ceiling in that offense.
* - FP consensus has them back-to-back at RB32/33 ROS. That seems pretty low on Chubb to me.
Well done. i don't get why anyone wants this mess on their roster. Not to mention Conner is out performing his #s. Bet he and his agent didn't see that coming... For those of you praying for a playoff run GL.I was offered Bell for Chubb in redraft about two weeks ago and passed. But I’m in a different situation at 4-4 (3-4 at the time) I just can’t give up any weeks at this point. In your situation it makes much more sense.
Yes?So he would go all out at risk of injury to win the superbowl to make the Steelers a gazillion dollars? at risk to his future?
It is looking like Bell might have overplayed his hand.GROOT said:Le'Veon Bell still hasn't told Steelers when or if he'll play; no teams called for him at trade deadline
https://www.cbssports.com/nfl/news/leveon-bell-still-hasnt-told-steelers-when-or-if-hell-play-no-teams-called-for-him-at-trade-deadline/
The argument that a player in the Super Bowl would give his all is more compelling than an argument a player in the Super Bowl wouldn't.It's obvious no
I don't think he was caring if he got traded. Wouldn't be relevant to his strategy. Not like a team trading for him could sign him.It is looking like Bell might have overplayed his hand.
I would like this if I wasn't a Steeler fanConnor needs to start saving his body for his next contract.
... he splits out like a WR? Doesn't that count for a ton?What are the excuses from the Bell guys this week?
I think at this point it's safe to say that you've (and bojang) won this debate. I will be pissed if Bell is even getting 30% of the share when he returns.What are the excuses from the Bell guys this week?
I actually think both are pretty damn good. I do think Bell regressed last year on the ground and it was roundly ignored. He’d be pretty good in Houston. All I was ever asking for was clarity as to whether Conner was on par with Bell or both were system backs. I’m guessing Conner’s value is now on par or higher than Bell’s in dynasty and Bell is probably more fair value especially seeing is ‘18 outlook is still highly questionable at best. Steelers could still use him if he comes back. Conner has had a tremendous workload which is always worrisome for backs come playoff time and were only halfway through the NFL season even though were way past halftime in fantasy.I think at this point it's safe to say that you've (and bojang) won this debate. I will be pissed if Bell is even getting 30% of the share when he returns.
Oh don't get me wrong. I'm of the mindset that it's a GREAT thing for the Steelers if Bell comes back and is motivated to contribute. I think Conner should be getting the majority of the work but it would be an absolute luxury to have Bell as an option. It wasn't too long ago when the Steelers were forced to start Fitzgerald Touissant in a playoff game.I actually think both are pretty damn good. I do think Bell regressed last year on the ground and it was roundly ignored. He’d be pretty good in Houston. All I was ever asking for was clarity as to whether Conner was on par with Bell or both were system backs. I’m guessing Conner’s value is now on par or higher than Bell’s in dynasty and Bell is probably more fair value especially seeing is ‘18 outlook is still highly questionable at best. Steelers could still use him if he comes back. Conner has had a tremendous workload which is always worrisome for backs come playoff time and were only halfway through the NFL season even though were way past halftime in fantasy.
:XOh don't get me wrong. I'm of the mindset that it's a GREAT thing for the Steelers if Bell comes back and is motivated to contribute. I think Conner should be getting the majority of the work but it would be an absolute luxury to have Bell as an option. It wasn't too long ago when the Steelers were forced to start Fitzgerald Touissant in a playoff game.
The Bell guys only support has been their eye test. It's the most hilarious thing I have ever seen.I think at this point it's safe to say that you've (and bojang) won this debate. I will be pissed if Bell is even getting 30% of the share when he returns.
In retrospect ... wasn't it kind of obvious that this plan wasn't going to work out? The Bell camp was THAT certain Conner would schmidt the bed? The contract Bell wants** ... that's a virtual impossibility this next offseason, isn't it?He should fire his agent
I think his dream scenario was unlikely even IF Conner sucked. Who's paying him? Not many teams have that cash.In retrospect ... wasn't it kind of obvious that this plan wasn't going to work out? The Bell camp was THAT certain Conner would schmidt the bed? The contract Bell wants** ... that's a virtual impossibility this next offseason, isn't it?
** I don't even really know what Bell's magic guaranteed-money figure is to feel like he won his holdout. $30 million? More?
If they trade him, I don't think they would get a comp pick, just whatever they get in the trade. I don't know this for a fact, but wouldn't make sense for them to trade him and still get a comp pick.And if the Steelers are smart they'll Franchise him again, and then say, "Hey, go make a trade." Then other teams could trade for and sign him and we could recoup the 3rd, and still sign FAs. The worry is that if we just let him walk, and sign free agents, we won't get a comp pick.
Then you need to watch more Steelers football. I'm not a Bell guy or a Conner guy, I'm a Steelers guy and I see it for what it is. Loved Bell when he was playing and I've loved Conner since his early days at Pitt.The Bell guys only support has been their eye test. It's the most hilarious thing I have ever seen.
The difference is that if the Steelers tag him and want to trade him, it presumably will be at a time when the team trading for him can sign him to a long term contract. No teams called at the deadline because they'd be in the same situation as the Steelers are in - they'd have a talented RB who they can't sign and they can't trust because his focus isn't on 2018.If they trade him, I don't think they would get a comp pick, just whatever they get in the trade. I don't know this for a fact, but wouldn't make sense for them to trade him and still get a comp pick.
They didn't receive one call about him leading up to the deadline, I can't imagine it would all of a sudden start ringing in the offseason, when free agents and draft is available. I would vote for letting him walk, hope for a comp pick, and use that money on other free agents, or to pay Ben or Conner.
This year wouldn't count as a franchise year if he doesn't report by tomorrow.I don't think he can be franchised again. Isn't there a 2 year limit? Or is it just that the 3rd year franchise is so ridiculously expensive no one ever does it?