FarFromHome
Footballguy
Not if I had even 54%. If Connor is indeed out for year this is the pickup you spend all your money on.53% of my FAAB left in a ten team. I’m not getting him am I?
Not if I had even 54%. If Connor is indeed out for year this is the pickup you spend all your money on.53% of my FAAB left in a ten team. I’m not getting him am I?
Major bummer for Conner. Easy guy to root for.
Dynasty?Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
No - redraftDynasty?Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
I think this is Bensons opportunity to run away with it if he shows he can.Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
Maybe it was just because it happened in game, but the Demarcado usage scares me from Benson being a bell cow or league winner. Still startable, but more of a low end rb two or flex.
I think this is Bensons opportunity to run away with it if he shows he can.Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
Maybe it was just because it happened in game, but the Demarcado usage scares me from Benson being a bell cow or league winner. Still startable, but more of a low end rb two or flex.
Sure Demarcado will get some play and to allow a breather, but if Benson shows he can do it I see no issues here.
I'm certainly a Gannon/Petzing skeptic...but who they aspire to be at least on offense works to Benson's advantage.I think this is Bensons opportunity to run away with it if he shows he can.Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
Maybe it was just because it happened in game, but the Demarcado usage scares me from Benson being a bell cow or league winner. Still startable, but more of a low end rb two or flex.
Sure Demarcado will get some play and to allow a breather, but if Benson shows he can do it I see no issues here.
I kind of agree, but I am hesitant because something is off in Arizona. They should be 3 - 0 and look dominant doing it, but they aren't.
I don't know what it is exactly, but something about their play just rubs me the wrong way.
Some people have faith. In redraft league just got offered Chase Brown and Terry McLaurin for Benson and Jordan Addison. Very good offer but I will keep my Benson shares instead. Risky but love the upside here. Connor has been very good for years and this is young legs.Nobody seems to have faith in this guy.
I think he shines,and people regret not owning or trying to trade for him..
Time to buy is now imo. cost is only going to go up.
My thinking is this: the combined average score per game for both AZ RBs is 14.1 points in 1.0 PPR, which would be a mid range RB2. If you think Benson will be the bellcow for the season and just average those points, ignoring stats like YPC and targets per game, this is a pretty decent baseline for what we might expect. There's some juicy match-ups and some nasty match-ups ahead, so I have him slotted away as an RB2 ROS with match-up based RB1 upside.color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
Arizona never seems to look as good on offense as we seem to believe they should. IMO, at this point the problem is our belief.I think this is Bensons opportunity to run away with it if he shows he can.Just traded T Henderson for Benson. Time share “potential” for a bell cow. I’m not upset.
Maybe it was just because it happened in game, but the Demarcado usage scares me from Benson being a bell cow or league winner. Still startable, but more of a low end rb two or flex.
Sure Demarcado will get some play and to allow a breather, but if Benson shows he can do it I see no issues here.
I kind of agree, but I am hesitant because something is off in Arizona. They should be 3 - 0 and look dominant doing it, but they aren't.
I don't know what it is exactly, but something about their play just rubs me the wrong way.
Isn't Conner's TD output based on the offense? I mean if they give Conner opps at the GL (inside the 5, 10 etc) do you believe Benson won't receive similar opportunity?color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
Isn't Conner's TD output based on the offense? I mean if they give Conner opps at the GL (inside the 5, 10 etc) do you believe Benson won't receive similar opportunity?color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
Do you think, based on his "rep" that the offense will change to not give Benson similar opportunities to Conner as the Cardinals approach the goal line?Isn't Conner's TD output based on the offense? I mean if they give Conner opps at the GL (inside the 5, 10 etc) do you believe Benson won't receive similar opportunity?color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
I don't really think so. He had that rep in Pittsburgh for being not necessarily durable, but a really hard, tough runner. I don't think Benson has that rep. I've already read "East-West" about Benson once today.
Isn't Conner's TD output based on the offense? I mean if they give Conner opps at the GL (inside the 5, 10 etc) do you believe Benson won't receive similar opportunity?color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
Do you think, based on his "rep" that the offense will change to not give Benson similar opportunities to Conner as the Cardinals approach the goal line?Isn't Conner's TD output based on the offense? I mean if they give Conner opps at the GL (inside the 5, 10 etc) do you believe Benson won't receive similar opportunity?color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
I don't really think so. He had that rep in Pittsburgh for being not necessarily durable, but a really hard, tough runner. I don't think Benson has that rep. I've already read "East-West" about Benson once today.
Luckily I can avoid starting him for next week's game against the Seahawks, I expect he'll have a rough start but the usage will be the key factor in predicting his future range of outcomes. As someone who expects him to be a decent play, but not elite play, I'm just hoping to see 20 touches and goal line usage.People are really high on this guy. I have no idea, really. Best of luck to everybody who is about to have him in their lineup. Heh. He's relatively big and darn fast, that's for sure.
Yeah I think he has the measurables, but doesn't have great insticts.Do you think, based on his "rep" that the offense will change to not give Benson similar opportunities to Conner as the Cardinals approach the goal line?Isn't Conner's TD output based on the offense? I mean if they give Conner opps at the GL (inside the 5, 10 etc) do you believe Benson won't receive similar opportunity?color me skeptical. connor has been a TD based asset for years. not sure I believe Benson will have nearly the same TD equity. I think McBride actually benefits more here.
I don't really think so. He had that rep in Pittsburgh for being not necessarily durable, but a really hard, tough runner. I don't think Benson has that rep. I've already read "East-West" about Benson once today.
I don't know. They praise Benson's size and power, so maybe not. His problem seems to be vision and bouncing runs outside, which a lot of young backs do. I was just saying that Conner was a really tough son of a gun. Do with that what you will.
Demercado would be the next guy in line for sure, but he's not trusted. I would just not target Benson's back up if I didn't absolutely have to.Who`s the back up to Benson to target?
That’s such a hyperbolic take. It’s James Connor. That claim wouldn’t even make sense if you were saying that about Benson vs an elite-level efficiency producer like Jamaal Charles. You’re essentially stating that Trey Benson would have averaged 1.8ypc on the career carries where Connor averaged 4.4ypc, or that Benson would’ve averaged 3.1 yards per catch to Connor’s 7.8. Or that Benson would’ve fumbled away a bunch of those 100 opportunities, or dropped those passes.I believe if you give Benson 100 opportunities previously given to Connor, Benson achieves 35-40% of the fantasy output that Connor would have achieved.
i didnt read that. with due respect, your 35%-40% comment is a bit odd. and i don't own a bit of Benson.got it. benson is guaranteed going forward. readies pen and notebook....
Yep, that’s exactly what everyone has stated in this thread.got it. benson is guaranteed going forward. readies pen and notebook....
His back up went for over 30% last night in one of the 12-team Shark Pool leaguesWas he on the wire in anyone's leagues? If so how much % did he go for? This is the kind of player you dump 100% for IMO lol.
I can honestly say he was a dude I was trying to roster in every league.Was he on the wire in anyone's leagues? If so how much % did he go for? This is the kind of player you dump 100% for IMO lol.
I’d take this ASAP.keeper league up to three years; was offered Rome for my Benson (pretty deep at RB).... thoughts?
Smash accept, and im high on BensonI’d take this ASAP.keeper league up to three years; was offered Rome for my Benson (pretty deep at RB).... thoughts?
I didn't NEED him since I already had CMC, C.Brown, Hall and Judkins in a short bench 10 tm league where I can only start 2 RB. The WR WW was barren though and I'm playing the Connor owner this week so I bid 55% just to make sure he didn't get him cheap. I guess he tried to because I won the bid.Now I'm hoping all of my RBs go off this week so I can trade one for a WR.
Same!Going Benson over C.Brown.