Some of the Gordon success has to go to Gordon. It's possible Gordon is that much better than CP.Norv made sure to increasingly get the ball into Josh Gordon's hands last year when he was the only weapon on a bad team with no running game and horrific QBs.
Over the course of the season he'll do the same with Patterson one way or the other.
Or that they are 2 completely different players? Gordon is a lot more of a traditional WR than Patterson is.Some of the Gordon success has to go to Gordon. It's possible Gordon is that much better than CP.Norv made sure to increasingly get the ball into Josh Gordon's hands last year when he was the only weapon on a bad team with no running game and horrific QBs.
Over the course of the season he'll do the same with Patterson one way or the other.
I can see Rudolph being a bump. He was getting 5.6 targets/game. If we give 3-4 of those to the replacement, that does leave an extra couple targets for the rest of the group. Perhaps an extra target/game for CP, which is certainly not meaningless and could show up in boxscores.With Rudolph out 6 weeks, and Teddy the QB, a big Patterson bump
Yes and no. The more weapons the Vikings lose, the more the defense will pay attention to Patterson. Honestly, I think this is a bump for Greg Jennings, who has had two very solid weeks out of three in PPR leagues.With Rudolph out 6 weeks, and Teddy the QB, a big Patterson bump
Gordon was getting 20 targets a game!!!, CPat gets less than 6Or that they are 2 completely different players? Gordon is a lot more of a traditional WR than Patterson is.Some of the Gordon success has to go to Gordon. It's possible Gordon is that much better than CP.Norv made sure to increasingly get the ball into Josh Gordon's hands last year when he was the only weapon on a bad team with no running game and horrific QBs.
Over the course of the season he'll do the same with Patterson one way or the other.
Maybe get your facts straight before posting? Gordon never once got 20 targets last year.Gordon was getting 20 targets a game!!!, CPat gets less than 6Or that they are 2 completely different players? Gordon is a lot more of a traditional WR than Patterson is.Some of the Gordon success has to go to Gordon. It's possible Gordon is that much better than CP.Norv made sure to increasingly get the ball into Josh Gordon's hands last year when he was the only weapon on a bad team with no running game and horrific QBs.
Over the course of the season he'll do the same with Patterson one way or the other.
It was likely more random than by design and I'd guess it has more to do with the changes at QB than anything else. Looking at past Norv teams, I don't spot a trend.As stated above, Norv "increasingly" got the ball in Gordon's hands over the course of the season. That is what IMO he will begin to do with Patterson over the course of this season.
I stand by my original projections. CP will not come close to his 4th round ADP. Immense young talent on a very very bad team.I agree. I think he is going to struggle learning a whole new playbook. Took him 8 weeks to learn the last one well enough to get in more than a handful of plays. And Norv's offense is supposedly much more complex and involves vertical routes. Patterson caught 85% of his passes within 10 yards of the line of scrimmage. I think 900 yards is absolute best case scenario...900 yards. Minnesota goes 4 and 12, good for last in the division. Bridgewater hanging with Rodgers, Cutler and the Calvin/Stafford combo? Please.
You guys are not thinking this through at all. If Bridgewater is not top ten elite, Minn is at the start of a 2-3 year experiment in a qb centric league.
Wow. Did you also project that the Vikings would lose Peterson after the first game?I stand by my original projections. CP will not come close to his 4th round ADP. Immense young talent on a very very bad team.I agree. I think he is going to struggle learning a whole new playbook. Took him 8 weeks to learn the last one well enough to get in more than a handful of plays. And Norv's offense is supposedly much more complex and involves vertical routes. Patterson caught 85% of his passes within 10 yards of the line of scrimmage. I think 900 yards is absolute best case scenario...900 yards. Minnesota goes 4 and 12, good for last in the division. Bridgewater hanging with Rodgers, Cutler and the Calvin/Stafford combo? Please.
You guys are not thinking this through at all. If Bridgewater is not top ten elite, Minn is at the start of a 2-3 year experiment in a qb centric league.
You are just a ball of sunshine.And I drafted the turd at 4.11 in a 12 team redraft.
I'd agree. He's so very talented with the ball in his hands that he doesn't need to be Victor Cruz as a route runner to be a serious weapon and put up big fantasy numbers. Way too early to give up on him in dynasty formats. I'm likely less bullish on his chances than the market, but I'm not writing him off at all.As raw as Patterson was coming into the league I have a hard time dismissing his ability to improve as a WR over the next 1-2 years. He's still learning how to play WR isn't he?
Patterson's had more than 5 pts in every week in all the leagues I play inMost fantasy football leagues.In what world did he have 5 points? He's got me 23,9,9 the first 3 weeks. Not bad for a wr3.
I don't see any way that he can't just give Patterson the ball a bunch of times. He's losing skill players left and right. Patterson and Grandpa Jennings are the only people on that team that deserve the ball in their hands.Maybe get your facts straight before posting? Gordon never once got 20 targets last year.Gordon was getting 20 targets a game!!!, CPat gets less than 6Or that they are 2 completely different players? Gordon is a lot more of a traditional WR than Patterson is.Some of the Gordon success has to go to Gordon. It's possible Gordon is that much better than CP.Norv made sure to increasingly get the ball into Josh Gordon's hands last year when he was the only weapon on a bad team with no running game and horrific QBs.
Over the course of the season he'll do the same with Patterson one way or the other.
In the first seven games of last year, Gordon averaged 9 tgts/game. In the last seven he averaged over 13 tgts/game (an increase of 40+%).
As stated above, Norv "increasingly" got the ball in Gordon's hands over the course of the season. That is what IMO he will begin to do with Patterson over the course of this season.
This is more to blame than anything, imo. Patterson is a weapon, but not a WR1. With Adrian Peterson in there, there's all these tricky ways to get Patterson the ball that just don't work the same way without Adrian being the focus of the Defense. Now Patterson is stuck being a more traditional receiver and defenses can take him away more easily when there are no other weapons. IMO, vastly, vastly downgraded outlook until Adrian Peterson returns. From a guy who kept him in a keep-3 league.Wow. Did you also project that the Vikings would lose Peterson after the first game?I stand by my original projections. CP will not come close to his 4th round ADP. Immense young talent on a very very bad team.I agree. I think he is going to struggle learning a whole new playbook. Took him 8 weeks to learn the last one well enough to get in more than a handful of plays. And Norv's offense is supposedly much more complex and involves vertical routes. Patterson caught 85% of his passes within 10 yards of the line of scrimmage. I think 900 yards is absolute best case scenario...900 yards. Minnesota goes 4 and 12, good for last in the division. Bridgewater hanging with Rodgers, Cutler and the Calvin/Stafford combo? Please.
You guys are not thinking this through at all. If Bridgewater is not top ten elite, Minn is at the start of a 2-3 year experiment in a qb centric league.
I was exaggerating, but my point is (as you showed) that Gordon was targeted a lot while Patterson isn't seeing any extra targets than the rest of his team.PhantomJB said:Maybe get your facts straight before posting? Gordon never once got 20 targets last year.KellysHeroes said:Gordon was getting 20 targets a game!!!, CPat gets less than 6steveski said:Or that they are 2 completely different players? Gordon is a lot more of a traditional WR than Patterson is.Dondante said:Some of the Gordon success has to go to Gordon. It's possible Gordon is that much better than CP.PhantomJB said:Norv made sure to increasingly get the ball into Josh Gordon's hands last year when he was the only weapon on a bad team with no running game and horrific QBs.
Over the course of the season he'll do the same with Patterson one way or the other.
In the first seven games of last year, Gordon averaged 9 tgts/game. In the last seven he averaged over 13 tgts/game (an increase of 40+%).
As stated above, Norv "increasingly" got the ball in Gordon's hands over the course of the season. That is what IMO he will begin to do with Patterson over the course of this season.
So however did that 67 yard touchdown run work week 1 with Peterson on the sidelines? The whole "Patterson is worthless without AP" stuff is ridiculous. See Patterson's stats last season without AP in the lineup.jackdubl said:This is more to blame than anything, imo. Patterson is a weapon, but not a WR1. With Adrian Peterson in there, there's all these tricky ways to get Patterson the ball that just don't work the same way without Adrian being the focus of the Defense. Now Patterson is stuck being a more traditional receiver and defenses can take him away more easily when there are no other weapons. IMO, vastly, vastly downgraded outlook until Adrian Peterson returns. From a guy who kept him in a keep-3 league.PhantomJB said:Wow. Did you also project that the Vikings would lose Peterson after the first game?Touchdown There said:I stand by my original projections. CP will not come close to his 4th round ADP. Immense young talent on a very very bad team.I agree. I think he is going to struggle learning a whole new playbook. Took him 8 weeks to learn the last one well enough to get in more than a handful of plays. And Norv's offense is supposedly much more complex and involves vertical routes. Patterson caught 85% of his passes within 10 yards of the line of scrimmage. I think 900 yards is absolute best case scenario...900 yards. Minnesota goes 4 and 12, good for last in the division. Bridgewater hanging with Rodgers, Cutler and the Calvin/Stafford combo? Please.
You guys are not thinking this through at all. If Bridgewater is not top ten elite, Minn is at the start of a 2-3 year experiment in a qb centric league.
tieIs there a reason you don't think they will increase Patterson's targets? I mean I understand if you think he's overrated and not a very good WR but he's seems to be in a situation now where he is clearly the teams best offensive weapon so I don't know why his targets wouldn't increase.
I mean here are Vikes 5 best offensive weapons. If I missed someone please let me know
Jennings
Patterson
McKinnon
Rudolph
Asiata
Please list those 5 guys in order of best to worst if you don't mind.
Vikings OC Norv Turner admits he's "got to continue to work ways" to get Cordarrelle Patterson the ball.
"Cordarrelle is a different situation he was a year ago," Turner said. "Hes growing and teams are matching with him and theyre concentrating on him." It's easy to say the Vikes have to get C-Patt the ball in Adrian Peterson and Kyle Rudolph's absence, but he has to continue to progress as a receiver who can create his own looks. That being said, Patterson is so dangerous with the ball in his hands that he remains locked in as a WR2. We trust Turner to scheme the ball to his biggest weapon.
Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune
Sep 25 - 2:25 PM
Negative. I have decent WRs (Antonio Brown, Mike Wallace, Brandin Cooks, Andrew Hawkins, plus a stashed Josh Gordon) and no backs behind Forte and Bush (DeAngelo Williams is the only back-up I have) and there's literally nothing on the wire at RB. I needed the RB depth more than the upside potential of Patterson. They've both scored 40 pts thus far in PPR, so they're interchangeable through 3 weeks as a flex play.That's a joke, right?I just traded him for Fred Jackson.
So another 13 plays for him then?Rotoworld:
Vikings OC Norv Turner admits he's "got to continue to work ways" to get Cordarrelle Patterson the ball.
"Cordarrelle is a different situation he was a year ago," Turner said. "Hes growing and teams are matching with him and theyre concentrating on him." It's easy to say the Vikes have to get C-Patt the ball in Adrian Peterson and Kyle Rudolph's absence, but he has to continue to progress as a receiver who can create his own looks. That being said, Patterson is so dangerous with the ball in his hands that he remains locked in as a WR2. We trust Turner to scheme the ball to his biggest weapon.
Source: Minneapolis Star-Tribune
Sep 25 - 2:25 PM
I completely disagree. All defenses playing them have got to see CPatt as the only threat right now with Rudolph gone and Bridge not having good accuracy on the deep ball. You double Patt and bring 8 into the box and it's game over.I have a feeling he's in for a huge week.
Way too early to tell.I also think it is possible that Teddy Bridgewater favors the more reliable route runner in Greg Jennings.
It's not easy as: Get him the ball. And even less so: Get him the ball in space. If it was easy, Devin Hester and Dante Hall would have been major offensive weapons and Tavon Austin would be putting up monster numbers.If I'm the Vikings I'm finding ways to get the ball in the hands of your most dangerous weapon on offense.....Might just take some pressure off Teddy. But what do I know? Its just wishful thinking from a guy who spent a 4th rounder on him.
Fair enough......maybe he'll improve in his 1 on 1.....maybe Bridgewater will help him.....whatever it takes, he and the Vikings should find ways to get him the dam ball! Cuz when he has it, he's electric.It's not easy as: Get him the ball. And even less so: Get him the ball in space. If it was easy, Devin Hester and Dante Hall would have been major offensive weapons and Tavon Austin would be putting up monster numbers.If I'm the Vikings I'm finding ways to get the ball in the hands of your most dangerous weapon on offense.....Might just take some pressure off Teddy. But what do I know? Its just wishful thinking from a guy who spent a 4th rounder on him.
Aside from winning 1 on 1 matchups and blown coverages--you have to catch the defense off guard. Deceptive plays require set up. And the more they're on film, the less productive they are. And, that's the scouting report on CP today--don't let him get the ball in space and let him try to beat with his routes. He needs to change that.
Patterson needs to win more 1 on 1 matchups to be more than he's been to this point.
Wow. You couldn't move Hawkins or Wallace for FJAx? Dude is 33, I am waiting for the worm to turn with him.Negative. I have decent WRs (Antonio Brown, Mike Wallace, Brandin Cooks, Andrew Hawkins, plus a stashed Josh Gordon) and no backs behind Forte and Bush (DeAngelo Williams is the only back-up I have) and there's literally nothing on the wire at RB. I needed the RB depth more than the upside potential of Patterson. They've both scored 40 pts thus far in PPR, so they're interchangeable through 3 weeks as a flex play.That's a joke, right?I just traded him for Fred Jackson.