Mr. Mojo said:
Lost In Translation.
Kinda disappointed with this movie, though i came in with high expectations. Great acting, excellent ending, and Scarlett Johannsen was hot, but one thing i really didn't like was how every Japanese person was portrayed as shallow and/or stupid. When all was said and done, the movie never really made me feel any emotions.
3/5.

I agree except I thought it was even worse than you.
It seemed like a good idea for a movie that was boring and went nowhere.
It's weird, as I get older I'm starting to find action movies boring and movies like Lost in Translation vastly more compelling. I understand people finding it boring, or thinking it doesn't really culminate with a stirring conclusion. With movies like these, I don't think it's about "getting it" or "not getting it". It's just about what a person wants from their viewing experience. Nowadays, often I head in looking for a seamless delivery in terms of believability--I like not feeling any moments where I'm thinking about the fact that I'm watching a movie. What Lost in Translation does for me is present a unique situation (big movie star trapped in a hotel in Tokyo with a newlywed trapped in a hotel in Tokyo), and shows it in an unflashy, believable way. There are akward silences and miscommunications. There are periods of contemplation over unexciting, real-life stuff. So I don't know, I feel connected to what I'm watching and it stirs my own contemplation.
Broken Flowers--another Bill Murray movie that people either like or dislike because of the way the story is presented--did the same thing for me. It was just a soothing movie that had me thinking while there are long periods of quiet thinking going on in the film. I liked it, but I understand why people wouldn't, and I think it comes down to what you want out of the experience.