What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental Edition (7 Viewers)

Speaking of Edward Norton, apparently they didnt want to pay him what he wanted for The Avengers movie, so Mark Ruffalo will be the Hulk instead of Norton in that movie. People want to complain about Adrien Brody being miscast in Predators, this sounds a lot worse to me, and I like most of Ruffalo's work.
I read yesterday they wanted Joaquin first after Norton. Huge Ruffalo fan, but he doesn't seem like a blind rage kind of guy.The studio released some pretty scathing comments about Norton not being much of a team player and wanting some sort of creative control. Norton seems pissed, but he couldn't have wanted to be Hulk that bad?

 
Warning, extremely long and detailed reviews below:

The Box - Slow, and didn't really care for the resolution. 2/5

The Crazies - Had much higher expectations for a movie that should be right up my alley. For a movie titled "The Crazies", they didn't show enough crazies IMO. 2.5/5

Surrogates - Meh. Avoid. 1.5/5

The Book of Eli - Not too bad. Thought the girl was kind of extraneous to the story and didn't really fit in. Enjoyed it though. 3/5

The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo - Best of the bunch. Good story without too much hand holding. Could have done without a couple scenes, but overall I enjoyed it. 4/5

 
Norton sounds like a DB. Remember he threw his weight around in the making of American History X?
If he did, Im glad he did because he was great in that and IMO that's one of the best movies of the last 20 years. Better than Fight Club IMO.ETA: Its a joke that Roberto Benigni won the Best Actor oscar that year over Norton.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Norton sounds like a DB. Remember he threw his weight around in the making of American History X?
If he did, Im glad he did because he was great in that and IMO that's one of the best movies of the last 20 years. Better than Fight Club IMO.
Edward Norton was said to have re-edited the film to lengthen his screen time. Director Tony Kaye then attempted to get his name removed but violated a Directors' Guild of America rule that states that directors that use pseudonyms (such as "Alan Smithee") must not talk about why they had their name removed - which Tony Kaye had done in ads in Variety. Kaye sued the DGA and New Line Cinema for $200 million stating that the DGA rule violated his first amendment rights.
Didn't much care for AHX.
 
Norton sounds like a DB. Remember he threw his weight around in the making of American History X?
If he did, Im glad he did because he was great in that and IMO that's one of the best movies of the last 20 years. Better than Fight Club IMO.
Norton re-edited it give himself more screen time, it was supposed to be more about Furlong's character.Director was so pissed he sued the studio for $275 million and wanted his name off the project.

Also always thought the alternate ending would have been better than the original that shows Norton shaving his head again after what happens to his brother.

 
Also always thought the alternate ending would have been better than the original that shows Norton shaving his head again after what happens to his brother.
I just re-watched this again a few months ago, thought it was even better than I remembered it being, but dont recall Norton doing that in the end. IIRC, it basically ended after he sees his brother dead in the BR.Dont think my copy has an alternate ending either. Its some POS other region DVD I got cheap awhile back. Think I'll need to fix that.....I think the copy I have includes the curb kick seen in whole, as Im pretty sure after the DVD was out for a little bit, after complaints, they edited out showing Norton actually stomping the dude.
 
Also always thought the alternate ending would have been better than the original that shows Norton shaving his head again after what happens to his brother.
I just re-watched this again a few months ago, thought it was even better than I remembered it being, but dont recall Norton doing that in the end. IIRC, it basically ended after he sees his brother dead in the BR.Dont think my copy has an alternate ending either. Its some POS other region DVD I got cheap awhile back. Think I'll need to fix that.....I think the copy I have includes the curb kick seen in whole, as Im pretty sure after the DVD was out for a little bit, after complaints, they edited out showing Norton actually stomping the dude.
The head shaving scene I believe was how it was scripted. I don't know if it was ever actually filmed. That's the ending I was referring too.You're correct on how it actually ends.
 
Also always thought the alternate ending would have been better than the original that shows Norton shaving his head again after what happens to his brother.
I just re-watched this again a few months ago, thought it was even better than I remembered it being, but dont recall Norton doing that in the end. IIRC, it basically ended after he sees his brother dead in the BR.Dont think my copy has an alternate ending either. Its some POS other region DVD I got cheap awhile back. Think I'll need to fix that.....I think the copy I have includes the curb kick seen in whole, as Im pretty sure after the DVD was out for a little bit, after complaints, they edited out showing Norton actually stomping the dude.
The head shaving scene I believe was how it was scripted. I don't know if it was ever actually filmed. That's the ending I was referring too.You're correct on how it actually ends.
Hard to say now, but I think ending with the head shaving would have really soured me on the movie.
 
Also always thought the alternate ending would have been better than the original that shows Norton shaving his head again after what happens to his brother.
I just re-watched this again a few months ago, thought it was even better than I remembered it being, but dont recall Norton doing that in the end. IIRC, it basically ended after he sees his brother dead in the BR.Dont think my copy has an alternate ending either. Its some POS other region DVD I got cheap awhile back. Think I'll need to fix that.....I think the copy I have includes the curb kick seen in whole, as Im pretty sure after the DVD was out for a little bit, after complaints, they edited out showing Norton actually stomping the dude.
The head shaving scene I believe was how it was scripted. I don't know if it was ever actually filmed. That's the ending I was referring too.You're correct on how it actually ends.
Ahh, k...I like the movie so much, not sure if Id prefer that ending or not since I think its pretty much perfect as it is. I think that ending might make the movie hit you even harder in the end, but I also think it would take away from how significant and integral the prison time/flashback sequence was on his character - and possibly minimize the impact of the death of his brother (ie he went through so much to change, but ultimately it didnt even matter). Then again, it also would make sense since he became a skinhead in the first place because his father was killed, so ultimately that ending might make more sense. Also just reading on wiki there were actually 3 different versions, and the 3rd version was what they released. I dont know if they still exist, but if they ever re-released the DVD or something, that would be pretty sweet if they included the other 2 versions.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I am 25 minutes into Breeders.

It is so bad it is laughable. The dialogue is atrocious and the monster suit looks like a guy wearing rubber gloves

However, there has been 2 gratuitous nudity scenes so far. Strike that, 3 now

 
Knight and Day - pretty absurd, but entertaining enough i guess if that's what your in the mood for. and i was. 5.5/10

 
Catching up on some from last year:

A Single Man: This movie had me within five minutes. I felt like I'd been punched in the gut and was practically ready to deem it one of the best movies I'd ever seen, until it meandered into an awkward scene with Julianne Moore (who was terrific) near the middle and got a little worn with the super-close-up camera work after a while. Still, the cinematography is outstanding (only later did I find out the movie was directed by Tom Ford, which made sense), and Colin Firth gives one of the best performances I've ever seen--right now I'm putting it in my top ten. As much as I rant on here against voice-overs, I equally love scenes that can tell a whole story without a word being spoken, and there are several in this movie that are just astounding. And some of the subtleties in the storytelling were terrific--notice, for instance, a seemingly inconsequential note at the beginning of the movie that the color red means "lust", and at the end of the movie the object of the protagonist's lust is filmed with a red glow over him. So despite the few flaws above, I still have to give this 4.5/5. One of my favorite movies in a long time.
I have mixed feelings about this movie. I agree that the cinematography is outstanding and Firth delivers a very solid performance. However I found that the characters, aside from Moore, didn't speak to me on anything but a superficial level. I just didn't really find myself emotionally invested in Firth, Hoult or Goode. And while I am also impressed when meaning can be conveyed without dialogue, after the 3rd or 4th scene of Firth staring off into the distance for two minutes the impact kind of wore off. I also did not enjoy the voice over because I felt that it came out of nowhere and really only spoke the obvious. Excellent point about using the color red at the end of the film, that point hadn't occurred to me.

Seriously if you haven't seen this don't open this spoiler unless you want the movie ruined for you.

Ultimately however the only part of the movie that really held me was the question "Is he or isn't he going to kill himself." And when we finally answer that question he instantly keels over and dies. What exactly was that supposed to be about? Was Ford trying to be ironic? The fact that he burned the letters almost immediately prior to dying IMO rendered the voice over completely unnecessary. It made me feel like Ford, after giving the audience the benefit of the doubt for most of the movie, thought his audience needed to have their hand held for the completely obvious point of "And just like that it came." No kidding Tommy.

*** SPOILER ALERT! Click this link to display the potential spoiler text in this box. ***
");document.close();

I really wanted to enjoy this movie, and I think it is worth seeing but something just missed for me. Perhaps I will need to digest it a little more and watch it again next year.
I connected with the Firth character enormously from the very beginning, maybe because of the raw emotion and harrowing nature of the beginning of the movie. I was also really taken with the moments when he would lighten up and almost seem natural, while we knew that almost everything he lived to the outside world was a lie. The point where the young guy says that they are "invisible" was telling in this regard. Also, I didn't really see scenes as "just" him staring into the distance, ever. I was completely fascinated by watching a wide range of emotions come and go in his face in each of the silent periods, which is why I found his performance so astonishing.As to the ending:

I happened to have this one waiting in my mailbox today. Beautiful film. :lmao: I agree with krista about the "staring into the distance" thing. Nothing seemed to drag at all. Firth was outstanding, and the pacing was perfect imo. Hard to believe that was a first time director.

I agree re: first-time director. When I saw the credits say "Tom Ford", I actually said out loud, "That couldn't be the guy from Gucci, could it?" I'm totally on-board with the idea of a designer being able to do this now, as the vision is just perfect for a film, if done well like this. It's kind of interesting, I'm starting to think that non-directors have a perspective that can be fresher or more interesting than the big names--see Julian Schnabel for The Diving Bell and the Butterfly, for instance.
 
I just put Ruthless People in the DVD player.

Haven't seen it in at least a decade, but it was one of my favorite comedies of the 80s.

I'll report back whether it holds up to time.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just put Ruthless People in the DVD player.

Haven't seen it in at least a decade, but it was one of my favorite comedies of the 80s.

I'll report back whether it holds up to time.
"This might be the stupidest man on the face of the earth" :lmao:
 
if you're shooting at me, then where's your gun?

who cares if it's as big as a Subaru and costs as much? if you can't afford it, ####### finance it!

GREAT movie.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sam Stone: [answering the phone] Hello? Debbie? Yeah, Debbie's here, who's this? Well, Ralph, uh, Debbie can't talk right now, my ####'s in her mouth. How about if I have her call you back later when I'm done?

[hangs up and laughs]

Sam Stone: I love wrong numbers.

 
Punisher: War Zone...Pretty sweet action/shootout scenes, but thats all it had going for it. Jimmy McNulty as the antagonist with a face that went thru a meatgrinder (literally) was laughable and just every time he's on screen you cant help but be distracted and not take him seriously. I actually thought the first Punisher with Thomas Jane was pretty good and underrated compared to most comic book adaptations, but this was meh....4.2/10
that is the 2nd punisher movie. the first one had Dolph Lundgren as the punisher

 
Brooklyn's Finest

Probably the best cop movie since The Departed, but I can't think of a whole lot of competition. No real holes, but nothing terribly exceptional. Some stuff that surprises and some stuff that makes you slap your forehead when you think about how stupid it is. Script lacked some of the punch of Training Day, but came together quite a bit better at the end. Doubt this will be anyone's favorite movie, but I enjoyed it. The three main character arches we've seen 1,000 times before.

3.5/5
Sweet. Added to the queue.
found it boring and to long. love the 3 acots in it. I did not know snipes was it, as well as omar and weebay from the wire

 
The Girl With The Dragon Tattoo - 7.5/10

I liked it okay, but it's not a masterpiece like is being intimated by some. I thought the scenes with the parole officer were over the top and the movie would have done better without them (even if they are in the book).

 
Watched Punch-Drunk Love for the first time last night. I didn't know Sandler had it in him. He was great. Really good movie.

The way the score and direction made you feel his anxiety was pretty impressive. It was a relief when you could relax again.

Just now saw that the pudding storyline was based on actual events. :wolf:

 
Watched Punch-Drunk Love for the first time last night. I didn't know Sandler had it in him. He was great. Really good movie.

The way the score and direction made you feel his anxiety was pretty impressive. It was a relief when you could relax again.
I liked this movie a lot, but then again, I am a PT Anderson junky.
 
Watched Punch-Drunk Love for the first time last night. I didn't know Sandler had it in him. He was great. Really good movie.

The way the score and direction made you feel his anxiety was pretty impressive. It was a relief when you could relax again.

Just now saw that the pudding storyline was based on actual events. :lmao:
:bag: I really dug this movie.
 
I just put Ruthless People in the DVD player.

Haven't seen it in at least a decade, but it was one of my favorite comedies of the 80s.

I'll report back whether it holds up to time.
"This might be the stupidest man on the face of the earth" :thumbup:
I've been kidnapped by K-Mart!
:lmao:
Give the bag to Bozo! :lmao:
[LOUD] "What the hell is going on?!?!"[LOUDER] "I'm robbing you!!!"

 
This is interesting:

http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/07/15...t-scientology-film-the-master-in-august-2010/

Paul Thomas Anderson Plans To Shoot Scientology Film ‘The Master’ in August 2010

In December of last year Paul Thomas Anderson started to reveal plans for his next feature, a script tentatively titled The Master which follows a man who creates a ‘faith-based organization’ that blossoms into an empire in the 1950s — a not so thinly disguised Scientology tale.

Anderson quickly cast Philip Seymour Hoffman in the title role, and Jeremy Renner (Hurt Locker) had been eyeing the role of Freddie, the young man who becomes the Master’s lieutenant before having second thoughts about the organization. Reese Witherspoon was in line to play Mary-Sue, wife of the title character (Hoffman) who “acts as his caretaker and vigilant lieutenant.” The other primary female role is Elizabeth, daughter of Mary-Sue and the master. Amanda Seyfried, Emma Stone and Deborah Ann Woll were said to be in contention for the part.

The film was set up but not greenlit at Universal, but the studio passed. In a post-Green Zone world, the studio was not interested in funding the film’s $35 million price tag. Anderson has been searching for new financing, but last we heard that Renner was close to signing a deal to appear in The Avengers as the hero Hawkeye, which might present a schedule conflict which could prevent him from appearing in The Master. And we haven’t heard anything about PTA’s scientology film since June, which wasn’t a good sign. But today we have an update, and it’s looking good.

PTA fansite Cigarettes and Red Vines caught up with Anderson on Thursday night at Fred Armisen’s show at the Largo in Los Angeles, and has the following bit of news: “we can exclusively tell you, despite everything else circulating the net (and hopefully without getting in trouble) that it sounds like The Master is set to shoot sometime next month. More details about things hopefully soon.”

So it sounds like PTA might have found funding somewhere. I’m hoping an artist friendly studio like Fox Searchlight or Warner Bros stepped up and took a chance. I’m sure we’ll see a trade break on the news when it becomes official.
 
Frozen River

A tale of mothers and the desperate things they do to keep their families intact. Thanks to those in this thread who recommended this movie. Seriously. This is a beautiful, haunting movie. I loved it. One of the best movies I've seen in years. Some in our society will rail against immigrants for being in this country illegally. But when you are fighting for your family's survival, immigration laws are irrelevant. Brilliant story. Kudos for the casting, as well. Almost every character was pitch perfect.

 
Finally caught Frozen River on the Netflix stream a few days ago. Nice little flick. I got engrossed in the tension of the last half hour or so. I was a regular viewer of "Homicide: Life on the Street" back in the day, so I was happy to see Melissa Leo on screen again. She was fantastic.
I haven't seen this movie, but Melissa Leo is awesome. Her character on Homicide is one of the best casting decisions in the history of TV. The casting on that show was brilliant. For the first time ever, here was a show where the cops actually looked like cops.
GBjdd, I'm disappointed you haven't seen this one.
Frozen River blew me away. This movie is squarely in my wheelhouse: unique, dramatic without being cliche, and just the right balance between sweet and gut-wrenching.
 
Saw A Beautiful Mind for the first time recently. Normally I'm not a big fan of movies that "hollywood" actual events, but I thought this was an all-around good movie; though I'm sure others will dislike the movie as it doesn't really strive for real-life accuracy. One thing that I I would have liked to see was for Ron Howard to put more effort towards the initial stages of the relationship between Alicia and John; as what was shown didn't feel very believable, but maybe it's just me. Overall, I'd give the movie a 8.5 or 9 out of 10. Also, is it me or does Jennifer Connelly look a lot like Megan Fox in this movie? Either way she looked real good.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Defendor

Started out meh, a story I've already seen a few times in the last couple years (Special and Mystery Team). Is he a super hero, or just a delusional, mentally challenged man? Second half of the film blew me away, seriously 5/5 material. If you're a comic fan and want to watch a real super hero movie, rent this, and don't waste you're time with the $100 million dollar crap Hollywood shoves down your throat all summer. Harrelson brings an extra layer to the character that most actor's couldn't. Mickey from NBK was a great character, but I believe that Harrelson has an all time great acting performance lurking in him yet. I'm always pleasantly surprised by everything he gets his hands on, to the point that I don't know why I'm even surprised anymore.

4/5

 
Jdogg, I seen in another thread you mentioned you hadn't seen Cool Hand Luke?

Bump this to the top of your queue, immediately, there is no possible way you couldn't be entertained by it and extremely unlikely that whatever you have currently at #1 is going to be more enjoyable.

Just a friendly suggestion. I know I often need that extra nudge to go back and experience the classics I missed. Sometimes they don't age well, other times I watch them three times in a row and kick myself for not watching them earlier.

 
Jdogg, I seen in another thread you mentioned you hadn't seen Cool Hand Luke?Bump this to the top of your queue, immediately, there is no possible way you couldn't be entertained by it and extremely unlikely that whatever you have currently at #1 is going to be more enjoyable.Just a friendly suggestion. I know I often need that extra nudge to go back and experience the classics I missed. Sometimes they don't age well, other times I watch them three times in a row and kick myself for not watching them earlier.
I'm not a big fan of older movies. This is a big-time exception.Cool Hand Luke is incredible. And not just for the car washing scene. :mellow:
 
Punisher: War Zone...Pretty sweet action/shootout scenes, but thats all it had going for it. Jimmy McNulty as the antagonist with a face that went thru a meatgrinder (literally) was laughable and just every time he's on screen you cant help but be distracted and not take him seriously. I actually thought the first Punisher with Thomas Jane was pretty good and underrated compared to most comic book adaptations, but this was meh....4.2/10
When I seen this at the theaters (the whole week it was in my local one), I was completely blown away. Maybe it was the grass, maybe it was because this is as close as it's ever going to get to the comics. It was over the top and corny, but that's exactly the way it should have been. I could have done without McNulty's accent, but Ray Stevenson was perfect casting for Punisher. I gave it a 5/5 and put it in my corny action rotation with Road House and The Rock.ETA: If anyone hasn't seen Stevenson in HBO's Rome, he puts Crowe's character in Gladiator to shame.

ETA 2: The Jane Punisher was very good as well, except for that fire skull scene at the end, that almost ruined the whole thing for me. The Lundgren Punisher sucked donkey balls.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Jdogg, I seen in another thread you mentioned you hadn't seen Cool Hand Luke?Bump this to the top of your queue, immediately, there is no possible way you couldn't be entertained by it and extremely unlikely that whatever you have currently at #1 is going to be more enjoyable.Just a friendly suggestion. I know I often need that extra nudge to go back and experience the classics I missed. Sometimes they don't age well, other times I watch them three times in a row and kick myself for not watching them earlier.
I'm not a big fan of older movies. This is a big-time exception.Cool Hand Luke is incredible. And not just for the car washing scene. :mellow:
I don't think any film has ever captured the concept of rebellion clearer.
 
Date Night: I expected a lot more our of Tina Fey and Carrell. Only good laughs came when Marky Mark was in the scene and the outtakes during the credits. 2/5

Unthinkable: Liked it a lot. Was expecting the same old negotiator flick, (except this time Sam Jackson plays the role of Denzel Washington!) and was pleasantly surprised that it actually had a little substance to it. Lots of moral issues get debated and the ending was not obvious from the start. 4/5

 
Jdogg, I seen in another thread you mentioned you hadn't seen Cool Hand Luke?Bump this to the top of your queue, immediately, there is no possible way you couldn't be entertained by it and extremely unlikely that whatever you have currently at #1 is going to be more enjoyable.Just a friendly suggestion. I know I often need that extra nudge to go back and experience the classics I missed. Sometimes they don't age well, other times I watch them three times in a row and kick myself for not watching them earlier.
Skimming through that thread (as I am thinking about my 100 movies), I realized I haven't seen Cool Hand Luke or Planes, Trains, and Automobiles. :mellow: need to update the queue.
 
Jdogg, I seen in another thread you mentioned you hadn't seen Cool Hand Luke?Bump this to the top of your queue, immediately, there is no possible way you couldn't be entertained by it and extremely unlikely that whatever you have currently at #1 is going to be more enjoyable.Just a friendly suggestion. I know I often need that extra nudge to go back and experience the classics I missed. Sometimes they don't age well, other times I watch them three times in a row and kick myself for not watching them earlier.
Skimming through that thread (as I am thinking about my 100 movies), I realized I haven't seen Cool Hand Luke or Planes, Trains, and Automobiles. :moneybag: need to update the queue.
I'm a youngster, but I consider PT&A the granddaddy of uncomfortable situation comedy.
 
Just watched What Would Jesus Buy, brought to you by Morgan Spurlock of 'Super-Size Me' fame. He follows around Reverend Billy and The Church of Stop Shopping, an activist/comedic group who go around preaching/singing about the dangers of consumerism and how we're in danger of bringing on the 'Shopacolyspe'. Funny and enlightening at the same time about consumerism without being heavy handed. Some segments really drove home the point of how the US has gone batshiat crazy about shopping without any regard to the consequences, not only for us but for the third world workers who make the crap. Definite recommend.

4/5

 
12 Monkeys - Don't know why I had never watched this before, it's right up my alley. I thought Brad Pitt was great in this, while Bruce Willis kind of annoyed me. I liked how they tied things together, and there was never really any huge confusion with respect to the time travel angle (which is hard in a time travel movie). Good stuff.

4/5

 
12 Monkeys - Don't know why I had never watched this before, it's right up my alley. I thought Brad Pitt was great in this, while Bruce Willis kind of annoyed me. I liked how they tied things together, and there was never really any huge confusion with respect to the time travel angle (which is hard in a time travel movie). Good stuff.

4/5
Back in the days when Madeline Stowe was hot. Now she has so much collagen in her lips it looks like she was punched in the mouth.
 
Worm said:
12 Monkeys - Don't know why I had never watched this before, it's right up my alley. I thought Brad Pitt was great in this, while Bruce Willis kind of annoyed me. I liked how they tied things together, and there was never really any huge confusion with respect to the time travel angle (which is hard in a time travel movie). Good stuff.

4/5
Check out La Jette on netflix instant watch if you had it.It's the 30 minute French film 12 Monkeys was based on. It's still images with a voice over, but compelling stuff.

One of my all time favorites, I'd go 4.5/5 if not 5/5. (referring to 12 Monkeys, La Jette is probably just a bit lower)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
hooter311 said:
This is interesting:

http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/07/15...t-scientology-film-the-master-in-august-2010/

Paul Thomas Anderson Plans To Shoot Scientology Film ‘The Master’ in August 2010
:lmao: PTA, that sounds awesome, hopefully they can lock down Renner, I hated him the first time I can remember seeing him in SWAT, but he has intrigued me since with his roles in 28 Weeks Later, Hurt Locker, and Assassination of Jesse James.
he got an IFC Best Actor nomination for Dahmer in 2002.
 
as for Frozen River, I thought it was awesome. Most movies I see, I forget them soon afterwards but that one has stuck with me for a long time.

 
hooter311 said:
This is interesting:

http://www.slashfilm.com/2010/07/15...t-scientology-film-the-master-in-august-2010/

Paul Thomas Anderson Plans To Shoot Scientology Film ‘The Master’ in August 2010
:lmao: PTA, that sounds awesome, hopefully they can lock down Renner, I hated him the first time I can remember seeing him in SWAT, but he has intrigued me since with his roles in 28 Weeks Later, Hurt Locker, and Assassination of Jesse James.
he got an IFC Best Actor nomination for Dahmer in 2002.
hmmm, I guess I'll have to check it out. He better be damn good in it, because I've been exposed to about as much Dahmer material as I can stomach already.Thanks for the rec, :unsure:

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top