Andy Dufresne
Footballguy
Gotcha.but you pointed out the "legality" of racism as a reason why that doesn't bother you as much. Just seemed an odd choice of reasoning to back up your claim that you didn't want to support Polanski. My only point was the legality of either action was kind of besides the point, as you've admitted with your stance on drug users, etc. I don't think we're disagreeing.I'm not sure what you're saying. I'm not so down on Polanski because he broke the law as I am because of the law he broke.it seems pretty easy to agree that Polanski is a scumbag, but it's not because he broke a law. if it was somehow legal to do what he did, he'd still be a scumbag. and I imagine there are plenty of other laws that people can break which wouldn't influence your opinion of their movies much at all.

I agree with your take.
People either really love, or really hate this film. Malick's stream of consciousness style is detracting to a lot of viewers, but I thought this was miles better than Saving Private Ryan.ETA: Call me crazy but I've always been hopeful to watch the 5 hour version some day.From Wikipedia:Reportedly, the first assembled cut took seven months to edit and ran five hours. By the final cut, all footage of the performances by Billy Bob Thornton, Martin Sheen, Gary Oldman, Bill Pullman, Lukas Haas, Viggo Mortensen and Mickey Rourke had been removed.
I love the film, but I completely understand how most people would find it incredibly boring. As a huge fan of samurai movies to begin with, plus being a lover of cinematic technique, I find it engrossing and flawlessly perfect............but I would never get mad at anyone if it wasn't their cup of tea.
I hear the name John Woo and the first thing I think of is Chow Yun Fat with a toothpick in his mouth stomping that bird cage and blowing away about 90 people in the restaurant.