What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Recently viewed movie thread - Rental, Streaming, Theater etc (23 Viewers)

I also starting watching The Hateful Eight but I may not want to watch the last 2 hours, I want to know who dared QT to make a movie in the style of Woody Allen.

H8 should have been awarded a special Oscar for "Least necessary expanded director's cut"

Who was the joker who chose it for the old FFA Movie Club?
Yeah it seemed like it was 8 hours long and I hated it
 
I also starting watching The Hateful Eight but I may not want to watch the last 2 hours, I want to know who dared QT to make a movie in the style of Woody Allen.

H8 should have been awarded a special Oscar for "Least necessary expanded director's cut"

Who was the joker who chose it for the old FFA Movie Club?
That was me but in fairness, I had never seen it and a QT movie seemed like something with mass appeal since it was the very first month we did it.
 
Samsara was quite an experience. Beautifully shot and sometimes painful to watch, it puts you through a lot of emotions. And I was totally straight watching it! I can't imagine what it would be like while being high. Some visions of hell on earth really make you uneasy. I had to fast forward through a bit of the animal processing parts. Ugh.
I found it on the Hoopla app.
 
Assault on Precinct 13 (Prime): 1976, IMDB 7.3. I’m not intentionally working my way through Carpenter movies, but he really had a run of high ratings. I’ve seen the modern remake, which has a pretty insane cast, but this was my first time watching the original.

There were my usual annoyances about the pacing of 70s movies (at least this wasn’t rapey), and some of the sound recording stuck out as too natural (meaning hard to hear and echoey as people moved through a building, but this was pretty fun. I’m guessing the concept of automatic weapons (which if I’m not mistaken weren’t even used) was pretty scary at the time, but after movies like Heat, this didn’t hit that hard.

I’m curious about how the opening scene was perceived at the time.

I don’t really see a 7.3 rating in this, but I’m glad I watched it.

One oddity: there’s a background song on the soundtrack called Precinct 9, District 13 that MUST have been the inspiration for the Mad Season song “Wake Up”.
 
I haven't done a director deepish dive for a while but when I accidentally stumbled into one this month I decided to keep on going. The spotlight is on Sydney Pollack who was well known "name" director in the 70s and 80s but isn't discussed much nowadays. The kind of adult character driven pieces he specialized in went out of vogue during his lifetime so he transitioned to more of a producer type in the last decades of his life.

Pollack came to movies at a good time for directors in Hollywood. The studios were at their least powerful and directors and independent producers were on the rise. He was a former actor and Emmy-winning TV director who was able to establish himself as a player in New Hollywood. He had a reputation as an actor's director who was able to handle stars' egos. His seven films with Robert Redford is testament to the relationships Pollack was able to develop on set.

The Way We Were (1973) was the first of the four Pollack films I watched. It was a huge hit at the time and is regarded by some as a classic movie romance. Call me unromantic but I didn't like it at all. The love story had some big gaps where the characters' relationships changed without explanation. I also didn't get the chemistry between Streisand's overacting and Redford's under. Pollack's technique was mostly invisible; there wasn't a lot of flash. He just bathed everything in a nostalgic tone and let his stars do their thing.

They Shoot Horses, Don't They? (1969) was Pollack at his best. It's a relentlessly bleak story set at a dance marathon during the Great Depression. Pollack keeps things interesting visually even though it's basically a one set production with only a couple of scenes taking place outside of the dance hall. There are great performances wherever you look especially Gig Young's Oscar winning turn as the master of ceremonies. They don't make 'em like this anymore.

The Firm (1993) is a star vehicle for Tom Cruise based on the legal thriller by John Grisham. I've never read the book but my guess is it's better than the movie. In spite of the efforts of some of Hollywood's best script doctors, The Firm never really achieves liftoff. The Cruise character's escape from his predicament is hard to follow and seems to drag on forever. Pollack gets strong performances from an excellent cast including Gene Hackman.

The Scalphunters (1968) is a revisionist Western starring Burt Lancaster. It's a strange mix of action, comedy and 60s social commentary involving a runaway slave character played by Ossie Davis. There's not much of a plot to speak of and what there is is completely implausible but it's a very entertaining movie in spite of it. I never figured Sydney Pollack for a director of Westerns but this one just worked for me.

His final feature The Interpreter (2015) is on Netflix and I might get around to it later this month.
 
The Firm (1993) is a star vehicle for Tom Cruise based on the legal thriller by John Grisham. I've never read the book but my guess is it's better than the movie. In spite of the efforts of some of Hollywood's best script doctors, The Firm never really achieves liftoff. The Cruise character's escape from his predicament is hard to follow and seems to drag on forever. Pollack gets strong performances from an excellent cast including Gene Hackman.

I've always felt it was underrated.

Hackman was amazing as usual.
 
The Way We Were (1973) was the first of the four Pollack films I watched. It was a huge hit at the time and is regarded by some as a classic movie romance. Call me unromantic but I didn't like it at all. The love story had some big gaps where the characters' relationships changed without explanation. I also didn't get the chemistry between Streisand's overacting and Redford's under. Pollack's technique was mostly invisible; there wasn't a lot of flash. He just bathed everything in a nostalgic tone and let his stars do their thing.


Did a rewatch of this recently, post-Redford's death. What stars Redford and Streisand were! Every time they were on the screen, it was hypnotic.

I suppose it's reflective of the timing of it in my life.

For all of its flaws, I still love the film
 
The Firm (1993) is a star vehicle for Tom Cruise based on the legal thriller by John Grisham. I've never read the book but my guess is it's better than the movie. In spite of the efforts of some of Hollywood's best script doctors, The Firm never really achieves liftoff. The Cruise character's escape from his predicament is hard to follow and seems to drag on forever. Pollack gets strong performances from an excellent cast including Gene Hackman.

I've always felt it was underrated.

Hackman was amazing as usual.

The Firm is definitely my favorite of all Grisham treatments.

My biggest complaint about them is that they are always so neatly wrapped up at the end; completely unrealistic
 
Just finished watching Eddington on HBO

Wow

Just wow
Oh nice it’s streaming now? Once I finish my noir watching I’ve got a bunch of new stuff on streaming to see. Eddington, Frankenstein, Nouvelle Vague, Ballad of a Small Player, The Materialists, Warfare, Sorry Baby, A House of Dynamite.
 
The Firm (1993) is a star vehicle for Tom Cruise based on the legal thriller by John Grisham. I've never read the book but my guess is it's better than the movie. In spite of the efforts of some of Hollywood's best script doctors, The Firm never really achieves liftoff. The Cruise character's escape from his predicament is hard to follow and seems to drag on forever. Pollack gets strong performances from an excellent cast including Gene Hackman.

I've always felt it was underrated.

Hackman was amazing as usual.

In addition to Cruise and Hackman, the other standout performance came from Wilford Brimley of all people. I've never read any Grisham and have no idea how closely the movie character tracked the novel's but Brimley made a perfectly malevolent and believable henchman.
 
Just finished watching Eddington on HBO

Wow

Just wow
Not sure if that is a good or bad wow. I am 1/2 way through my 4th rewatch, and I would say it's my favorite movie of the last couple years. I don't expect many positive reviews in here, but we will see.

It encapsulates and lays bare all of the worst in today's crippled, deeply divided, internet-fueled world

Left me less optimistic about this current world of ours
 
I did another 50s double feature with a couple Kubrick movies: The Killing + Paths of Glory.

I also watched Kubrick by Kubrick this month which is a great documentary on Prime with interviews with Kubrick about his movies. The Killing is also on Prime, and is still one of my favorites of his despite the clunky voiceover. This was one of my main "ins" to older movies overcoming biases about pre-60s movies. I especially love Hayden and Cook Jr in this one. Sherry cracks me up in this as well - from the first second she is on screen taking down her husband with haymakers. Paths of Glory is fantastic as well, these are both rewatches of movies I own. My main love for Kubrick started as a fascination over how he was able to basically make 1 movie in each genre and arguably make one of the greatest examples of a movie in that genre.

Another thing that stood out watching The Killing right after Sudden Fear is the differences in the dialogue and character portrayals of the femme fatales and women in general between the two movies. It didn't surprise to read today that one was largely written by a woman and one was not.
Pure Cinema Podcast is doing a 2 episode Kubrick series
Yep. I listened to ep. 1. Good stuff as usual, but yet again their pairings are often hard to find.
Oh boy you aren't kidding hard to find. This Japanese boxing movie they had to get from a guy who's name they keep a secret and it was so rare, he even had to make some kind of special deal to locate it. It has 0 reviews on IMDB. I guess I probably won't ever be seeing that one.

Of course that was one of the ones I was most interested in. They redeemed themselves with the pairing for 2001. I see that's on Criterion, so that will make a perfect double feature next month when I hit the 60s. Other than that, I was a little disappointed with the suggestions with the other 5 movies. The only other that really stood out was the Bergman that was suggested with Full Metal Jacket.

Their mention of Bergman and the tidbit about Kubrick sending him a letter got me staring again at my box set I am behind on. I watched a couple documentaries on Criterion channel about him and his movies and this week I am going to knock out a couple of his 50s movies I haven't gotten to. Waiting Women, Brink of Life, and The Magician are at the top of the queue.
 
The Firm is definitely my favorite of all Grisham treatments.

My biggest complaint about them is that they are always so neatly wrapped up at the end; completely unrealistic

Cruise's get out scheme was very complicated and Pollack and the screenwriters left the reveal too late for my liking. In the meantime, only Cruise's character knew what was going on.

I read the Wikipedia synopsis for Grisham's book and was surprised that the filmmakers changed the ending of a book that was so well known at the time
 
Just finished watching Eddington on HBO

Wow

Just wow
Not sure if that is a good or bad wow. I am 1/2 way through my 4th rewatch, and I would say it's my favorite movie of the last couple years. I don't expect many positive reviews in here, but we will see.

It encapsulates and lays bare all of the worst in today's crippled, deeply divided, internet-fueled world

Left me less optimistic about this current world of ours
:lol: Yep, it did all that but it still made me laugh a lot in the process. Despite how fantastically shot his movies are, I love the minute details in Aster's movies that for me makes them so rewatchable despite their often bleak subject matter. In Eddington there are so many things in the background that I pick up that enhance the rewatch and make me laugh at something new. From a video someone is watching to a poster or bumper sticker there is something to pick up on.
 
Just finished watching Eddington on HBO

Wow

Just wow
Not sure if that is a good or bad wow. I am 1/2 way through my 4th rewatch, and I would say it's my favorite movie of the last couple years. I don't expect many positive reviews in here, but we will see.

It encapsulates and lays bare all of the worst in today's crippled, deeply divided, internet-fueled world

Left me less optimistic about this current world of ours
:lol: Yep, it did all that but it still made me laugh a lot in the process. Despite how fantastically shot his movies are, I love the minute details in Aster's movies that for me makes them so rewatchable despite their often bleak subject matter. In Eddington there are so many things in the background that I pick up that enhance the rewatch and make me laugh at something new. From a video someone is watching to a poster or bumper sticker there is something to pick up on.

He is definitely an equal-opportunity exposer

Reminds me of South Park in that way; nothing is off-limits and/or sacred
 
I did another 50s double feature with a couple Kubrick movies: The Killing + Paths of Glory.

I also watched Kubrick by Kubrick this month which is a great documentary on Prime with interviews with Kubrick about his movies. The Killing is also on Prime, and is still one of my favorites of his despite the clunky voiceover. This was one of my main "ins" to older movies overcoming biases about pre-60s movies. I especially love Hayden and Cook Jr in this one. Sherry cracks me up in this as well - from the first second she is on screen taking down her husband with haymakers. Paths of Glory is fantastic as well, these are both rewatches of movies I own. My main love for Kubrick started as a fascination over how he was able to basically make 1 movie in each genre and arguably make one of the greatest examples of a movie in that genre.

Another thing that stood out watching The Killing right after Sudden Fear is the differences in the dialogue and character portrayals of the femme fatales and women in general between the two movies. It didn't surprise to read today that one was largely written by a woman and one was not.
Pure Cinema Podcast is doing a 2 episode Kubrick series
Yep. I listened to ep. 1. Good stuff as usual, but yet again their pairings are often hard to find.
Oh boy you aren't kidding hard to find. This Japanese boxing movie they had to get from a guy who's name they keep a secret and it was so rare, he even had to make some kind of special deal to locate it. It has 0 reviews on IMDB. I guess I probably won't ever be seeing that one.

Of course that was one of the ones I was most interested in. They redeemed themselves with the pairing for 2001. I see that's on Criterion, so that will make a perfect double feature next month when I hit the 60s. Other than that, I was a little disappointed with the suggestions with the other 5 movies. The only other that really stood out was the Bergman that was suggested with Full Metal Jacket.

Their mention of Bergman and the tidbit about Kubrick sending him a letter got me staring again at my box set I am behind on. I watched a couple documentaries on Criterion channel about him and his movies and this week I am going to knock out a couple of his 50s movies I haven't gotten to. Waiting Women, Brink of Life, and The Magician are at the top of the queue.
I agree the recommendations weren't great- many were just too difficult to see or too obscure. Captain Lightfoot by Douglas Sirk sounded interesting though, I will keep an eye out at least for it.

I should dig a little more into Bergman. I would like giving a couple of the ones I liked another watch (Seventh Seal, Autumn Sonata, Winter Light, Fanny and Alexander) and also a couple I haven't seen yet like Scenes from a Marriage, Crimes and Whispers, Summer with Monika, Virgin Spring. Mabe next year.
 
Captain Lightfoot by Douglas Sirk sounded interesting though, I will keep an eye out at least for it.

You could watch it for Rock Hudson's 100th birthday which was yesterday. I watched A Farewell to Arms instead and probably should have gone in another direction.
I've seen the Gary Cooper from the 30s and it is disappointing. It's been awhile since I read the book but it felt like there was room for a very good movie in it.

My favorite note about that 50's version is this:
When producer David O. Selznick crowed that his wife, Jennifer Jones, was starring in “A Farewell to Arms” and he’d pay Hemingway a $50,000 bonus from any profits, the novelist wrote back: “If by some miracle, your movie, which stars 41-year-old Mrs. Selznick portraying 24-year-old Catherine Barkley, does earn $50,000, you should have all $50,000 changed into nickels at your local bank and shove them up your [bleep] until they came out of your ears.”
 
Captain Lightfoot by Douglas Sirk sounded interesting though, I will keep an eye out at least for it.

You could watch it for Rock Hudson's 100th birthday which was yesterday. I watched A Farewell to Arms instead and probably should have gone in another direction.
I've seen the Gary Cooper from the 30s and it is disappointing. It's been awhile since I read the book but it felt like there was room for a very good movie in it.

My favorite note about that 50's version is this:
When producer David O. Selznick crowed that his wife, Jennifer Jones, was starring in “A Farewell to Arms” and he’d pay Hemingway a $50,000 bonus from any profits, the novelist wrote back: “If by some miracle, your movie, which stars 41-year-old Mrs. Selznick portraying 24-year-old Catherine Barkley, does earn $50,000, you should have all $50,000 changed into nickels at your local bank and shove them up your [bleep] until they came out of your ears.”

Mrs. Selznick/Jennifer Jones is awful in the movie. Her acting when Catherine goes into labor is the definition of ham.

The movie can't decide whether it's a huge 50s Cinemascope war epic or an intimate story of star-crossed lovers but it does better as the former. It would have been 1000% better with Elizabeth Taylor playing opposite Hudson.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top