Dope
Footballguy
Great watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.
Great watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.
42.07 Johnson, Jarret BAL DE39.10 Rayner, Dave GBP PK Second kicker, again young with a good leg. Only knock would be the Frozen Tundra.Lots have happened since Round 28.34.07 Griese, Brian CHI QBUpdate:
Updating after my last few selections:24.07 Buckhalter, Correll PHI RB10.13 Jackson, Tarvaris MIN QB
05.01 Vick, Michael ATL QB
36.07 Bollinger, Brooks MIN QB
31.10 Rosenfels, Sage HOU QB
34.07 Griese, Brian CHI QB
04.09 Barber, Marion DAL RB
08.13 Jordan, Lamont OAK RB
01.04 Westbrook, Brian PHI RB
24.07 Buckhalter, Correll PHI RB
37.04 Ward, Derrick NYG RB
40.07 Shipp, Marcel ARI RB
11.04 Bennett, Drew TEN WR
11.01 Caldwell, Reche NEP WR
15.13 Crayton, Patrick DAL WR
03.08 Driver, Donald GBP WR
09.04 Glenn, Terry DAL WR
09.02 Jones, Brandon TEN WR
22.09 Jason Avant PHI WR
37.10 McMullen, Billy MIN WR
43.13 Northcutt, Dennis CLE WR
44.07 Looker, Dane STL WR
19.10 Baker, Chris NYJ TE
04.10 Crumpler, Alge ATL TE
22.07 Jeff King CAR TE
43.02 Miller, Billy NOS TE
26.07 Gregg, Kelly BAL DT
41.10 Glover, La' roi STL DT
17.14 Anderson, Mark CHI DE
13.10 Ogunleye, Adewale CHI DE
38.07 Tapp, Darryl SEA DE ®
42.07 Johnson, Jarret BAL DE
43.10 Wistrom, Grant SEA DE
06.10 Briggs, Lance CHI LB
18.07 Greenway, Chad MIN LB
17.13 Greenwood, Morlon HOU LB
37.10 Banta-Cain, Tully NEP LB
27.10 Colvin, Rosevelt NEP LB
20.07 Vrabel, Mike NEP LB
45.10 Godfrey, Randall SDC LB
21.04 McAllister, Chris BAL CB
25.10 Hill, Tye STL CB
28.07 Bodden, Leigh CLE CB
37.02 Sheppard, Lito PHI CB
12.07 Hamlin, Ken SEA S
34.15 Brown, Mike CHI S (I)
33.10 Bullocks, Josh NOS S
37.14 Smith, Anthony PIT S ®
32.70 Smith, Dwight MIN S
36.04 Akers, David PHI PK
39.10 Rayner, Dave GBP PK
Also well positioned in the rookie draft with 8 of 80 picks including 1.05, 1.07 and 1.08.
C-Buck was supposed to be a nice backup to Westy, but rumored to be getting even better chances if he goes to free agency.
25.10 Hill, Tye STL CB
Hill's the starting CB in STL, so I'm good with the youth there.
26.07 Gregg, Kelly BAL DT
Yes he's over 30, but he's a very good DT and a strong part of a solid Baltimore defense.
27.10 Colvin, Rosevelt NE LB
Nice to pair with Vrabel, but a good young LB in his own right.
28.07 Bodden, Leigh CLE CB
Another young CB with strong upside. Could be my starter next to McAllister.
36.07 Bollinger, Brooks MIN QB
Two QBs with upside. Griese is self-explanatory with Rex, but Bollinger is allegedly competing with Tarvaris. Either way, nice to have both.
37.04 Ward, Derrick NYG RB
Second RB on the roster right now for the Giants. Also an interesting pickup if Buckhalter goes to the G-men.
37.10 McMullen, Billy MIN WR
Former Eagle is doing well with the Vikings (and TJax) and is a nice sleeper. He actually can catch over half his targets.
36.04 Akers, David PHI PK
My #1 PK in the 36th round. Sounds good to me.
38.07. Tapp, Darryl SEA DE ®
The former Hokie had a nice first year, and he's already Top 50 DL on most Dynasty lists.
37.10 Banta-Cain, Tully NEP LB
Either a solid young LB in NE, or possibly the next SF LB that does well. Either way, I like the upside.
37.02 Sheppard, Lito PHI CB
Can't have too many Eagles, right? Actually he's about my 5th or 6th (Westbrook, Avant, Akers, possibly C-Buck) but he's a solid Pro Bowl corner.
34.15 Brown, Mike CHI S (I)
33.10 Bullocks, Josh NOS S
37.14 Smith, Anthony PIT S ®
32.70 Smith, Dwight MIN S
That "I" next to Mike Brown means injured, but it could also mean "Incredible" Value. This guy was lights out good two years ago, so I'll take that chance.
Bullocks is a bright young prospect for the Saints in a bad secondary.
Not an expert on Anthony Smith, but Bloom says he's good so that works for me. Actually I do know him - 3rd rounder from Syracuse, started in December. Good young prospect.
Daryl Smith is an oldie but a goodie. Actually he's on the right side of 30, but he might not be a Viking much longer. Their secondary is a mess, but he's a solid S in a league where good DBs stick around.
I also traded 2 4th round rookies and a 5th rounder for 3 veteran picks. I figured that my 4 rookies picks (1.05, 1.07, 1.08 and 2.10) are worth enough, and then there is enough value to scoop up in the veteran rounds.
40.07 Shipp, Marcel ARI RB
Rumors abound on where this free agent RB goes. Giants? Denver? Detroit's out now, but he could go a lot of places, and he's under 30.
41.10 Glover, La' roi STL DT
Extremely talented DT, and a nice compliment to Kelly Gregg. DT's the least glamorous position of IDP, so two solid vets sounds great to me.
Six more vet picks to go....
Source: Carroll County Times Getting a DE that could be used like AD even in a limited capacity is a huge steal this late.Feb. 22 - If the Ravens don't franchise Adalius Thomas or sign him long term, free agent Jarret Johnson is expected to be their top priority.
Thomas is a marvelous athlete, but Johnson, at 6-3/285 with the ability to play linebacker, would seem a very respectable fallback option.
10.13 Jackson, Tarvaris MIN QB
05.01 Vick, Michael ATL QB
36.07 Bollinger, Brooks MIN QB
31.10 Rosenfels, Sage HOU QB
34.07 Griese, Brian CHI QB
04.09 Barber, Marion DAL RB
08.13 Jordan, Lamont OAK RB
01.04 Westbrook, Brian PHI RB
24.07 Buckhalter, Correll PHI RB
37.04 Ward, Derrick NYG RB
40.07 Shipp, Marcel ARI RB
11.04 Bennett, Drew TEN WR
11.01 Caldwell, Reche NEP WR
15.13 Crayton, Patrick DAL WR
03.08 Driver, Donald GBP WR
09.04 Glenn, Terry DAL WR
09.02 Jones, Brandon TEN WR
22.09 Jason Avant PHI WR
37.10 McMullen, Billy MIN WR
43.13 Northcutt, Dennis CLE WR
44.07 Looker, Dane STL WR
19.10 Baker, Chris NYJ TE
04.10 Crumpler, Alge ATL TE
22.07 Jeff King CAR TE
43.02 Miller, Billy NOS TE
26.07 Gregg, Kelly BAL DT
41.10 Glover, La' roi STL DT
17.14 Anderson, Mark CHI DE
13.10 Ogunleye, Adewale CHI DE
38.07 Tapp, Darryl SEA DE ®
42.07 Johnson, Jarret BAL DE
43.10 Wistrom, Grant SEA DE
06.10 Briggs, Lance CHI LB
18.07 Greenway, Chad MIN LB
17.13 Greenwood, Morlon HOU LB
37.10 Banta-Cain, Tully NEP LB
27.10 Colvin, Rosevelt NEP LB
20.07 Vrabel, Mike NEP LB
45.10 Godfrey, Randall SDC LB
21.04 McAllister, Chris BAL CB
25.10 Hill, Tye STL CB
28.07 Bodden, Leigh CLE CB
37.02 Sheppard, Lito PHI CB
12.07 Hamlin, Ken SEA S
34.15 Brown, Mike CHI S (I)
33.10 Bullocks, Josh NOS S
37.14 Smith, Anthony PIT S ®
32.70 Smith, Dwight MIN S
36.04 Akers, David PHI PK
39.10 Rayner, Dave GBP PK
Rookie Picks - 1.05, 1.07, 1.08, and 2.10.
When I didn't draw 1.01 in the draft, I made it my first priority to get to 1.02 to get Larry Johnson. I advocate the "supergiant RB" theory in leagues like this one. Right now, I see LJ as the 2nd most desirable RB to build around after LT. I gave up relatively small bumps (late 2nd to early 3rd, 5th to late 7th were the biggest) to move up from 1.06 (would have been Bush) to 1.02. If this was a full PPR instead of .5 PPR for RBs, i would have considered staying home and taking Bush/Gore. Other than that, I did not want to (and did not have the opportunity) to invest other premium picks in RBs. RB value is so mercurial that I don't really like investing initial picks in guys unless they are on the upside or their career. That being said, I would have considered MBIII and Turner at 5.02, but didnt have the chance. I would have considered Thomas Jones at my clump in the 7th, but i didnt have the chance. I dont mind having a vacancy at RB2. In a similar league to this one, I have traded for Mike Anderson in 05 and Warrick Dunn in 06, and been fine at RB/TE flex. Ill probably pursue a similar plan in red dog.* Jake Bachman gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 1.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 3.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 7.13;Year 2006 Draft Pick 12.15
* Sigmund Bloom gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 1.06;Year 2006 Draft Pick 2.11;Year 2006 Draft Pick 5.06;Year 2006 Draft Pick 10.11
And then Graham signs with Denver to compete with Scheffler for receptions.TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
I like this group. All three will probably be the primary pass-catching TE's for their teams which is great, and Scheffler's end of last season showed some amazing potential with Cutler. I needed good depth here given my shaky RB2 situation and the potential need for starting 2 TE's instead of 2 RB's, especially given the added weight given to TE scoring, and I feel like I was successful in getting that.

Hey maybe you inspired the Broncos... life imitates drafts. Wiggins is an FA too, lets bring the Overton 3 together!And then Graham signs with Denver to compete with Scheffler for receptions.TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
I like this group. All three will probably be the primary pass-catching TE's for their teams which is great, and Scheffler's end of last season showed some amazing potential with Cutler. I needed good depth here given my shaky RB2 situation and the potential need for starting 2 TE's instead of 2 RB's, especially given the added weight given to TE scoring, and I feel like I was successful in getting that.![]()
If Shanny signs Wiggins I'm driving to Denver to shoot him.Hey maybe you inspired the Broncos... life imitates drafts. Wiggins is an FA too, lets bring the Overton 3 together!And then Graham signs with Denver to compete with Scheffler for receptions.TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
I like this group. All three will probably be the primary pass-catching TE's for their teams which is great, and Scheffler's end of last season showed some amazing potential with Cutler. I needed good depth here given my shaky RB2 situation and the potential need for starting 2 TE's instead of 2 RB's, especially given the added weight given to TE scoring, and I feel like I was successful in getting that.![]()

Hey maybe you inspired the Broncos... life imitates drafts. Wiggins is an FA too, lets bring the Overton 3 together!And then Graham signs with Denver to compete with Scheffler for receptions.TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
I like this group. All three will probably be the primary pass-catching TE's for their teams which is great, and Scheffler's end of last season showed some amazing potential with Cutler. I needed good depth here given my shaky RB2 situation and the potential need for starting 2 TE's instead of 2 RB's, especially given the added weight given to TE scoring, and I feel like I was successful in getting that.![]()

I think you showed too much confidence in Scheffler's late season performance.As I said in my earlier post looking at your begining draft, the Scheffler pick was the only choice you made that I wasn't really sold on and thought you should have gone another direction.And then Graham signs with Denver to compete with Scheffler for receptions.TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
I like this group. All three will probably be the primary pass-catching TE's for their teams which is great, and Scheffler's end of last season showed some amazing potential with Cutler. I needed good depth here given my shaky RB2 situation and the potential need for starting 2 TE's instead of 2 RB's, especially given the added weight given to TE scoring, and I feel like I was successful in getting that.![]()
You may well be right. I made the same mistake with a redraft team in 2003 going off of Jerramy Stevens' last six games the year before and paid all year long for that one too. He certainly was the riskiest pick of the TE's to that point in the draft. Meanwhile . . .Biabreakable said:I think you showed too much confidence in Scheffler's late season performance.As I said in my earlier post looking at your begining draft, the Scheffler pick was the only choice you made that I wasn't really sold on and thought you should have gone another direction.redman said:And then Graham signs with Denver to compete with Scheffler for receptions.TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
I like this group. All three will probably be the primary pass-catching TE's for their teams which is great, and Scheffler's end of last season showed some amazing potential with Cutler. I needed good depth here given my shaky RB2 situation and the potential need for starting 2 TE's instead of 2 RB's, especially given the added weight given to TE scoring, and I feel like I was successful in getting that.![]()
All of your other early choices were solid however so you should still be in a very good situation despite this weakness at TE.
So you're sayin' there's a chance! :(zadok said:Uh oh...according to PFT:
REPORTS OF GRAHAM DEAL NOT TRUE
John Crowe of WSKO radio tells us that he has spoken to Jack Mills, the agent for tight end Daniel Graham, and that Mills says that no deal has been reached between the Broncos and Graham.
Mills will appear on WSKO at 3:30 p.m. EST to address the situation. The spot can be heard right here.
And, on further review of our e-mailbox, we discovered a message from agent Tom Mills, who writes of Graham: "He has not agreed to terms with Denver or anyone. Don't know where that rumor started, but it's completely inaccurate. Dan will visit with the Broncos later today, but we haven't discussed contract and Dan is planning to take a trip to Oakland tomorrow and Seattle after that."
Although I'm a big fan of Calvin, I wanted to stick to the plan and use the rookies as bargaining chips to climb the vet ladder. Gaining 21 slots for a 3 slot drop was worth it.* Brian Smith gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 2.13;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.05
* Nick Chadick gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.02
Again, using my rookies to gain in the vet. Another 20 slot increase to drop 8 spots (where I think after 1.03r the drop in value is pretty small) fits perfectly. This gave me 5 picks in the first 3 rounds.* Nick Chadick gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 2.13;Year 2006 Draft Pick 5.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.05
* Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 3.10;Year 2006 Draft Pick 3.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13
I hit the motherload. This was actually offered to me, and couldn't believe it. To have an outright stud RB in a 16 team league is a huge advantage. I wanted to trade up in the 1st all along but wasn't ready to do so. Having this fall right into my lap was a nice surprise.* Marc Faletti gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 1.03;Year 2006 Draft Pick 5.03
* Nick Chadick gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 1.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 2.02
The draft started and I thought after 1.06 Peyton was gonna be taken. After it got to 1.08 and he was still there I started slinging offers left and right to try and get him. By 1.14 I finally got him.Here's how I ended up. Overall I'm really happy with how it turned out. I missed out on a few IDP's that I let slip too long.* Nick Chadick gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 3.10;Year 2006 Draft Pick 3.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 47.15
* Carlos Rodrigues gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 1.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 14.06
STARTERS
QB
Peyton Manning
RB
Steven Jackson
Edgerrin James
WR
Marvin Harrison
Terrell Owens
Keyshawn Johnson
TE
Desmond Clark
PK
Shayne Graham
DT
Mike Patterson
DE
Derrick Burgess
Chike Okeafor
LB
Mike Peterson
Derrick Brooks
Brady James/Al Wilson/Derek M Smith (rotation for LB3/4)
CB
Terrence McGee
Fakhir Brown
S
Gibril Wilson
Brian Dawkins
BENCH
QB
Steve McNair
Kyle Boller
Jim Sorgi
RB
Nick Goings
Artose Pinner
Ryan Moats
Cedric Cobbs
WR
Arnaz Battle
Mark Bradley
Bobby Engram
Sinorice Moss
Sam Hurd
Willie Reid
TE
Marcedes Lewis
Dave Thomas
PK
John Kasay
DT
Mike Wright (will most likely move to DE)
DE
Shaun Ellis
Chris Gocong (might move to LB)
LB
Brady James
Tedy Bruschi
Derek M Smith
Al Wilson
Teddy Lehman
Darnall Bing
Brent Hawkins
CB
Fabian Washington
S
Greg Wesley
Terrence Holt
The Good
7.03 Thomas Jones - Insane value this late. He's younger than Edgerrin James and Shaun Alexander, and he has less tread off the tires.
8.13 LaMont Jordan - I'm not a big Jordan fan, but he's only one year removed from a monster season. This late in the draft, I love the risk vs. reward.
9.01 LenDale White - Good gamble this late.
9.10 Ahman Green - Might not have much left in the tank, but he played well last year. He went eight rounds later than Shaun Alexander.
Don't hold out, who else you got????The Good
7.03 Thomas Jones - Insane value this late. He's younger than Edgerrin James and Shaun Alexander, and he has less tread off the tires.
8.13 LaMont Jordan - I'm not a big Jordan fan, but he's only one year removed from a monster season. This late in the draft, I love the risk vs. reward.
9.01 LenDale White - Good gamble this late.
9.10 Ahman Green - Might not have much left in the tank, but he played well last year. He went eight rounds later than Shaun Alexander.![]()
![]()
Page 14.Don't hold out, who else you got????The Good
7.03 Thomas Jones - Insane value this late. He's younger than Edgerrin James and Shaun Alexander, and he has less tread off the tires.
8.13 LaMont Jordan - I'm not a big Jordan fan, but he's only one year removed from a monster season. This late in the draft, I love the risk vs. reward.
9.01 LenDale White - Good gamble this late.
9.10 Ahman Green - Might not have much left in the tank, but he played well last year. He went eight rounds later than Shaun Alexander.![]()
![]()

While I agree with Henry news, I expect TJones' numbers to actually decline. The Jets are enamored with the RBBC approach, so I don't think you'll see TJones with the same number of touches as last year (even on a per game basis). If you'll recall, Jones was questioned throughout the year, in particular during the beginning of '06.He also averaged less than 4YPC in 8 of 16 games last season.Lastly, Morency has to be encouraged, but all signs point towards a new rookie RB in GB this year.Quick comments on Faletti's draft/team on the offensive side of the ball. He appears to be the big winner with the FA RB news over the past 2 days of Thomas Jones going to the Jets, Travis Henry going to the Bronco's, & Ahman Green signing with Houston, which gives Morency a shot at being the starting back in GB. For at least this year, Marc has a very great chance of winning the championship with his late RB picks, especially the Henry pick at 6.14.
Rookie draft will start after the NFL Draft.Brian is very impatient so, it may start after Day 1 of the NFL DraftGreat watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.
Rookie draft will start after the NFL Draft.Brian is very impatient so, it may start after Day 1 of the NFL DraftGreat watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.

Personally, I think we should just have the rookie draft nowRookie draft will start after the NFL Draft.Brian is very impatient so, it may start after Day 1 of the NFL DraftGreat watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.

Cheater!Not until I get Bob's rankings!Personally, I think we should just have the rookie draft nowRookie draft will start after the NFL Draft.Brian is very impatient so, it may start after Day 1 of the NFL DraftGreat watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.![]()

Personally, I think we should just have the rookie draft nowRookie draft will start after the NFL Draft.Brian is very impatient so, it may start after Day 1 of the NFL DraftGreat watching this from afar.Does the rookie draft start right away? I can't wait to see that go down.Five more picks and this draft is (Finally) over.![]()
:feedtheaddiction:RB - Tomlinson, L. White, C. Brown, C. Houston, A. Thomas, A. Harris
TE - Scheffler, Graham, Wiggins
Pretty ironic: I went from having drafted a couple of good TE's in order to compensate for a weak RB2 spot (so I could start two TE's and one RB if I desired), to having three pretty good starting candidates at RB and potentially a very mediocre TE corps.
Pretty Good starting candidates? C.Brown?RB - Tomlinson, L. White, C. Brown, C. Houston, A. Thomas, A. Harris
TE - Scheffler, Graham, WigginsPretty ironic: I went from having drafted a couple of good TE's in order to compensate for a weak RB2 spot (so I could start two TE's and one RB if I desired), to having three pretty good starting candidates at RB and potentially a very mediocre TE corps.
![]()
Yes assuming the rumors about the Bills' intentions to trade McGahee are true.Pretty Good starting candidates? C.Brown?RB - Tomlinson, L. White, C. Brown, C. Houston, A. Thomas, A. Harris
TE - Scheffler, Graham, WigginsPretty ironic: I went from having drafted a couple of good TE's in order to compensate for a weak RB2 spot (so I could start two TE's and one RB if I desired), to having three pretty good starting candidates at RB and potentially a very mediocre TE corps.
![]()
Don't forget that Brown averaged an eye-popping 13.1 yards per catch the last year he started, which is especially valuable in our ppr league.When was that, 2000?Yes assuming the rumors about the Bills' intentions to trade McGahee are true.Pretty Good starting candidates? C.Brown?RB - Tomlinson, L. White, C. Brown, C. Houston, A. Thomas, A. Harris
TE - Scheffler, Graham, WigginsPretty ironic: I went from having drafted a couple of good TE's in order to compensate for a weak RB2 spot (so I could start two TE's and one RB if I desired), to having three pretty good starting candidates at RB and potentially a very mediocre TE corps.
![]()
Don't forget that Brown averaged an eye-popping 13.1 yards per catch the last year he started, which is especially valuable in our ppr league.
2005. I may start him against you just to let him light you up.When was that, 2000?Yes assuming the rumors about the Bills' intentions to trade McGahee are true.Pretty Good starting candidates? C.Brown?RB - Tomlinson, L. White, C. Brown, C. Houston, A. Thomas, A. Harris
TE - Scheffler, Graham, WigginsPretty ironic: I went from having drafted a couple of good TE's in order to compensate for a weak RB2 spot (so I could start two TE's and one RB if I desired), to having three pretty good starting candidates at RB and potentially a very mediocre TE corps.
![]()
Don't forget that Brown averaged an eye-popping 13.1 yards per catch the last year he started, which is especially valuable in our ppr league.
i love your sig!Bring it Redman!
I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.

If you ask Jeff, he'll tell you how brilliant he was. I promise.Biabreakable said:I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()

5 weeks between posts =I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()

Someone else bumped it and then I noticed your rationalizations.Thank goodness there is no experation date on things that can amuse me.5 weeks between posts =I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()
![]()

Denial, in fact, gets better with age.Someone else bumped it and then I noticed your rationalizations.Thank goodness there is no experation date on things that can amuse me.5 weeks between posts =I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()
![]()
![]()

So Bia,Since you brought this up, I'd like to hear what you believe would be fair value for both sides (4/8 and the two 6s).Someone else bumped it and then I noticed your rationalizations.Thank goodness there is no experation date on things that can amuse me.5 weeks between posts =I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()
![]()
![]()
Fair value is a very subjective thing.Perhaps the best measure of if a trade is fair value is if you would be willing to do either side of a trade.So for example: 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330)If this deal is pretty even in value then people would be willing to do either side of the deal I would think. Or one person would be willing to do this deal trading up or down based on thier personal goals at the time. In this case that is the price you established for moving up to pick 4.14 Total number of picks exchanged were even (3 picks for 3 picks). Late 4th for mid 6th evened out by giving mid 6th for early 8th then an additional upgrade for you in round 21 to even out the total number of slots exchanged.What I find to be ammusing and contraticory is that when you are trading down that you required a very different deal in order to do so. SayingSo Bia,Since you brought this up, I'd like to hear what you believe would be fair value for both sides (4/8 and the two 6s).Someone else bumped it and then I noticed your rationalizations.Thank goodness there is no experation date on things that can amuse me.5 weeks between posts =I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()
![]()
![]()
andsomeone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge
So when you are trading down (from almost exactly the same pick 4.15) you require a very different deal in order to have incentive to do so..4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 You trade late 4th (almost early 5th) for mid 6th + early 9th round pick and get a substantial rookie pick upgrade as well. Net 2 picks for 3.I am not taking issue with, nor am questioning the fairness of either deals value. What I find ammusing about this however is how different you percieve (or rationalize) the value of each deal (that involves VERY similar picks) depending on if you are trading up or trading down. Becuase you clearly would not do either of these deals if you were the other party involved.trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).

That's about the response I would have expected.Perception all depends on the person - that's why it is subjective, not objective.Trading is an art and a science. You could offer what you would personally believe is fair value or even more than fair value, but you cannot force the other party to accept the deal.As for the examples above, I would actually take either side of the deal regarding a 4th and an 8th for 2 6ths - if I felt I needed to move up to get whomever I wanted, I'd have sold two 6s to get to a 4th and be willing to back down to an 8th. Moreover, if I felt that I needed to get more starters sooner than others and that I wanted 7 players before many had 6, or even if I felt that after the 6th round that value plummeted, I would sell a 4th and an 8th for two 6s. Frankly I can't even remember which side of this deal I was on, I think I was moving up, because I targeted a player. The other team's incentive was that he was lacking in Top 6 round picks so it benefitted both sides.As for rationalizing, you'd be lying to yourself and everyone else if it isn't a part of your nature to rationalize each and every decision we make - WDIS, trades, picks, everything. If I am trading downward, I have a different rationale than if I'm moving up. I have to have incentive to make both maneuvers, but those incentives may not (and likely won't) be the same in either case.Fair value is a very subjective thing.Perhaps the best measure of if a trade is fair value is if you would be willing to do either side of a trade.So for example: 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330)If this deal is pretty even in value then people would be willing to do either side of the deal I would think. Or one person would be willing to do this deal trading up or down based on thier personal goals at the time. In this case that is the price you established for moving up to pick 4.14 Total number of picks exchanged were even (3 picks for 3 picks). Late 4th for mid 6th evened out by giving mid 6th for early 8th then an additional upgrade for you in round 21 to even out the total number of slots exchanged.What I find to be ammusing and contraticory is that when you are trading down that you required a very different deal in order to do so. SayingSo Bia,Since you brought this up, I'd like to hear what you believe would be fair value for both sides (4/8 and the two 6s).Someone else bumped it and then I noticed your rationalizations.Thank goodness there is no experation date on things that can amuse me.5 weeks between posts =I just find it pretty amusing that Jeff on one hand is calling 4.14(62) + 8.02(114) + 21.04(324) for 6.07(87) + 6.09(89) + 21.10(330) even money.Then on the other hand giving up 4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 was neccessary for the "priveledge" to move up.Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.15;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.13AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 9.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 46.08Pretty sure that the 6/9 for a 4th is negative value in a pick calculator, so a bump in the rookie draft isn't out of line. For someone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledge, so you could even argue that trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).AJ Moura gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 4.14;Year 2006 Draft Pick 8.02;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.04Jeff Pasquino gave up Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.07;Year 2006 Draft Pick 6.09;Year 2006 Draft Pick 21.10After 3 trades with AJ, I'm realizing this guy isn't quite up to speed on trading. I see this as a straight value deal and it is pretty even. Look at the moves up and down, and it really is, no matter how you slice it. I don't see how you can say someone moving down 27 spots then picking up 23 later and another 6 very late is unfair.![]()
![]()
andsomeone who also wants to move up, they should be paying for the priviledgeSo when you are trading down (from almost exactly the same pick 4.15) you require a very different deal in order to have incentive to do so..4.15(63) + rookie pick 1.13 for 6.07(87) + 9.02(130) + rookie pick 1.08 You trade late 4th (almost early 5th) for mid 6th + early 9th round pick and get a substantial rookie pick upgrade as well. Net 2 picks for 3.I am not taking issue with, nor am questioning the fairness of either deals value. What I find ammusing about this however is how different you percieve (or rationalize) the value of each deal (that involves VERY similar picks) depending on if you are trading up or trading down. Becuase you clearly would not do either of these deals if you were the other party involved.trading at even value is a loss for the owner moving down (i.e. no incentive).![]()
so long as i stay in the moura division, im willing to discuss it
Riding the gravy train huh?How unmanly of you.so long as i stay in the moura division, im willing to discuss it
Riding the gravy train huh?How unmanly of you.so long as i stay in the moura division, im willing to discuss it![]()

arent you the 1 with tatum bell as your top rb?Riding the gravy train huh?How unmanly of you.so long as i stay in the moura division, im willing to discuss it![]()
![]()