This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!
If true this is shocking, this is basic data analysis. This sort of flawed analysis plagues so much of the "science" that we see today with regard to covid and social issues (wage gap another example).
Agreed. Particularly now that the vaxxed can get and spread almost as readily as the unvaxxed.
I answered your question. Cancer is a commonly rejected claim on standard insurance. It's been hard to find ANY standard plans that provide meaningful cancer coverage. That's why supplemental cancer insurance exists. Below are the two posts I saw before I replied. I didn't see where he said to refuse a hospital bed to unvaxxed patients. Can you point it out to me? The only shifting of goalposts that I've seen in this exchange is going from "refusing insurance coverage" to "refusing treatment", but I'm open to the possibility that I missed something.
I agree with the gist of what he says but it sounds like he has an agenda. Getting vaxxed should be first and it wasn't the answer before there was a vaccine for almost a year. Social isolation made sense in the beginning, and around immunocompromised people. Good luck with losing weight. And what does "Optimize your medical problems" mean?
I hope you weren't referring to my post. I was talking about refusing insurance (or charging much higher insurance rates). If it was me, can you refer to the post where I said to refuse someone a hospital bed.
I think people may conflate things like “I think he goes to far” and “he has an agenda”.
"Optimize your medical problems, lose weight, get vaccinated, and get on with life. That was always the right answer. Everything else is a fools errand."
I dunno, I think when he says getting vaxxed is part of the right answer it is to be assumed the statement applies to the time when the vaxx existed.
Well, duh. It's pretty obvious that the guy means that this is how it should have been since vaccines were available, not from March 2020.
Both are examles of what you were asking for. Sorey you dont like the answers I guess.
Both are examples of how insurance companies refuse coverage. Take your pick. Reality is, the tactic is common despite you not realizing that. That said, I do agree it's over. It was likely over when you were accusing people of moving goal posts while at the same time attempting to equate "But maybe not offering insurance for a Covid hospital stay would have pushed more people to get vaccinated." with "REFUSING HOSPITAL beds to unvaxxed Covid sufferers".
We have a set or rules and processes to obtaining insurance already established. We'd follow those. No idea why you'd think that would have to change just because one gets COVID
I don't. But all this covid punishment stuff seems more you and Chaz's thing.We have a set or rules and processes to obtaining insurance already established. We'd follow those. No idea why you'd think that would have to change just because one gets COVID
Man. I guess it's tough to say sorry, I misread your post.John123 said:
Wow.
RavenFan said:
Then why ask the question? Not sure I understand honestly. All I said needed to happen was payments get back to our SOP process we have with insurance companies. Process who pays for what the way we do with everything else. The rest is dishonestly created straw man arguments by others. Yourself included it seems.quick-hands said:
SoBeDad said:
So, not at peak yet. Daily cases jumped again yesterday with 4,385 reported. Putting our 7 day rate at 2.14K per 100K. So, 2.14% of our county got Omicron last week (and reported it, actual number probably significantly higher).
The crazy thing is that her NFT farts are going to be bought as an investment by someone.
Although, I have to admit that whoever started this gets innovation credits in my book. He saw a money-making opportunity with the lemmings and struck fast.
I can't knock it at all. Anytime you can separate a fool from his/her money is a quality investment.
Honestly, this was never really alive. The hope is that as this thing mutates into new strands it becomes less and less virulent and eventually is generally ignorable. Omicron seems to be trending that way.
Good thing the economy is going well enough for people that they have extra money to waste on LGB gear.
Ironically I got more "free" money last year than this year. I just have trouble understanding when the economy is in the ####ter for people and when it's not, I guess. in one thread we are getting free money and these wonderful businesses are flourishing, in another thread people are barely scraping by.
Oh, I get it. just an attempt a poking the narrative I see in these threads. It's usually not anything like the bolded.
Losing weight is one of the hardest things for most people to do and maintain. Something like 80% of the weight loss during diets is regained within 5 years. I'd put getting a vaccine first and foremost to stop the current surge in hospital admissions and get us back to normal faster, since dieting will have no impact at all on the current crisis.
I thought for sure this was going to be the "Lets Go Brandon" stores popping up
I think Phase 1 trials are completed and Phase 2 is coming soon.
Is she talking about omicron specifically, or all covid-19 deaths? Also, is this all-time since the start of the pandemic or just for the post-vaccine era?
Hasn't this been the case forever, interesting time to start talking about it in the media...unless she already has been.
