The Commish
Footballguy
Wait.....did I just open a cached copy of FBG from early 2021??
If we're talking someone who already had it, sure. I'm thinking on those who never had it and aren't vaccinated. In terms of myocaritis risk, getting vaxxed is safer. And obviously, there are additional factors of health risk here too.Some people couldn't help getting it naturally. Why force them to increase their risk for no benefit?Ummm. The risk of myocarditis from getting that Covid to develop "natural immunity" is HIGHER than getting the vaccines though.Or recognize natural immunity that seems to be holding up very well in the young and healthy.Frankly ... I think way too much has been made of the myocarditis risks. "Myocarditis" is not popularly understood and sounds scary -- in fact, it's something patients usually never even notice. Yes, yes ... it's easy to find cases of myocarditis that lead to infirmity and (maybe?) death. Doesn't mean that's what's coming for men under 40 who get a vaccine.
And at this point? Worried about myocarditis from an mRNA vaccine? Run, don't walk, to get your Novavax series.
That was always the case against getting vaccinated post covid. We all have different health risks and mandating a one size fits all approach was short sighted.If we're talking someone who already had it, sure. I'm thinking on those who never had it and aren't vaccinated. In terms of myocaritis risk, getting vaxxed is safer. And obviously, there are additional factors of health risk here too.Some people couldn't help getting it naturally. Why force them to increase their risk for no benefit?Ummm. The risk of myocarditis from getting that Covid to develop "natural immunity" is HIGHER than getting the vaccines though.Or recognize natural immunity that seems to be holding up very well in the young and healthy.Frankly ... I think way too much has been made of the myocarditis risks. "Myocarditis" is not popularly understood and sounds scary -- in fact, it's something patients usually never even notice. Yes, yes ... it's easy to find cases of myocarditis that lead to infirmity and (maybe?) death. Doesn't mean that's what's coming for men under 40 who get a vaccine.
And at this point? Worried about myocarditis from an mRNA vaccine? Run, don't walk, to get your Novavax series.
It's like they're unfamiliar with the 5G zombie stuff, or maybe just intentionally trolling the Qdiots.Thankfully this FDA tweet finally got me to understand the benefit of the booster and why we need to take it forever...
I didnt even the consider the 5G angle of that. Going to have to look into it now....It's like they're unfamiliar with the 5G zombie stuff, or maybe just intentionally trolling the Qdiots.Thankfully this FDA tweet finally got me to understand the benefit of the booster and why we need to take it forever...
Wait.....did I just open a cached copy of FBG from early 2021??
And this is a fine position to have in general. What makes absolutely no sense is why one would do this for a particular vaccine and not all. You're either ok with the concept or you aren't. Wiggling around, drawing arbitrary lines and making exceptions just reeks of political "sides" short-sightedness.I'm just going to continue to hate on mandates and forcing this stuff on people.
My issue is with forcing a medical treatment on a person when it may not be necessary or the right choice for them. Its not a vaccine thing, the vaccine was just the catalyst for this round. This current vaccine has jumped the shark and most people have realized it.And this is a fine position to have in general. What makes absolutely no sense is why one would do this for a particular vaccine and not all. You're either ok with the concept or you aren't. Wiggling around, drawing arbitrary lines and making exceptions just reeks of political "sides" short-sightedness.I'm just going to continue to hate on mandates and forcing this stuff on people.
Since the inception of vaccines, this has been in play....this vaccine is no different in that regard. This same argument you are making now has been in play for decades and decades.My issue is with forcing a medical treatment on a person when it may not be necessary or the right choice for them. Its not a vaccine thing, the vaccine was just the catalyst for this round. This current vaccine has jumped the shark and most people have realized it.And this is a fine position to have in general. What makes absolutely no sense is why one would do this for a particular vaccine and not all. You're either ok with the concept or you aren't. Wiggling around, drawing arbitrary lines and making exceptions just reeks of political "sides" short-sightedness.I'm just going to continue to hate on mandates and forcing this stuff on people.
I would say defending the mandates while ignoring the science behind them looks political at this point and does not serve the interest of public health.
This "vaccine" is a bit different as it's really more of a treatment. It is also using different technology and Comirnaty (the approved version) wasn't available when mandated. Those are major milestones that we can't just ignore. We can force people to take something un an EUA. That is unethical.Since the inception of vaccines, this has been in play....this vaccine is no different in that regard. This same argument you are making now has been in play for decades and decades.My issue is with forcing a medical treatment on a person when it may not be necessary or the right choice for them. Its not a vaccine thing, the vaccine was just the catalyst for this round. This current vaccine has jumped the shark and most people have realized it.And this is a fine position to have in general. What makes absolutely no sense is why one would do this for a particular vaccine and not all. You're either ok with the concept or you aren't. Wiggling around, drawing arbitrary lines and making exceptions just reeks of political "sides" short-sightedness.I'm just going to continue to hate on mandates and forcing this stuff on people.
I would say defending the mandates while ignoring the science behind them looks political at this point and does not serve the interest of public health.
ETA: And this is from a guy who doesn't like mandates, but understands if companies, organizations, schools etc decide that's what they believe is best for their employees/students etc.
None of this matters to the practicality of a "treatment"...at all. You know this and you've also been shown at least 5 times how the bold is just a really bad talking point. Stop trying to move goalposts around. I'm already giving a pass to the fact you think this vaccine, which it actually is, isn't because you're looking at the efficacy of a vaccine against strands of the virus that didn't even exist when the vaccine was created while completely ignoring the enormous success of the vaccine against the virus that was in front of us at the time....the one the vaccine was created for.This "vaccine" is a bit different as it's really more of a treatment. It is also using different technology and Comirnaty (the approved version) wasn't available when mandated. Those are major milestones that we can't just ignore. We can force people to take something un an EUA. That is unethical.Since the inception of vaccines, this has been in play....this vaccine is no different in that regard. This same argument you are making now has been in play for decades and decades.My issue is with forcing a medical treatment on a person when it may not be necessary or the right choice for them. Its not a vaccine thing, the vaccine was just the catalyst for this round. This current vaccine has jumped the shark and most people have realized it.And this is a fine position to have in general. What makes absolutely no sense is why one would do this for a particular vaccine and not all. You're either ok with the concept or you aren't. Wiggling around, drawing arbitrary lines and making exceptions just reeks of political "sides" short-sightedness.I'm just going to continue to hate on mandates and forcing this stuff on people.
I would say defending the mandates while ignoring the science behind them looks political at this point and does not serve the interest of public health.
ETA: And this is from a guy who doesn't like mandates, but understands if companies, organizations, schools etc decide that's what they believe is best for their employees/students etc.
None of this matters to the practicality of a "treatment"...at all. You know this and you've also been shown at least 5 times how the bold is just a really bad talking point. Stop trying to move goalposts around. I'm already giving a pass to the fact you think this vaccine, which it actually is, isn't because you're looking at the efficacy of a vaccine against strands of the virus that didn't even exist when the vaccine was created while completely ignoring the enormous success of the vaccine against the virus that was in front of us at the time....the one the vaccine was created for.This "vaccine" is a bit different as it's really more of a treatment. It is also using different technology and Comirnaty (the approved version) wasn't available when mandated. Those are major milestones that we can't just ignore. We can force people to take something un an EUA. That is unethical.Since the inception of vaccines, this has been in play....this vaccine is no different in that regard. This same argument you are making now has been in play for decades and decades.My issue is with forcing a medical treatment on a person when it may not be necessary or the right choice for them. Its not a vaccine thing, the vaccine was just the catalyst for this round. This current vaccine has jumped the shark and most people have realized it.And this is a fine position to have in general. What makes absolutely no sense is why one would do this for a particular vaccine and not all. You're either ok with the concept or you aren't. Wiggling around, drawing arbitrary lines and making exceptions just reeks of political "sides" short-sightedness.I'm just going to continue to hate on mandates and forcing this stuff on people.
I would say defending the mandates while ignoring the science behind them looks political at this point and does not serve the interest of public health.
ETA: And this is from a guy who doesn't like mandates, but understands if companies, organizations, schools etc decide that's what they believe is best for their employees/students etc.
And its unfortunately too late for most. The federal mandate is still on pause because Biden won't kill it and has no idea how to dig out of the hole currently.Good for Billy Moseley, but that was in May. At present:
"The FDA also gave EUA to the vaccines produced by Pfizer, Moderna and Janssen. Pfizer and Moderna have also gotten full FDA approval for use in adults, but the vaccine formulas for kids remains at EUA. The military is able to mandate the troops receive the COVID-19 vaccine because there are two options that have full FDA approval, although service members can receive a EUA vaccine if they would rather." (USNI News, 8/2/2022)
I don't think you were legally forced to get the vaccine. It depends on the company's wording. If you went to get the vaccine over the threat of losing your job, that was your decision at that point sadly. You had the right to refuse it per the EUA, but did not. I think the company has a legal out, but it again depends how they phrased it.discussed recent email with my manager
I was forced to get vaxxed so I wouldn't get covid/transmit covid
now we know vaxxed gets covid and asymptomatic people with covid transmit covid
so ...... why was I forced to get vaxxed? It doesn't stop me from getting or transmitting covid, and in my age group and conditions, its like a 0.01% chance of death
he didn't have any answers for me
I don't think you were legally forced to get the vaccine. It depends on the company's wording. If you went to get the vaccine over the threat of losing your job, that was your decision at that point sadly. You had the right to refuse it per the EUA, but did not. I think the company has a legal out, but it again depends how they phrased it.
I hate it too, I was just giving my outsider opinion of how a company will finesse the situation now.I don't think you were legally forced to get the vaccine. It depends on the company's wording. If you went to get the vaccine over the threat of losing your job, that was your decision at that point sadly. You had the right to refuse it per the EUA, but did not. I think the company has a legal out, but it again depends how they phrased it.
get it or lose my job was how it was conveyed to me
oh I suppose I had a choice - but not really. Lost my seniority, income, I'd have had to move, leave my people where I am .......... I guess it was still a choice but not much of one
and now looking back how wrong they all were on why we were being forced to get shots :(
I don't think you were legally forced to get the vaccine. It depends on the company's wording. If you went to get the vaccine over the threat of losing your job, that was your decision at that point sadly. You had the right to refuse it per the EUA, but did not. I think the company has a legal out, but it again depends how they phrased it.discussed recent email with my manager
I was forced to get vaxxed so I wouldn't get covid/transmit covid
now we know vaxxed gets covid and asymptomatic people with covid transmit covid
so ...... why was I forced to get vaxxed? It doesn't stop me from getting or transmitting covid, and in my age group and conditions, its like a 0.01% chance of death
he didn't have any answers for me
Not quite but close. Remember democrats(and liberals especially) operate on feelings. Always and forever. They generally don't think things through when feelings are involved. So the whole "if we can save one life" trumps every single other data point. This is how they work. And I mean it's an OK concept, but they just take it too far. Always have.I would bet our covid response probably cost about $50 million per life saved. This policy is even worse and seems like a negative return. At this point it is purely a show of power and has nothing to do with protecting anyone.
It looks like more and more people are stumbling on to the non covid excess mortality issue hitting a lot of countries right now. The facts are that these deaths are happening and those numbers can not finessed, they are hard numbers.Seems like nearly everyday now I come across another article about a young famous (or adjacent famous) person dying from either cancer or some other unexplained 'natural' cause. Two days ago it was a 51 yr old stand up comic. Yesterday it was a 34 yr old ex UFC fighter. Today it was the young wife of an MLB player.
Is it long covid? Or the other elephant? Or just noise? I don't know, but it sure would be nice to.
There is no "unexplained natural cause" in either of those three cases. One had cancer, the other had cirrhosis of the liver. Can't find the news on the wife that died today. You are looking for a conspiracy when you should be shouting "**** cancer" insteadSeems like nearly everyday now I come across another article about a young famous (or adjacent famous) person dying from either cancer or some other unexplained 'natural' cause. Two days ago it was a 51 yr old stand up comic. Yesterday it was a 34 yr old ex UFC fighter. Today it was the young wife of an MLB player.
Is it long covid? Or the other elephant? Or just noise? I don't know, but it sure would be nice to.
Me too.Pretty sure Covid will just bounce off of me and say "ouch!" if I encounter it.
The purpose of the vaccination programme is to prevent severe illness, hospitalisation and death. Therefore, people at the highest risk of becoming severely ill will be offered booster vaccination. The purpose of vaccination is not to prevent infection with covid-19, and people aged under 50 are therefore currently not being offered booster vaccination.
People aged under 50 are generally not at particularly higher risk of becoming severely ill from covid-19. In addition, younger people aged under 50 are well protected against becoming severely ill from covid-19, as a very large number of them have already been vaccinated and have previously been infected with covid-19, and there is consequently good immunity among this part of the population.
It is important that the population also remembers the guidance on how to prevent the spread of infection, including staying at home in case of illness, frequent aeration or ventilation, social distancing, good coughing etiquette, hand hygiene and cleaning.
Hope so broMe too.Pretty sure Covid will just bounce off of me and say "ouch!" if I encounter it.
If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.Biden declared the pandemic over and progressive liberals threw a hissy fit
Biden told ‘60 Minutes’ COVID pandemic ‘is over,’ sparking liberal backlash
President Biden declared the COVID-19 pandemic “over” during an interview that aired Sunday night — and immediately sparked a bitter backlash from progressives and liberal Democra…nypost.com
Definitely need to end the mandates.If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.Biden declared the pandemic over and progressive liberals threw a hissy fit
Biden told ‘60 Minutes’ COVID pandemic ‘is over,’ sparking liberal backlash
President Biden declared the COVID-19 pandemic “over” during an interview that aired Sunday night — and immediately sparked a bitter backlash from progressives and liberal Democra…nypost.com
I can understand that you might disagree with various aspects of COVID policies. That said, the logic in the bolded is incorrect. It's entirely possible that a pandemic can be over AND specific policies are required to keep it that way. For example, measles and polio are no longer at pandemic stages, yet much of the reason for that is due to the existence of and mandates for vaccines.If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.
In before the "natural immunity is the reason" posts.despite being the lowest at risk population in terms of age, the unvaccinated made up the lions share of death and hospitalizations in 2021 and 2022. Luckily enough of our country trusted the science and we can get on with our lives.
How come nobody complains about other required vaccines hurting readiness and weakening the armed services?I can understand that you might disagree with various aspects of COVID policies. That said, the logic in the bolded is incorrect. It's entirely possible that a pandemic can be over AND specific policies are required to keep it that way. For example, measles and polio are no longer at pandemic stages, yet much of the reason for that is due to the existence of and mandates for vaccines.If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.
To be clear, I'm not arguing that any specific COVID policy is necessary at this time. I'm simply noting that your logic above is flawed and that you should find alternate arguments.
The bolded is complete misinformation. Please don't do that. At no point in the past few years have the lowest at risk population in terms of age made up the lions share of death and hospitalizations, vaccinated or otherwise. Misinformation like this is the reason we have legions of mentally scarred parents who still fret over their kids going to school, as well as a few remaining mask mandates for children.Definitely need to end the mandates.If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.Biden declared the pandemic over and progressive liberals threw a hissy fit
Biden told ‘60 Minutes’ COVID pandemic ‘is over,’ sparking liberal backlash
President Biden declared the COVID-19 pandemic “over” during an interview that aired Sunday night — and immediately sparked a bitter backlash from progressives and liberal Democra…nypost.com
I'm just happy that enough folks got vaccinated so that Omicron didn't quite overrun our health system and provided enough people with protection so that future mutations were much less deadly. Heck, despite being the lowest at risk population in terms of age, the unvaccinated made up the lions share of death and hospitalizations in 2021 and 2022. Luckily enough of our country trusted the science and we can get on with our lives.
Because those workHow come nobody complains about other required vaccines hurting readiness and weakening the armed services?I can understand that you might disagree with various aspects of COVID policies. That said, the logic in the bolded is incorrect. It's entirely possible that a pandemic can be over AND specific policies are required to keep it that way. For example, measles and polio are no longer at pandemic stages, yet much of the reason for that is due to the existence of and mandates for vaccines.If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.
To be clear, I'm not arguing that any specific COVID policy is necessary at this time. I'm simply noting that your logic above is flawed and that you should find alternate arguments.
- Adenovirus
- Hepatitis A
- Hepatitis B
- Influenza
- Measles, mumps, rubella
- Meningococcal
- Poliovirus
- Tetanus-Diphtheria
- Varicella
Fair. I wasn't talking about children, but adults age less than 80. These folks massively disproportionately were hospitalized and died from Covid.The bolded is complete misinformation. Please don't do that. At no point in the past few years have the lowest at risk population in terms of age made up the lions share of death and hospitalizations, vaccinated or otherwise. Misinformation like this is the reason we have legions of mentally scarred parents who still fret over their kids going to school, as well as a few remaining mask mandates for children.Definitely need to end the mandates.If its over Biden needs to end the federal mandate. I can't believe how stupid the policy is at this point. It severely hurt military readiness and weakened our armed services. This mandate made America worse off and he still can't see it.Biden declared the pandemic over and progressive liberals threw a hissy fit
Biden told ‘60 Minutes’ COVID pandemic ‘is over,’ sparking liberal backlash
President Biden declared the COVID-19 pandemic “over” during an interview that aired Sunday night — and immediately sparked a bitter backlash from progressives and liberal Democra…nypost.com
I'm just happy that enough folks got vaccinated so that Omicron didn't quite overrun our health system and provided enough people with protection so that future mutations were much less deadly. Heck, despite being the lowest at risk population in terms of age, the unvaccinated made up the lions share of death and hospitalizations in 2021 and 2022. Luckily enough of our country trusted the science and we can get on with our lives.
That's also untrue. The rates are higher for the unvaccinated, but the vast majority of death and disease and burden on the health care system was definitely not coming from the unvaccinated this year. It's important to be accurate about these things considering a significant portion of our population still to this day has a poor understanding of the age-related risk ratios for Covid.The vast majority of deaths and hospitalizations were unvaccinated in all age groups.
Then you should be accurate.It's important to be accurate
I was. Say what you mean.Then you should be accurate.It's important to be accurate
I did in the post you originally quoted.I was. Say what you mean.Then you should be accurate.It's important to be accurate
Well, I'll be generous and say you are mistaken, rather than call you a liar. The 'vast majority' of death and hospitalizations in all age groups were not in the unvaccinated in 2022. That's simply untrue.I did in the post you originally quoted.I was. Say what you mean.Then you should be accurate.It's important to be accurate
Link?Well, I'll be generous and say you are mistaken, rather than call you a liar. The 'vast majority' of death and hospitalizations in all age groups were not in the unvaccinated in 2022. That's simply untrue.I did in the post you originally quoted.I was. Say what you mean.Then you should be accurate.It's important to be accurate
Link?Well, I'll be generous and say you are mistaken, rather than call you a liar. The 'vast majority' of death and hospitalizations in all age groups were not in the unvaccinated in 2022. That's simply untrue.I did in the post you originally quoted.I was. Say what you mean.Then you should be accurate.It's important to be accurate