You obviously know so much about this program...lol whatever you say buddy. I'm actually more concerned about the security issues with the system than the lack of basic functionality.Schlzm
Clearly more than you think I do. I'm really just poking fun over this whole thing. Obviously part of this is your baby so I can understand being defensive. If I wanted to work on that contract I would have submitted a bid, though I guess maybe a little after the fact damage control could be available?SchlzmYou obviously know so much about this program...lol whatever you say buddy. I'm actually more concerned about the security issues with the system than the lack of basic functionality.
Schlzm
What is clear is that you think you know more than you do.Clearly more than you think I do. I'm really just poking fun over this whole thing. Obviously part of this is your baby so I can understand being defensive. If I wanted to work on that contract I would have submitted a bid, though I guess maybe a little after the fact damage control could be available?SchlzmYou obviously know so much about this program...lol whatever you say buddy. I'm actually more concerned about the security issues with the system than the lack of basic functionality.
Schlzm
Oh you don't want this to crash? Double that number to $600 million. Look how that turned out...I wouldn't say that...but there is a much larger emphasis on cost/benefit in a private company setting. $300 million for you to give me this box on the login page?? Screw that. In government....$300 million for you to give me this box on a the login page?? Hmmm....ok, well if you say it's that much it must really be hard to do. Go ahead.Night and day.Because in the private sector there are rarely politics involved.It's always a head scratcher to me when they are able to compare government programs to similar like ones run by private companies. In this case Facebook. Why is the private sector so much more efficient at just about everything?It cost $634,320,919 to build Healthcare.gov. Initial estimates were $93.7 million. The company has been a darling of the Obama administration, which since 2009 has bestowed it with $1.4 billion in contracts.http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-spent-634-million-to-build-broken-healthcare-gov-website/At least it didn't cost that much.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/10/09/report-us-taxpayers-shelled-out-634320919-obamacare-website
600+ million!
Or government could learn some valuable lessons on cost/benefit, but they'd have to do it on their own. They don't have stockholders holding their feet to the fire to produce dividend checks. None of this is me advocating for one thing or the other. Simply pointing out the thought process differences. I've been in government projects myself and when "budget" is brought up in the planning, there's a general chuckle in the room. You ask for an explanation to your head scratcher and I am answering it. It's two completely different cultures.So with that thought process, shouldn't we be trying to shift government run programs to the private sector instead of the other way around?I wouldn't say that...but there is a much larger emphasis on cost/benefit in a private company setting. $300 million for you to give me this box on the login page?? Screw that. In government....$300 million for you to give me this box on a the login page?? Hmmm....ok, well if you say it's that much it must really be hard to do. Go ahead.Night and day.Because in the private sector there are rarely politics involved.It's always a head scratcher to me when they are able to compare government programs to similar like ones run by private companies. In this case Facebook. Why is the private sector so much more efficient at just about everything?It cost $634,320,919 to build Healthcare.gov. Initial estimates were $93.7 million. The company has been a darling of the Obama administration, which since 2009 has bestowed it with $1.4 billion in contracts.http://frontpagemag.com/2013/dgreenfield/obama-spent-634-million-to-build-broken-healthcare-gov-website/At least it didn't cost that much.
http://nation.foxnews.com/2013/10/09/report-us-taxpayers-shelled-out-634320919-obamacare-website
600+ million!
What is clear is that you think you know more than you do.Clearly more than you think I do. I'm really just poking fun over this whole thing. Obviously part of this is your baby so I can understand being defensive. If I wanted to work on that contract I would have submitted a bid, though I guess maybe a little after the fact damage control could be available?SchlzmYou obviously know so much about this program...lol whatever you say buddy. I'm actually more concerned about the security issues with the system than the lack of basic functionality.
Schlzm

I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking.I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
It's also quite apparent how much joy you're taking in the website problems, and how you're actively rooting against an Act designed to get poor Americans access to affordable health insurance.matttyl said:I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking.SacramentoBob said:I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.matttyl said:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
Also, the true open enrollment period (when you'd have to sign up by before being hit with a tax penalty) was apparently clarified yesterday by the White House...to be Valentine's day. You've got 4 months, not 5 and a half.....tick, tick, tick.
We're not allowed to burn down their hovels and pelt them with rotten food so we have to settle for what we can. Don't be so judgemental.SchlzmIt's also quite apparent how much joy you're taking in the website problems, and how you're actively rooting against an Act designed to get poor Americans access to affordable health insurance.matttyl said:I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking. Also, the true open enrollment period (when you'd have to sign up by before being hit with a tax penalty) was apparently clarified yesterday by the White House...to be Valentine's day. You've got 4 months, not 5 and a half.....tick, tick, tick.SacramentoBob said:I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.matttyl said:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
Not at all to the first part. I'm an insurance agent, so I need the website to work so that I can help my clients. The fact that it's still not working is extremely annoying to me, as it is to everyone I'm trying to help. I take absolutely no joy in it at all.It's also quite apparent how much joy you're taking in the website problems, and how you're actively rooting against an Act designed to get poor Americans access to affordable health insurance.matttyl said:I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking.SacramentoBob said:I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.matttyl said:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
Also, the true open enrollment period (when you'd have to sign up by before being hit with a tax penalty) was apparently clarified yesterday by the White House...to be Valentine's day. You've got 4 months, not 5 and a half.....tick, tick, tick.
I'm pretty sure the "poor Americans" are what Medicaid is for, but I like the attempt at hyperbole.It's also quite apparent how much joy you're taking in the website problems, and how you're actively rooting against an Act designed to get poor Americans access to affordable health insurance.matttyl said:I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking.SacramentoBob said:I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.matttyl said:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
Also, the true open enrollment period (when you'd have to sign up by before being hit with a tax penalty) was apparently clarified yesterday by the White House...to be Valentine's day. You've got 4 months, not 5 and a half.....tick, tick, tick.
Welcome to Obamacare!So even if you manage to apply for a plan, you are not emailed the plan details or the address and name to make your first payment to.
When I log in now, I am able to log into the site, it remembers who I am (name, addresss, etc..), but when I click my Plan/Coverage I'm taken to a blank page.
Buyer-Beware.
Once people realize their kids are covered until the age of 26, no pre-existing conditions, not being tied to their employer's insurance it's over. Their insurance went up? It always goes up.Cruz to Hannity:
“If we don’t do it (defund Obacare) now, in all likelihood, Obamacare will never, ever be repealed. Why is that? Because on January 1, the exchanges kick in, the subsidies kick in,” and added that “their plan is to get the American people addicted to the sugar, addicted to the subsidies, and once that happens, in all likelihood, it never gets…”
“It’s over,” Hannity cut in, “it never gets repealed.”
Or just healthcare like the rest of the civilized world. I mean it's only your life. No big deal. Everyone could be rich if they just tried. And if they don't have the talent they don't deserve to live.Great job everyone! Health care and rainbows for all. :confetti:
Congratulation?Or just healthcare like the rest of the civilized world. I mean it's only your life. No big deal. Everyone could be rich if they just tried. And if they don't have the talent they don't deserve to live.Great job everyone! Health care and rainbows for all. :confetti:
According to Ted Cruz, getting there.Congratulation?Or just healthcare like the rest of the civilized world. I mean it's only your life. No big deal. Everyone could be rich if they just tried. And if they don't have the talent they don't deserve to live.Great job everyone! Health care and rainbows for all. :confetti:
Yes, but only one.Congratulation?Or just healthcare like the rest of the civilized world. I mean it's only your life. No big deal. Everyone could be rich if they just tried. And if they don't have the talent they don't deserve to live.Great job everyone! Health care and rainbows for all. :confetti:
Health care is available to everyone in this country. Saying otherwise is just wrong.Or just healthcare like the rest of the civilized world. I mean it's only your life. No big deal. Everyone could be rich if they just tried. And if they don't have the talent they don't deserve to live.Great job everyone! Health care and rainbows for all. :confetti:
March 1rst. No worries.When's the deadline to sign up for Obamacare? Will they have this fixed by then?
Don't worry when people see what kind of a ripoff obamacare is, they will wish everything was still down.When's the deadline to sign up for Obamacare? Will they have this fixed by then?
You obviously have more faith in the gubernent then i do.March 1rst. No worries.When's the deadline to sign up for Obamacare? Will they have this fixed by then?
This doesn't make sense.Many companies will eventually dump employer-sponsored health care plans I feel. Therefore leaving their employees to be forced to the crap alternative.
Increased demand is one thing. I fear if employees lose their company subsidies they will not be able to afford ANY alternative! Therefore, a counterproductive byproduct of the ACA.This doesn't make sense.We have an open marketplace, and you're saying demand for services in the openMany companies will eventually dump employer-sponsored health care plans I feel. Therefore leaving their employees to be forced to the crap alternative.
marketplace will increase. Why wouldn't you
expect increased competition to reduce prices and improve quality?
It's likely if they can't afford it, there will be a subsidy to help.Increased demand is one thing. I fear if employees lose their company subsidies they will not be able to afford ANY alternative! Therefore, a counterproductive byproduct of the ACA.This doesn't make sense.We have an open marketplace, and you're saying demand for services in the openMany companies will eventually dump employer-sponsored health care plans I feel. Therefore leaving their employees to be forced to the crap alternative.
marketplace will increase. Why wouldn't you
expect increased competition to reduce prices and improve quality?
Poor people have Medicaid, if you don't qualify for Medicaid you cannot afford either the premiums, deductibles or maximum out of pocket. You should know this by now. I am rooting against it, maybe I can forgo having to pay the tax for the first year.It's also quite apparent how much joy you're taking in the website problems, and how you're actively rooting against an Act designed to get poor Americans access to affordable health insurance.I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking.I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
Also, the true open enrollment period (when you'd have to sign up by before being hit with a tax penalty) was apparently clarified yesterday by the White House...to be Valentine's day. You've got 4 months, not 5 and a half.....tick, tick, tick.
I thought the ACA expanded Medicaid.Poor people have Medicaid, if you don't qualify for Medicaid you cannot afford either the premiums, deductibles or maximum out of pocket. You should know this by now. I am rooting against it, maybe I can forgo having to pay the tax for the first year.It's also quite apparent how much joy you're taking in the website problems, and how you're actively rooting against an Act designed to get poor Americans access to affordable health insurance.I don't expect them to, either. That said, they have an awful lot of catching up to do just to get to the apparently required minimum to keep this thing afloat - and the clock just keeps on ticking.I don't expect the problems to continue through the entire open enrollment period. If they do, that'd be a major black eye.http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2452537/Administration-sources-Obamacare-website-received-just-51-000-completed-insurance-applications.html
Apparently only 51k people have completed applications through the federal exchange. At this rate, and applying that rate to the other 14 states and DC, roughly only 2 million will apply during open enrollment. That's less than 29% of what's needed to keep this thing afloat, according to the CBO.
Looks like we don't need Republicans to kill the ACA, it apparently will kill itself.
Also, the true open enrollment period (when you'd have to sign up by before being hit with a tax penalty) was apparently clarified yesterday by the White House...to be Valentine's day. You've got 4 months, not 5 and a half.....tick, tick, tick.
Right now, for some companies/industries that may be true. When the economy really gets going again and companies are competing with other companies for talent, the leverage will have shifted and I'm hopeful this won't happen.pizzatyme said:Many companies will eventually dump employer-sponsored health care plans I feel. Therefore leaving their employees to be forced to the crap alternative.
The deadline is the end of March. The problem is that you have to have a completed and verified application in by the 15th of the month to have coverage start the following 1st of the month (so you need to be completed by December 15th if you want your coverage to begin Jan. 1st).Dr Oadi said:March 1rst. No worries.KingPrawn said:When's the deadline to sign up for Obamacare? Will they have this fixed by then?
If they can't handle the traffic when the program first opens, how in the world will they handle the traffic leading up to the deadline? We are a nation of procrastinators.The deadline is the end of March. The problem is that you have to have a completed and verified application in by the 15th of the month to have coverage start the following 1st of the month (so you need to be completed by December 15th if you want your coverage to begin Jan. 1st). If you go without coverage for more than 90 days, you will be fined - so you have to have your application completed and verified by roughly Valentine's day or you will be fined for being without coverage (if in fact you don't have coverage now)Dr Oadi said:March 1rst. No worries.KingPrawn said:When's the deadline to sign up for Obamacare? Will they have this fixed by then?
Complete opposite there. The only people that are being "put on the market" that weren't there already were the unhealthy ones. Having to insure them will drive prices up, way up.rolyaTy said:It's likely if they can't afford it, there will be a subsidy to help.
It's ironic to me that so many people who likely extoll the values of a free market, are really down on the idea of the insurance marketplace. It gives people information on policies, sets a level playing field, puts a lot of people into the market, and all of this seems much more likely to drive down prices, drive up competition, and improve the quality of plans people are eligible for.
You might find this interesting, and I'm still getting clarification on it cause it doesn't make sense to me....If they can't handle the traffic when the program first opens, how in the world will they handle the traffic leading up to the deadline? We are a nation of procrastinators.
Bored so I gave this a shot.I urge you to go to ehealth.com and look for yourself at the individual plans available today and what will be available to you next year - see the vast difference in the deductible options?
Come on now. As a agent/broker you know someone is not going to be able to buy coverage and have it effective "On the way to the hospital".You might find this interesting, and I'm still getting clarification on it cause it doesn't make sense to me....If they can't handle the traffic when the program first opens, how in the world will they handle the traffic leading up to the deadline? We are a nation of procrastinators.
The "open enrollment" period is only for "on exchange plans", but apparently you can still buy "off exchange plans" all year round. These should be the same prices and actually the exact same plans, you just can't get any government subsidy if you're enrolling on an "off exchange plan". For many people, that won't matter because they know they won't qualify for a subsidy.
So follow me here - if you can buy an "off exchange plan" 365 days a year, and they aren't underwritten, and they are guaranteed issue, and they can't exclude any pre-ex.....what's keep someone from literally buying insurance on their way to the hospital?! And then what's keeping them from dropping the coverage the day after the get out of the hospital? And people think insurance rates aren't going to skyrocket (after the reinsurance program expires in 3 years when Obama is out of office)?! They've got a lot more faith in the average man than I do.....
I get that, and it was an exaggeration, obviously. But what about a woman who's 8 months pregnant? What about someone who's just been diagnosed with something, like cancer? What about someone with an issue they can live with, but would like to have surgically repaired (like a joint replacement)?Come on now. As a agent/broker you know someone is not going to be able to buy coverage and have it effective "On the way to the hospital".
So twice the premium for twice the deductible. Got it.Currently paying ~$100/month for an HDHP + HRA (pretty awesome really) with a $1,600 deductible. In my 30s, non-smoker.
For that same price I can get an HDHP + HSA with a $3,500 deductible "pre-Obamacare".
For $234/month I can get an HDHP + HSA with a $3650 deductible silver plan "post-Obamacare".