What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Robert Kraft (yes, THAT Robert Kraft) charged with soliciting prostitution (2 Viewers)

(HULK) said:
Orchids of Asia has still, as of today, not been connected to sex trafficking.  Unless the WSJ is wrong:

https://www.wsj.com/articles/florida-prosecutors-offer-to-drop-charges-against-patriots-owner-robert-kraft-11553014972

Any connection that has been brought up in this thread was a result of people conflating which lady worked where or owned which spa.  I realize that Americans often have difficulties distinguishing between Asian names and faces, but the fact is, as of today there is still zero charges tying Orchids of Asia to see trafficking, and zero evidence released of it either.  There were statements made by the DA that were walked back, and nothing else. So, while there may have been trafficking in that spa, there is zero reason at present to just assume there was.
Totally different point.

I agree that charges are absolutely necessary to make claims about sex trafficking. And authorities saying such charges were imminent were worth relying upon. And the fact they have not brought them is totally relevant. However again it is a different argument than the one you made before.

 
Latest news(these are snippets, click link for full story)

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/26315681/source-kraft-files-motion-suppress-evidence

====================

Attorneys for New England Patriots owner Robert Kraft filed a motion Wednesday to suppress evidence -- notably the video evidence -- in his solicitation of prostitution case, according to a source.

The motion is an effort to make sure that the surveillance video, described as graphic and damning, isn't released if he doesn't reach a plea deal with prosecutors. It also is a warning shot to prosecutors that Kraft's legal team will try to go after the state's case by saying there was no probable cause to collect the evidence in the first place.

...

(regarding plea deal) A source close to Kraft said, "That's not going to happen," and said the 77-year-old would rather fight the charges in court than admit to a crime. Sources said that the two sides were continuing to negotiate and that Kraft had not rejected the deal outright.

 
From what I saw, part of the legal strategy in asking to suppress evidence is rooted in Florida wiretapping laws that require all parties on a recorded conversation to be made aware that they were being recording. If Kraft (and others) were not notified, then the legal argument would be that the recordings were obtained illegally and thus could not be used . . . and the case essentially would have little compelling evidence at that point. Similarly, I have heard arguments that the police stop of Kraft in his vehicle would fall under scrutiny if there were no probable cause to pull the car over . . . especially demanding a license from Kraft who wasn't driving.

It will be interesting to see what the NFL would do if the case / charge was dismissed entirely or if Kraft were cleared. It still would leave a black mark on the league and certainly did not make the shield look good in the process. That would open up another can of worms if the league still wanted to levy severe discipline / multi-game suspension on Kraft.

 
Kraft finally released a statement

===================

"I am truly sorry," Kraft said in a statement. "I know I have hurt and disappointed my family, my close friends, my co-workers, our fans and many others who rightfully hold me to a higher standard."

Kraft said he had remained silent since the charges "in deference to the judicial process." He has pleaded not guilty.

"Throughout my life, I have always tried to do the right thing. The last thing I would ever want to do is disrespect another human being. I have extraordinary respect for women; my morals and my soul were shaped by the most wonderful woman, the love of my life, who I was blessed to have as my partner for 50 years," Kraft said in the statement.

"As I move forward, I hope to continue to use the platform with which I have been blessed to help others and to try to make a difference. I expect to be judged not by my words, but by my actions. And through those actions, I hope to regain your confidence and respect."

 
Kraft's lawyer also laid out how they intend to fight it

=======================

Kraft's lawyer, William Burck, told ESPN: "There was no human trafficking and law enforcement knows it. The video and the traffic stop were illegal and law enforcement just doesn't want to admit it. The state attorney needs to step up and do the right thing and investigate how the evidence in this case was obtained."

 
Kraft finally released a statement

===================

"I am truly sorry," Kraft said in a statement. "I know I have hurt and disappointed my family, my close friends, my co-workers, our fans and many others who rightfully hold me to a higher standard."

Kraft said he had remained silent since the charges "in deference to the judicial process." He has pleaded not guilty.

"Throughout my life, I have always tried to do the right thing. The last thing I would ever want to do is disrespect another human being. I have extraordinary respect for women; my morals and my soul were shaped by the most wonderful woman, the love of my life, who I was blessed to have as my partner for 50 years," Kraft said in the statement.

"As I move forward, I hope to continue to use the platform with which I have been blessed to help others and to try to make a difference. I expect to be judged not by my words, but by my actions. And through those actions, I hope to regain your confidence and respect."
He is pleading not guilty but that's not the statement of an innocent man.

 
He is pleading not guilty but that's not the statement of an innocent man.
If you look at the lawyers statement, they are not denying the act he committed, they are fighting how he was charged and how evidence was obtained.  He clearly is not "innocent" as we use the word.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
NewlyRetired said:
If you look at the lawyers statement, they are not denying the act he committed, they are fighting how he was charged and how evidence was obtained.  He clearly is not "innocent" as we use the word.
Seems incredibly stupid. Everyone knows what you did, you acknowledge it was wrong, and have already committed to being better. Why drag it all out further when you can make that same acknowledgment to the court and be done with everything? Worried about landing your next job with that on your record?

 
Seems incredibly stupid. Everyone knows what you did, you acknowledge it was wrong, and have already committed to being better. Why drag it all out further when you can make that same acknowledgment to the court and be done with everything? Worried about landing your next job with that on your record?
I am assuming he does not want to go to jail. 

 
Seems incredibly stupid. Everyone knows what you did, you acknowledge it was wrong, and have already committed to being better. Why drag it all out further when you can make that same acknowledgment to the court and be done with everything? Worried about landing your next job with that on your record?
1) he might not want to risk jail time, albeit minimal risk

2) if he gets convicted, even with a plea, the NFL might have stronger grounds to punish him.  I bet this is the driving force behind fighting the charges while still basically admitting he did it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
he wouldn't go to jail... no of them are.  I bet hes prepared to admit guilt and accept the NFL's punishment.
I agree that he wouldn’t go to jail but I thought perhaps paying a good lawyer to fight the case is the way wealthy people like him are able to escape prison in these circumstances. Maybe you are right and he will change his plea.

 
Krafts legal team is going to smoke these yokels if this goes to trial. My guess is the video is then “leaked” as a FU to Kraft. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Sounds like typical patriot way. Do something wrong, get caught then scream I'm innocent and drag it out as long as possible. Scumbag organization.

 
Krafts legal team is going to smoke these yokels if this goes to trial. My guess is the video is then “leaked” as a FU to Kraft. 
I completely agree.  The PD there violated the Constitution in a few different ways, and claimed "sex trafficking" as the rationale for it.

I honestly find the whole thing fascinating.  I am strongly for legalized or decriminalized sex work, I am strongly against sex trafficking, and strongly support constitutionally protected rights.  This thing has 3 elements that will make for an interesting case study IMO.

 
I am sick of all of these rich people thinking they are above the law.!  If I were on that jury I would be finding him guilty of all charges...     

...unless his legal team bribed me.  
I'm sure he's guilty of paying for a handy.  But, should that even be illegal?  Assuming everyone was a consenting adult.

Furthermore, should the Police Department be allowed to fake a bomb threat to install cameras in a private business to covertly film sex acts?  And to stop cars not violating any law and demand identification of passengers?  

 
I'm sure he's guilty of paying for a handy.  But, should that even be illegal?  Assuming everyone was a consenting adult.
I don't think "Judge, what I did shouldn't be illegal" is much of a defense.

Furthermore, should the Police Department be allowed to fake a bomb threat to install cameras in a private business to covertly film sex acts?  And to stop cars not violating any law and demand identification of passengers?
I am not sure but my guess is that if law enforcement believes that crimes are being committed in a private business and they can get a warrant then they are allowed.   As far as demanding identification of passengers in a car I think it is permissible if they have probable cause.

 
I honestly find the whole thing fascinating.  I am strongly for legalized or decriminalized sex work, I am strongly against sex trafficking, and strongly support constitutionally protected rights.  This thing has 3 elements that will make for an interesting case study IMO.
I agree with you on sex work, sex trafficking, and constitutional rights.  But I'm strongly in favor of Bob Kraft's public humiliation, so I'm torn on this one.

 
I doubt the sex traffic thing was even thought of by Kraft,  no different than it is in the military in those over seas bars.

I would think with his $$$$$ things would be brought to him.  I don't see it as some big deal to be honest.

 
Seems like an important lesson here, if you visit one of these establishments ensure that at least some of the other clients are rich enough to obtain really good lawyers.  

 
It is now official. Prosector for the state of Florida says no sex trafficking at Orchids of Asia.

http://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/26507622/lawyer-argues-kraft-video-release-authorities-say-spa-not-linked-human-trafficking

Soooooo... Anyone want to walk back any of their previous statements?
Um, knowing what I know about the internet and the people making the statements, probably not. There will be some justification for bomb threats and video surveillance of an establishment that merely solicited hand jobs. It's always for the greater good, don't you know?  

eta* Max and the act (NSFW)

eta2* Montage (NSFW)

 
Last edited by a moderator:
rockaction said:
Because there's sex trafficking in Florida, which means every bit of prostitution involves just that.  
Odd... the DA seems to have come to a different conclusion (after falsely dragging peoples names through that mud based purely on speculation) 

Hopefully heads will roll and checks will be cut. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so if there was not trafficking does that mean that the prostitution and solicitation charges get dropped i dont understand what you are saying take that to the bank brohans

 
so if there was not trafficking does that mean that the prostitution and solicitation charges get dropped i dont understand what you are saying take that to the bank brohans
I doubt it. But they were tying Kraft and the women -- the madams/doyennes --  to something a lot more sinister than ordinary solicitation and prostitution.

 
  • Thanks
Reactions: SWC
so are people celebrating in here because hes not a sex trafficer but just a john i guess you gotta take your wins where you can brohan take that to the bank 

 
Maybe there are people in here who would be cool with their name being publicly dragged through the mud of one of the most morally dispicable and vile crimes after committing a misdemeanor that is openly legal in more than one developed nation. 

Me, I’d probably like those who used my name as a pawn in a publicity stunt to be held accountable.

Different strokes I guess. 

You do you. I’ll do me.

Glll peas. :D  

 
Last edited by a moderator:
so are people celebrating in here because hes not a sex trafficer but just a john i guess you gotta take your wins where you can brohan take that to the bank 
Nobody is celebrating.  But there were people wanted to castrate the guy for getting a hand job.  There is a ton of human trafficking going on with disgusting tactics which include drugging and abuse and forced prostitution.   Those guys deserve condemnation.   But equating those guys with going to an AMP seemed way way over the top.  

 
Three ultra-rich prominent Republican donors have warrants for their arrest in a human trafficking and prostitution case.  Where they all apparently knew what strip mall massage parlors to go to.  All were connected in some way. And those massage parlors apparently trafficked in sexual experiences with girls as young as fourteen. 
this didn't age well

 
this didn't age well
There were enough seeds of doubt to jump to wild conclusions, that's for sure.

But it's sort of like any other law enforcement narrative that's leaked with evidence that was probably obtained unconstitutionally. Probably, if not likely, bull####. 

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I just hope this case ends up as a landmark that stops sex work and trafficking being constantly conflated with each other.  Because they're drastically different things.

I also wouldn't mind if this stops law enforcement from infringing on constitutionally protected rights without a damn solid reason to do so.

Somehow, I doubt either occur, but I guess we'll see.

Even though everyone they have on video getting handies DEFINITELY broke the law, I wouldn't be surprised to see charges against all of them dropped because LE had no reason to have gotten the video surveillance in the first place, therefor making their smoking gun inadmissible.  And then I'd expect the defamation suits to roll into Jupiter.  Maybe that will be enough to cause departments across the nation to pause and think before they act in these matters.

I really think that decriminalization or legalization of sex work would really be a helpful step towards fighting actual sex trafficking.  I know the stats on that say I could be right but also that I could be wrong.  Regardless, anything has got to be better than just racially profiling Asian sex workers as trafficked and bending the law beyond reason to prosecute misdemeanors is about the worst way to combat actual sex trafficking. I just hope that we can find a better way because it is something that should happen to no one ever.

 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top