Roberto Wallace, Rod Streater, Cole Beasley (1 Viewer)

[jacobo_moses]

Just kind of curious what you guys think? What WR will be most fantasy relevant for 2012?

Rod Streater WR OAK (Jord being inconsistant and DHB and Denarious Moore having some nagging inj could be something)

Roberto Wallace WR MIA (Door is open on the roster for Him to start along with Bess and Naanee)

Cole Beasley WR DAL (Was working with 1st team in 3 WR sets and what not as the Slot WR, but Andre Holmes has been too.)

 

[hal9000]

You forgot to include your scoring system and lineup requirements

 

[finito]

You forgot to include your scoring system and lineup requirements

Nope, I think this is a relevant thread here, so back off!!Wallace has potentially the easiest road to start, Streater has looked the part but is buried for now and has legit competition from another rookie in Criner. Beasley is interesting, especially with Witten potentially dinged to start the season. I haven't paid enough attention to this.

 

[hal9000]

You forgot to include your scoring system and lineup requirements

Nope, I think this is a relevant thread here, so back off!!Wallace has potentially the easiest road to start, Streater has looked the part but is buried for now and has legit competition from another rookie in Criner. Beasley is interesting, especially with Witten potentially dinged to start the season. I haven't paid enough attention to this.

Please. If it was a relevant thread then why arent and Criner and Holmes part of the discussion.Its obvious the OP is trying to pick between the three in a league of his. His MO in the Shark Pool and the IDP Forum is to make thinly veiled Assistant Coach Forum topics.

 

[finito]

You forgot to include your scoring system and lineup requirements

Nope, I think this is a relevant thread here, so back off!!Wallace has potentially the easiest road to start, Streater has looked the part but is buried for now and has legit competition from another rookie in Criner. Beasley is interesting, especially with Witten potentially dinged to start the season. I haven't paid enough attention to this.

Please. If it was a relevant thread then why arent and Criner and Holmes part of the discussion.Its obvious the OP is trying to pick between the three in a league of his. His MO in the Shark Pool and the IDP Forum is to make thinly veiled Assistant Coach Forum topics.

Please yourself. I think it's valid here. If you don't want to contribute, go to a different thread. Even if he is thinking of picking up one of the three, it still has value IMO as these are interesting dynasty guys to me.

 

[jacobo_moses]

Guys its really easy. Who has the best chance to be fantasy relevant in your opinion? Thats all I asked. Obviously I'd want your opinion based on talent, chatter out of camp, and depth chart ahead of them. I'm just asking who looks to contribute more for their team. Thats all, nothing more and nothing less. So lets not read too much between the lines here.

 

[eric rymer]

You forgot to include your scoring system and lineup requirements

Nope, I think this is a relevant thread here, so back off!!Wallace has potentially the easiest road to start, Streater has looked the part but is buried for now and has legit competition from another rookie in Criner. Beasley is interesting, especially with Witten potentially dinged to start the season. I haven't paid enough attention to this.

Yeah I like Wallace as well here. I like Streater, but he has a long road and a lot of other guys who can play ahead of him. Beasley is pretty interesting but I like Danny Coale a lot as well. You have to look at surrounding talent as well. Oakland has a ton of receiving options and Beasley at best would be behind Bryant, Austin and Witten. So just trying to find enough targets to go around will be tough. Wallace has the best chance to get on the field "this" year.

 

[duaneok66]

Wallace primarily because (as others have stated) there is NO ONE ahead of him. Hartline hasn't returned to practice, and when he does he will just be the mediocre receiver like he has been for his career. Maybe Wallace sheds the anke weights and steps up his game - I will be watching this weekend.

 

[Banemorth]

Any WR who's coaching staff calls them "Ankle weights" makes me skeptical.

Streater looked like he really had some honest talent in that game. Moore can't stay healthy and Ford's hands looked like they were greased.

 

[duaneok66]

good points about Streater.

Graham from Buffalo is another undrafted sleeper. If BUF is going to be throwing it around with a (supposedly) improved Fitzpatrick, then the offense should have more than one FF relevant receiver.

 

[loose circuits]

good points about Streater.Graham from Buffalo is another undrafter sleeper. If BUF is going to be throwing it around with a (supposedly) improved Fitzpatrick, then the offense should have more than one FF relevant receiver.

Blackmon from jax is another one...

 

[duaneok66]

to clairfy: I meant a player who is (likely) going undrafted in FF leagues.

 

[Mr. Soup Nazi]

Guys its really easy. Who has the best chance to be fantasy relevant in your opinion? Thats all I asked. Obviously I'd want your opinion based on talent, chatter out of camp, and depth chart ahead of them. I'm just asking who looks to contribute more for their team. Thats all, nothing more and nothing less. So lets not read too much between the lines here. Just please hurry up and chime in before my waiver period ends tomorrow night.

FYP