Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Unless you mean you think every able minded non felon should have a gun, sounds like you’re pro choice.
Use the ignore function.
I don’t see the function on the phone. I guess I’ll just do it myselfUse the ignore function.
Then grumble with the rest of us that it doesn't work that well and you still see 1/2 their posts as people quote them.
Some people like to spout “facts” without showing anything.
I think on the phone you have to go to your profile and go to the ignore featured. on the PC you can just hover of the name, and the options pop up.I don’t see the function on the phone. I guess I’ll just do it myself
Use the ignore function.
Then grumble with the rest of us that it doesn't work that well and you still see 1/2 their posts as people quote them.
Gun control isn't about protecting people, it's about forcing anti-gun fears on the populace.
Abortion bans aren't about forcing an opinion on a populace, it's about saving lives.
It's really interesting where people draw their lines in the sand of when something should be banned or regulated and when it shouldn't be. I'd prefer neither be banned, but that's just me.
Use the ignore function.
Then grumble with the rest of us that it doesn't work that well and you still see 1/2 their posts as people quote them.
Guilty as charged. Sorry.
I do think a line should be drawn somewhere. Mostly I disagree with Alito’s stance on that point and agree with previous courts. I’m not necessarily opposed to somewhat earlier like many countries use.
Is it murder for a family member with the appropriate relationship to disconnect someone from life support?
Too something.
So, killing human life might be acceptable in some circumstances? There might be times where it is better for the government to stay out of the way? So, all of your "you must admit that a pregnancy is a human life, a baby " is ultimately irrelevant to the discussion the same way "you must admit that it is a human life, a man" with cancer. The relevant question is what role the government should have in deciding whether your "blessing" is a harm to society, if it is, can they effectively protect your tea, if not, then what?
When the leftist media pumps out their propaganda I sometimes wonder who actually falls for it. Then I come in here and I'm immediately reminded. If you want to believe pro lifers -as a movement - are anti contraception, knock yourself out. I gave my opinion on why I thought they voted against. If you you want to discuss that or offer your own opinion on why, I'm all ears. But imo the Walgreens silliness is just a deflection from the dishonest media.
And I gave my opinion on why suggesting religious freedom should be offered to a cashier such that the cashier is able to implement a policy that woman cannot buy contraception from her is wrong! And if that wrongness is what GOP House members want to hang their hats on to excuse an excusable vote, then good for them that this
is so effective. I respect your reverence for innocent human lives from the point of conception. I'm curious about your views on the hundred of million animals slaughtered each year in the USA. There are alternatives. In India, there are hundreds of millions of Hindus who have survived for generations without killing animals. There are many plant-based options in this country too. In addition, the meat industry is responsible in big part for destroying many of God's species and contributing to global warming.
Let's say for the sake of argument that this is correct. So what?
I'm not suggesting that you be embarrassed. I'm asking that you be aware. When "you" as a single-issue voter cast that vote for the Pro-Life candidate did you even care to know their contraception position? I think most do not.
Someone dying of cancer is not even close to the same thing as snuffing out life at the very beginning.
Your false equivalencies aren't fooling anyone, BFS.
Right! We have a fundamental difference of opinion on the purpose of government. I believe that government exist for the purpose "...to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity."
Of course I value human life over animal life. It's ok to use mice in experiments if it has a possibility of leading to a treatment for ALS or other terrible diseases.
