Philly Hater
Footballguy
There's been a rumor going around for a couple of weeks now that Romo may unseat Bledsoe. Don't buy it.
thanks bro. already had my draft and Bledsoe is my backupThere's been a rumor going around for a couple of weeks now that Romo may unseat Bledsoe. Don't buy it.
I agree. Parcels did this when he was with the Giants with Simms and Hostetler. He's just getting them both ready to play.There's been a rumor going around for a couple of weeks now that Romo may unseat Bledsoe. Don't buy it.
OK. Think about this from Coach Parcells point of view - If he replaces Bledsoee with Romo to start the season what is the result? You have a guy who has never thrown a pass in the NFL lining up as your starting QB, while the veteran QB that took you to a Super Bowl gets ticked off on the bench? Is this giving your team the best chance to win?He is getting Romo mentally prepared to be a starter in case Bledsoe gets schmeared - which isn't unlikely with the OT position being what it is in Dallas. This is why I love Coach Parcells.Seriously thinking about replacing Bledsoe with Romo?
Neidermeier! - Dead!Costas is Dissing Fantasy Football players....calling them geeks, Has he listen to himself or looked in the mirror? Talk about a Geek
yepAnyone know what the deal is with Maurice Morris? Is he still Shaun Alex's handcuff?
Seems Weaver has been getting alot of work this game. Converted Fullback. Big back - good pass blocking techniche from what I've seen. A plodder as far as a runner goes - big and slow. Looks like a FB.Mungro just completely misread the pass blocking on the last play - would have still been 1 guy free but instead there were two. Just made a nice burst run up the middle. Kept very low.Edit: The starting OL is out for the Colts - its getting hard to grade them as the line is breaking down on every play.Mungro just got hurt in the backfield.Anyone know what the deal is with Maurice Morris? Is he still Shaun Alex's handcuff?
Guess not -I know I think I said this before, but Rhodes is going to take 90% of the snaps for this offense - I garuntee it. In a 1 back set (which is what the Colts are running) it will only take one missed block to cost you Manning and the season. They will never risk the loss of Peyton to Addai's learning curve. Addai is the future - maybe. But Rhodes is definetly the now.as insignificant as a Mungro injury might be, i had some concerns that he could be a TD vulture on the goal line.
While you may be right,I wonder what the odds are in Rhodes staying healthy all year with that workload?Guess not -I know I think I said this before, but Rhodes is going to take 90% of the snaps for this offense - I garuntee it. In a 1 back set (which is what the Colts are running) it will only take one missed block to cost you Manning and the season. They will never risk the loss of Peyton to Addai's learning curve. Addai is the future - maybe. But Rhodes is definetly the now.as insignificant as a Mungro injury might be, i had some concerns that he could be a TD vulture on the goal line.
He is the king of geeks. He is a BASEBALL geek!Costas is Dissing Fantasy Football players....calling them geeks, Has he listen to himself or looked in the mirror? Talk about a Geek
He did it just 3 or 4 years ago, didn't he? Besides - what are the odds of any RB staying healthy? Starting RB on Indy sounds very nice when you can get him with value.While you may be right,I wonder what the odds are in Rhodes staying healthy all year with that workload?Guess not -I know I think I said this before, but Rhodes is going to take 90% of the snaps for this offense - I garuntee it. In a 1 back set (which is what the Colts are running) it will only take one missed block to cost you Manning and the season. They will never risk the loss of Peyton to Addai's learning curve. Addai is the future - maybe. But Rhodes is definetly the now.as insignificant as a Mungro injury might be, i had some concerns that he could be a TD vulture on the goal line.
Its slop football right now - scrubs everywhere. I doubt he's on the field for this. Hollings is carrying the ball right now.Sorgi, the Colts Backup QB hurt his shoulder.Addai hasn't seen any action in the 2nd half, has he?thought Andrea said that Dungy said he would
Don't let his size fool you...Weaver has some serious speed for a guy his size. He busted a HUGE run in the preseason last year.Seems Weaver has been getting alot of work this game. Converted Fullback. Big back - good pass blocking techniche from what I've seen. A plodder as far as a runner goes - big and slow. Looks like a FB.Anyone know what the deal is with Maurice Morris? Is he still Shaun Alex's handcuff?
I agree he does look faster and more powerful - but IMO if he doesnt learn to block he wont play. And definetly not in crunch time.Rhoads looks ok ....But nothing specialAddai...IMO looks like a faster more powerful back...rhoads may start the season as the starter..but i dont see that lasting long.....
Im not saying anything bad about him, just seems like a grinder to me. He'd be a good fit in Pittsburg.Don't let his size fool you...Weaver has some serious speed for a guy his size. He busted a HUGE run in the preseason last year.Seems Weaver has been getting alot of work this game. Converted Fullback. Big back - good pass blocking techniche from what I've seen. A plodder as far as a runner goes - big and slow. Looks like a FB.Anyone know what the deal is with Maurice Morris? Is he still Shaun Alex's handcuff?
Weaver isn't a converted fullback..he is a fullback.Hairy Snowman said:Im not saying anything bad about him, just seems like a grinder to me. He'd be a good fit in Pittsburg.This_Is_Not_VRR said:Don't let his size fool you...Weaver has some serious speed for a guy his size. He busted a HUGE run in the preseason last year.Hairy Snowman said:Seems Weaver has been getting alot of work this game. Converted Fullback. Big back - good pass blocking techniche from what I've seen. A plodder as far as a runner goes - big and slow. Looks like a FB.ICWT10 said:Anyone know what the deal is with Maurice Morris? Is he still Shaun Alex's handcuff?- reminds me of Haynes a little.
IMO I think the 85/15 split looks right (that leaves 50-75 carries for the backups). I have him pegged at 1200+ also. I would think at least 7 TDs. Puts him right behind EJ for me. Also, they still have a starting offensive lineman coming back from injury for the opener (forget his name-he was held out last night).So if Rhodes has the edge ( no pun intended) on being the starter, how do you adjust his projections?Currently I have (courtesy of FFG) Addai 190 Rushes for 732yards and 7 TD's and Rhodes 185 Rushes for 722yards and 7 TD's.Swapping them does nothing for me. If this migrates towards a 75/25 split, we are now looking at close to 300 carries and 1100+ yards. If it's an 85/15 split like in Indy in 2004, that's 1200+. ( That's when Edge's 2004 stat line was 334 1548 yds). If I am even in the ballpark for Rhodes, this immediately puts him ahead of were I have EJ now, right around top 10 or 12...Anyone agree or disagree with my logic?
Ryan Lilja.IMO I think the 85/15 split looks right (that leaves 50-75 carries for the backups). I have him pegged at 1200+ also. I would think at least 7 TDs. Puts him right behind EJ for me. Also, they still have a starting offensive lineman coming back from injury for the opener (forget his name-he was held out last night).So if Rhodes has the edge ( no pun intended) on being the starter, how do you adjust his projections?Currently I have (courtesy of FFG) Addai 190 Rushes for 732yards and 7 TD's and Rhodes 185 Rushes for 722yards and 7 TD's.Swapping them does nothing for me. If this migrates towards a 75/25 split, we are now looking at close to 300 carries and 1100+ yards. If it's an 85/15 split like in Indy in 2004, that's 1200+. ( That's when Edge's 2004 stat line was 334 1548 yds). If I am even in the ballpark for Rhodes, this immediately puts him ahead of were I have EJ now, right around top 10 or 12...Anyone agree or disagree with my logic?
Shick! said:Mr. Peterson, welcome to Seattle.Forced a fumble. Forced an interception.
Right. Houshmazilli. Championship!Ryan Lilja.IMO I think the 85/15 split looks right (that leaves 50-75 carries for the backups). I have him pegged at 1200+ also. I would think at least 7 TDs. Puts him right behind EJ for me. Also, they still have a starting offensive lineman coming back from injury for the opener (forget his name-he was held out last night).So if Rhodes has the edge ( no pun intended) on being the starter, how do you adjust his projections?Currently I have (courtesy of FFG) Addai 190 Rushes for 732yards and 7 TD's and Rhodes 185 Rushes for 722yards and 7 TD's.Swapping them does nothing for me. If this migrates towards a 75/25 split, we are now looking at close to 300 carries and 1100+ yards. If it's an 85/15 split like in Indy in 2004, that's 1200+. ( That's when Edge's 2004 stat line was 334 1548 yds). If I am even in the ballpark for Rhodes, this immediately puts him ahead of were I have EJ now, right around top 10 or 12...Anyone agree or disagree with my logic?
All of these positive comments about Rhodes are making me positively giddy. In 2001, Rhodes got 233 of the Colts' 401 rushing attempts (58%). He ran for 1,104 yards and 9 TDs, plus he caught 34 balls for another 224 yards. I anticipate similar numbers for 2006, with potential for more.gruecd said:I agree wholeheartedly. Drafted Rhodes today at 9.03 as my RB4 in my 10-team league. He was the 37th RB selected. (FWIW, Addai was the 27th RB at 6.07.)packersfan said:And I'll continue to say what I started saying several months ago -- Rhodes could be this year's Mike Anderson, not in terms of total production but in terms of being a veteran everybody thinks will lose the starting job to the younger RB with more upside but ends up keeping the starting job all year long.BusMan said:Also: Rhodes is picking up the blitz well.
I still have to wait another week for my draft.All of these positive comments about Rhodes are making me positively giddy. In 2001, Rhodes got 233 of the Colts' 401 rushing attempts (58%). He ran for 1,104 yards and 9 TDs, plus he caught 34 balls for another 224 yards. I anticipate similar numbers for 2006, with potential for more.gruecd said:I agree wholeheartedly. Drafted Rhodes today at 9.03 as my RB4 in my 10-team league. He was the 37th RB selected. (FWIW, Addai was the 27th RB at 6.07.)packersfan said:And I'll continue to say what I started saying several months ago -- Rhodes could be this year's Mike Anderson, not in terms of total production but in terms of being a veteran everybody thinks will lose the starting job to the younger RB with more upside but ends up keeping the starting job all year long.BusMan said:Also: Rhodes is picking up the blitz well.