seahawk 17
Footballguy
Back on track.
Discuss
Discuss

*Fixed1a Seattle1b Atlanta1c Chicago
This is the game we never got to see last year because Steve Smith became a one man wrecking crew. I was anxiously awaiting it last year, and it looks like the two teams should be even better in '06. Making this game on prime-time =![]()
I think he's referring to the SEA @ CHI game next week on Sunday night.This is the game we never got to see last year because Steve Smith became a one man wrecking crew. I was anxiously awaiting it last year, and it looks like the two teams should be even better in '06. Making this game on prime-time =![]()
![]()
Yeah but what does Steve Smith have to do with it?I think he's referring to the SEA @ CHI game next week on Sunday night.This is the game we never got to see last year because Steve Smith became a one man wrecking crew. I was anxiously awaiting it last year, and it looks like the two teams should be even better in '06. Making this game on prime-time =![]()
![]()
Uhhh, playoff game last year in Chi.Yeah but what does Steve Smith have to do with it?I think he's referring to the SEA @ CHI game next week on Sunday night.This is the game we never got to see last year because Steve Smith became a one man wrecking crew. I was anxiously awaiting it last year, and it looks like the two teams should be even better in '06. Making this game on prime-time =![]()
![]()
Uhhh, playoff game last year in Chi.Yeah but what does Steve Smith have to do with it?I think he's referring to the SEA @ CHI game next week on Sunday night.This is the game we never got to see last year because Steve Smith became a one man wrecking crew. I was anxiously awaiting it last year, and it looks like the two teams should be even better in '06. Making this game on prime-time =![]()
![]()
Making my butt sit down in the stadium to watch it in person makes itThis is the game we never got to see last year because Steve Smith became a one man wrecking crew. I was anxiously awaiting it last year, and it looks like the two teams should be even better in '06. Making this game on prime-time =![]()
I'm not sold on Seattle yet. They've not had an impressive win yet - their first three opponents are a combined 2-7 on the season. While Hasselbeck looks great, that running game will need to get on track if they want to compete with the other top NFC teams. For now, I'd rank the top NFC teams as follows:1. Philadelphia2. Chicago3. Seattle4. AtlantaIt's odd having the only team with a loss at the top of that list, but the Eagles to me have the best overall combination of offense, defense and special teams and I view that loss to the Giants as a fluke.
I wouldn't be so quick to say that the loss is a fluke. And Philly's two wins have been against Houston and San Francisco. Philly's first 3 opponents are a combined 2-7 too so not sure why you would even use that as an argument. So I would put Philly below Chicago, Seattle and Atlanta, and perhaps Dallas.I'm not sold on Seattle yet. They've not had an impressive win yet - their first three opponents are a combined 2-7 on the season. While Hasselbeck looks great, that running game will need to get on track if they want to compete with the other top NFC teams. For now, I'd rank the top NFC teams as follows:1. Philadelphia2. Chicago3. Seattle4. AtlantaIt's odd having the only team with a loss at the top of that list, but the Eagles to me have the best overall combination of offense, defense and special teams and I view that loss to the Giants as a fluke.
FWIW, Burleson was wearing a small cast on his hand that could have contributed to that drop. He looked much better this week than in previous ones.Yes, I purposefully left Burleson off that list. Was nice to see him make two tough grabs today, but he also dropped a gimme (again).
Chicago's opponents record: 3-6 (GB, DET, MIN) Seattle's opponents record: 2-7 (DET, ARI, NYG)Atlanta's opponents record: 3-5 (CAR, TB, NO)Dallas' opponents record: 3-3 (JAX, WAS)Not really sure why opponents record is so important when ranking a team. Especially this early in the season. Personally, I think Seattle may be the best team in the NFC. But IMO they need home-field to get back to the Superbowl.I wouldn't rank Chicago high because they can't score with good teams. So in the playoffs, if their D has a so-so game where they give up 17-20 points they will have a hard time winning.Atlanta will rely on Vick, but he is too reliant on his feet. Once he becomes a better passer and teams have to respect his arm, he will be unstoppable. Unfortunately, that may never happen.Drew Bledsoe...that's all I have to say about Dallas.I wouldn't be so quick to say that the loss is a fluke. And Philly's two wins have been against Houston and San Francisco. Philly's first 3 opponents are a combined 2-7 too so not sure why you would even use that as an argument. So I would put Philly below Chicago, Seattle and Atlanta, and perhaps Dallas.
big bears fan hereseattle is still #1 in the NFC although like everyone said, this weekend could change that if the bears beat em. as for now, i do think they're still alone at the top, and i expect them to get a win this weekend @ chicagothe only teams that i see having the potential to de-throne seattle are chicago, philly, and i had thought atlanta before monday night ... maybe it was a fluke with all the hype and they'll start looking good againjust beneath them are carolina (only with steve smith), dallas & NYG
Dear Chicago Bears,MUCH love.Sincerely,NorvilleSounds about right. I don't get all the love for the Bears - but if they manage to beat the Seahawks I'll dish it out. I don't see that happening - but then again, any given Sunday . . .
Nice move champ.... replying to your own post.Dear Chicago Bears,MUCH love.Sincerely,NorvilleSounds about right. I don't get all the love for the Bears - but if they manage to beat the Seahawks I'll dish it out. I don't see that happening - but then again, any given Sunday . . .
big bears fan here
seattle is still #1 in the NFC although like everyone said, this weekend could change that if the bears beat em. as for now, i do think they're still alone at the top, and i expect them to get a win this weekend @ chicago
the only teams that i see having the potential to de-throne seattle are chicago, philly, and i had thought atlanta before monday night ... maybe it was a fluke with all the hype and they'll start looking good again
just beneath them are carolina (only with steve smith), dallas & NYG
More like eatting crow where crow needed to be eaten, something 99% of the people on the internet (and this forum in particular) are incapable of doing.Nice move champ.... replying to your own post.Dear Chicago Bears,MUCH love.Sincerely,NorvilleSounds about right. I don't get all the love for the Bears - but if they manage to beat the Seahawks I'll dish it out. I don't see that happening - but then again, any given Sunday . . .
Dear Chicago Bears,MUCH love.Sincerely,NorvilleSounds about right. I don't get all the love for the Bears - but if they manage to beat the Seahawks I'll dish it out. I don't see that happening - but then again, any given Sunday . . .
Hey there Mr. clueless, he was giving props to the Bears, admitting that he was wrong. Very classy thing to do.Nice move champ.... replying to your own post.Dear Chicago Bears,MUCH love.Sincerely,NorvilleSounds about right. I don't get all the love for the Bears - but if they manage to beat the Seahawks I'll dish it out. I don't see that happening - but then again, any given Sunday . . .