Seattle WRs (1 Viewer)

[CanaBuc]

Well Baldwin is banged up. Both Richardson and Lockett have flashed at times.

Lockett going back his past 13 healthy games had close to 900 receiving yards and 5 or 6 TD.

Richardson has seen 19 targets in 3 games and 2 TD so far.

Does one of these guys become the legit wr2 on this offense and become a good fantasy play?

If Baldwin does miss any time who is the receiver to target. 

Between injuries and poor performance we has not been so great this year in fantasy. Maybe some gold here?

 

[BobbyLayne]

Both are on my wire - pretty common I imagine, that offense has been inept with horrible line - and I imagine a lot of people are mulling this over. P-Rich has his subset of fans here, has always baffled me. Not a fan of two-ACL WRs & he hasn’t done much in his not insignificant sample size career.

For me, small consideration given to return yards as we get 1/40. Doesn’t move the needle much.

Lockett over his last16:

73 targets 47-682-1

I’ve never been that impressed watching him. He’s no Percy Harvin. Baldwin out makes less attractive IMO because he’ll draw tougher coverage.

Richardson over his 34G, 4 year career:

100 targets, 59-707-4

Bad situation, guess it could get better, not convinced either has the talent to go to the next level. Both have been oft-injuries, which in the sometimes upside down thinking of FF potential, lends itself to Ifs, Buts, and woulda/shoulda/coulda analysis.

Pass for me.

 

[SoBeDad]

Both are on my wire - pretty common I imagine, that offense has been inept with horrible line - and I imagine a lot of people are mulling this over. P-Rich has his subset of fans here, has always baffled me. Not a fan of two-ACL WRs & he hasn’t done much in his not insignificant sample size career.

For me, small consideration given to return yards as we get 1/40. Doesn’t move the needle much.

Lockett over his last16:

73 targets 47-682-1

I’ve never been that impressed watching him. He’s no Percy Harvin. Baldwin out makes less attractive IMO because he’ll draw tougher coverage.

Richardson over his 34G, 4 year career:

100 targets, 59-707-4

Bad situation, guess it could get better, not convinced either has the talent to go to the next level. Both have been oft-injuries, which in the sometimes upside down thinking of FF potential, lends itself to Ifs, Buts, and woulda/shoulda/coulda analysis.

Pass for me.

Lockett flashed as a KR in his rookie year. But I agree that as a WR he has limitations.

 

[CanaBuc]

Richardson has 19 targets though. 4 redzone targets and 2 TD.  Due to injury he has yet to play a full season but flashes when he plays.

He was a 2nd round pick.

He is right time for wr breakout

 

[SameSongNDance]

If Baldwin is out I'd probably lean Lockett. Richardson is likely to draw Vontae Davis where as Lockett would move into the slot and draw Nate Hairston.

Yeah, Lockett.

 

[CanaBuc]

If Baldwin is out I'd probably lean Lockett. Richardson is likely to draw Vontae Davis where as Lockett would move into the slot and draw Nate Hairston.

Yeah, Lockett.

While i agree with the logic Davis is coming off an injury. In the past when he played hurt he often was beat.

 

[Gopher State]

Graham is the play this week.

 

[Alex P Keaton]

Graham is the play this week.

Why?

 

[lod001]

Because the WRs after Baldwin suck and White will have to throw to someone.

 

[Zyphros]

Keep an eye on Amara Darboh.  But I'd imagine Paul Richardson is the biggest beneficiary this week.