Seattle Zach Miller (1 Viewer)

[Harjiran]

There's been very little news about him all preseason and now FBG has him listed as questionable for this weekend. Does anyone have any information about the nature of his injury? Calling all Seattle homers.

 

[AmosMoses]

He is still on Seattle, which is bad enough.

 

[Harjiran]

I'm aware that he plays for Seattle. I'm looking for news about his injury. Anyone?

 

[Megatron Bombs]

It's the other Zach Miller, the Jaguars TE - who is questionable.

 

[Harjiran]

It's the other Zach Miller, the Jaguars TE - who is questionable.

Thanks, I see that now. I wonder why he's been so quiet during preseason. I guess I assumed he was injured.

 

[Eastwood]

as long as he is healthy, I'm planning on starting him tomorrow over Pettigrew.

 

[Lab]

What do people think about Seattle Zach's long-term dynasty prospects? He's clearly going to stink for 2011. But he's shown great receiving skills while in Oakland, and Seattle's bound to get a better QB next season (if not sooner). Seems like he might be a good buy-low for dynasty purposes. What do you think? Any chance of a 2012 revival? Or is he dead to us?

 

[jonboltz]

What do people think about Seattle Zach's long-term dynasty prospects? He's clearly going to stink for 2011. But he's shown great receiving skills while in Oakland, and Seattle's bound to get a better QB next season (if not sooner). Seems like he might be a good buy-low for dynasty purposes. What do you think? Any chance of a 2012 revival? Or is he dead to us?

He is talented, and he is young. If you can stash him, he is certainly likely to improve his value especially when they do upgrade the QB position. The question is-- will you gain more value by what you can get or use him for next year vs. what you might find by using that roster spot on taking a shot at different players.