Penis Van Lesbian Show?Seinfeld was way better than the #### Van #### Show.
I know where it came from, but the context it was used in, as well as the situation, was hilarious.It's from a Meryl Streep movie."The dingo ate your baby..."That line came out of nowhere, and it is funny as hell.
I know where it came from, but the context it was used in, as well as the situation, was hilarious.It's from a Meryl Streep movie."The dingo ate your baby..."That line came out of nowhere, and it is funny as hell.
Best show I've ever seen.2nd = B&W Andy Griffith
I think George got to be the most cliched.I took about 5 years off from it, and have just gotten back into it. I Watch it in the morning as it is recorded on my DVR in my bedroom, and its simply phenomenal. Not that there weren't a few clunkers, I just watched the one where Jerry tries to buy a car from Puddy. George is a parody of himself, just yelling the whole time, and the laugh track seems forced.
That's a good episode, but I agree that George is a little too over-the-top in it.starting over said:I just watched the one where Jerry tries to buy a car from Puddy. George is a parody of himself, just yelling the whole time, and the laugh track seems forced.
"High five."That's a good episode, but I agree that George is a little too over-the-top in it.starting over said:I just watched the one where Jerry tries to buy a car from Puddy. George is a parody of himself, just yelling the whole time, and the laugh track seems forced.
Bottom line: The show was diferent and over the top. The "popular" sitcoms now(other than the office) are the very definition of formulaic. They're all about some fat loser with an attractive, mean wife and smart kids. The father puts his foot in his mouth, the kids roll their eyes, the wife stomps off, hilarity ensues...i guess.
"On the flip side.""High five."That's a good episode, but I agree that George is a little too over-the-top in it.starting over said:I just watched the one where Jerry tries to buy a car from Puddy. George is a parody of himself, just yelling the whole time, and the laugh track seems forced.
That episode is hilarious."Where'd you go for lunch?""A restaura-""Arby's.""I had the roast beef.""But for a variety of reasons, I don't want to be responsible for purchasing costly gasoline...""Please. I think I've reached a point in my life where I can tell the difference between nougat and cookie. So let's not just say things we both know are obvious fabrications !""Finders fee.....""Finders fee? it was on the lot !""Yeah, that's right. Rustproofing, undercoating surcharge, additional overcharge... keys...""Keys?""How are you gonna start it?""High five."That's a good episode, but I agree that George is a little too over-the-top in it.starting over said:I just watched the one where Jerry tries to buy a car from Puddy. George is a parody of himself, just yelling the whole time, and the laugh track seems forced.
"Only I hold the answer key to their true candy identities. And so, without further ado, I give you ... the candy line-up."That episode is hilarious."Where'd you go for lunch?""A restaura-""Arby's.""I had the roast beef.""But for a variety of reasons, I don't want to be responsible for purchasing costly gasoline...""Please. I think I've reached a point in my life where I can tell the difference between nougat and cookie. So let's not just say things we both know are obvious fabrications !""Finders fee.....""Finders fee? it was on the lot !""Yeah, that's right. Rustproofing, undercoating surcharge, additional overcharge... keys...""Keys?""How are you gonna start it?""High five."That's a good episode, but I agree that George is a little too over-the-top in it.starting over said:I just watched the one where Jerry tries to buy a car from Puddy. George is a parody of himself, just yelling the whole time, and the laugh track seems forced.
There's an element of truth to the original post. I guess I partially disagree that it's held up poorly because most of those criticisms were true of the show at the time it was popular. "What seemed smart feels like shtick."Nigel Tufnel said:Get out!Bob Sacamano said:ush:
"The Limo" is the best example of this. That is an episode that I think sucks, but a lot of people seem to like. Whatever.There are episodes that fail miserably.
That's a great one."I can't tell you right now, Ma ! Yeah, well guess what.. now I'm never telling you ! You hear me? NEVER !!!!!!!!!""uhhhhhhh..... A-Astroturf ! You know who's responsible for that, don't you? The Jews !"The best example I can think of is "The Suzie." That one was historically weak and ridiculous."The Limo" is the best example of this. That is an episode that I think sucks, but a lot of people seem to like. Whatever.There are episodes that fail miserably.Regardless, still the funniest sitcom ever.
Gotta disagree with you. Okay, the plot was fairly ridiculous, but there are tons of laughs in that one, and it did have the awesome answering machine message..."Believe it or not, George isn't at home..."The best example I can think of is "The Suzie." That one was historically weak and ridiculous.
IMO, Seinfeld and Cheers stand head and shoulders above any other sitcom ever (though All in The Family was more bold and edgy, and as well-written as these two, just not as laugh-out-loud funny in my estimation.)
I still watch re-runs. The show's just f'n funny, why try to dissect it?
I don't really like this one either. Strange tone. Large roles played by "outsiders." Nazism?"The Limo" is the best example of this. That is an episode that I think sucks, but a lot of people seem to like. Whatever.There are episodes that fail miserably.Regardless, still the funniest sitcom ever.
The answering machine is classic, I'll give you that. But the whole "Suzie" story-line was absurd, right up to the fake funeral, and the whole thing with Jerry and the bet was kind of dumb too. The George storyline provided the only laughs in that one, IMO.Gotta disagree with you. Okay, the plot was fairly ridiculous, but there are tons of laughs in that one, and it did have the awesome answering machine message..."Believe it or not, George isn't at home..."The best example I can think of is "The Suzie." That one was historically weak and ridiculous.![]()
It is interesting to note that the gal in the limo is the same actress who later played Poppy's daughter (in the episode where he didn't wash his hands); ya know, the girlfriend who refused to try the pie at Monks.I don't really like this one either. Strange tone. Large roles played by "outsiders." Nazism?"The Limo" is the best example of this. That is an episode that I think sucks, but a lot of people seem to like. Whatever.There are episodes that fail miserably.Regardless, still the funniest sitcom ever.
Lately TBS or TNT has been showing episodes from early on in season one. Many of them were simply not funny. They just stood around chatting in Jerry's apartment and he spent way too much time in the episode doing standup. The show got better as the writing improved. Less Jerry standup footage and more story lines like Cramer spilling coffee and going to Jackie his lawyer and George trying to figure out how to replace the Marble Rye his father took from his future in-laws' house... or "shrinkage."
I totally disagree with this one. The show took a real dive imo when they started just taking plot lines from the news. "Hey, A woman spilled coffee on herself and sued. Let's have Kramer do that." "Hey, OJ is in the news, let's do something about a friend being accused of murder. Perhaps we can incorporate the actual chase footage. Won't that be original!" "Hey, let's have Jerry and George get tangled up in a Tanya Harding scandal!"Lately TBS or TNT has been showing episodes from early on in season one. Many of them were simply not funny. They just stood around chatting in Jerry's apartment and he spent way too much time in the episode doing standup.
The show got better as the writing improved. Less Jerry standup footage and more story lines like Cramer spilling coffee and going to Jackie his lawyer and George trying to figure out how to replace the Marble Rye his father took from his future in-laws' house... or "shrinkage."
It did have a strange tone, but the whole George/Jerry interaction in that one is great. "I see things as they are and say... no. Wait, you see things as they are and say why.. do you see things as they are?"I don't really like this one either. Strange tone. Large roles played by "outsiders." Nazism?"The Limo" is the best example of this. That is an episode that I think sucks, but a lot of people seem to like. Whatever.There are episodes that fail miserably.Regardless, still the funniest sitcom ever.
Friends peaked very early, while Seinfeld did not. But not even the best Friends season can compare with the best four or five Seinfeld seasons (3, 4, 5, 7 and maybe even 6).I rented the first couple of discs of season 1 from Netflix (having not watched it when it ran) and thought it was horrible. I did the same thing with friends and went out and bought the complete collection the next day. Not even close.
I won't argue with any of that, but many of the plots became pretty ridiculous in the later years, as opposed to simple things that happen to us all in real life every day, which is what they focused on in the earlier years, but again, I laugh a lot watching that episode, so it works for me.The answering machine is classic, I'll give you that. But the whole "Suzie" story-line was absurd, right up to the fake funeral, and the whole thing with Jerry and the bet was kind of dumb too. The George storyline provided the only laughs in that one, IMO.
Oof.I know it's a minority opinion but I would take Friends over Seinfeld any day. But both are absolutely hilarious even when I was too young to get the first 5 or 6 years on first run through.
I thought it's arc was much like Simpsons, years 3-7 best to own.Season 1 is terrible for the most part. Those first few episodes really aren't funny.
Oof, indeed. Don't get me wrong, overall, I like Friends, as its first five seasons were all really good, but it really went downhill in the later years. Sure, there were still some gems in there, but the overall consistency was long gone as soon as Monica and Chandler got engaged, and some of the storylines were just stupid.Oof.I know it's a minority opinion but I would take Friends over Seinfeld any day. But both are absolutely hilarious even when I was too young to get the first 5 or 6 years on first run through.
eh.. I laughed.I totally disagree with this one. The show took a real dive imo when they started just taking plot lines from the news. "Hey, A woman spilled coffee on herself and sued. Let's have Kramer do that." "Hey, OJ is in the news, let's do something about a friend being accused of murder. Perhaps we can incorporate the actual chase footage. Won't that be original!" "Hey, let's have Jerry and George get tangled up in a Tanya Harding scandal!"Lately TBS or TNT has been showing episodes from early on in season one. Many of them were simply not funny. They just stood around chatting in Jerry's apartment and he spent way too much time in the episode doing standup.
The show got better as the writing improved. Less Jerry standup footage and more story lines like Cramer spilling coffee and going to Jackie his lawyer and George trying to figure out how to replace the Marble Rye his father took from his future in-laws' house... or "shrinkage."
Gotta disagree with you. Okay, the plot was fairly ridiculous, but there are tons of laughs in that one, and it did have the awesome answering machine message..."Believe it or not, George isn't at home..." :whoosh:The best example I can think of is "The Suzie." That one was historically weak and ridiculous.