What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Shanahan Running Back Syndrome: An Explanation? (3 Viewers)

JGalligan

Footballguy
Presently, fantasy owners tend to stay away from Denver running backs as if they had Ebola. You know, the disease where you bleed from every orifice? Yeah, that one.

This is because in the past few years Mike Shanahan has decided that his team shall use a running back by committee, even when it does not make sense in the way it is being used. To be fair, Shanahan was the trend-setter in regards to the current committee running back situations we’re now faced with. Or shall I say, burdened with. Not that knowing the running back’s backup and backup’s backup is a bad thing. It’s just that if we didn’t need to, we could be spending that research time on other things like you know, our families.

Most of all that is common knowledge. What isn’t, is why it’s all happened in the first place. I’ve never heard an explanation, nor could I find one with specifically phrased searches through Google. So in the interests of fantasy owners who have been met their downfall thanks to a committee backfield in Denver, I embarked on a quest. I did not know where it would take me nor did I know what I would find. I just knew that it was a quest worth taking. I’m not promising an answer to the whole thing but as you’ll find at the end, a logical suggestion.

THE MILE HIGH RUNNING BACK FACTORY

In the wake of Terrell Davis’ retirement right before the 2002 season, the Denver Broncos became known as a running back factory. It seemed that no matter who the running back was, they would rack up at least 1200 yards and a half dozen TD’s. That stat mark, surprisingly was the minimum for that time and was set by Reuben Droughns in 2004. Yes, you read that correctly. Had you forgotten that Droughns was actually relevant once upon a time? It’s understandable.

Clinton Portis would alter Broncos fans‘ opinions that Davis could not be replaced rather quickly in 2002. At least the opinion that 1508 rushing yards 15 TD’s was a suitable replacement. Portis would follow his breakout rookie season with an even better one in 2003. He would rush for more yards (1591), but one less touchdown (14). Oh yeah, Portis also played in only 13 games in 2003 compared with all 16 the previous year. It puts the whole thing into better perspective, I think.

Following (what would soon come to be) an annual decimation of the team by the Indianapolis Colts 41-10 in the Wild Card round, Portis would be traded to the Washington Redskins for shut down corner Champ Bailey and a second rounder. The trade made sense because the passing game had needed help, but many wondered how the running game would fare now that Terrell Davis’ worthy successor had been traded away.

The answer to that question would lie in a Broncos fullback named Reuben Droughns. After rushing for 1240 yards and 6 TD’s, many declared Shanahan a genius in his scouting of running backs. Droughns would go onto Cleveland after just one year as a starter in Denver. There, he would put up another respectable season (1232 yards and 2 TD’s) in 2005 and then fall off the face of the earth. At least in terms of being a starting RB.

Once Droughns was shipped to Cleveland, that was it in terms of having just one starting RB. Over the next three years Shanahan’s approach to the running game would shift dramatically. He would use at least two but sometimes three different RB’s throughout the season.

A NEW PHILOSOPHY

While it’s impossible to pinpoint exactly where Shanahan shifted towards this new mentality, my best guess is Week 1 in 2005 at Dolphins Stadium. Anderson had gotten the start and was likely primed to be the starter for the rest of the year except that he got roughed up, bruised his ribs and effectively changed the landscape of fantasy football for the remainder of time. Way to go, Mike.

Into the game stepped Tatum Bell a rookie out of Oklahoma State. Although the team was shellacked 34-10 by the Dolphins and Bell only rushed for 47 yards on 13 carries with no TD’s, the teams backfield was never quite the same. Bell had to have done something.

Opinions here can vary. Either you can think Shanahan was going to use both Anderson and Bell from the get go or you can think Anderson’s injury and something about Bell’s performance in that game changed his perception somehow. One would make sense while the other would not. At least not as much.

Take into account the rest of what happened. In 2006, with Anderson gone and Bell poised to be the starter, Shanahan would give more than half of Tatum’s carries to an un-drafted rookie free agent named Mike Bell. The fact they both had the last name Bell only proved to further frustrate fantasy owners who had banked on Tatum, but not on this un-drafted Mike character. It was here that the legend of Mike Shanahan not being a big a fan of fantasy football would begin. It would only multiply exponentially in 2007.

With Tatum Bell gone, Mike Shanahan decided not to give his only remaining Bell any shot at the starting job at all. This is because the team had signed free agent Travis Henry and two more un-drafted rookie FA’s Selvin Young and Andre Hall. Hey, I never said this whole thing was going to make sense.

Although Henry and Young would split the majority of the carries, Shanahan designated Hall worthy of his own 44 carries. The ordeal was so traumatizing for some fantasy owners that many swore off Denver Broncos RB’s for the rest of their lives. Many have stayed true to that claim to this very day.

WHERE WE STAND CURRENTLY

With both Selvin Young and Andre Hall still on the team, Shanahan went ahead and gave the go-ahead to draft another rookie RB in the fifth round of the draft. He was out of Arizona State and his name is Ryan Torain.

Unfortunately for Ryan, he dislocated his elbow, did some ligament damage to it and will likely miss three months minimum. While I would not even think about suggesting that this injury was incurred due to the mass amount of karma directed at the Broncos RB situation from fantasy football owners who had put stake in them, I could go ahead and say that it may have opened up an opportunity for Shanahan to go back to a one-back system.

Or if you’ve already solved the mystery, will realize that 2008 will just become another chapter in the wondrous story that is Mike Shanahan’s running back depth chart management. Here’s a Scooby Snack for you.

THE THEORY THAT EXPLAINS IT ALL

When you read the history of the whole ordeal as I have so succinctly put it and then sit back and think about it, it will likely just dawn on you. It’s really the only thing that would make sense next to Mike Shanahan actually trying and enjoying his toying with the game of fantasy football. Since that reason has never really sat right with me, the new one I’ve come up with makes a lot more sense.

Think about it. What other possibility could there be for someone to go all-in on not one, but TWO un-drafted rookie RB’s? And then have it work for them? And THEN proceed to draft another rookie in the fifth round of the very next draft? Why on earth would someone do that? I don’t care how much he dislikes fantasy football, I don’t think he’s going to involve a whole draft selection in order to mess give in to his hatred.

We’ve all come to the conclusion that Mike Shanahan is a supreme evaluator of RB talent. That much is certain. But why would he just not use one back? Why use multiple ones year after year, especially after having had so many successful years with just one starting RB? The answer?

The can of Coke is always hall-full for Mike Shanahan.

He’s an optimist.

An optimist with a Hall of Fame eye for RB talent, but an optimist none-the-less.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Presently, fantasy owners tend to stay away from Denver running backs as if they had Ebola. You know, the disease where you bleed from every orifice? Yeah, that one.

This is because in the past few years Mike Shanahan has decided that his team shall use a running back by committee, even when it does not make sense in the way it is being used. To be fair, Shanahan was the trend-setter in regards to the current committee running back situations we’re now faced with. Or shall I say, burdened with. Not that knowing the running back’s backup and backup’s backup is a bad thing. It’s just that if we didn’t need to, we could be spending that research time on other things like you know, our families.

Most of all that is common knowledge. What isn’t, is why it’s all happened in the first place. I’ve never heard an explanation, nor could I find one with specifically phrased searches through Google. So in the interests of fantasy owners who have been met their downfall thanks to a committee backfield in Denver, I embarked on a quest. I did not know where it would take me nor did I know what I would find. I just knew that it was a quest worth taking. I’m not promising an answer to the whole thing but as you’ll find at the end, a logical suggestion.

THE MILE HIGH RUNNING BACK FACTORY

In the wake of Terrell Davis’ retirement right before the 2002 season, the Denver Broncos became known as a running back factory. It seemed that no matter who the running back was, they would rack up at least 1200 yards and a half dozen TD’s. That stat mark, surprisingly was the minimum for that time and was set by Reuben Droughns in 2004. Yes, you read that correctly. Had you forgotten that Droughns was actually relevant once upon a time? It’s understandable.

Clinton Portis would alter Broncos fans‘ opinions that Davis could not be replaced rather quickly in 2002. At least the opinion that 1508 rushing yards 15 TD’s was a suitable replacement. Portis would follow his breakout rookie season with an even better one in 2003. He would rush for more yards (1591), but one less touchdown (14). Oh yeah, Portis also played in only 13 games in 2003 compared with all 16 the previous year. It puts the whole thing into better perspective, I think.

Following (what would soon come to be) an annual decimation of the team by the Indianapolis Colts 41-10 in the Wild Card round, Portis would be traded to the Washington Redskins straight-up for shut down corner Champ Bailey. The trade made sense because the passing game had needed help, but many wondered how the running game would fare now that Terrell Davis’ worthy successor had been traded away.

The answer to that question would lie in a Broncos fullback named Reuben Droughns. After rushing for 1240 yards and 6 TD’s, many declared Shanahan a genius in his scouting of running backs. Droughns would go onto Cleveland after just one year as a starter in Denver. There, he would put up another respectable season (1232 yards and 2 TD’s) in 2005 and then fall off the face of the earth. At least in terms of being a starting RB.

Once Droughns was shipped to Cleveland, that was it in terms of having just one starting RB. Over the next three years Shanahan’s approach to the running game would shift dramatically. He would use at least two but sometimes three different RB’s throughout the season.

A NEW PHILOSOPHY

While it’s impossible to pinpoint exactly where Shanahan shifted towards this new mentality, my best guess is Week 1 in 2005 at Dolphins Stadium. Anderson had gotten the start and was likely primed to be the starter for the rest of the year except that he got roughed up, bruised his ribs and effectively changed the landscape of fantasy football for the remainder of time. Way to go, Mike.

Into the game stepped Tatum Bell a rookie out of Oklahoma State. Although the team was shellacked 34-10 by the Dolphins and Bell only rushed for 47 yards on 13 carries with no TD’s, the teams backfield was never quite the same. Bell had to have done something.

Opinions here can vary. Either you can think Shanahan was going to use both Anderson and Bell from the get go or you can think Anderson’s injury and something about Bell’s performance in that game changed his perception somehow. One would make sense while the other would not. At least not as much.

Take into account the rest of what happened. In 2006, with Anderson gone and Bell poised to be the starter, Shanahan would give more than half of Tatum’s carries to an un-drafted rookie free agent named Mike Bell. The fact they both had the last name Bell only proved to further frustrate fantasy owners who had banked on Tatum, but not on this un-drafted Mike character. It was here that the legend of Mike Shanahan not being a big a fan of fantasy football would begin. It would only multiply exponentially in 2007.

With Tatum Bell gone, Mike Shanahan decided not to give his only remaining Bell any shot at the starting job at all. This is because the team had signed free agent Travis Henry and two more un-drafted rookie FA’s Selvin Young and Andre Hall. Hey, I never said this whole thing was going to make sense.

Although Henry and Young would split the majority of the carries, Shanahan designated Hall worthy of his own 44 carries. The ordeal was so traumatizing for some fantasy owners that many swore off Denver Broncos RB’s for the rest of their lives. Many have stayed true to that claim to this very day.

WHERE WE STAND CURRENTLY

With both Selvin Young and Andre Hall still on the team, Shanahan went ahead and gave the go-ahead to draft another rookie RB in the fifth round of the draft. He was out of Arizona State and his name is Ryan Torain.

Unfortunately for Ryan, he dislocated his elbow, did some ligament damage to it and will likely miss three months minimum. While I would not even think about suggesting that this injury was incurred due to the mass amount of karma directed at the Broncos RB situation from fantasy football owners who had put stake in them, I could go ahead and say that it may have opened up an opportunity for Shanahan to go back to a one-back system.

Or if you’ve already solved the mystery, will realize that 2008 will just become another chapter in the wondrous story that is Mike Shanahan’s running back depth chart management. Here’s a Scooby Snack for you.

THE THEORY THAT EXPLAINS IT ALL

When you read the history of the whole ordeal as I have so succinctly put it and then sit back and think about it, it will likely just dawn on you. It’s really the only thing that would make sense next to Mike Shanahan actually trying and enjoying his toying with the game of fantasy football. Since that reason has never really sat right with me, the new one I’ve come up with makes a lot more sense.

Think about it. What other possibility could there be for someone to go all-in on not one, but TWO un-drafted rookie RB’s? And then have it work for them? And THEN proceed to draft another rookie in the fifth round of the very next draft? Why on earth would someone do that? I don’t care how much he dislikes fantasy football, I don’t think he’s going to involve a whole draft selection in order to mess give in to his hatred.

We’ve all come to the conclusion that Mike Shanahan is a supreme evaluator of RB talent. That much is certain. But why would he just not use one back? Why use multiple ones year after year, especially after having had so many successful years with just one starting RB? The answer?

The can of Coke is always hall-full for Mike Shanahan.

He’s an optimist.

An optimist with a Hall of Fame eye for RB talent, but an optimist none-the-less.
I'm not quite so sure his eye for talent has been that great. He's just had great blocking/a great scheme that's given these backs a great chance to succeed. I love Shannahan, but he is the same eye for talent that wanted Clarrett in the 3rd.
 
He’s an optimist.

An optimist with a Hall of Fame eye for RB talent, but an optimist none-the-less.
I'm not quite so sure his eye for talent has been that great. He's just had great blocking/a great scheme that's given these backs a great chance to succeed. I love Shannahan, but he is the same eye for talent that wanted Clarrett in the 3rd.
They were un-drafted, though. I don't care how good a blocking scheme is, your not getting un-drafted rookie's to excel in it unless you noticed something about them that everyone else did not.As for Clarrett, well, can't we chalk that up as a Mike Martz moment for Shanahan?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
nice write-up, but a couple of factual errors here:

1. Portis was not traded straight up for Champ. It was Portis for Champ + a 2nd rounder, who ended up being Tatum Bell.

2. in 2004, the answer out of TC was not RDroughns, it was QGriffin, who had some great games in 2003 late in the season. Q was really too small for the role - he played great week one, and got progressively more ineffective. RDroughns took over in week 5, and the rest is history.

3. Fantasy footballers hates Shanahan for rotating RB's much prior to 2005 - he was known as skeletor because he had a history for not sticking with the season starting RB all season - he has no problem pulling the plug on a guy if need be.

4. Denver ran RBBC in 2001. This is the first time Shanahan used such an approach, not 2005.

ETA: 5. In 2007, Henry had more carries than the next RB by a margin of at least 3:1 for the first 7 games. in fact, for a majority of the season, the leading back had at least 3x more carries than the next back. 2007 was not RBBC - it was a season which saw a few injuries and distractions at both the RB and the OL position.

My thoughts on the matter:

I believe that RBBC was the plan all along in 2005 - in training camp, neither TBell nor MAnderson had done enough to separate themselves - both guys deserved a shot. They both had very complimentary styles - kind of a thunder and lightning approach, with TBell getting the high potential runs, and MAnderson doing the dirty work of short yardage. Doesn't really matter though, this is the season that RBBC started in earnest in Denver.

I also think that Shanahan does not place the RB position on a pedestal like us FF'ers do. RB is simply one of eleven offensive positions, and rushing yards is earned by the team as much as the player. the Zone Blocking Scheme, implemented by by Gibbs and run to perfection by the OL should have more credit for yards gained than the backs themselves. With that in mind, why should Shanahan use a high draft pick on a RB? and if an undrafted back is outperforming vets, why not give him a chance?

This is important now - it's not an eye for talent as Jon_Moore says, it's an eye for who fits his unique system. Note the (lack of success) Denver backs have had outside of Denver. Portis has been OK in WAS, but has never eclipsed 4.3 YPC outside of Denver, where he put up 5.5 twice. RDroughns had one good year in Cleveland where he got the ball on a league high 80% of team carries, but his production has diminished rapidly. TBell was a joke in DET last year. MAnderson hasn't done a thing in Baltimore, but then again, he's on the wrong side of 30. Olandis Gary - who? No back has ever done better outside of Denver except for THenry, who was off to a good start before his world collapsed around him last season.

Here's the thing you've got to keep in mind - Shanahan runs the show, 100%. All decisions are his, and he reserves the right to change his mind at any given time. I do not believe anything is a ploy to motivate anyone else, I think when he puts up a depth chart, that's how it is at that given time, but there are no guarantees that the pecking order will remain static. TC (and the season in general) is a fluid environment, and we've got to keep that in mind. Shanahan will do what he feels is best for the team, period. Really, that's all there is to it.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm just a bit too bleary eyed right now to read your whole and assuredly well thought out post, but to chime in on a theory I just think Shannahan believes that he's smarter than everybody else and tries to prove it by using what he believes to be a far superior "eye for RB talent" than everybody else by plugging in some 5th round rookie or FA in at RB year after year to prove that he can.

I just think that at this point Shannahan's perception of his own greatness is diverging further and further from the reality of the situation with each passing season since Alex Gibbs has left Denver.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
He’s an optimist.

An optimist with a Hall of Fame eye for RB talent, but an optimist none-the-less.
I'm not quite so sure his eye for talent has been that great. He's just had great blocking/a great scheme that's given these backs a great chance to succeed. I love Shannahan, but he is the same eye for talent that wanted Clarrett in the 3rd.
They were un-drafted, though. I don't care how good a blocking scheme is, your not getting un-drafted rookie's to excel in it unless you noticed something about them that everyone else did not.As for Clarrett, well, can't we chalk that up as a Mike Martz moment for Shanahan?
Nope, still gonna disagree. Other than Portis, who was taken in the 2nd, most of them have stunk outside of Denver.
 
....

We’ve all come to the conclusion that Mike Shanahan is a supreme evaluator of RB talent. That much is certain. But why would he just not use one back? Why use multiple ones year after year, especially after having had so many successful years with just one starting RB? The answer?

....
I have come to the exact opposite conclusion.
 
He’s an optimist.

An optimist with a Hall of Fame eye for RB talent, but an optimist none-the-less.
I'm not quite so sure his eye for talent has been that great. He's just had great blocking/a great scheme that's given these backs a great chance to succeed. I love Shannahan, but he is the same eye for talent that wanted Clarrett in the 3rd.
They were un-drafted, though. I don't care how good a blocking scheme is, your not getting un-drafted rookie's to excel in it unless you noticed something about them that everyone else did not.As for Clarrett, well, can't we chalk that up as a Mike Martz moment for Shanahan?
Actually, he is a great evaluator of TALENT. He absolutely sucks at evaluating the mental portion of the player, however. Nobody denies that Clarrett once had talent that justified his 3rd round selection, or better. But only Shannie couldn't see that Clarrett had a High School JV talent level brain.
 
I just think that at this point Shannahan's perception of his own greatness is diverging further and further from the reality of the situation with each passing season since Alex Gibbs has left Denver.
I agree with this 100%. I would also add that the Broncos haven't had to pay the running backs after Davis much of anything until last year with Henry and, even then, I'm sure they were able to get out from under that contract pretty clean due to his prior troubles. I think it might just catch up with them this season.
 
One Clarett doesn't invalidate years of lower round picks blossoming in the system. I will always believe Shanny just got a little cute with that pick.

I think Shanahan is a bit too quick to overlook character red flags, especially with Goodell running around (I'm sure I speak for all Raider fans when i say I am outraged, yes outraged, by the lack of moral fiber in the NFL :goodposting: ).

 
This is because in the past few years Mike Shanahan has decided that his team shall use a running back by committee, even when it does not make sense in the way it is being used.
I don't think is actually correct. The evidence would suggest that Shanahan prefers to have a lead back he can feed the ball, but when he doesn't have such a back, he goes RBBC to maximise the output from the mediocre backs he does have.
 
reminder: Clarrett never played a single snap for the Broncos, including pre-season.

Shanahan WILL draft/sign low character guys who are looking to turn around their careers and give them another chance, but if they fail he WILL cut them loose. This is a completely separate issue from his supposedly "eye for talent".

 
This is because in the past few years Mike Shanahan has decided that his team shall use a running back by committee, even when it does not make sense in the way it is being used.
I don't think is actually correct. The evidence would suggest that Shanahan prefers to have a lead back he can feed the ball, but when he doesn't have such a back, he goes RBBC to maximise the output from the mediocre backs he does have.
:)
 
Nicely written. I like the effort.

For me, the interesting thing about the Denver backfield for the last 5 years or so is how valuable they can be as commodities in the fantasy world still.

In dynasty, I have seen (over that time span):

- Reuben Droughns traded for 2 1st round picks

- Tatum Bell traded for Terrell Owens

- Mike Bell traded for a 1st and a 3rd

- A 32 year old Mike Anderson drafted with the 1.04 pick (ahead of rookies like Gore, Braylon Edwards, Brandon Jacobs, etc.) ((mind you, this one was ridiculous at the time as well))

- Travis Henry and a 3rd rounder got another owner the 3rd overall rookie pick last year in another league (Calvin Johnson).

- And my personal favorite, after Quentin Griffin's week 1 masterpiece, I saw him traded (alongside Trent Green) for Peyton Manning.

What this tells me is that an astute fantasy owner can use the aura surrounding the "Denver Running Back" to make significant improvements to his team. If I were a Selvin Young owner, I would be shopping the hell out of him to anyone who would listen.

 
I stay away from drafting them for the most part but pick up the leftovers cheap. Selvin won me a title last year this way.

 
Okay, all great replies, every one! I definitely overlooked a couple things as I was writing this, but once you delve into the reality that is a Denver backfield, you've entered a maelstrom of questions of which few return.

Anyway, although I was going for.. I would say 75% seriousness in the article, I was hoping that 25% of it would be a bit tongue in cheek. Basically poking fun at the whole Denver situation, people hating Mike Shanahan, things like that. Opinions on the whole thing will vary, but I honestly came to the conclusion that Mike Shanahan is an optimist. Yes, some may disagree that he actually has an eye for RB talent -- but who else but an optimist would be taking chances on undrafted free agents and Maurice Clarrett?

I don't care how much confidence he had in his system, that would still be a risk. I guarantee he's a Coke half full type of guy.

 
We always have a funny situation at my draft. Everyone avoids the Denver RBs, even the non-astute owners. There's a hardcore group of us that will draft anyone if their ADP falls far enough, and its always a game of chicken to see which owner will blink first and draft Denver's starting RB.

I've enjoyed success with guys like Mike Anderson and Tatum Bell, but nowadays I stay away from the Denver RBs because of the sheer amount of roster spots involved with chasing after them. If you really want to cover the starting spot, you need Denver's HB1, their HB1 and possibly their FB1.

I'd rather have a clear-cut starter from another team that would net me less fantasy points and use the other roster spots on other team needs.

 
All the Bronco RBs did really well when the chop block was not outlawed in the NFL......and who invented it?

 
The Bottom line on Mike Shanahan is that he is an extreme risk taker. How many countless times have we seen him call a deep throw down the field on a 3rd and 1 for success or call a rushing play on 3and 8 for success. He is just willing to let it all hang out. If he succeeds then he looks like a genius; if he fails then everybody calls him an idiot. That’s Mike Shanahan in a nut shell. This attitude also carries over into the people he drafts and signs as free agents. He is willing to take a chance at some players, and like I already said, if it works he’s a genius, and if not he’s crap.

I laugh at everybody who says that “he thinks he’s smarter than everybody else”. He’s just a proverbial gun slinger. He’s that guy who tries to hit a homer with every swing; he throws haymakers instead of jabs; and so on and so forth.

He’s also a pragmatist. If it works he uses it, and if it don’t he dumps it. If he has a lead back, then he uses one back. If he has RBBC type backs, then he will make the best possible use of it. This year he has RBBC rb’s and that’s what you’ll see all year.

It’s an enticing thought to try and grab the lowly Denver RB on the cheap to get the extra edge if he finds his way to the top of the depth chart by mid-season, but if you go this route you’ll have to be aggressive and be an extreme risk taker. It will pay off big time, or it will be a total flop.

The bottom line – if you are aggressive you follow the news coming out of Denver. If you are conservative then you avoid Denver RBs like the plague. But don’t spew invectives about the decisions Shanny makes if it bites you in the rear. Just look at it like gambling…you win some you lose some.

 
All the Bronco RBs did really well when the chop block was not outlawed in the NFL......and who invented it?
Chop blocking was illegal before Shanahanahan took over the Broncos. Chop blocking involves two offensive players. The Broncos don't do thatWhat they do do is Cut blocking, which involves one player. And it is not illegal. It's just illegal below the knees.
 
All the Bronco RBs did really well when the chop block was not outlawed in the NFL......and who invented it?
Chop blocking was illegal before Shanahanahan took over the Broncos. Chop blocking involves two offensive players. The Broncos don't do thatWhat they do do is Cut blocking, which involves one player. And it is not illegal. It's just illegal below the knees.
I thought a cut block was by definition below the knees. :confused:
 
All the Bronco RBs did really well when the chop block was not outlawed in the NFL......and who invented it?
Chop blocking was illegal before Shanahanahan took over the Broncos. Chop blocking involves two offensive players. The Broncos don't do thatWhat they do do is Cut blocking, which involves one player. And it is not illegal. It's just illegal below the knees.
I meant to say cut blocking...thank you for the correction.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top