What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Simple rating system scores (1 Viewer)

Chase Stuart

Footballguy
The simple rating system only knows three things: the score of the winning team, the score of the losing team, and the location of the game. The home team is given 3 points in every game. A home win of 1, 2 or 3 points is credited as a tie. A win of (after adjusting for home field) fewer than 7 points is credited as a 7-point win. A win of (after adjusting for home field) more than 24 points is credited as the average of the difference (after accounting for home field) and 24 points.

The nice thing about the simple rating system is it completely takes strength of schedule into account, by taking into the SOS of all of each team's opponents, and taking the SOS of all of their opponents, and the SOS of all of their opponents, etc. By using a computer to do hundreds of iterations, you can often discover things the naked eye misses.

Of course, we only have three inputs -- points for, points allowed, and site location. Hence the simple part of the simple rating system. But that doesn't mean it's meaningless. MOV is the adjusted margin of victory; SOS is strength of schedule. SRS is simply the sum of those two numbers.

Code:
Team			G	MOV	SOS	SRS	RecGreen Bay Packers	5	13.4	0.8	14.2	5-0New England Patriots	5	10.0	3.0	13.0	4-1Baltimore Ravens	4	14.3	-2.1	12.1	3-1Detroit Lions		5	13.0	-2.2	10.8	5-0New Orleans Saints	5	7.4	2.1	9.5	4-1Buffalo Bills		5	7.5	1.8	9.3	4-1San Francisco 49ers	5	10.8	-1.8	9.0	4-1Oakland Raiders		5	1.4	6.1	7.5	3-2Dallas Cowboys		4	0.0	6.0	6.0	2-2New York Jets		5	-0.6	5.9	5.3	2-3Houston Texans		5	5.8	-0.6	5.2	3-2Chicago Bears		5	-2.6	5.7	3.1	2-3Cincinnati Bengals	5	3.6	-0.7	2.9	3-2Pittsburgh Steelers	5	2.9	-0.6	2.3	3-2Tennessee Titans	5	2.6	-1.5	1.1	3-2San Diego Chargers	5	2.2	-2.1	0.1	4-1Washington Redskins	4	5.3	-6.5	-1.3	3-1Denver Broncos		5	-7.6	5.2	-2.4	1-4Carolina Panthers	5	-4.8	1.9	-2.9	1-4Atlanta Falcons		5	-3.0	-0.1	-3.1	2-3Minnesota Vikings	5	-1.4	-2.7	-4.1	1-4Philadelphia Eagles	5	-3.2	-1.7	-4.9	1-4Tampa Bay Buccaneers	5	-5.8	-0.5	-6.3	3-2New York Giants		5	1.4	-7.7	-6.3	3-2Seattle Seahawks	5	-5.4	-1.3	-6.7	2-3Miami Dolphins		4	-9.3	2.0	-7.3	0-4Arizona Cardinals	5	-4.2	-4.3	-8.5	1-4Jacksonville Jaguars	5	-12.2	3.2	-9.0	1-4Kansas City Chiefs	5	-9.9	0.2	-9.7	2-3Cleveland Browns	4	-5.8	-4.5	-10.3	2-2Indianapolis Colts	5	-11.2	-3.8	-15.0	0-5St. Louis Rams		4	-17.1	-0.1	-17.2	0-4
 
Looks about right at the top. Some statistical confirmation that the Jets, Bears, and Cowboys have played tough schedules, and the Redskins and Giants might be pretenders.

This is my first season on these boards, have you done this in the past? Have you tracked how well it predicts outcomes as the season goes on? Just curious.

 
Looks about right at the top. Some statistical confirmation that the Jets, Bears, and Cowboys have played tough schedules, and the Redskins and Giants might be pretenders.

This is my first season on these boards, have you done this in the past? Have you tracked how well it predicts outcomes as the season goes on? Just curious.
It predicts future performance well. Given its limitations, it predicts it as well as could be expected.For example, here were the SRS standings from last year: http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2010/

The Packers were highest in the NFC, and the Steelers and Patriots highest in the AFC.

The SRS "fixes" the two biggest problems with using W-L record to rank teams: the binary nature of wins and losses for predictive purposes (using point differentials is much more granular) and it includes strength of schedule.

 
Nice to see that the numbers that you posted does not match the ones at pro-football-reference.com...http://www.pro-football-reference.com/years/2011/
Yes, I think there's a bug there related to SOS. We're working on it. :thumbup: (Note that I like to use the adjusted MOV, but the official PFR formula does not, which is why the MOV columns don't match up perfectly, either.)
 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top