Good point. I'll be sitting Evans this week.4 for 32 and 0 TD.His history against the Pats is terrible. I posted this in the Losman thread:Since 2005, his last 5 starts against NE:1/7/01/10/02/25/04/83/01/14/0Bad game for Lee.
Is last weeks 4 catches for 65 yards and 0 TD's considered part of this hot streak?Yes I am. You dont sit a guy on a hot streak like this.
Is last weeks 4 catches for 65 yards and 0 TD's considered part of this hot streak?Yes I am. You dont sit a guy on a hot streak like this.
Sure, that's a solid game for a WR. You can't go for 100/1 every week, you know. Even in his 143-catch season, Harrison had games of 8 for 76, 6 for 77, 9 for 76, and 6 for 28. When Holt had his unbelievable 2003 season, he had days of 5 for 68, 3 for 38, 4 for 31, and 5 for 54.I will be starting Evans this week, just like I will be starting him every week until he gets injured. Matchups are all well and good, but all he needs is one good play to justify the start.Is last weeks 4 catches for 65 yards and 0 TD's considered part of this hot streak?Yes I am. You dont sit a guy on a hot streak like this.
Let's not forget (and how could we) that he also already has games of2/5/02/17/01/7/06/72/0 --not to shabby here, I will admit1/12/0to go along with his4/65/0It is those other 3 weeks that look like the outliers....yet here I am still considering starting the guy myself.Sure, that's a solid game for a WR. You can't go for 100/1 every week, you know. Even in his 143-catch season, Harrison had games of 8 for 76, 6 for 77, 9 for 76, and 6 for 28. When Holt had his unbelievable 2003 season, he had days of 5 for 68, 3 for 38, 4 for 31, and 5 for 54.I will be starting Evans this week, just like I will be starting him every week until he gets injured. Matchups are all well and good, but all he needs is one good play to justify the start.Is last weeks 4 catches for 65 yards and 0 TD's considered part of this hot streak?Yes I am. You dont sit a guy on a hot streak like this.
you have no other options, just admit it. anyone who is starting evans this week has no other options.Sure, that's a solid game for a WR. You can't go for 100/1 every week, you know. Even in his 143-catch season, Harrison had games of 8 for 76, 6 for 77, 9 for 76, and 6 for 28. When Holt had his unbelievable 2003 season, he had days of 5 for 68, 3 for 38, 4 for 31, and 5 for 54.I will be starting Evans this week, just like I will be starting him every week until he gets injured. Matchups are all well and good, but all he needs is one good play to justify the start.Is last weeks 4 catches for 65 yards and 0 TD's considered part of this hot streak?Yes I am. You dont sit a guy on a hot streak like this.
I love how some folks think that a very good wide reciever that has huge big play potential somehow stacks up to a turd runningback.i have other options and am choosing to play Evans.I have started him every week in one of my dynasty leagues. Somehow my Avg team is 7-3. I Dont have other players to sub that could really carry me. FWIW I have had 15+ offers for Lee in the last 3 weeks...Hey i could get Benson![]()
thisI am starting Lee Evans. but without confidence.
Really? Even with Branch coming back? Seems to me, in all likelihood, that the Bills will be playing from behind, so Evans will certainly see a bunch of targets.Sitting him for Hackett.
I think this is a pretty accurate assessment. Without Lynch, the Pats will probably play Evans the same way they played Wayne two weeks ago. The will send Cobbs at him and then double Lee with a safety over the top on EVERY play.I don't think the idea that Buffalo will have to throw alot to keep up is really valid either. If the Patriots get ahead, which they will, they'll be able to play off of Evans limiting his big play ability, which is what makes Evans so dangerous. He may get a ton of targets, but I don't think they'll be quality targets.With that said, I'm starting him. As SSOG said earlier, it only takes one play to justify the start. Those of you saying you have better options must have lucked out and had an impatient owner in your league who dropped Lee allowing you to hit the jackpot on the waiver wire, or you're in a two WR league. My other options would be Engram or Curry, and with Branch coming back and Oakland being terrible, I have to go with Lee.No confidence here, but Lee has the talent to turn in a big game.The NE Defense is always capable of taking away the other offense's primary weapon. Without Lynch, the only threat on the Buffalo offense is Evans. I expect the defense to take him out most of this game. I would not start him at all.
Targets does not equal catches. I doubt he gets more than 4 catches and doesn't get the opportunity to go deep on any of them. Not a good outlook, especially with Lynch down.Really? Even with Branch coming back? Seems to me, in all likelihood, that the Bills will be playing from behind, so Evans will certainly see a bunch of targets.Sitting him for Hackett.
If he catches them, they will equal catchesTargets does not equal catches. I doubt he gets more than 4 catches and doesn't get the opportunity to go deep on any of them. Not a good outlook, especially with Lynch down.Really? Even with Branch coming back? Seems to me, in all likelihood, that the Bills will be playing from behind, so Evans will certainly see a bunch of targets.Sitting him for Hackett.
I'm starting him over Holmes, but that may change depending on my confidence level.
That's my choice, too, and I'm going with Johnson.Exile said:Sitting him for the triumphant return of Andre Johnson!Evans + Patriots = the oppossite of fantasy gold (opposite of gold, Jerry!)
Way to overgeneralize. I have Evans in a dynasty, got him 2 years ago, and am benching him for TO, Hines Ward, Roy Williams and Braylon Edwards. In a redraft it wouldn't be hard to have drafted Evans, Edwards, Welker, and Holmes or Jennings.Grahamburn said:Those of you saying you have better options must have lucked out and had an impatient owner in your league who dropped Lee allowing you to hit the jackpot on the waiver wire, or you're in a two WR league.
or you drafted galloway, welker, jennings late so you don't have to start him, I spent a 4th on this bum and have yet to start him since week one.or you have him in a dynasty league and have wayyy better options.Those of you saying you have better options must have lucked out and had an impatient owner in your league who dropped Lee allowing you to hit the jackpot on the waiver wire, or you're in a two WR league.
Yeah, sorry fellas. I only play in redraft leagues, so I guess I wasn't thinking about the possiblity of someone having much better options in a redraft.If you managed to nail Edwards, Welker, Holmes, and Jennings along with Evans you should be playing the lotto.Way to overgeneralize. I have Evans in a dynasty, got him 2 years ago, and am benching him for TO, Hines Ward, Roy Williams and Braylon Edwards. In a redraft it wouldn't be hard to have drafted Evans, Edwards, Welker, and Holmes or Jennings.Grahamburn said:Those of you saying you have better options must have lucked out and had an impatient owner in your league who dropped Lee allowing you to hit the jackpot on the waiver wire, or you're in a two WR league.
Well, then he should be about due...If you have an alternative I would bench him for sure - He has never had a good game against NE - I am going with Jennings in his place plus I would hate to play Evans against my NE def this week
The NE Defense is always capable of taking away the other offense's primary weapon. Without Lynch, the only threat on the Buffalo offense is Evans. I expect the defense to take him out most of this game. I would not start him at all.