What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.

Some good info on Bucs RBs (1 Viewer)

http://www.pewterreport.com/articles/view/4826

The 5-3 Tampa Bay Buccaneers are favored to defeat 1-6 Kansas City on Sunday, but winning against the Chiefs won't be easy for the Pewter Pirates, who could be without several key members of their football team due to injuries.

Bucs running back Warrick Dunn still is nursing a back injury he sustained vs. the Seahawks two weeks ago. While he played vs. Dallas last Sunday, Dunn was limited due to the ailment, and head coach Jon Gruden went as far as saying he regretted playing Dunn in that contest.

Dunn, who has rushed fro 423 yards (4.8 avg.), missed a second straight day of practice at One Buc Place on Thursday and might not play vs. the Chiefs.

"The thing with him is he's such a game-day guy, he's played so long and knows himself so well," Gruden said of Dunn. "He's got a lot to prove to himself more than anyone. Just right now we don't think he's physically ready to go. We'll see how he is tomorrow."

Complicating matters is the fact that the Bucs placed fullback Byron Storer (ACL tear) on injured reserve a few weeks ago and have been without the services of starting FB B.J. Askew since Week 4 due to a torn hamstring he sustained vs. Chicago. Askew, who was limited in practice for the second straight day, might not be able to play until after Tampa Bay's bye week, which will follow the Kansas City game.

"I don't know," Gruden said of Askew. "It's been real frustrating. This will be six weeks now. It was a serious injury he suffered in the Chicago game. Hamstrings are tough. The hard tares don't heal as quickly as you'd like them to and you're talking about a 233-pound guy. He is making progress and he is practicing, but he is somewhat limited at this point. His status for the game is very questionable at this point."

The Bucs sorely need to get healthy in the backfield, evidenced by the fact that Tampa Bay rushed for just 49 yards vs. the Cowboys last Sunday.

In the meantime, FB Jameel Cook, who signed with the team two weeks ago, still is attempting to get re-acclimated to Gruden's offense and get Tampa Bay's running game going again.

"We had two halfbacks and two fullbacks earlier in the year. We had a nice little rotation going," said Gruden. "With Warrick's injury lingering and two fullbacks out, I'm not making excuses, but Jameel Cook is just getting back into it. He's been out of football for a while. I know he was here in 2005, but a lot has changed since Chris Simms was the quarterback here."

Bucs RB Carnell "Cadillac" Williams is taking part in his second week of practice since tearing his patellar tendon in Week 4 of the 2007 season. While he's making significant progress, Williams, who has been simulating Chiefs RB Larry Johnson and Kolby Smith as a member of the scout team this week, is not ready to be activated for this Sunday's game.

"We had a 12-play simulation of the Chiefs and we did the best we could," said Gruden. "Carnell took 10 or 11 straight plays [on scout team], and it's exciting. It's really exciting to see him out there, not only to see him out there, but the progress. He really looked good today. Next week during the bye we'll put the pads on and make it a little more tough, but step two went well today."

Tampa Bay RB Michael Bennett has only been active for four games this season while Earnest Graham and Dunn have carried the load in the running game, but that could change due to Dunn's injury.

Gruden suggested Thursday that Bennett, who had an impressive preseason, could receive some playing time vs. Kansas City, where he played from 2006-07 before being traded to Tampa Bay midway through last season.

"Yes, it's possible [that Bennett will play]," said Gruden. "There's a chance you will see some of Mike Bennett this week. Like a lot of guys in pro football, you have to make the most of your opportunities. I know he's prepared to play well and hopefully he does if we need him."

Bucs starting left guard Arron Sears was also held out of Thursday's practice due to a concussion he suffered during Wednesday's workout. Gruden suggested the concussion was mild in nature and that Sears would be able to play vs. the Chiefs as long as he returned to practice on Friday.

"I don't believe he's [in danger of missing the game], but I am one of those coaches that believes you've got to practice to play," Gruden said when asked about Sears. "I don't want to discount how important practice is. We think he'll be okay. We'll let you know tomorrow. We've had a number of guys that have been idle, and I think it impacts the way you play. It's a tough business, especially when you don't practice."

Should Sears not be able to play vs. the Chiefs, rookie guard Jeremy Zuttah would start in his place.

Safety Jermaine Phillips (broken arm) did not practice Thursday and will be sidelined for at least two weeks. Wide receiver Michael Clayton (knee) had full participation in practice on Thursday. Quarterback Brian Griese (elbow), defensive tackle Jovan Haye (foot), wide receiver Ike Hilliard (shoulder) and wide receiver Maurice Stovall (hamstring) were limited for the second straight day.

QUOTE OF THE DAY

Bucs head coach Jon Gruden on rookie running back Clifton Smith's knack for running straight ahead after fielding punts and kickoffs.

"I like that. A lot of guys go backwards, and I'm not saying Dexter [Jackson] did or does, but I'm just saying that a lot of guys retreat and go the other way because no one is there. You go forward then everybody is coming at you. It's not a job that everybody is after. There aren't a lot of guys that want to return punts and kicks in the NFL. We're down there on the sidelines and I stand behind players. It's a bizarre scene. Guys are flying down there. It's not for everybody. It takes experience, and you have to acquire the experience. Some of the great returners struggled in their first and second years in this league. We're going to keep working with Dexter, but we do like the decisiveness that Clifton shows and we think he has promise."
Bennet may be worth grabbing in deep leagues. Anyone can blow up against KC.Not so much concerned about Dunn not playing as Askew.

Basically, Dexter Jackson is scared to go up the middle, and Gruden is defending him since he used a 2nd round pick on him.

There is already a thread on the current status of Caddy.

 
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?

You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?

Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?

 
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Say it isn't so! Us Graham owners are ready to hoist a cold one after his big day :thumbdown:
 
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
 
QUEZILLA said:
Black said:
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
Plus.......remember, Bennett CAME FROM Kansas City........so you may see Gruden give Bennett some extra RZ carries.And just think.......if Bennett was still in KC, he'd probably be their starter during this debacle with LJ.
 
Graham is the money play here. Remember he caught a lot of passes last year before Dunn got there so if Dunn is dinged/not playing, Graham will be even more valuable in PPR leagues, especially against that KC run D.

 
Graham is the money play here. Remember he caught a lot of passes last year before Dunn got there so if Dunn is dinged/not playing, Graham will be even more valuable in PPR leagues, especially against that KC run D.
I don't think your taking into account the void at FB. The run game isn't the same as it is when Askew is in, and Graham has to play FB. It's not as easy as just saying, no Dunn = great for Graham. No Dunn & no Askwew = :moneybag: That's what we are trying to predict in the last few post. They signed Jameel Cool, but from the sound of Gruden's quotes he has catching up to do. Graham has seen time at FB the last few weeks, and is expected to see time at FB again this week. That leaves Bennet as a possible waiver wire gem.

FB may be one of the most under appreciated positions in the game.

 
QUEZILLA said:
Black said:
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
Plus.......remember, Bennett CAME FROM Kansas City........so you may see Gruden give Bennett some extra RZ carries.And just think.......if Bennett was still in KC, he'd probably be their starter during this debacle with LJ.
:moneybag:
 
Ugh. I was almost ready to start Graham over Jacobs this week and now I am back to fighting myself on the decision. It certainly can go a lot of different ways here given this news.

 
Graham is the money play here. Remember he caught a lot of passes last year before Dunn got there so if Dunn is dinged/not playing, Graham will be even more valuable in PPR leagues, especially against that KC run D.
I don't think your taking into account the void at FB. The run game isn't the same as it is when Askew is in, and Graham has to play FB. It's not as easy as just saying, no Dunn = great for Graham. No Dunn & no Askwew = :lmao: That's what we are trying to predict in the last few post. They signed Jameel Cool, but from the sound of Gruden's quotes he has catching up to do. Graham has seen time at FB the last few weeks, and is expected to see time at FB again this week. That leaves Bennet as a possible waiver wire gem.

FB may be one of the most under appreciated positions in the game.
I don't disagree with the sentiment in your post but if Cook is healthy, he can play some. For better or worse, alot of teams only run a handful of running plays some sundays-IE if it's working, they're doing it again. That fits perfectly with the Chiefs porous D. I don't think it's a stretch to say he picks up 10 running plays. There's no doubt he can pickup the blitz but, I think that the passing game is the problem. If they audible at all, is this guy clueless then? Does it matter(other weeks) if the D sees him and knows they're running?

The hurt FBs can't be around in practice and gameday sorta coaching him, catching him up?

There is absolutely something that can be done so Cook can play. Gruden's sugar-coating things a little bit. I think it was Reuben Droughns who once played with the QB telling him "off tackle, right guard..." where the hole would be.

I find it odd that Alstott's former team gets another hammer and they're struggling to get him involved. Just point and let him lay into someone. Yeah I gave some extreme examples but, finding a spot for a FB that loves to hit is hardly a problem.

ETA How long did it take Benson to play in Cincy?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
QUEZILLA said:
Black said:
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
Plus.......remember, Bennett CAME FROM Kansas City........so you may see Gruden give Bennett some extra RZ carries.And just think.......if Bennett was still in KC, he'd probably be their starter during this debacle with LJ.
Coaches can't coach to appease players but maybe in garbage time. They just can't. Those are pipedream reasons.Somehow I think Bennett would rather be in Tampa then starting in KC.
 
Hmmm...I may end up playing Bennett over Fargas if this news is accurate. What do you think Bennett's chances are of getting 10+ carries?

 
QUEZILLA said:
Black said:
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
:mellow: I'm confused. The Bucs had the same fullback situation last week, and Graham had 17 of the 18 runningback carries. Why would Askew's absence matter this week if it didn't matter last week?
 
QUEZILLA said:
Black said:
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
:D I'm confused. The Bucs had the same fullback situation last week, and Graham had 17 of the 18 runningback carries. Why would Askew's absence matter this week if it didn't matter last week?
me too.. How would we find out if Graham actually will start at Fullback.. I wouldn't trust that the Bucs would somehow tell us before the game.. Can we actually believe they may start Bennett at tailback & make Graham start at full back???
 
QUEZILLA said:
Black said:
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
:crazy: I'm confused. The Bucs had the same fullback situation last week, and Graham had 17 of the 18 runningback carries. Why would Askew's absence matter this week if it didn't matter last week?
me too.. How would we find out if Graham actually will start at Fullback.. I wouldn't trust that the Bucs would somehow tell us before the game.. Can we actually believe they may start Bennett at tailback & make Graham start at full back???
just wanted to point out you're off on a tangent not stated in the articlein fact I took it to mean Bennett might get Dunn's carries. Carry on and all, it's an interesting theory just felt like reminding about OP
 
here:

With their top two fullbacks out with injuries, the Bucs continue to make do by splitting the reps between lead back Earnest Graham and newcomer Jameel Cook.

That has limited Graham's effectiveness. When you throw in the fact that fellow tailback Warrick Dunn is nursing a sore back, you suddenly have a situation in which the Bucs' ability to run the ball is greatly compromised.

The situation should improve after the bye week. Top fullback B.J. Askew could return from his hamstring injury by then. Even if he doesn't, Cook should have a better grasp of the offense by that time.

For the time being, the Bucs will continue to make do with what they have, which could mean leaning more on reserve tailbacks Michael Bennett and Clifton Smith.

Bucs coach Jon Gruden has admitted to possibly making a mistake by dressing the ailing Dunn for last week's game at Dallas when Bennett was healthy. That might not be the only mistake contributing to the slump.

The Bucs have all but abandoned their downfield passing game the past couple weeks. Opposing defenses are taking advantage by crowding the line of scrimmage with extra run-stoppers.

"It does sort of have something to do with the way they're playing us," Graham said. "But with the running game, it always comes down to what we do."

http://www2.tbo.com/content/2008/oct/31/sp...un/sports-bucs/

 
And this:

TAMPA - Michael Bennett's long wait for a chance to prove he is worthy of regular playing time in the Bucs' backfield might finally be over.

With Warrick Dunn likely to miss this week's game against the Chiefs because of a sore back, Bennett is expected not only to dress but get regular playing time on Sunday. The timing, Bennett said, couldn't be much better.

Bennett spent a year-and-a-half with the Chiefs before being sent to Tampa Bay at the trade deadline in October 2007. He is eager to show his old team, and his new team, what he can do.

"This is the kind of game you want to go back and play," Bennett said. "It's one of those things where, 'This is where I am now, and this is where you are now.' "

Bennett started his career and played five seasons in Minnesota, but he said the time he spent in Kansas City was special.

"When they came out and did the national anthem, that was the biggest charge I ever got as a player," Bennett said. "When they said 'The home of the Chiefs' it sends an electric charge through your body.

"I was telling some of the guys about that. If it's a sold-out game, watch how much electricity that brings to players and the team going out. It was a great overall experience."

The Bucs are hoping Bennett can give their running game a charge. After averaging 5 yards per carry through the first six weeks of the season, the Bucs have averaged just 2.5 in the last two games.

Bennett seems capable of giving the Bucs a boost. He has a career rushing average of 4.5 yards per carry and ran 45 times for 203 yards to lead the Bucs in rushing during the 2008 preseason.

...

In addition to Warrick Dunn, WR Maurice Stovall (hamstring, questionable) and FB B.J. Askew (hamstring, questionable) are expected to miss Sunday's game.
LinkDunn was brought in to be the speed back to complement Graham, but with him hurt, things are setting up nicely for Bennett this week. Fact is, the Bucs haven't run the ball well of late (partially because of Dunn's injury), and Bennett might provide a spark with a few swing passes and plays designed to get him in the open field - even if it's just for this game.

FBs hurt and Graham filling in, Dunn hurt, Bennett back to KC, Gruden wanting to re-establish the run - if he assumes the Dunn role this week, he could be a sneaky play, especially in PPR.

 
Bennett seems like a very risky play. But, could reward very well too. A lot of S Jax owners (myself included) may want to keep an eye on this.

 
I'm planning to start Graham over Jacobs -- as a Vikings fan, I've seen alot of Bennett over the few years he was here, and it doesn't seem like he's too likely to take many carries from Graham. More of a change of pace back. Does anyone more familiar with the Tampa Bay situation see that differently?

 
If Graham plays FB he is still going to get carries at RB.
True, but the question if Bennett will get a bulk of the touches that Dunn would have gotten. Graham may see more, esp. if they take a big lead, but Bennett will be involved. And it wouldn't shock me to see him break off a couple of nice runs and catch some swing passes in open space.
 
man the guy im playing has graham...I hope he plays FB this week >.>
It doesn't matter. He will play SOME FB, but he will get the majority of the RB carries. Last week, he got 17/18 carries by RB. If Bennet plays, I expect it to be about 20-25 carries for Graham, 5-10 for other RBs.
 
If I read this right, there are no FBs healthy that know the playbook yet?You think we see EGraham at FB again and Bennett get carries?Bennett a good start vs. KC in a PPR league?
Yes. I would defiantly grab Bennet in deep leagues, or if you have room on your roster. He has little to no value right now, so the only way he can go is up. I wouldn't write off Graham though, as he will still get his.fwiw, Bennet complained about not seeing much action this season, and he said he was running the ball in pre-season so much that he didn't learn ST. He just wants to see the field. Gruden may make it up to him in a big way by giving him +15 carries.
Plus.......remember, Bennett CAME FROM Kansas City........so you may see Gruden give Bennett some extra RZ carries.And just think.......if Bennett was still in KC, he'd probably be their starter during this debacle with LJ.
:lmao:
Ok we get it, you both own Bennett.He could be a decent one week filler (if desperate), but nothing worth starting after the bye.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
(Rotoworld) According to the St. Petersburg Times, Bucs RB Michael Bennett "is expected not only to dress but get regular playing time on Sunday."

Analysis: Fullback Jameel Cook is still rounding into football shape, so Earnest Graham may see some time in the blocking role. Graham, of course, is the better bet for carries, but Bennett could be a sneaky high-risk/high-reward flex play in a mouthwatering matchup against the Chiefs.

(FFChamps) According to the Tampa Tribune not only will running back Michael Bennett play this week but he will also see extensive playing time. Analysis: Bennett has explosive athletic ability and is healthy and well-rested. If you are in dire need of a flex play this week, you could do a lot worse than gambling on Bennett.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
I'm all aboard the one week Michael Bennett flex train.

Unlike the moronic Eric Mangini, Gruden knows how to game plan against an inferior opponent by taking advantage of his enemy's greatest weaknesses. Gruden is not going to have Garcia drop back and throw the ball 40 times like Favre did last week. He is going to pound the ball down the throats of the weak KC defense. I can see 35 rushes by TB which would likely translate to 20-25 carries for Graham and 10-15 carries for Bennett. Throw in some dump off passes and it is quite feasible that Bennett gets 15-20 touches. I have seen what the KC defense is capable of giving up on the ground. It is not unrealistic at all for Bennett to net 100 total yards and a possible score. Sure I could flex Mason and hope for a steady 5 catches for 50 yards and no score. I'll roll the dice on Bennett. The matchup is too tempting.

 
Interesting to see FBG's take on this. Without pulling the veil on subscriber info, they are pretty damned high on Graham, and Bennett isn't getting any love.

I can see TB getting up early and playing ball control, limiting Bennett's touches. What's possible in this scenario is that, with a substantial lead, Gruden may not want to risk pounding his #1 back, and might give these carries to Cook and Bennett to see what they can do.

This is just a theory. There a a few scenarios of what Bennett's role might be. Wondering why none of these situations seem to resonate at all with the rankings this week for Bennett. They have Dantrell Savage putting up more points than Bennett.

Dantrell who, you ask?

Exactly.

 
I just saw that Askew didn't make the trip... so the only lead blocker in the line-up w/ experience is Graham, so it could very well end up that he plays a lot of FB today.

I feel for Graham owners.. I haven't seen a situation like this where you RB is playing, but you don't know which position he playing at.

 
I just saw that Askew didn't make the trip... so the only lead blocker in the line-up w/ experience is Graham, so it could very well end up that he plays a lot of FB today.I feel for Graham owners.. I haven't seen a situation like this where you RB is playing, but you don't know which position he playing at.
TB is in the same situation it's been in for the last 2 weeks. In the last two weeks Graham has 23 & 17 carries. I don't see that changing today. Bennett isn't really that much of a risk to steal significant carries. Sure he may get 5-10 carries but Graham will get the bulk of the work, as he as the past few weeks and Bennett will get in there every once and a while to give Earnest a break.
 
I wouldn't be surprised to see them use Bennett the same way they used Dunn. I think EG will get all the GL carries and carry the ball when their in a single back formation. I see Bennett coming in on I formations and other dual back formations.

My guesstimate... EG gets 18 Carries to Bennetts 12

 
I wouldn't be surprised to see them use Bennett the same way they used Dunn. I think EG will get all the GL carries and carry the ball when their in a single back formation. I see Bennett coming in on I formations and other dual back formations. My guesstimate... EG gets 18 Carries to Bennetts 12
:thumbup: Bennett should play the Dunn role this week - speed out of the backfield, and he'll catch a few passes to get him in the open field. He may not get as many touches as Dunn would have, but they won't go exclusively to Graham, either.I'd expect a good mix of Bennett/Graham in the first half, and if the Bucs manage to take a lead in the second half, to go conservative and try and control the clock with Graham.Count me among the minority that thinks the Bucs don't take a big lead right away, and could struggle a bit on the road for the second straight week.
 
If he wasn't playing the Chiefs, I wouldn't even think about playing him but since they are..........the Bucs may have 3 100-yard rushers this week. :)

 
Cook was signed back on Oct. 15th to fill in at FB. I would think this is enough time by now for him to take most of the snaps at FB for their basic sets. The Bucs have lined up 2 backs on 3rd down but Graham and Bennet should take most of those.

I can see Graham with around 25 carries and around 5 dump off receptions.

 
Adam Shefter is reporting that Graham won't even start. Bennett gets the start, while Graham loses significant touches. Looks like Graham might play FB again. Oh how I hate Chucky.

 
I hate John Gruden. I can only hope Graham gets a good chunk of passes out of the backfield or Bennett fumbles his way to the doghouse. What a joke. Dude is inactive the majority of the season, now he's starting. Good times.

 
Adam Shefter is reporting that Graham won't even start. Bennett gets the start, while Graham loses significant touches. Looks like Graham might play FB again. Oh how I hate Chucky.
Did Michael Bennett just become the bye-week-fill-in waiver wire pick-up of the week? I'll bet he is still in almost all free agent pools in fantasy football.
 
Adam Shefter is reporting that Graham won't even start. Bennett gets the start, while Graham loses significant touches. Looks like Graham might play FB again. Oh how I hate Chucky.
Does Graham usually start or does Dunn?
 
Adam Shefter is reporting that Graham won't even start. Bennett gets the start, while Graham loses significant touches. Looks like Graham might play FB again. Oh how I hate Chucky.
Here's the text:
Adam also reports that Michael Bennett will start in the absence of Warrick Dunn, who is dealing with an injured back and didn’t make the trip to Kansas City. If you’re desperate for a runner or flex starter, Bennett could be a sleeper based on the favorable matchup.Of course, Earnest Graham will also see plenty of carries as well.
 
I'm planning to start Graham over Jacobs -- as a Vikings fan, I've seen alot of Bennett over the few years he was here, and it doesn't seem like he's too likely to take many carries from Graham. More of a change of pace back. Does anyone more familiar with the Tampa Bay situation see that differently?
I'm in the same boat. Love Jacbos (a little homer love there as well) but I can't help but drool over that KC matchup that Graham has. I've switched my lineup 4 times already......
 
Bennett May Get Chance Sunday

The Tampa Tribune

Published: November 1, 2008

TAMPA Michael Bennett's long wait for a chance to prove he is worthy of regular playing time in the Bucs' backfield might finally be over.

With Warrick Dunn likely to miss this week's game against the Chiefs because of a sore back, Bennett is expected not only to dress but get regular playing time on Sunday. The timing, Bennett said, couldn't be much better.

Bennett spent a year-and-a-half with the Chiefs before being sent to Tampa Bay at the trade deadline in October 2007. He is eager to show his old team, and his new team, what he can do.

"This is the kind of game you want to go back and play," Bennett said. "It's one of those things where, 'This is where I am now, and this is where you are now.' "

Bennett started his career and played five seasons in Minnesota, but he said the time he spent in Kansas City was special.

"When they came out and did the national anthem, that was the biggest charge I ever got as a player," Bennett said. "When they said 'The home of the Chiefs' it sends an electric charge through your body.

"I was telling some of the guys about that. If it's a sold-out game, watch how much electricity that brings to players and the team going out. It was a great overall experience."

The Bucs are hoping Bennett can give their running game a charge. After averaging 5 yards per carry through the first six weeks of the season, the Bucs have averaged just 2.5 in the last two games.

Bennett seems capable of giving the Bucs a boost. He has a career rushing average of 4.5 yards per carry and ran 45 times for 203 yards to lead the Bucs in rushing during the 2008 preseason.

 
Adam Shefter is reporting that Graham won't even start. Bennett gets the start, while Graham loses significant touches. Looks like Graham might play FB again. Oh how I hate Chucky.
Here's the text:
Adam also reports that Michael Bennett will start in the absence of Warrick Dunn, who is dealing with an injured back and didn’t make the trip to Kansas City. If you’re desperate for a runner or flex starter, Bennett could be a sleeper based on the favorable matchup.Of course, Earnest Graham will also see plenty of carries as well.
So, is Bennett a classic "Shark move"? I am driving myself crazy looking for a rb2 this week. Struggling between Kolby, Kevin Smith and now Bennet. :confused:
 
Adam Shefter is reporting that Graham won't even start. Bennett gets the start, while Graham loses significant touches. Looks like Graham might play FB again. Oh how I hate Chucky.
Here's the text:
Adam also reports that Michael Bennett will start in the absence of Warrick Dunn, who is dealing with an injured back and didn’t make the trip to Kansas City. If you’re desperate for a runner or flex starter, Bennett could be a sleeper based on the favorable matchup.Of course, Earnest Graham will also see plenty of carries as well.
So, is Bennett a classic "Shark move"? I am driving myself crazy looking for a rb2 this week. Struggling between Kolby, Kevin Smith and now Bennet. :confused:
I put him in my lineup today. Go for it. only 2% own him in CBS and 1% start. The guy's got 1 FF pt so far this year. So why not take the chance??!!
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Top