i agree. not espn top-10 worth stuff but productivehe looked like jamal lewis the way he ran his 2000yd seasonMaybe it's me but that wasn't all that impressive for a highlight video.
he hasn't had a full season yet =PWasn't the best but as a Jackson owner, I want to see that all season long!
That's why I want to see it!he hasn't had a full season yet =PWasn't the best but as a Jackson owner, I want to see that all season long!
Is that really a true stat?Where's the highlight video of the 75 odd carries he had last year where he gained zero or negative yards.
It's not bad for only about a year worth of play.Anyway, IMO this guy is a Ricky Williams clone, and if Healthy should put up similar, or better numbers...Maybe it's me but that wasn't all that impressive for a highlight video.
Marcel Shipp 27 29 1.1 Curtis Martin 42 77 1.8 Steven Jackson 39 74 1.9 Julius Jones 34 65 1.9 Reuben Droughns 35 75 2.1 Willis McGahee 65 140 2.2 Jamal Lewis 41 90 2.2 Stephen Davis 36 81 2.3 Priest Holmes 30 69 2.3 Jerome Bettis 43 104 2.4 DeShaun Foster 31 75 2.4 Greg Jones 28 68 2.4 Warrick Dunn 36 88 2.4 Marion Barber III 42 105 2.5 Kevin Jones 32 80 2.5 Thomas Jones 40 102 2.6 LaMont Jordan 42 108 2.6 Chris Brown 36 93 2.6 Rudi Johnson 67 177 2.6 Ricky Williams 29 77 2.7 Mike Anderson 57 157 2.8 Tatum Bell 38 106 2.8 LaDainian Tomlinson 55 155 2.8 Edgerrin James 78 229 2.9 Clinton Portis 51 155 3.0 Cadillac Williams 32 98 3.1 Tiki Barber 54 169 3.1 Corey Dillon 34 107 3.2 Ronnie Brown 30 101 3.4 Shaun Alexander 69 236 3.4 Larry Johnson 65 223 3.4
Eddie George as wellThat highlight video IMHO is a portrait of a runner who gives his numbers to the defense. What I mean is this - Is it me or do you rarely see him put his shoulder pads down (unless someone is tripping him)? It just seems to me that runners that have running styles like that tend to get creamed at some point, usually when they lose a step (whether due to age or injury). Examples that pop to mind are Eric Dickerson, Bo Jackson and Chris Brown. I could think of more (those just pop to mind), but this is just a general observation and I'm asking other peoples opinions on this.Do you think his running styles lends itself to more contact and more contact in places other than his shoulder pads?
I certainly agree - but what we need to remind ourselves is that this footage is against NFL defenders... and not the usual "future top5 pick" highlight reel that we see from a guy that runs against defenders that wouldn't tackle anyone with decent moves... that was the only thing that I looked at...But like you mentioned - nothing ESPNesque in there...Maybe it's me but that wasn't all that impressive for a highlight video.
Pass theRB Steven Jackson was pulled from practice early with a strained Achilles heel. Linehan said the move was simply precautionary. "It bothered him last week and he's been taping it," Linehan said.
I can manipulate statistics too!!He had 11 rushes inside the 5 and scired 5 TDs.He was thrown to 8 times inside the 20 and scored 2 TDs.He rushed the ball 39 times inside the 20 and scored 7 TDs.I don't care anout YPR or YPC insuide the 20 - I care about TDs.46 touches inside the 20, 9 TDs.Like I said, he is good inside the 20.
Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.
Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.Funniest thing I've read here in a long time.
Moe might get 4 to 5 td's at most this year. Williams will replace Jackson only when he's tired or uneffective. S-Jax will get the first crack at the endzone as long as he's rested.Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.
Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.
Did you watch the video clip? Seems to me he got to the line pretty darn quick.To be honest, I've never been all that impressed to date with Jackson. It seems it takes him an eternity to get to the line.
Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.
Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.
Doubt it. Takes far too many losses. Nearly 40% of his carries last year resulted in a gain of one yard or less and that was against a very easy run schedule overall. Give him a nice big hole and let him pick up a head of steam and he's impressive. Get him out into space catching the ball and he's impressive. As far as making or finding his own room to run and he's severely lacking.Around this time next year we will be asking who should go #1? S-jax or ______
The guy is a beast..whoever made the eddie george comparison needs to put their glasses on.
http://www.usatoday.com/sports/football/nf...n-jackson_x.htm
Entering his third season, Jackson has goals of 1,600 yards and 15 touchdowns. He makes no secret that he wants the fame that would accompany those numbers.
"I don't need to be a household name because I want to be recognized," Jackson said. "I want to be a household name because I believe I have a gift."
The obvious part of that gift is the bruising style of the 6-2, 231-pound Jackson. In one of only two games in which he carried 25 times last season, Jackson posted a career-high 179 yards vs. the Jacksonville Jaguars.
Jackson's obsession with numbers also is made clear by the one he chose for his uniform — 39.
Jackson's father, Steve, suggested No. 39 because that's how many books are in the Old Testament of the Bible. His son wanted it for another reason — because the last big-name feature back to wear 39 was Larry Csonka with the Miami Dolphins in the 1970s.
"If I see a kid wearing 39, I'll know it's because of me," Jackson said.
He's a one-cut runner. He seems to like to start parallel to the line and then cut upfield. I will say that on top of his deceptive speed, he also reads and sets up his blocks well. Again though, this is all outside running skills.Did you watch the video clip? Seems to me he got to the line pretty darn quick.To be honest, I've never been all that impressed to date with Jackson. It seems it takes him an eternity to get to the line.![]()
You can't be serious. Please don't insult our intelligence.Highly likely Moe gets all the carries within the 5 yard line. Moe should end up with about 10-12 TDS and S. Jax will get the rest, like 3 or 4.THIS could pose a big problem for a first round pick....?!
As I'm watching that video, the only thing I kept thinking is....GOD, I wish the Cowboys had drafted him instead of Julius Jones.As I'm watching that video, the only thing I kept thinking is....
GOD, I wish the Rams were still wearing these jerseys.
![]()
Do you really think that Parcells would go for his running style? Parcells seems to want his RB's to hit the line hard and fast, and not lose yardage, even if that means that they're averaging less than 4 yards per carry. That, for him, keeps down and distance manageable. While Jackson probably has a skill set superior to Jones', his habit of waiting to make his cut and the greater risk of losing yardage would probably drive Parcells nuts.As I'm watching that video, the only thing I kept thinking is....GOD, I wish the Cowboys had drafted him instead of Julius Jones.As I'm watching that video, the only thing I kept thinking is....
GOD, I wish the Rams were still wearing these jerseys.
![]()
As I'm watching that video, the only thing I kept thinking is....
GOD, I wish the Rams were still wearing these jerseys.
I'd call Alexander and LT (and even Dillon) great redzone threats, not Jackson. He is decent though and falls in the next grouping along with James, Jordan, Portis, etc....Below shows player name, redzone touches, and scoring percentage from the redzone.I've always liked his production after the catch and after the first hit.
and he's a great red zone threat.
SJax is one more in that influx of talent at RB - they really are a dime a dozen in the NFL, even if you don't feel like there are plenty to spare in FF.
This is a highly flawed way of rating runners; it's a far better way to rate teams, but because this is of course retrospective, that only helps you so much. For example, do you really think at this stage of their careers that Corey Dillon and Dominic Rhodes are superior to Clinton Portis as red zone runners? I've always thought that the red zone was too broadly defined to be of any value beyond a general discription of game situation. Do you really think that teams call the same plays from the 19 yard line that they call from the 4 yard line?I'd call Alexander and LT (and even Dillon) great redzone threats, not Jackson. He is decent though and falls in the next grouping along with James, Jordan, Portis, etc....Below shows player name, redzone touches, and scoring percentage from the redzone.I've always liked his production after the catch and after the first hit.
and he's a great red zone threat.
SJax is one more in that influx of talent at RB - they really are a dime a dozen in the NFL, even if you don't feel like there are plenty to spare in FF.
Dillon, Corey - 36 36.10%
Alexander, Shaun - 70 35.70%
Westbrook, Brian - 21 28.60%
Rhodes, Dominic - 14 28.60%
Tomlinson, LaDainian - 57 28.10%
Johnson, Larry - 64 23.40%
Jordan, LaMont - 48 22.90%
Jones, Thomas - 38 21.10%
Jackson, Steven - 46 19.60%
Portis, Clinton - 49 18.40%
James, Edgerrin - 76 18.40%
Johnson, Rudi - 66 18.20%
Davis, Domanick - 23 17.40%
Jones, Kevin - 33 15.20%
Brown, Chris - 34 14.70%
Williams, Carnell - 35 14.30%
Gore, Frank - 7 14.30%
Barber, Tiki - 54 13.00%
Jones, Julius - 31 12.90%
Bell, Tatum - 39 12.80%
Parker, Willie - 24 12.50%
Martin, Curtis - 40 12.50%
McAllister, Deuce - 28 10.70%
Brown, Ronnie - 32 9.40%
Lewis, Jamal - 44 9.10%
McGahee, Willis - 64 7.80%
Taylor, Fred - 26 7.70%
Foster, DeShaun - 34 5.90%
Taylor, Chester - 20 5.00%
Dunn, Warrick - 33 3.00%
Droughns, Reuben - 35 2.90%
Green, Ahman - 4 0.00%
Benson, Cedric - 4 0.00%
Not ranking runners based on redzone scoring percentage, just replying to Mark Levin's post about Jackson being a great redzone threat. These were the best stats I could find supporting/negating that statement. How would you classify somebody as a great redzone threat?This is a highly flawed way of rating runners; it's a far better way to rate teams, but because this is of course retrospective, that only helps you so much. For example, do you really think at this stage of their careers that Corey Dillon and Dominic Rhodes are superior to Clinton Portis as red zone runners? I've always thought that the red zone was too broadly defined to be of any value beyond a general discription of game situation. Do you really think that teams call the same plays from the 19 yard line that they call from the 4 yard line?I'd call Alexander and LT (and even Dillon) great redzone threats, not Jackson. He is decent though and falls in the next grouping along with James, Jordan, Portis, etc....Below shows player name, redzone touches, and scoring percentage from the redzone.I've always liked his production after the catch and after the first hit.
and he's a great red zone threat.
SJax is one more in that influx of talent at RB - they really are a dime a dozen in the NFL, even if you don't feel like there are plenty to spare in FF.
Dillon, Corey - 36 36.10%
Alexander, Shaun - 70 35.70%
Westbrook, Brian - 21 28.60%
Rhodes, Dominic - 14 28.60%
Tomlinson, LaDainian - 57 28.10%
Johnson, Larry - 64 23.40%
Jordan, LaMont - 48 22.90%
Jones, Thomas - 38 21.10%
Jackson, Steven - 46 19.60%
Portis, Clinton - 49 18.40%
James, Edgerrin - 76 18.40%
Johnson, Rudi - 66 18.20%
Davis, Domanick - 23 17.40%
Jones, Kevin - 33 15.20%
Brown, Chris - 34 14.70%
Williams, Carnell - 35 14.30%
Gore, Frank - 7 14.30%
Barber, Tiki - 54 13.00%
Jones, Julius - 31 12.90%
Bell, Tatum - 39 12.80%
Parker, Willie - 24 12.50%
Martin, Curtis - 40 12.50%
McAllister, Deuce - 28 10.70%
Brown, Ronnie - 32 9.40%
Lewis, Jamal - 44 9.10%
McGahee, Willis - 64 7.80%
Taylor, Fred - 26 7.70%
Foster, DeShaun - 34 5.90%
Taylor, Chester - 20 5.00%
Dunn, Warrick - 33 3.00%
Droughns, Reuben - 35 2.90%
Green, Ahman - 4 0.00%
Benson, Cedric - 4 0.00%
I would define that purely as touches (and scores) inside the five, and touches and scores inside the ten. Do both, because it helps differentiate guys who are multiple threats (receivers as well as runners) from the Leroy Hoards of the world. The 20 yard line is too far out to be of any great value in this analysis, at least as far as RB's go; it's more useful as to TE's and WR's.Not ranking runners based on redzone scoring percentage, just replying to Mark Levin's post about Jackson being a great redzone threat. These were the best stats I could find supporting/negating that statement. How would you classify somebody as a great redzone threat?This is a highly flawed way of rating runners; it's a far better way to rate teams, but because this is of course retrospective, that only helps you so much. For example, do you really think at this stage of their careers that Corey Dillon and Dominic Rhodes are superior to Clinton Portis as red zone runners? I've always thought that the red zone was too broadly defined to be of any value beyond a general discription of game situation. Do you really think that teams call the same plays from the 19 yard line that they call from the 4 yard line?I'd call Alexander and LT (and even Dillon) great redzone threats, not Jackson. He is decent though and falls in the next grouping along with James, Jordan, Portis, etc....Below shows player name, redzone touches, and scoring percentage from the redzone.I've always liked his production after the catch and after the first hit.
and he's a great red zone threat.
SJax is one more in that influx of talent at RB - they really are a dime a dozen in the NFL, even if you don't feel like there are plenty to spare in FF.
Dillon, Corey - 36 36.10%
Alexander, Shaun - 70 35.70%
Westbrook, Brian - 21 28.60%
Rhodes, Dominic - 14 28.60%
Tomlinson, LaDainian - 57 28.10%
Johnson, Larry - 64 23.40%
Jordan, LaMont - 48 22.90%
Jones, Thomas - 38 21.10%
Jackson, Steven - 46 19.60%
Portis, Clinton - 49 18.40%
James, Edgerrin - 76 18.40%
Johnson, Rudi - 66 18.20%
Davis, Domanick - 23 17.40%
Jones, Kevin - 33 15.20%
Brown, Chris - 34 14.70%
Williams, Carnell - 35 14.30%
Gore, Frank - 7 14.30%
Barber, Tiki - 54 13.00%
Jones, Julius - 31 12.90%
Bell, Tatum - 39 12.80%
Parker, Willie - 24 12.50%
Martin, Curtis - 40 12.50%
McAllister, Deuce - 28 10.70%
Brown, Ronnie - 32 9.40%
Lewis, Jamal - 44 9.10%
McGahee, Willis - 64 7.80%
Taylor, Fred - 26 7.70%
Foster, DeShaun - 34 5.90%
Taylor, Chester - 20 5.00%
Dunn, Warrick - 33 3.00%
Droughns, Reuben - 35 2.90%
Green, Ahman - 4 0.00%
Benson, Cedric - 4 0.00%
Well RBs that are also receiving threats (westy, LT, jordan) have the added dimension of being able to take it in from the 20 on a pass play. showing only from the 5 and 10 would show better stats for pure runners, whereas showing from the 20 and in evens out the playing field for rbs with the added dimension of being able to catch it and take it in for the score. there are different ways to be a "redzone threat" and showing from the 20 and in doesn't favor either one, whereas showing from the 5 or 10 and in would IMO.redman said:I would define that purely as touches (and scores) inside the five, and touches and scores inside the ten. Do both, because it helps differentiate guys who are multiple threats (receivers as well as runners) from the Leroy Hoards of the world. The 20 yard line is too far out to be of any great value in this analysis, at least as far as RB's go; it's more useful as to TE's and WR's.
You may be right on that. I think the goal of my analysis would be to try to separate guys who are essentially not in the game from the 10 or 5 yard line in (e.g. Warrick Dunn, Tiki Barber), from guys who are purely goalline runners (e.g. Jacobs, Duckett), from guys who have a role in the offense in the entire red zone (LT, Portis, etc.). A simple "red zone" analysis doesn't allow you to do that very well.Well RBs that are also receiving threats (westy, LT, jordan) have the added dimension of being able to take it in from the 20 on a pass play. showing only from the 5 and 10 would show better stats for pure runners, whereas showing from the 20 and in evens out the playing field for rbs with the added dimension of being able to catch it and take it in for the score. there are different ways to be a "redzone threat" and showing from the 20 and in doesn't favor either one, whereas showing from the 5 or 10 and in would IMO.redman said:I would define that purely as touches (and scores) inside the five, and touches and scores inside the ten. Do both, because it helps differentiate guys who are multiple threats (receivers as well as runners) from the Leroy Hoards of the world. The 20 yard line is too far out to be of any great value in this analysis, at least as far as RB's go; it's more useful as to TE's and WR's.