'GManiac said:
'plymkr said:
'gradin123 said:
'jbz said:
Different sounding report here from CBS fantasy feed:
Mikel Leshoure, RB, DET
News: Lions offensive coordinator Scott Linehan said running back Mikel Leshoure recovered well from his extensive workload Week 3 and "got a lot of work in" Thursday. Leshoure is on the injury report with a groin injury, but he continues to practice leading up to Week 4 against the Vikings.
He was overused in his first game. First of all, why would you give a guy that much work in his first regular season NFL game? He really wasn't that good but his overall numbers look good because of the volume of carries he was given against a bad run defense. 26 carries for 100 yards really isn't good against Tennessee.But my really problem with how he was used is that it seemed the Lions changed their whole offense to focus around him. Calvin Johnson was an afterthought through 3 quarters while the Lions focused on LaShoure and had a uninspired 16 points through 3 quarters. It seemed like the Lions tried to change their whole identity on offense to accomodate LeShoure who only produced mediocre results. The lions almost got away with it vs a bad Titans team but they won't be in a position against most teams to run so much. LeShoure also got severely worn down from the massive workload he got. It really made no sense why he got so much work in his first week back.
Am I a bitter Kevin Smith owner who didn't have LeShoure? Yes I am. But honestly I think Leshoure has little chance to a good RB in the longterm. He is injury prone and the Lions aren't the best pure running team. I think Leshoure's pass protection leaves something to be desired and that combined with injuries will mean his first game this season will ultimately be his best game this season. if he has a good week this week vs the good Vikings run defense then I would be surprised.
U are ooozing bitterness!
Wow. Not only Oozing bitterness.
But straight out making things up based on a negative perspective. Leshoure is injury PRONE?
Because he had one real injury? At least that I know about. He did look good in the game. He's a bruising runner. He keeps moving. I see very little weakness in his general run game. Not so sure how he'd be in the passing game. He did get warn down. He has been out for well over a year. It was a terrible decision by the Lions coaching staff not to ease him in and get him in better physical condition. There is absolutely no reason Kevin Smith shouldn't have gotten 10 more carries last week. And he should get about 10 carries in week 4. But he probably won't unless Leshoure is actually dinged up or warn out now. Terrible coaching decision. There was nothing I could blame Leshoure for. If he fails its the coaches fault.
I agree that gradin123 is over-reacting, but if I'm not mistaken (perhaps someone else can find something to back this up) Leshoure battled injuries during college, as well. From what I can recall, he only was able to carry the load 1 year in college. If that's true, we're talking about a 3-5 year history of being unable to stay healthy. Again, anyone who can shed more light on this, please do so. (Not that anyone cares, but I have a few trades offered to me for Leshoure), and maybe selling high would make sense, if he is actually "injury prone."