What's new
Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums

This is a sample guest message. Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Steelers Extend Antonio Brown (1 Viewer)

All those MF punks dissin me cuz I traded Wallace for Brown straight up in week 10. Eff them. It was evident if you watch football who was the real future of the PIT WR corps.
It's still a terrible trade. You left a lot of value on the table.
 
Last six weeks after the bye week;

Antonio Brown

Week GS Rec Yds Avg Lng Td

12 0 4 81 20.3 34 0

13 0 2 67 33.5 45 0

14 1 5 151 30.2 79 1

15 1 5 59 11.8 24 0

16 0 3 34 11.3 19 0

17 0 6 90 15.0 40 0

Total 25 482 19.28 1

Mike Wallace

Week

12 0 2 17 8.5 9 0

13 1 3 38 12.7 19T 2

14 1 4 57 14.3 22 0

15 1 5 66 13.2 36 0

16 0 4 82 20.5 46 0

17 1 1 11 11.0 11 0

Total 19 271 14.27 2

Look as though when they were both getting similar snaps at the end of the season Brown had better stats

All season; Rushes

AB TOTAL 16 3 69 1,108 16.1 79 2 7 41 5.9

MW TOTAL 16 14 72 1,193 16.6 95 8 5 57 11.4

Early in the season Wallace was clearly superior but Brown was better in the last part. The players were pretty equal but Brown also works on special teams and was the MVP of the team.

Would love for Mike Wallace to play and stay with the Steelers but I am ok with the Brown signing

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Green Bay got Jordy for 3/$25m last season...5/$42 for Brown seems about right with a couple more years added and they get him for the best years of his career. Pittsburgh showing how champions field a team for 40 years now.

I hate Pittsburgh and their stinking players but you have to respect that front office and the way they do things in Pittsburgh.

And good for Brown, good story for young prospects. He was a blip on the radar a year or two ago, now look where he is at. Combination of hard work, good attitude, great organization, and a big time QB.

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Green Bay got Jordy for 3/$25m last season...5/$42 for Brown seems about right with a couple more years added and they get him for the best years of his career. Pittsburgh showing how champions field a team for 40 years now. I hate Pittsburgh and their stinking players but you have to respect that front office and the way they do things in Pittsburgh.And good for Brown, good story for young prospects. He was a blip on the radar a year or two ago, now look where he is at. Combination of hard work, good attitude, great organization, and a big time QB.
Jordy signed a 4 year, $14M deal last year. It replaced his current contract that was set to expire after the 2011 season and added three more years.Steal...
 
Green Bay got Jordy for 3/$25m last season...5/$42 for Brown seems about right with a couple more years added and they get him for the best years of his career. Pittsburgh showing how champions field a team for 40 years now. I hate Pittsburgh and their stinking players but you have to respect that front office and the way they do things in Pittsburgh.And good for Brown, good story for young prospects. He was a blip on the radar a year or two ago, now look where he is at. Combination of hard work, good attitude, great organization, and a big time QB.
Jordy signed a 4 year, $14M deal last year. It replaced his current contract that was set to expire after the 2011 season and added three more years.Steal...
Oh wow that was a steal. Thanks for the info, thought it was 3 years...Jordy gonna be 30 before he is a FA.
 
'Ministry of Pain said:
'Kleck said:
'Ministry of Pain said:
Green Bay got Jordy for 3/$25m last season...5/$42 for Brown seems about right with a couple more years added and they get him for the best years of his career. Pittsburgh showing how champions field a team for 40 years now. I hate Pittsburgh and their stinking players but you have to respect that front office and the way they do things in Pittsburgh.And good for Brown, good story for young prospects. He was a blip on the radar a year or two ago, now look where he is at. Combination of hard work, good attitude, great organization, and a big time QB.
Jordy signed a 4 year, $14M deal last year. It replaced his current contract that was set to expire after the 2011 season and added three more years.Steal...
Oh wow that was a steal. Thanks for the info, thought it was 3 years...Jordy gonna be 30 before he is a FA.
It was pretty much a three year extension.
 
As a Bears fan with family ties to Cleveland I hate the Steelers, but I have the highest respect for the way they have run and continue to run their organization.

If we're taking sides on Wallace & Brown, I like both and have owned both. It's obvious to me that Wallace is better but Brown is damn good in his own right. The interesting thing is that we may find out how Brown does as the #1 with a target on his back. He may very well prove me wrong given the chance.

 
'Evilgrin 72 said:
'Touchdown There said:
'Evilgrin 72 said:
You'll notice the Steelers fans and the front office pretty much universally agree he's not worth more than that. The fact that you do is completely and utterly irrelevant.
I'll notice that Steelers fans support the front office pretty much universally because they have a basement full of Steelers gear. Team over individual. That is the way it works. What you think is irrelevant, just like me.The Steelers could not afford both Wallace and Brown. They chose Brown because it fit their cap and they could not make it work, just like I stated in post #1 of the other thread. :bye:
Yes, team over individual. Imagine that....And they could have afforded Wallace just fine, except that he wants more than he's worth. The Steelers will pay players, they just won't overpay them, which is what they'd have been doing if they gave Wallace the money he's looking for. He's not worth "Fitzgerald money." I'm not sure if you can't see it or are just choosing not to. I'm phrasing this delicately so you don't get all upset again.
And they especially won't overpay for WR's. Nothing new here with the Steelers since they've shown in the past that they don't care too much about WR's. Who I think this hurts is Ben, who will be losing his best target in the red zone.

 
Good for Brown, seems like a nice kid and has some talent, will be a solid NFL WR. But For those doubting Wallace you are severely underrating him. Dude is a STUD. Might not be Fitz or Megatron but he's the top of the tier right below them. Remember Wallace did it without out Brown. Guess we'll see if it works the other way around now. And for those who don't think Brown benefited from Wallace lining up on the other side I have 2 words for you. Anquan Boldin.

 
Good for Brown, seems like a nice kid and has some talent, will be a solid NFL WR. But For those doubting Wallace you are severely underrating him. Dude is a STUD. Might not be Fitz or Megatron but he's the top of the tier right below them. Remember Wallace did it without out Brown. Guess we'll see if it works the other way around now. And for those who don't think Brown benefited from Wallace lining up on the other side I have 2 words for you. Anquan Boldin.
I dont see how Boldin is all that good of a comparison to Brown. For starters, his best year was before he even played with Fitzgerald. Second, Id say Joe Flacco has something to do with Boldin's numbers, especially when you consider he went from Warner to Flacco. Boldin never was a guy who depended on his speed, but I think its fallen off significantly the last few years and that hasnt helped his cause (a good comparison here may actually be Hines Ward). Brown isnt as fast as Wallace, but he's plenty fast with even better quickness. Most importantly, Boldin left Fitzgerald at 30, Brown will be playing without Wallace when he's 24. Big difference.ETA: I do pretty much agree with the rest of your post, but that "next tier" that Wallace is in is about a dozen WRs deep
 
Last edited by a moderator:
In no way was I comparing the physical skills of Boldin vs Brown. Clearly Brown is the quicker/ faster guy (but Boldin has the size you can't teach and Brown is no where close to it). I was simply comparing a recent team with and elite WR and a good WR whom everyone at the time called elite. You can always add 10 different variables in debate like this (QB, Age, Size, Offensive gameplans, etc etc) but the point I'm making is once Boldin left Fitz it exposed him for what he is. A good solid NFL receiver. This is what I think will become of Brown. It's no knock on him just what I see. Wallace is the elite talent and has proven it time and time again. KC Joyner from ESPN even made a case toward the end of last year that he was the #1 WR in the entire league, above Megatron ( http://insider.espn.go.com/nfl/story/_/id/7122234/nfl-why-mike-wallace-bigger-gamebreaker-calvin-johnson ). Now while I won't go this far I would say without hesitation that he's a top 5 guy and should at least be getting offered V-Jax money.

And BTW I'm a Rams Fan....

 
Below quote is from Rotoworld today...any chance we can stop with the "Fitzgerald money" thing now? I'm getting pretty tired of reading that rumor repeated ad nauseum over the last few months...

According to the Pittsburgh Tribune-Review, unsigned restricted free agent Mike Wallace is seeking a contract similar to Vincent Jackson's in Tampa Bay.

The Sacramento Bee reported in March that Wallace was demanding Larry Fitzgerald money. Fitzgerald received $120 million over eight years, good for an annual average of $15 million and the richest contract in league history for a wideout at the time it was signed. Jackson's deal was worth $55.555 million over five years -- an $11.1 annual average and quite a bit more reasonable. A team willing to pony up that kind of dough plus a decent draft pick could probably take Wallace off the Steelers' hands before the season. Jul 28 - 3:33 PM

Source: Pittsburgh Tribune-Review
All I've seen all over the interwebs is "Wallace wants Fitzgerald money...no way". Turns out that doesn't seem to be the case now, even IF it was a few months ago. It looks like the Steelers weren't too far off on the overall money with Wallace, but my guess is that the reason he wouldn't sign is that he was offered a backloaded cap-friendly contract similar to Brown's deal, and that wasn't acceptable to him. I think he wants to be paid more now rather than later, when they could release him before he gets the big money.Here's a good blog post that disputes this and other rumors that have been rampant with Wallace: Mike Wallace Rumors are Mounting

2.) Wallace wants “Larry Fitzgerald money”: This one became a big story all across Steeler Nation after a reporter in San Francisco, of all places, said that a “league source” (still unnamed of course) had told him Wallace wanted “Fitz money.” Trust me there are multiple problems with this rumor. One neither Wallace nor his agent Bus Cook have said anything about their contract demands to the media making this 100% speculation. Next, Steelers GM Kevin Colbert continues to remain optimistic about the Steelers ability to sign Wallace long-term. The Steelers would never be able to fit that large of a contract into the cap space they have left. Maybe Wallace is lying; maybe Colbert is telling us what we want to hear, but more likely is that this reporter wanted to make a name for himself by making up a story.
 
I think the steelers made a mistake here just to prove a point to wallace. They could have had brown for 2 more years at a discount and let him play hard for that new contract while keeping wallace around for at least 1 more year. Now, they may have overpaid early for brown and lost their #1 deep threat. hmmmm
I think the timing by the Steelers is perfect. If Wallace holds out until week ten, Brown will probably put up very good numbers in 2012. That would likely make him a lot more expensive to sign long-term heading into next season than he is now.The Steelers have locked Brown up at a pre-full-breakout price (if last year was only a partial breakout), and did so with minimal risk since he's cuttable in a couple years if he doesn't live up to the contract.
Is the week 10 holdout still possible under the new CBA? I thought that I remembered during the CJ holdout last year that you are required to report by a certain day or you lose that year. Or is that only for players already under contract?

 
Last edited by a moderator:
Antonio Brown is playing really well this pre-season. Tonight vs. the Bills, he already has 6 receptions for 86 yards and 2 tds. He scored last week vs. the Colts on a 57 yard catch and run. He had 2 catches totaling 75 yards.

 
Antonio Brown is playing really well this pre-season. Tonight vs. the Bills, he already has 6 receptions for 86 yards and 2 tds. He scored last week vs. the Colts on a 57 yard catch and run. He had 2 catches totaling 75 yards.
His agility and acceleration were really impressive on that TD vs the Colts. I'm thinking his low TDs last year were a fluke.. big things in store for 2012, imo.
 
His agility and burst is crazy good... I'm talking elite, elite, elite grades on both.
What metrics are you looking at for agility and burst? Serious question - I keep a spreadsheet with everyone's metrics from combine/pro day so I'm curious what you're looking at.
 
It has been posted around here that while his combine and workout metrics were less than stellar , most who watch Antonio Brown play recognize he has exceptional game speed.

 
His agility and burst is crazy good... I'm talking elite, elite, elite grades on both.
What metrics are you looking at for agility and burst? Serious question - I keep a spreadsheet with everyone's metrics from combine/pro day so I'm curious what you're looking at.
this point has been made many times (by Cosell and many others) that timed speed and game speed are two totally different things.
 
His agility and burst is crazy good... I'm talking elite, elite, elite grades on both.
What metrics are you looking at for agility and burst? Serious question - I keep a spreadsheet with everyone's metrics from combine/pro day so I'm curious what you're looking at.
this point has been made many times (by Cosell and many others) that timed speed and game speed are two totally different things.
Sure, that's pretty obvious but I'm still curious what makes someone say he's got elite level burst. Are there numbers to back it up or just an opinion based on eyeball test? His 3 cone, 20 yard shuttle and 10 yard dash are in the upper echelon of WRs but certainly not the best. He's up there though.
 
I agree with you on that. Elite is stretching it - but that's the norm for the shark pool. Every other player has an "elite something".

 
I agree with you on that. Elite is stretching it - but that's the norm for the shark pool. Every other player has an "elite something".
LOL, fair enough. Talk about elite - Larry Fitzgerald KILLED his broad jump with 139 inches - about 5 inches farther than anyone on my list of WRs (my list has 98 WRs). He also is tied for the highest verticle at 42.5 inches. And since we're in the Antonio Brown thread, Mike Wallace has the most elite stats in the 10, 20 and 40 yard dash times with 1.43, 2.45 and 4.28 respectively. THAT is elite.
 
I agree with you on that. Elite is stretching it - but that's the norm for the shark pool. Every other player has an "elite something".
LOL, fair enough. Talk about elite - Larry Fitzgerald KILLED his broad jump with 139 inches - about 5 inches farther than anyone on my list of WRs (my list has 98 WRs). He also is tied for the highest verticle at 42.5 inches. And since we're in the Antonio Brown thread, Mike Wallace has the most elite stats in the 10, 20 and 40 yard dash times with 1.43, 2.45 and 4.28 respectively. THAT is elite.
Correction, Jacoby Ford actually nudges out Brown on the 20 and 40 yard dash with times of 2.44 and 4.22 respectively. Darrius Heyward-Bey and Johnny Knox round out the top 4 in those metrics with both timing under 4.3 in their 40s. Those are some incredible times, yet only 1 of those players has "proved" it on the field so far.
 
Nice stats. I think you and I both agree that our interpretation of the word elite is much more narrow than the interpretation of the word by others.

 
Nice stats. I think you and I both agree that our interpretation of the word elite is much more narrow than the interpretation of the word by others.
Thanks and yes, I'm with you. Elite is elite and includes only a few. I sometimes use the term "near elite" when a guy's metrics are close. Like Kendall Wright, a few of his pro day metrics are "near elite" but not quite there. I do think he'll make a very good WR though and traded for him in one of my dynasty leagues.
 
Yeah, I'm super high on Brown, but agree that 'elite' may be a slight stretch. Though in terms of burst, agility, and instincts, his TD vs the Colts is worth a watch.

The move he makes around 5 secs into the play is pretty sick. The blocking was decent on the play, but for the most part Brown made that TD happen.

 
Last edited by a moderator:

Users who are viewing this thread

Back
Top