Godsbrother
Footballguy
Just heard on Pittsburgh Sports radio that the Steelers just signed Najeh Davenport.
I'm surprised, but they actually released Cobbs. LINKI don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
The GL fumble had NOTHING to do with Haynes what so ever. If they use Davenpoo in GL situations it will simple be because they think he is the best RB for that job.The goalline carry when the fumble occurred....Haynes was in. Will the Davenport signing likely result in the end of goalline carries for Verron?
Verron had nothing to do with the fumble, Batch never made it to him with the ball. He may not get the goal line carries anyway though.The goalline carry when the fumble occurred....Haynes was in. Will the Davenport signing likely result in the end of goalline carries for Verron?
I agree...I wasn't trying to associate Haynes with the fumble. Merely observing he was out there at the goalline, and wondering if Najeh would replace him.The GL fumble had NOTHING to do with Haynes what so ever. If they use Davenpoo in GL situations it will simple be because they think he is the best RB for that job.The goalline carry when the fumble occurred....Haynes was in. Will the Davenport signing likely result in the end of goalline carries for Verron?
I don't know how it effects Hayes, but it further cements the probability that all of Parker's touchdowns this year will have to be long ones.The goalline carry when the fumble occurred....Haynes was in. Will the Davenport signing likely result in the end of goalline carries for Verron?
Didn't Pitt trade a pick for Cobbs?The Steelers made room on their roster for Davenport by releasing rookie running back Patrick Cobbs, who the team claimed off of waivers from the New England Patriots on Sept. 1
I guess they didn't like him so much once he got into town. I believe the trade to the Pats was a conditional pick so they'll owe NE nothing.I'm surprised, but they actually released Cobbs. LINKI don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
Haynes did not fumble the ball. Batch did.The goalline carry when the fumble occurred....Haynes was in. Will the Davenport signing likely result in the end of goalline carries for Verron?
It's happened before...Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
Well played.Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
At least the Steelers have a "#2" RB now....It's happened before...Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
I wonder when he'll report for "duty."At least the Steelers have a "#2" RB now....It's happened before...Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
It would be a little surprising considering Cowher's comments during the post-game press conference. He said that they were going to need Duce "down the road."It's happened before...Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
Traded, maybe. Dropped? I doubt it. (they would have dropped him instead of Cobbs) Don't forget that teams like Miami are looking for depth...It's happened before...Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
They won't drop him.....since he was on the roster for the first game his salary for the season is guaranteed.Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
Traded, maybe. Dropped? I doubt it. (they would have dropped him instead of Cobbs) Don't forget that teams like Miami are looking for depth...It's happened before...Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?
I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?
Was that what happened? I really couldn't tell but I thought Parker did call for a breather. He was in on the carry before which was from I think the 7 yard line and almost scored. I was wondering if he was taken out or called for a breather. To be honest, he may not have been gassed, it was a pretty solid run and he might have gotten knocked around a bit. I have seen RBs come out of the game for a play if they get stung if you will.Then again, no RB in the league will average 29 carries a game or 464 for a year, although posters on this site also seem to think that every starter gets 90% of their team carries and 25+ rushes a game.For a 14th round pick, I am pretty happy with Parker and thought he looked great against a defense that clearly was playing against the run and giving Batch opportunities. He didn't go down on the first contact and finished runs well.I'd do that to if my RB1 called for a breather on 1st and goal at the 1.Of course the braintrust that makes up the posters on this site tell me there's nothing to worry about, he was just gassed.
I agree. None the less, it seems worrysome if you are a Parker owner who was holding onto those GL carries, which many seem to be doing.I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?
Parker wanted a breather, he waved to the sideline to come out of the game on the goal line, he is human...FWIWWas that what happened? I really couldn't tell but I thought Parker did call for a breather. He was in on the carry before which was from I think the 7 yard line and almost scored. I was wondering if he was taken out or called for a breather. To be honest, he may not have been gassed, it was a pretty solid run and he might have gotten knocked around a bit. I have seen RBs come out of the game for a play if they get stung if you will.Then again, no RB in the league will average 29 carries a game or 464 for a year, although posters on this site also seem to think that every starter gets 90% of their team carries and 25+ rushes a game.For a 14th round pick, I am pretty happy with Parker and thought he looked great against a defense that clearly was playing against the run and giving Batch opportunities. He didn't go down on the first contact and finished runs well.I'd do that to if my RB1 called for a breather on 1st and goal at the 1.Of course the braintrust that makes up the posters on this site tell me there's nothing to worry about, he was just gassed.
Hi jurb,Thanks for the posts. What makes you think Parker won't get the goal line and short yardage carries?JI agree. None the less, it seems worrysome if you are a Parker owner who was holding onto those GL carries, which many seem to be doing.I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?
Did you guys watch the game at all or do you just "believe" it? Yes, I own Parker and hope he gets all Gl carries, but he looked very good between the tackles. The only times he lost yardage were on outside runs where there were tons of defenders right there.taz said:meanjoegreen said:I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.jurb26 said:So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?I had a hard time believing Cowher would be comfortable w/ FWP as his goal-line back.
Very true. I only see Davenport getting the short yardage work if Parker gets pooped.Sheriff66 said:Parker wanted a breather, he waved to the sideline to come out of the game on the goal line, he is human...FWIWstbugs said:Was that what happened? I really couldn't tell but I thought Parker did call for a breather. He was in on the carry before which was from I think the 7 yard line and almost scored. I was wondering if he was taken out or called for a breather. To be honest, he may not have been gassed, it was a pretty solid run and he might have gotten knocked around a bit. I have seen RBs come out of the game for a play if they get stung if you will.Then again, no RB in the league will average 29 carries a game or 464 for a year, although posters on this site also seem to think that every starter gets 90% of their team carries and 25+ rushes a game.For a 14th round pick, I am pretty happy with Parker and thought he looked great against a defense that clearly was playing against the run and giving Batch opportunities. He didn't go down on the first contact and finished runs well.Limp Ditka said:I'd do that to if my RB1 called for a breather on 1st and goal at the 1.Of course the braintrust that makes up the posters on this site tell me there's nothing to worry about, he was just gassed.
The amount of :whoosh: in here is a little frightening.flranger said:They won't drop him.....since he was on the roster for the first game his salary for the season is guaranteed.Weapon of Mass Instruction said:Are you saying that Davenport would cause a Duce to be dropped?Godsbrother said:I don't have a link yet but I think this would mean the end of Duce.
Davenport can certainly move a pile.meanjoegreen said:I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.jurb26 said:So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?
I watched the game, and I think Parker did great. He would have scored had he not gotten tackled on the 1 yard line. I was simply stating why I would think they might would put a GL back in for Parker. I never said he wasn't good enough to do it himself. The only reasons I could think of for why they would put someone other than him in at the GL is to either give him a breather, use another big back to keep Parker healthy, or to put in a bigger back to move the pile. Either way, I think Parker will see some situations around the GL.Did you guys watch the game at all or do you just "believe" it? Yes, I own Parker and hope he gets all Gl carries, but he looked very good between the tackles. The only times he lost yardage were on outside runs where there were tons of defenders right there.taz said:meanjoegreen said:I don't think the Steelers don't feel comfortable running parker at the GL, because they don't think he can do it. I would think it's because he is a smallish back just like Tiki, so putting a large power runner in at GL's helps preserve backs like Parker and Tiki. Big backs can move the pile better too, without having to be shifty to get in.jurb26 said:So how many moves for a "big" RB will Pitt have to make before Parker owners realize taht the team just isn't that dang comfortable running Parker in those short yd and GL situations?I had a hard time believing Cowher would be comfortable w/ FWP as his goal-line back.
on?Very true. I only see Davenport getting the short yardage work if Parker gets pooped.
PODDidn't Parker convert a key 4th and 1 play and pick up tons of tough yards up the middle yesterday?The poopster is in town... when has he ever proven he's a goal line back. He is not the bus or steven davis people, he is an average player with extremely active bowels.
Not to mention the continued use of Davenport doody jokes.(I still laugh.)The amount of :whoosh: in here is a little frightening.
Or he could get wipe up mop up duty at the ending of a winning game...You guys kill me. Parker is a stud. Davenport is depth, nothing more. Just like Duce. Not the ordained GL back, etc. Along with Haynes they will get carries to lighten the workload on FWP. BREATHERS.Very true. I only see Davenport getting the short yardage work if Parker gets pooped.Sheriff66 said:Parker wanted a breather, he waved to the sideline to come out of the game on the goal line, he is human...FWIWstbugs said:Was that what happened? I really couldn't tell but I thought Parker did call for a breather. He was in on the carry before which was from I think the 7 yard line and almost scored. I was wondering if he was taken out or called for a breather. To be honest, he may not have been gassed, it was a pretty solid run and he might have gotten knocked around a bit. I have seen RBs come out of the game for a play if they get stung if you will.Then again, no RB in the league will average 29 carries a game or 464 for a year, although posters on this site also seem to think that every starter gets 90% of their team carries and 25+ rushes a game.Limp Ditka said:I'd do that to if my RB1 called for a breather on 1st and goal at the 1.
Of course the braintrust that makes up the posters on this site tell me there's nothing to worry about, he was just gassed.
For a 14th round pick, I am pretty happy with Parker and thought he looked great against a defense that clearly was playing against the run and giving Batch opportunities. He didn't go down on the first contact and finished runs well.