Fantasy Football - Footballguys Forums
Welcome to Our Forums. Once you've registered and logged in, you're primed to talk football, among other topics, with the sharpest and most experienced fantasy players on the internet.
Stephen Jackson (1 Viewer)
- Thread starter DeepOut
- Start date
One
Not Allowed In Mexico
I wouldn't worry. Especially in PPR leagues, STL will find ways to get him involved and he'll serve a good FF purpose ..as a point machine.Is it time to start looking to trade Jackson now that he doesn't have Pace or id he just a slow starter?
fridayfrenzy
Footballguy
What does Orlando Pace have to do with Stephen Jackson's basketball career?
Limp Ditka
Footballguy
Because SJAX sucked so bad when he didn't have Pace in there for the last 6-7 weeks of the season?
Da Guru
Fair & Balanced
Losing Pace was a big blow..no doubt.Is it time to start looking to trade Jackson now that he doesn't have Pace or id he just a slow starter?
kevthegrad
Footballguy
all I know is I took this bozo at 1.02 in a TD only league and he's killing my team.
peter griffin
Footballguy
Maybe you should spell his name right in order to get some advice you old fart.
Sweetness_34
Footballguy
It's your fault for not taking Shaun Alexander then.....TD only leagues you should go with someone who has consistently scored TDs every year....and that is Shaun, not SJax
Kuz
Footballguy
That didn't work out that well for me last year...
North
Footballguy
SJAX isn't getting the ball.
Week 1- Down 1 point with 23 minutes to play. SJAX GETS 2 CARRIES THE FINAL 23 MINUTES!
Week 2- Up for a majority of the game, but with a 4 point lead with 27 minutes to play. SJAX GETS 7 CARRIES IN THE FINAL 27 MINUTES!!!
Bulger throwing 40+ times per game will not win ball games. I'm sick of seeing SJAX get the 1st down carry, get 3 yds and then watch the Rams throw on 2nd and 3rd downs. A RB like Jackson needs carries to be sucessful.
I admit he needs to hit the hole harder but when he's not getting the ball there's nothing he can do.
The Rams did this last year weeks 1-5. After their bye they gave him the ball more and made him a part of the passing game and he BLEW up.
Hopefully it won't take that long for the coaching staff to realize THEY are taking their best player out of the game.
With their crappy play calling, they deserve their 0-2 start!
Week 1- Down 1 point with 23 minutes to play. SJAX GETS 2 CARRIES THE FINAL 23 MINUTES!
Week 2- Up for a majority of the game, but with a 4 point lead with 27 minutes to play. SJAX GETS 7 CARRIES IN THE FINAL 27 MINUTES!!!
Bulger throwing 40+ times per game will not win ball games. I'm sick of seeing SJAX get the 1st down carry, get 3 yds and then watch the Rams throw on 2nd and 3rd downs. A RB like Jackson needs carries to be sucessful.
I admit he needs to hit the hole harder but when he's not getting the ball there's nothing he can do.
The Rams did this last year weeks 1-5. After their bye they gave him the ball more and made him a part of the passing game and he BLEW up.
Hopefully it won't take that long for the coaching staff to realize THEY are taking their best player out of the game.
With their crappy play calling, they deserve their 0-2 start!
SJax with Pace last year:
166 carries
703 yards
4.2 ypc
41 rec
387 yards
9.4 ypr
4 rushing td/0 rec tds
without Pace:
180 carries
825 yards
4.6 ypc
49 rec
419 yards
8.6 ypr
9 rushing tds/3 rec tds
looks better without Pace to me
the problem is the gameplan/play calling...once they get their act together he'll be fine
166 carries
703 yards
4.2 ypc
41 rec
387 yards
9.4 ypr
4 rushing td/0 rec tds
without Pace:
180 carries
825 yards
4.6 ypc
49 rec
419 yards
8.6 ypr
9 rushing tds/3 rec tds
looks better without Pace to me
the problem is the gameplan/play calling...once they get their act together he'll be fine
KellysHeroes
Footballguy
didn't he have a similar start last yr????
helped alot. thanks
Let us not forget that Pace was replaced by Todd Steussie last year2006helped alot. thanks
| Steven Jackson career stats | 2006 St. Louis Rams |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| WK OPP | RSH YD | RECYD | TD |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| 1 den | 22 121 | 19 | 0 |
| 2 sfo | 22 103 | 21 | 0 |
| 3 ari | 24 62 | 59 | 0 |
| 4 det | 22 81 | 65 | 1 |
| 5 gnb | 23 98 | 20 | 0 |
| 6 sea | 20 56 | 40 | 1 |
| 8 sdg | 18 84 | 55 | 1 |
| 9 kan | 19 86 | 133 | 1 |
| 10 sea | 18 93 | 40 | 1 |
| 11 car | 7 27 | 30 | 0 |
| 12 sfo | 23 121 | 71 | 1 |
| 13 ari | 21 96 | 69 | 0 |
| 14 chi | 18 81 | 58 | 2 |
| 15 oak | 31 127 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 was | 33 150 | 102 | 2 |
| 17 min | 25 142 | 24 | 4 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| TOTAL | 346 1528 | 806 | 16 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
Underlined games are with Pace, bolded games are with Stuessie. Stuessie is out until at least november.
Week 11 was when neither Stuessie or Pace placed.
I'm not saying Barron (I think that's the name of the guy who's replacing Pace this year) isn't good, I'm just saying, you can't compare losing Pace last year to losing him this year, because it's not the same.
peter griffin
Footballguy
Hey Deep Out, watch it. But not before looking at his feet.
mdog1967
Footballguy
Yeah after Bulger getting banged around yesterday like a Ping Pong ball that was a Savay move.
tri-man 47
Footballguy
See, if you'd have had 1.01, you could have had this year's dominant stud - LT. Oh, wait ...
Let us not forget that Pace was replaced by Todd Steussie last year2006
| Steven Jackson career stats | 2006 St. Louis Rams |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| WK OPP | RSH YD | RECYD | TD |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| 1 den | 22 121 | 19 | 0 |
| 2 sfo | 22 103 | 21 | 0 |
| 3 ari | 24 62 | 59 | 0 |
| 4 det | 22 81 | 65 | 1 |
| 5 gnb | 23 98 | 20 | 0 |
| 6 sea | 20 56 | 40 | 1 |
| 8 sdg | 18 84 | 55 | 1 |
| 9 kan | 19 86 | 133 | 1 |
| 10 sea | 18 93 | 40 | 1 |
| 11 car | 7 27 | 30 | 0 |
| 12 sfo | 23 121 | 71 | 1 |
| 13 ari | 21 96 | 69 | 0 |
| 14 chi | 18 81 | 58 | 2 |
| 15 oak | 31 127 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 was | 33 150 | 102 | 2 |
| 17 min | 25 142 | 24 | 4 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| TOTAL | 346 1528 | 806 | 16 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
Underlined games are with Pace, bolded games are with Stuessie. Stuessie is out until at least november.
Week 11 was when neither Stuessie or Pace placed.
I'm not saying Barron (I think that's the name of the guy who's replacing Pace this year) isn't good, I'm just saying, you can't compare losing Pace last year to losing him this year, because it's not the same.
Let us not forget that Pace was replaced by Todd Steussie last year
2006
| Steven Jackson career stats | 2006 St. Louis Rams |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| WK OPP | RSH YD | RECYD | TD |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| 1 den | 22 121 | 19 | 0 |
| 2 sfo | 22 103 | 21 | 0 |
| 3 ari | 24 62 | 59 | 0 |
| 4 det | 22 81 | 65 | 1 |
| 5 gnb | 23 98 | 20 | 0 |
| 6 sea | 20 56 | 40 | 1 |
| 8 sdg | 18 84 | 55 | 1 |
| 9 kan | 19 86 | 133 | 1 |
| 10 sea | 18 93 | 40 | 1 |
| 11 car | 7 27 | 30 | 0 |
| 12 sfo | 23 121 | 71 | 1 |
| 13 ari | 21 96 | 69 | 0 |
| 14 chi | 18 81 | 58 | 2 |
| 15 oak | 31 127 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 was | 33 150 | 102 | 2 |
| 17 min | 25 142 | 24 | 4 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| TOTAL | 346 1528 | 806 | 16 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
Underlined games are with Pace, bolded games are with Stuessie. Stuessie is out until at least november.
Week 11 was when neither Stuessie or Pace placed.
I'm not saying Barron (I think that's the name of the guy who's replacing Pace this year) isn't good, I'm just saying, you can't compare losing Pace last year to losing him this year, because it's not the same.
Hey Modog, that's great insight. It looks like Left tackle has gone from all pro to all schmo.
2006
| Steven Jackson career stats | 2006 St. Louis Rams |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| WK OPP | RSH YD | RECYD | TD |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| 1 den | 22 121 | 19 | 0 |
| 2 sfo | 22 103 | 21 | 0 |
| 3 ari | 24 62 | 59 | 0 |
| 4 det | 22 81 | 65 | 1 |
| 5 gnb | 23 98 | 20 | 0 |
| 6 sea | 20 56 | 40 | 1 |
| 8 sdg | 18 84 | 55 | 1 |
| 9 kan | 19 86 | 133 | 1 |
| 10 sea | 18 93 | 40 | 1 |
| 11 car | 7 27 | 30 | 0 |
| 12 sfo | 23 121 | 71 | 1 |
| 13 ari | 21 96 | 69 | 0 |
| 14 chi | 18 81 | 58 | 2 |
| 15 oak | 31 127 | 0 | 2 |
| 16 was | 33 150 | 102 | 2 |
| 17 min | 25 142 | 24 | 4 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
| TOTAL | 346 1528 | 806 | 16 |
+----------+-------------+--------+----+
Underlined games are with Pace, bolded games are with Stuessie. Stuessie is out until at least november.
Week 11 was when neither Stuessie or Pace placed.
I'm not saying Barron (I think that's the name of the guy who's replacing Pace this year) isn't good, I'm just saying, you can't compare losing Pace last year to losing him this year, because it's not the same.
Hey Modog, that's great insight. It looks like Left tackle has gone from all pro to all schmo.
Peter, get off this forum or I'll send my son Jimmy after you, you young whippersnapper!
Took him 1.02 and he's disappointed, but I took Ocho Cinco and Steve Smith at 2.09 and 3.02 (picks 19 and 22) when my fellow owners were taking tier 2 RBs and so far, I'm going well. PPR league. Ahman and A. Peterson (Minn. version) are my RB2 and RB3. Hoping that Sjax starts to produce b/c I know I won't get this type of WR production all year. For now, to answer your question, I'm holding onto him. I know I wouldn't get what I want (an Addai or something).Is it time to start looking to trade Jackson now that he doesn't have Pace or id he just a slow starter?
